ttb2013990021s1

advertisement

Appendix A. Proof of Proposition 1

Let us denote the Lyapunov (energy) function of perturbative gene regulatory network in equation (4) as

 

 T

[ ] X [ ] [ ] , for some symmetric positive definite matrix P

P T 

0 .

[

1]

V X t

X

T

[ t

1] [

  T

X [ ] [ ]

X

T t A (1

 

) 

T

X

T t

A (1

 

) 

T

   T

(1 ) [ ] X [ ] [ ]

(1

 

)

 

P

[ ]

0

(1

 

) 

T

 (1

 

) P 0

Based on quadratic stability [29], if the LMI in equation (5) holds, then the perturbative network is robustly stable.

Appendix B. Proof of Proposition 2

Let us denote the Lyapunov function of gene regulatory network under external stimulation signals in equation (7) as

 

 T

[ ] X [ ] [ ] , for some symmetric positive definite matrix P

P T 

0 . We have

[

1]

X

T

[ t

1] [

1]

ˆ

[ ]

[ ]

 

ˆ

[ ]

[ ]

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

ˆ

[ ]

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

[ ]

 T

[ ]

ˆ

[ ]

 T

[ ] [ ]

T

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

ˆ

[ ]

 T [ ]

ˆ

T [ ]

[ ]

ˆ

[ ]

 T [ ] [ ]

 

2 T

U t U t

 T

Y t Y t

 

2 T

[ ] [ ]

   

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

ˆ

[ ]

 T

[ ]

ˆ

T

[ ]

[ ]

ˆ

[ ]

 T

[ ] [ ]

T T

[ ]

  2 T

[ ] [ ]

 T

[ ] [ ]

 

 T

[ ] [ ]

 

2 T

[ ] [ ]

1

If the following inequality holds

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

ˆ

[ ]

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

[ ]

U

T

[ ]

ˆ

[ ]

U

T

[ ] [ ]

 T

X [ ]

T

[ ]

 

2

U

T

[ ] [ ]

X

T

[ ] [ ]

0 then, we get

[

1]

  

 T

[ ] Y [ ] [ ]

  2

U

T

[ ] [ ] inequality holds:

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

ˆ

[ ]

X

T

[ ]

ˆ

T

[ ]

U

T

[ ]

ˆ

[ ]

U

T

[ ] [ ]

 T

X [ ]

T

[ ]

 

2

U

T

[ ] [ ]

X

T

[ ] [ ]

0

The above inequality can be equivalent to the following inequality

X

T 

ˆ

T

ˆ  T 

P

ˆ

T

P

 

2

I

 

0

(A1)

So we sum the above inequality from 0 to ∞ to get

  

[0]

 t

0

T

Y [ ] [ ]

 

2 t

0

T

U [ ] [ ]

 t

0

Y

T

[ ] [ ] t

0

Y

T

[ ] [ ]

[0]

 

2 t

0

T

U [ ] [ ]

  t

0

T  T

Y [ ] [ ] X [0] PX [0]

  2 t

0

T

U [ ] [ ]

(A2) which is the inequality of response ability in equation (9) in the case X [0]

0

 t

0

T  

2 t

0

T

 t

0 t

0

T

T

 

2

The above results hold only when the inequality (A1) holds, i.e., the following

(A3)

The inequality (A3) holds for all [ ] and [ ] if and only if the following LMI holds.

ˆ

T

ˆ  T 

P

ˆ

T

 

2

P I

 

0

2

Download