Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 1a & 1b
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Demographic Data
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

CAN Criterion 1:
Systems to recruit and
admit candidates result
in increased racial and
ethnic diversity of
completers in the
workforce
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Leadership Interview
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 2a, 2b & 2c
Admission Policy
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

MTEL Data
GPA Data
Educator Evaluation Data
Persistence Data
?
+
Rating Rationale:

CAN Criterion 2:
Admission criteria and
processes are rigorous
such that those
admitted demonstrate
success in the program
and during employment
in the licensure role.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Faculty Focus Group(s)
Leadership Interview
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 3a, 3b & 3c
Advising Policy
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Persistence Data
Stakeholder Survey(s)*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
CAN Criterion 3:
Candidates receive
effective advising
throughout the program
(including, but not
limited to, being
knowledgeable about
licensure requirements
and career development
and placement services
that contribute to
employment upon
completion).
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Faculty Focus Group(s)
Candidate/Completer Focus Group(s)
Advisors Interview (if appropriate)
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 4a & 4b
Advising OR admission policy
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Persistence Data
Educator Evaluation Data
MTEL Data
Stakeholder Survey(s)*
?
+
Rating Rationale:
CAN Criterion 4:
Candidates at-risk of not
meeting standards are
identified throughout
the program (in prepracticum, during
coursework, and while
in practicum) and
receive necessary
supports and guidance
to improve or exit the
program.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Faculty Focus Group(s)
FBE Staff Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Candidate Worksheet Prompt 5
Waiver Policy
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

CAN Criterion 5:
Waiver policy ensures
that academic and
professional standards
of the licensure role are
met.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Artifacts
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: The Candidate (CAN)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
Overall Domain Summary
Criterion
Offsite
Output
Onsite
Commendation
Criterion
Met
Finding
1. Systems to recruit and admit candidates
result in increased racial and ethnic diversity
of completers in the workforce
2. Admission criteria and processes are
rigorous such that those admitted
demonstrate success in the program and
during employment in the licensure role.
3. Candidates receive effective advising
throughout the program (including, but not
limited to, being knowledgeable about
licensure requirements and career
development and placement services that
contribute to employment upon
completion).
4. Candidates at-risk of not meeting standards
are identified throughout the program (in
pre-practicum, during coursework, and
while in practicum) and receive necessary
supports and guidance to improve or exit
the program.
5. Waiver policy ensures that academic and
professional standards of the licensure role
are met.
Domain Summary
Overall Domain Recommendation
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6