UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Name of Course Co-ordinator:
It is
that this box is completed by the student
COURSEWORK: BA/BSc
Student’s Candidate Number*:
Degree for which you are enrolled:
Have you been formally diagnosed as having dyslexia? YES/NO
Do you have any other documented disability that may affect the presentation of your coursework? If yes, please give details on the reverse of this form: YES
/
NO
Course Code and Title:
Full Title of Coursework:
First/Second/Third piece of work submitted for this course
(circle as appropriate)
Submission Deadline:
Actual Date of Submission:
This work must also be submitted to Turnitin at: http://www.submit.ac.uk/en_gb/home Instructions for how to do this are available on the Institute of Archaeology website.
Word limit ( as given in the course handbook
):

Actual word count:
I understand that I will be penalised if work is submitted late without a completed ERF and that will be that recorded by ‘Turnitin’
. the official date of submission

I understand that I will be penalised if the wordcount is found to exceed the official limit.

I certify that the work submitted is my own and that the exact source of any material (ideas, information, figures or text) derived or quoted from the published or unpublished work of other persons has been cited according to the required conventions. I confirm that
I have read the UCL and Institute notes on plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion and falsification.
 I confirm that I have submitted this coursework to ‘Turnitin’ in accordance with the instructions issued. I understand that my coursework will be stored in the ‘Turnitin’ database and may be compared against work submitted from this or any other department(s) within this or other institutions using the service.
* Please do not enter your name anywhere on this form, or on your coursework . You can find your candidate number on Portico: https://evision.ucl.ac.uk/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn .
NB: Please remember that all marked coursework must be returned by the student via the red essay box at the IoA Reception
Desk within two weeks of its return.
Failure to do so will result in the student being recorded as not having completed the course
Notes
(a) Grading system: 70% and above = First Class, 60-69% = Upper Second Class, 50-59% = Lower Second Class,
40-49% = Third Class, 0-39% = Fail.
(b) The mark given in the Provisional Mark box overleaf is the provisional mark awarded by the First Internal Examiner.
Assessed coursework may be subject to review later in the year by the Second Internal Examiner and the External
Examiner.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Second Examiner’s comments (to be completed later in the year)
If there is a discrepancy between the marks awarded by first and second internal examiners, please indicate here the rationale for the mark agreed:
GREEN FORM

Please note that the generic criteria linked to the tick-boxes below are used only as a relative guide and are not all equally weighted. For further details of
Grade Descriptors students are advised to read http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students/handbook/marking
MARKER’S COMMENTS Excellent Satisfactory Poor
DOES THE ESSAY ANSWER THE QUESTION WITHIN THE STATED WORD LIMIT?
(demonstrate understanding of the issues, build to a relevant conclusion)
STRUCTURE OF THE ARGUMENT
(relevance, analysis, logic and coherence)
SOURCES
(use of an appropriate range of relevant sources)
USE OF EVIDENCE
(selection of evidence bearing on the question)
WRITING QUALITY
(spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing and general fluency; use of appropriate vocabulary; detail, accuracy and completeness of citations)
USE OF TABLES, CHARTS, ILLUSTRATIONS
(presentation quality_
ORIGINALITY AND INDEPENDENT THINKING
(critical reflection)
The best features:
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consult the marker for further advice on improving your work.

First examiner's signature
Date:
First examiner’s mark based on content:
Penalty (if any, and reason):
Provisional Overall Mark:
Second Examiner's
Mark:
Agreed Internal
Mark:
UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
Final Mark:
Name of Course Co-ordinator:

It is
that this box is completed by the student
COURSEWORK: BA/BSc
Student’s Candidate Number*:
Degree for which you are enrolled:
Have you been diagnosed as having dyslexia? YES/NO
Do you have any other documented disability that may affect the presentation of your coursework? If yes, please give details on the reverse of this form: YES
/
NO
Course Code and Title:
Full Title of Coursework:
First/Second/Third/Fourth piece of work submitted for this course
(circle as appropriate)
Submission Deadline:
Actual Date of Submission:
This work must also be submitted to Turnitin at: http://www.submit.ac.uk/en_gb/home Instructions for how to do this are available on the Institute of Archaeology website.
Word limit ( as given in the course handbook
):

Actual word count:
I understand that I will be penalised if work is submitted late without a completed ERF and that will be that recorded by ‘Turnitin’
. the official date of submission

I understand that I will be penalised if the wordcount is found to exceed the official limit.

I certify that the work submitted is my own and that the exact source of any material (ideas, information, figures or text) derived or quoted from the published or unpublished work of other persons has been cited according to the required conventions. I confirm that
I have read the UCL and Institute notes on plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion and falsification.
 I confirm that I have submitted this coursework to ‘Turnitin’ in accordance with the instructions issued. I understand that my coursework will be stored in the ‘Turnitin’ database and may be compared against work submitted from this or any other department(s) within this or other institutions using the service.
* Please do not enter your name anywhere on this form, or on your coursework . You can find your candidate number on Portico: https://evision.ucl.ac.uk/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn
Please remember that all marked coursework must be returned by the student to the relevant teacher via the red essay box at the IoA
Reception Desk within two weeks of its return.
Failure to do so will result in the student being recorded as not having completed the course
Notes
(c) Grading system: 70% and above = First Class, 60-69% = Upper Second Class, 50-59% = Lower Second Class,
40-49% = Third Class, 0-39% = Fail.
(d) The mark given in the Provisional Mark box overleaf is the provisional mark awarded by the First Internal Examiner. All assessed coursework is subject to review later in the year by the Second Internal Examiner and the External Examiner.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Second Examiner’s comments (to be completed later in the year).
If there is a discrepancy between the marks awarded by first and second internal examiners, please indicate here the rationale for the mark agreed:

Please note that the generic criteria linked to the tick-boxes below are used only as a relative guide and are not all equally weighted. For further details of
Grade Descriptors students are advised to read http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students/handbook/marking
MARKER’S COMMENTS Excellent Satisfactory Poor
DOES THE ESSAY ANSWER THE QUESTION WITHIN THE STATED WORD LIMIT?
(demonstrate understanding of the issues, build to a relevant conclusion)
STRUCTURE OF THE ARGUMENT
(relevance, analysis, logic and coherence)
SOURCES
(use of an appropriate range of relevant sources; discrimination of relative value of different sources)
USE OF EVIDENCE
(selection of evidence bearing on the question; selection of appropriate case studies or examples)
WRITING QUALITY
(spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing and general fluency; use of appropriate vocabulary; detail, accuracy and completeness of citations)
USE OF TABLES, CHARTS, ILLUSTRATIONS
(presentation quality; effectiveness in highlighting points and making an argument)
ORIGINALITY AND INDEPENDENT THINKING
(critical reflection; ability to critique assumptions of other writers)
INTEGRATION OF THEORY, METHODS AND DATA
(ability to relate argument to core concepts in general archaeological method and theory; reasoning from problem to methods to data, to build a sustained argument)
The best features:
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consult the marker for further advice on improving your work.
First examiner's signature
First examiner’s mark based on content:
Penalty (if any, and reason):
Date:
Provisional Overall Mark:
Second Examiner's
Mark:
Agreed Internal
Mark:
Final Mark:

UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Name of Course Co-ordinator:
It is
that this box is completed by the student
COURSEWORK: BA/BSc
Student’s Candidate Number*:
Degree for which you are enrolled:
Have you been diagnosed by the UCL Dyslexia Centre as having dyslexia? YES/NO
Do you have any other documented disability that may affect the presentation of your coursework? If yes, please give details on the reverse of this form: YES
/
NO
Course Code and Name:
Full Title of Coursework:
First/Second/Third piece of work submitted for this course
(circle as appropriate)
Submission Deadline:
Actual Date of Submission:
This work must also be submitted to Turnitin at http://www.submit.ac.uk/en_gb/home Instructions for how to do this are available on the Institute of Archaeology website.
Word limit ( as given in the course handbook
):

Actual word count:
I understand that I will be penalised if work is submitted late without a completed ERF and that the official date of submission will be that recorded by ‘Turnitin’.


I understand that I will be penalised if the wordcount is found to exceed the official limit.
I certify that the work submitted is my own and that the exact source of any material (ideas, information, figures or text) derived or quoted from the published or unpublished work of other persons has been cited according to the required conventions. I confirm that
I have read the UCL and Institute notes on plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion and falsification.
 I confirm that I have submitted this coursework to ‘Turnitin’ in accordance with the instructions issued. I understand that my coursework will be stored in the ‘Turnitin’ database and may be compared against work submitted from this or any other department(s) within this or other institutions using the service.
* Please do not enter your name anywhere on this form, or on your coursework . You can find your candidate number on Portico: https://evision.ucl.ac.uk/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn
NOTE: Please remember that all marked coursework must be returned by the student to the relevant teacher via the red essay box at the
IoA Reception Desk within two weeks of its return.
Failure to do so will result in the student being recorded as not having completed the course
(e) Grading system: 70% and above = First Class, 60-69% = Upper Second Class, 50-59% = Lower Second Class,
40-49% = Third Class, 0-39% = Fail.
(f) The mark given in the Provisional Mark box overleaf is the provisional mark awarded by the First Internal Examiner. All assessed coursework is subject to review later in the year by the Second Internal Examiner and the External Examiner.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Second Examiner’s comments (to be completed later in the year)
If there is a discrepancy between the marks awarded by first and second internal examiners, please indicate here the rationale for the mark agreed:

Please note that the generic criteria linked to the tick-boxes below are used only as a relative guide and are not all equally weighted. For further details of Grade
Descriptors students are advised to read http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students/handbook/marking
MARKER’S COMMENTS Excellent Satisfactory Poor
DOES THE ESSAY ANSWER THE QUESTION WITHIN THE STATED WORD LIMIT?
(demonstrate understanding of the issues, build to a relevant conclusion)
STRUCTURE OF THE ARGUMENT
(relevance, analysis, logic and coherence)
SOURCES
(use of an appropriate range of relevant sources; discrimination of relative value of different sources originality in selection of sources; reading beyond the reading list))
USE OF EVIDENCE
(selection of evidence bearing on the question; selection of appropriate case studies or examples; judgment in weighing and assessing different lines of evidence)
WRITING QUALITY
(spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing and general fluency; use of appropriate vocabulary; detail, accuracy and completeness of citations)
USE OF TABLES, CHARTS, ILLUSTRATIONS
(presentation quality; effectiveness in highlighting points and making an argument; synthesis of data in original format)
ORIGINALITY AND INDEPENDENT THINKING
(critical reflection; ability to critique assumptions of other writers; ability to recognize and evaluate own assumptions; independent thinking in evaluation of evidence / interpretation))
INTEGRATION OF THEORY, METHODS AND DATA
(ability to relate argument to core concepts in general archaeological method and theory; reasoning from problem to methods to data, to build a sustained argument; clear statement / understanding of a research problem or question; selection of appropriate methods for the problem; selection of appropriate data )
The best features:
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consult the marker for further advice on improving your work.
First examiner's signature First examiner’s mark based on content:
Date: Penalty (if any, and reason):
Provisional Overall Mark:
Second Examiner's
Mark:
UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
Agreed Internal
Mark:
Final Mark:

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT PROGRESS FORM
Each student must attend a termly meeting (in November and February) with her/his Personal Tutor to discuss progress. Before the meeting the student should complete this form (whether or not you have grades to record) and take a copy to the Tutor, who will then add her/his comments and pass a copy to the Year Tutor.
NAME__________________________________ YEAR OF COURSE 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
DEGREE_______________________________ PERSONAL TUTOR_________________
CONTACT PHONE NO______________________
Short titles of courses for which you are enrolled (and grades awarded to date for assessed work - if any)
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Have you had to request an extension to any essay deadline?
If yes, for what reason(s):
___________________________________________________________________________
Student’s comments on progress ( please be sure to complete this section )
Signed Date
_______________________________________________________________
Date of meeting with Personal Tutor:
________________________________________________________________
Personal Tutor’s comments
Areas to check: o Academic/attendance o Accommodation o Finance/Paid work o Fieldwork, including days outstanding o Dissertation plans (Yrs2+3) o Career development plans (including external activities, volunteering, etc) o Other
Signed Date
______________________________________________________________________
A copy of this form must be passed by the Personal Tutor to the appropriate Year Tutor (Yr 1: Gabe Moshenska,
Yr 2: Andrew Reid, Yr 3: Corinna Riva). A copy must be retained by the Personal Tutor.

SKILL AREA
1 2 3

UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Name of Course Co-ordinator:
It is
that this box is completed by the student
COURSEWORK:
Student’s Candidate Number
* :
Degree for which you are registered:
Have you been formally diagnosed as having dyslexia? YES/NO
Do you have any other documented disability that may affect the presentation of your coursework? If yes, please give details on the reverse of this form: YES
/
NO
Course Code and Title:
Full Title of Coursework:
First/Second/Third piece of work submitted for this course
(circle as appropriate)
Submission Deadline:
Actual Date of Submission:
This work must also be submitted to Turnitin at: http://www.submit.ac.uk/en_gb/home Instructions for how to do this are available on the Institute of Archaeology website.
Word limit ( as given in the course handbook
):

Actual word count:
I understand that I will be penalised if work is submitted late without a completed ERF and that the official date of submission will be that recorded by ‘Turnitin’
.

I understand that I will be penalised if the wordcount is found to exceed the official limit.

I certify that the work submitted is my own and that the exact source of any material (ideas, information, figures or text) derived or quoted from the published or unpublished work of other persons has been cited according to the required conventions. I confirm that I have read the UCL and Institute notes on plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion and falsification.

I confirm that I have submitted this coursework to ‘Turnitin’ in accordance with the instructions issued. I understand that my coursework will be stored in the ‘Turnitin’ database and may be compared against work submitted from this or any other department(s) within this or other institutions using the service.
* Please do not enter your name anywhere on this form, or on your coursework . You can find your candidate number on Portico: https://evision.ucl.ac.uk/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn
NB: Please remember that all marked coursework must be returned by the student to the relevant teacher via the red essay box at the IoA Reception Desk within two weeks of its return.
Failure to do so will result in the student being recorded as not having completed the course
Notes
(a) Grading system: 70% and above = Distinction, 60-69% = Merit, 50-59% = Pass, 0-49% = Fail.
(b) The mark given in the Provisional Mark box overleaf is the provisional mark awarded by the First Internal Examiner. All assessed coursework is subject to review later in the year by the Second Internal Examiner and the External Examiner.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Second Examiner’s comments (to be completed later in the year)
If there is a discrepancy between the marks awarded by first and second internal examiners, please indicate here the rationale for the mark agreed:

Please note that the generic criteria linked to the tick-boxes below are used only as a relative guide and are not all equally weighted.
For details of Grade Descriptors students are advised to read http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students/handbook/marking
MARKER’S COMMENTS Excellent Satisfactory Poor
DOES THE ESSAY ANSWER THE QUESTION WITHIN THE STATED WORD LIMIT?
(demonstrate understanding of the issues, build to a relevant conclusion)
STRUCTURE OF THE ARGUMENT
(relevance, analysis, logic and coherence)
SOURCES
(use of an appropriate range of relevant sources; discrimination of relative value of different sources; originality in selection of sources; reading beyond the reading list))
USE OF EVIDENCE
(selection of evidence bearing on the question; selection of appropriate case studies or examples; judgment in weighing and assessing different lines of evidence)
WRITING QUALITY
(spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing and general fluency; use of appropriate vocabulary; detail, accuracy and completeness of citations)
USE OF TABLES, CHARTS, ILLUSTRATIONS
(presentation quality; effectiveness in highlighting points and making an argument; synthesis of data in original format)
ORIGINALITY AND INDEPENDENT THINKING
(critical reflection; ability to critique assumptions of other writers; ability to recognize and evaluate own assumptions; independent thinking in evaluation of evidence/interpretation; original insight; originality, (for example in the application of knowledge); awareness of unresolved issues in the discipline as a whole)
INTEGRATION OF THEORY, METHODS AND DATA
(ability to relate argument to core concepts in general archaeological method and theory, to build a sustained argument; clear statement/understanding of research problem or question; reasoning from problem to methods to data;selection of appropriate methods and data for the problem; justification of methods chosen)
The best features:
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consult the marker for further advice on improving your work.
First examiner's signature
First examiner’s mark based on content:
Date: Penalty (if any, and reason):
Provisional Overall Mark:
Second Examiner's Agreed Internal Final Mark:
Mark: Mark: