13ECO TEST 3 – Assessment Schedule Task Evidence A, M, E 1 (a) (b) (c) Monopoly A1 both correct (d) (e) 2 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Duopoly A1 2 correct characteristics Strong barriers to entry Strong control over price Differentiated product Pacific Blue a new firm may aim to establish market share and to ensure flights have passengers Accept follow through if 1 (b) answered incorrectly A1 Idea of establish market share due to new entrant Accept follow through if 1 (b) answered incorrectly A1 2 correct Examples Service Advertising Sponsorship Loyalty schemes Accounting costs examples Wages, fuel, rent on premises, cost of planes, repairs, maintenance, advertising Economic costs examples Revenue from flying domestic / cargo flights, alternatives to owner’s time or capital investment (any appropriate opportunity cost) Q TVC ($) TFC ($) TC ($) MC ($) 0 0 100 100 - 1 80 100 180 80 2 120 100 220 40 3 140 100 240 20 4 180 100 280 40 5 260 100 360 80 3 1. As diminishing returns sets in more variable inputs / factors are required to produce an extra unit. 2. The cost of each extra unit (MC) must increase as more inputs are being used At five flights per day the MC=S of $80 is greater than the min AVC / shutdown point of $45 A2 both correct (must relate to AA Airlines) A2 all correct A2 correct A2 law of diminishing returns described M2 both points A2 idea of covering AVC or M2 explanation refers to Table 2 Document1 3 (a) A3 all correct (i) MC, AR, MR labelled (ii) Pm Qm Cost / Revenues $ MC AC Pm AR MR Qm Output (iii) AC correct A3 all correct (b) A3 all correct Super-normal profit shaded (i) MC, AR labelled (ii) Ppc, Qpc Cost/ Revenues $ MC AC Ppc AR=MR=P Qpc Output (iii) AC correct (c) Super-normal profit shaded Both perfect competitor and monopolist will increase output due to decrease in marginal cost. 1. Decrease variable cost leads to decrease in marginal cost 2. At the original profit maximising the extra revenue gained from producing an extra unit is greater than the extra cost MR > MC 3. Both the monopolist and perfect competitor should increase output to gain the extra revenue until MR = MC to maximise profits The monopolist will decrease price whereas perfect competitor’s price remains the same. 1. To increase quantity the monopolist must decrease price as a monopolist has a downward sloping D / AR curve. A3 all correct A3 description of increase output or M3 explanation of increase output using marginal analysis A3 description of changes to prices or M3 explanation provided for changes in price Document1 2. Perfect competitor’s price remains the same as perfect competitor’s are too small to influence price (price takers) OR E3 if Both M3’s awarded (d) In the long run perfect competitor will make normal profits monopolist will continue to make super-normal profits 1. Perfect competitor’s have perfect knowledge / perfect mobility / no barriers to entry firms will enter the market to compete for supernormal profits 2. Increase in market supply will cause market price to decrease until normal profits 3. Whereas monopolist’s strong barriers to entry prevent firms from competing for super-normal profit 4. As perfectly competitive firms enter the market AR = MR decreases 5. At the original equilibrium MC > MR the extra cost of producing an extra unit is greater than the extra revenue gained 6. the perfect competitor should decrease output until MR = MC to maximise profits Note: students gain E3 only, not E3 and 2 M3’s A3 types of profits correct OR M3 first 3 points OR E3 all six points Note: award A3, M3 or E3, not all 3 Judgement statement Achievement 1 x A1 1 x A2 1 x A3 4 other As or better Merit Achieved plus: 1 x M2 1 x M3 Excellence Merit plus: 1 x E3 Note: A1 relates to the first criterion A2 and M2 relate to the second criterion A3, M3 and E3 relate to the third criterion Document1 Task 4 (a) (b) (c) Evidence A, M, E 1. A3 both correct Supply of labour right and labelled New equilibrium price and quantity labelled Demand right and labelled New equilibrium price and quantity labelled Increase demand creates excess demand at original equilibrium 2. (some) consumers are willing to pay a higher price 3. price increase causes quantity supplied to increase and quantity demanded to decrease until QD = QS / new equilibrium is reached 5 (a) A3 both correct A2 2 points described or M2 all 3 points Accept follow through errors if 2(b) incorrect A3 Pw labelled (i) S Price S SNZ World price + tariff Pw DNZ Quantity M (ii) See above (iii) See above M3 M labelled A2 correct shading (iv) See above A2 correct shading (b) The sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus will increase thus increasing allocative efficiency. A2 description of allocative efficiency increasing 1. Lower prices transfer some producer surplus to consumer surplus. 2. Consumer surplus gain the deadweight loss and government revenue caused by the tariff. 3. Overall the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus will increase thus increasing allocative efficiency. 1. Removal of tariffs will lead to increased imports / lower prices 2. NZ clothing producers less competitive and decrease production 3. Fewer clothing workers will be needed to produce the lower output (derived demand idea) or M2 all 3 points (c) A3 employment decrease (point 3) or M3 all 3 points E3 also awarded if 2 M3’s awarded in 3 Document1 6(a) Supply shifted right by vertical distance $100 New supply curve labelled Pc labelled Pp labelled Q1 labelled (b) A3 all correct A2 Deadweight loss correctly shaded (allow ft) S Pp S1 Pc D Q1 (c) (d) Government subsidy that is not gained by another party / producer surplus or consumer surplus 1. Government intervention has intervened / distorted price signals 2. resources are not allocated efficiently 3. results in a loss of producer surplus / consumer surplus / welfare to the economy as a whole 1. Consumers pay $175 after the subsidy and increase consumption by 500. Producers receive $275 after the subsidy and increase production by 500. 2. Consumers gain ¾ of the incidence / benefit and producers gain ¼ of the incidence / benefit because demand for rental properties is inelastic. 1. The total cost to the government of the subsidy is $350 000 2. The subsidy causes a loss of allocative efficiency / deadweight loss of $25 000. Answers must relate to Graph 5. Accept a range in output Δ from 400 to 600. A2 description of deadweight loss or M2 all 3 points explanation of why deadweight loss occurred A3 description of effect of subsidy on consumers, producers or M3 both points A3 description of effect of subsidy on govt or M3 both points E3 awarded if 2 M3’s awarded in 4(d) Judgement statement Achievement 1 x A2 1 x A3 3 other A or M Merit Achieved plus: 1 x M2 1 x M3 Excellence Merit plus: 1 x E3 1 other M or E A1 relates to the first criterion A2 and M2 relate to the second criterion A3, M3 and E3 relate to the third criterion Document1