Corporate Services Risk Management Policy

advertisement

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Adopted 18 March 2013

Incorporating Annual Review (2014)

Incorporating Annual Review (2015)

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Contents of Risk Management Policy

Contents

1.0

INTRODUCTION

2.0

CONTEXT

3.0

POLICY STATEMENT

4.0

OBJECTIVES

5.0

DEFINITIONS

6.0 APPLICATION

6.1

Council

6.2

The Audit Committee

6.3

Chief Executive Officer

6.4

The Executive Management Team (EMT)

6.6

Managers

6.7

Coordinators

6.8

Risk Management Unit

6.9

Employees and Temporary Staff

6.10

Contractors

7.0 REFERENCES and SOURCE

8.0 THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

8.1

The Continuum of Assessment and Review

8.2

Communication and Consultation

8.3

Establishing the Context

8.4

Identification of Risks

8.5

Assessment

8.6

Risk Appetite

8.7

Treatment

8.8

Implementation

8.9

Performance Measuring

8.10

Monitoring and Review

8.11

Records

9.0

REVIEW

10.0

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1

– Risk Consequence Criteria

Attachment 2 – Risk Controls Criteria

Attachment 3 – Risk Likelihood Criteria

Attachment 4

– Risk Matrix

Attachment 5 – Risk Rating Definitions

Attachment 6 – Definition of Risk Status

14

15

16

17

18

18

19

10

11

11

12

12

14

14

7

7

8

4

5

7

7

3

3

4

8

9

9

20

20

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 2 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The management of risk is recognised as an integral part of good management practice.

Effective risk management supports informed decision making and encourages the identification of opportunities for continuous improvement. Risk Management is no longer accepted as only a process of good operating standards but rather, as a critical element of sound governance across an organisation.

Council, through its management accountability systems, internal audit programs, Audit

Committee, risk assessment processes, occupational health & safety systems and various other policies and procedures, has a strong commitment towards the principles of risk identification, risk assessment and risk removal/minimisation or elimination.

This P olicy and procedure formalises and details Council’s approach to organisational risk management and provides a framework for the ongoing conduct of risk identification, assessment and minimisation practices across the organisation.

The principles supporting this Policy are based on the International Standard for Risk

Management, ISO AS/NZS 31000 - 2009 Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines.

2.0 CONTEXT

The context within which this Policy is written is one of ongoing strong governance and leadership. Since its formation in 1994, the City of Stonnington has continuously delivered to its ratepayers and residents, stability in government, excellence in service/facilities within a backdrop of growing prosperity. The City of Stonnington is a

Council within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1989 and has been given the authority and guidance to raise revenue from rates and charges, adopt it own budget independent of other governments or agencies and to adopt its own local laws to uniquely regulate its district.

The determinations and considerations made in this Policy have been based on the legislated framework within which the Council exists and operates. It is based on this context that the risk appetite of Council has been declared.

Stonnington has achieved a significant place within Local Government in Victoria as a stable and high performing Council. It guards its reputation conscientiously and invests significant resources to maintain and improve it. This achievement is to be seen against the backdrop of a business which is performing and delivering scores of diverse functions any of which have the potential to impact negatively on this reputation with its residents, visitors and the State Government.

As a consequence, Council’s Risk Appetite is variable and commensurate with the risk being assessed. However, Council ’s appetite to risks that encompasses corruption, fraud, theft or personal harm or injury is zero. To accommodate this, Council has established a program of continuous development and review of Policies, procedures, organisational structures and systems that are all designed to mitigate the likelihood and consequence of risk.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 3 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

3.0 POLICY STATEMENT

CITY OF STONNINGTON

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENT

The City of Stonnington is actively committed to the management of risk and reducing its exposure in all facets of its business. It endeavours to ensure that all necessary practices and procedures are effective and fully implemented to control any risks and thereby providing employees and the community with services, facilities and an environment which are sound, safe and inviting.

By this commitment to Risk Management, the City of Stonnington aims to:- a) Provide safe, quality facilities and environment for all stakeholders; b) Ensure there is an open and objective rationale for managing risk; c) Ensure that risk forms an integral part of all decision-making; d) Maintain appropriate budgetary levels to enable the effective management of risks related to Council’s physical assets; e) Provide appropriate training and information to all employees and contractors on risk management and risk reduction techniques; f) Ensure all employees are accountable for their actions including compliance with policies and procedures; and g) Work in partnership with the community, employees and contractors to identify, minimize, or eliminate potential and future risks.

Warren Roberts

Chief Executive Officer

4.0 OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the Risk Management Policy are to:

define risk in the context of Council;

 articulate Council’s commitment to risk management;

provide broad guidance to Council ’s General Managers, Managers and

Coordinators, to enable them to fulfil their Risk Management responsibilities;

introduce the fundamental principles and measures of risk;

promote and support risk management and hazard identification practices throughout the organisation;

recognise that successful risk management relies on input from all employees; and

 protect Council’s corporate image.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 4 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

5.0 DEFINITIONS

For the purpose of this Policy, the following definitions will apply.

Commercial Risk Risk such as a failed contract or business relationship.

Compliance Risk

Consequence

Contractor

Employee

Co-ordinators

Executive Management

Team

Financial & Systems

Risk

General Manager

Hazard

Risk of failing to meet statutory obligations.

The impact on an organisation should an event occur. For details refer Attachment 1 .

An independent entity that agrees to furnish a certain number or quantity of goods, material, equipment, personnel, and/or services that meet or exceed stated requirements or specifications, at a mutually agreed upon price and within a specified timeframe.

All fourth level managers. Usually in charge of a Service

Unit.

Includes all permanent and temporary employees of

Council within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act

1996 and includes the Chief Executive Officer.

Comprises the Chief Executive Officer and General

Managers

Risk posed to Council’s financial systems and controls such as fraud.

All second level managers. Usually in charge of a Division.

Likelihood

Managers

Monitor

Operational Risk

Risk

A source of potential harm or a situation with a potential to cause injury, damage or loss.

The probability of an event occurring. For details refer

Attachment 3 .

All third level managers. Usually in charge of a

Department.

To check, supervise, observe critically, or record the progress of an activity, action or system on a regular basis in order to identify change.

Risk which occurs in, hampers or effects an individual

Division, Department, Service Unit or area of an organisation.

The chance of an event occurring that will have an adverse effect on business objectives. It is measured in terms of consequences and likelihood. The consequent liability is usually measure in financial terms, but may involve bodily injury, financial loss or property damage.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 5 | P a g e

Risk Analysis

Risk Appetite

Risk Assessment

Risk Control

Risk Evaluation

Risk Identification

Risk Management

Risk Management process

Risk Minimisation

Risk Rating

Risk Tolerance

Risk to Public

Strategic Risk

Technical Risk

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

A systematic use of available information to determine how often specified events may occur and the magnitude of their consequences.

The amount and type of risk that an organisation is willing to take in order to meet its strategic objectives. Risk

Appetite is best desc ribed as an organisation’s pursuit of risk or its willingness to take risks as opposed to avoiding them.

The overall process of risk analysis and risk evaluation.

That part of risk treatment which involves the implementation of policies, standards, procedures and physical changes to a thing, work process or system of work to eliminate or minimise the impact of the risk.

The process used to determine risk management priorities by comparing the level of risk against predetermined standards, target risk levels or other criteria.

The process of determining what can happen, why and how.

The culture, processes and structures that are directed towards the effective management of potential opportunities and adverse effects.

The systematic application of management policies, procedures and practices to the tasks of establishing the context, identifying, analysing, evaluating, treating, monitoring and communicating risk.

A selective application of appropriate control measures, techniques and management principles to reduce either likelihood of an occurrence or its consequences, or both.

The level of severity applied to a risk based upon its impact to the organisation. Refer Attachment 5 .

The level of risk that Council is prepared to accept, before action is deemed necessary to reduce it and represents a balance between the potential benefits of calculated risk and the threats that it inevitably brings.

Those risks that are created by the activities, actions or inactions of Council in the delivery of services or works in the public space that may result in bodily harm or damage to property.

Risk which will effect or hamper across the organisation its ability to operate or deliver its policy, strategy or services.

Risk such as failed equipment and managing assets.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 6 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

6.0 APPLICATION

This Policy applies equally to all employees and contractors.

Employees and contractors all have joint responsibility for ensuring risk management is a key part of their approach to the delivery of the Council’s functions, operations and services.

6.1 Council will provide:-

Guidance and governance to support significant and/or high profile elements of the risk management spectrum; and

The support and basis upon which the Risk Management framework can be established and developed including listing Risk Management as an element of the

Council Plan.

6.2 The Audit Committee will provide:-

Guidance and quality advice on existing Council processes and alternatives to managing risks; and

Advice and guidance on effective industry standards for managing risks associated with Council business.

6.3 Chief Executive Officer is responsible for:-

Providing direction and advice on the management of risks within Council and ensuring that appropriate treatment measures are in place to mitigate Council’s exposure;

Promoting a culture of risk management and ensuring that a strategic, comprehensive and systematic risk management program operates throughout

Council;

E nsuring that the Council’s organisational vision and values (relative to risk) are aligned and synchronised with its strategic direction and culture;

Making the case to the elected Council for budgetary consideration of additional risk initiatives;

Ensuring that the risk management program is intrinsic to everything Council undertakes and is incorporated in the messages given to the organisation;

E nsuring that Council’s commitments support the risk management program;

Discussing and supporting the risk management program with Councillors; and

Considering the information and implications contained in the regular report provided to the Executive on matters of risk that have been either reported to Council or are considered to be strategic risks for Council including insurance claim management.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 7 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

6.4 The Executive Management Team (EMT) will provide:-

Comment and feedback regarding the elements of risk as they apply to their specific areas of responsibility;

Provide quality advice to the CEO on the elements of risk they may consider to be an exposure to Council business.

6.5 General Managers are responsible within their Divisions for:-

Management of strategic risks that are directly related to their Division;

Maintaining the overall responsibility for the effective management of all types of risks related to this Policy within their Division;

E nsuring that Council’s assets and operations, together with liability risks and hazards, are adequately protected through appropriate risk budgeting, internal audit processes, loss control programs and the development and application of complementary practices and procedures;

Developing and fostering working relationships with other agencies with whom

Council has a shared risk;

Ensuring that assistance is provided to support the provision of requested information in relation to an insurance claim or a risk management issue, in a timely manner;

Advising of any risk management matter that should be referred for consideration for incorporation into forthcoming budgets;

Ensuring that employees within their Division are adequately trained in the identification, assessment and procedures available for the minimisation of risk;

Ensuring that performance measures are determined, to track progress in implementing risk treatment plans; and

Acknowledging that the management of risk is an integral part of service delivery.

6.6 Managers are responsible within their Departments for:-

Management of risks that are directly related to their Department;

E nsuring that Council’s assets and operations, together with liability risks and hazards within their areas of responsibility, are adequately protected through appropriate risk budgeting, loss control programs and measures, and adherence to

Council’s various complementary practices and procedures;

Managing relationships with other agencies on shared risk issues;

Arranging for advice and assistance to be provided including the provision of requested information, in relation to an insurance claim or a risk management issue, in a timely manner;

Ensuring that Council responds immediately to the investigation of any report of a hazard or incident received from a resident, employee, contractor or visitor;

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 8 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Implementing risk control measures to mitigate exposure;

Advising their Divisional Manager of any risk management matter that should be considered for incorporation into forthcoming budgets.

Ensuring that their employees and contractors within their Department are trained, updated and undertake their duties in accordance with Council’s risk management and other related policies and procedures;

E nsuring Council’s Risk Management Unit is advised immediately of any potential insurance claims and ensure appropriate incident investigation has taken place;

Reporting to their Divisional Manager on a regular basis on risk management issues including budget, programs, measures and incidents; and

Acknowledging that the management of risk is an integral part of service delivery.

6.7 Coordinators are responsible within their Service Unit or area of responsibility for:-

Management of risks that are directly related to their Unit;

Ensuring that Council’s assets and operations, together with liability risks and hazards, are adequately protected through appropriate risk budgeting, loss control programs and measures, and adherence to Council’s various complementary policies and procedures;

Ensuring that their employees and contractors within their Unit are trained, updated and undertake their duties in accordance with Council’s risk management and other related policies and procedures;

Providing and arranging assistance and requested information in relation to an insurance claim or a risk management issue, in a timely manner;

Ensuring that Council responds immediately to the investigation of any report of a hazard or incident received from a resident, employee, contractor or visitor;

Implementing risk control measures to mitigate exposure;

Advising their Departmental Manager of any risk management matter that should be considered for incorporation into forthcoming budgets;

E nsuring Council’s Risk Management Unit is advised immediately of any potential insurance claims; and

Acknowledge that the management of risk is an integral part of service delivery.

6.8 Risk Management Unit is responsible for supporting all Council Business Units in properly managing risk within their units, and monitoring compliance with the risk management policy and processes.

The Risk Management Unit shall support the corporate risk initiatives by:-

Ensure that Council’s assets and operations, together with liability risks and hazards to the public, are adequately protected through appropriate risk budgeting, loss control programs and measures, and adherence to Council’s various complementary policies and procedures;

Reporting on high and extreme risks with existing control measures and recommendations for further mitigation;

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 9 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Documenting the Council risk management program through the compilation and regular update of the Council risk management strategy;

Providing a platform to host Council

’s Operational Risk Register which provides for the recording and management of these risks by Divisions, Department and Service

Units;

Providing a platform to host and record Council’s Strategic Risks;

Ensuring that risk management platforms are functional and provide advice and guidance to users;

Assisting in the planning, monitoring, and review of risk assessments for Council assets and activities;

Ensuring that complementary policies and practices are implemented, periodically reviewed and where required, updated;

Providing regular reporting through the Manager Risk Management and Contracts

Compliance to the Executive, the Audit Committee, and Council on risk management issues, statistics and strategies including insurance claim management;

Providing advice and educational material on industry trends and legal developments; and

Placing and managing of Council’s insurance portfolio, ensuring that adequate insurance coverage exists for all classes of insurable risk.

The Risk Management Unit provides guidance and advice on risk exposure issues as required by all Council Divisions and service areas. The risk owners (General

Managers, Managers and Coordinators) are responsible for managing the risks of their areas and should seek assistance from the Risk Management Unit as soon as an exposure or an emerging risk becomes known or suspected.

6.9 Employees and Temporary Staff are responsible for:-

Reporting any risk, potential risk or incident immediately it is brought to their attention, to their Team Leader/Coordinator;

Ensuring that they conduct their daily duties in a manner that does not expose

Council to loss or risk, and that these duties are conducted in accordance with the relevant policies, procedures and legislative requirements;

Assisting in the investigation of any incident that may have occurred and for which they were involved or have knowledge of, as a result of a risk or hazard;

Acting in a pro-active manner to control and prevent risk, injury or harm to the

Council or any person;

Reporting either through a corporate recording system or to their Supervisor, any notification of a hazard or incident received from a resident, employee or visitor, in order to allow Council to respond immediately;

Managing risk (including OHS risk) and, participate in risk management and OHS processes by encouraging all individuals to take responsibility for managing risks associated with their official duties. This is to be achieved through the observance of Council Policy, following lawful direction of their Supervisors and ensuring they

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 10 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013 carry out their tasks properly and safely, utilising the correct equipment for the task; and

Acknowledging that they all have a part to play in managing risk.

6.10 Contractors are responsible for:-

E nsuring that Council’s assets and operations, together with liability risks and hazards to the public, are adequately protected through appropriate loss control programs and measure s, and adherence to Council’s various complementary policies and procedures;

Responding immediately to the investigation of any report of a hazard or incident received from an employee, resident or visitor;

Maintaining appropriate and adequate insurances as required under their contract; and

Ensuring that they conduct their daily duties in a manner that does not expose

Council to loss or risk and that these duties are performed in accordance with the relevant policies, procedures and legislative requirements.

7.0 REFERENCES and SOURCE

The references and sources for the content of this Policy have been derived from the following documents;

1. International Standard – ISO AS/NZS 31000 – 2009 Risk Management

2. Council’s Occupational Health & Safety Policy and Manual

3. Occupational Health and Safety Act (Vic) 2004

4. Managing Risk Cross the Public Sector 2004

5. Implementation of Government Risk Control Framework 2013;

6. Delivering Assurance on Risk Management ISO 31000 - 2009 (HB158/2010)

7. Risk Assessment Techniques (HB89/2012)

8. Fraud Prevention Strategies in Local Government 2012

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 11 | P a g e

8.0 THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.1 The Continuum of Assessment and Review

For the Risk Management process to be successful and effective within Council, it must be:

an integral part of management;

embedded in the culture and practices; and

tailored to the processes of the organisation.

The process comprises a number of logical and distinct steps which are necessary to not only establish the specifics of the risk but to also engage it into the continuum of control and review.

The steps are detailed in the flow chart below.

ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT

IDENTIFY RISKS

ANALYSE RISKS

EVALUATE RISKS

TREAT RISKS

* Source ISO AS/NZS 31000 - 2009 Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 12 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

To apply the assessment and review continuum into a City of Stonnington context, the following flowchart details the process.

Cycle

Commences

Regular

Departmental

Managers/

Coordinators meetings to discuss operational risks

Regular Divisional

Managers/

Departmental

Managers meet to discuss operational risks

Divisions advise Risk

Management of exposure. RM analyse, evaluate, provide treatment advice and record in

Risk Register.

All risks are monitored, reviewed and reassessed as required (special focus on

High and Extreme risks)

Risk Management Unit operates ongoing training and awareness workshops.

Monthly Risk Management reports to the Executive regarding High and Extreme

Risks.

KEY

Identifying Risk

Analysis & Treatment

Monitor & Review

Training & Awareness

Reporting

Quarterly the Risk

Management Coordinator revises the Risk

Management Strategy,

Action Plan and Strategic

Audit Plan.

Quarterly the Audit

Committee reviews the Risk

Management issues presented in the Risk

Management report.

Half yearly, Council review

Risk Management issues presented in a Risk

Management Report.

Annually, the Risk

Management Policy is reviewed and updated.

Cycle

Recommences

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 13 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.2 Communication and Consultation

Communication and consultation with internal and external stakeholders should take place during all stages of the risk management process.

Risk ownership is integral to its successful management and therefore, all risk creations and reviews are to involve the areas or key individuals who will effectively manage and control the risk exposure to Council throughout its life cycle. Relevant people will be involved in the consultation process and contribution into the various aspects of the process will be encouraged and acknowledged.

8.3 Establishing the Context

The establishment of the context (or parameter of reference) is an integral element within the process of risk management as it establishes and defines the various environments in which risk is to be considered, assessed and managed.

The level of contextual relevance should be considered on;

External context – the external environment in which the organisation seeks to achieve its objectives;

Internal context – the internal environment in which the organisation seeks to achieve its objectives;

Context of the risk management process – the objectives, strategies, scope and parameters of the organisation should be established; and

Defining the risk criteria – the organisation should define criteria to be used to evaluate the significance of risk.

8.4 Identification of Risks

The effective identification of risk exposures to which Council may be subjected, is a foundation element of establishing the basis of effective mitigation, control and review.

As various levels of assumptions are made during this process, it is essential to remain grounded in establishing the likelihood, consequence and realism of such a risk occurring.

Unrealistically assessed events, impacts or consequences undermine the validly and credibility of the risk management process and its relevance to the organisation ’s business rapidly becomes irrelevant as people disengage from the process.

The primary questions must be based on;

The current environment in which the activity is undertaken (political, financial etc);

The past history or experience of the organisation;

Any known or suspected threats;

Recent experience of other like industries; or

Other relevant knowledge, local or otherwise, to risk exposures that may also impact on Council.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 14 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

The key ele ments of Council’s risk identification processes are:

The cyclical ‘whole-of-organisation’ risk assessments undertaken by Council’s internal auditors;

Risk assessments undertaken within individual Divisions, Departments and Units by key personnel on a regular basis that are both supported by the Risk Management

Unit and form part of Council’s Risk Registers (Strategic and Operational);

T he annual liability risk assessment undertaken by Council’s Public Liability insurer; and

Key industry information derived from various sources.

In managing organisational risk, Council will focus on the following major areas of risk exposure:

Human Resources;

Occupational Health & Safety;

Legislative Compliance;

Internal Controls;

Contract Management;

Insurance Liability;

Corporate Governance;

Information Technology;

Asset Management;

Security;

Professional Advice;

Records Management;

Systems – Efficiency and Effectiveness;

Financial Management;

Reputational exposure; and

Management Reporting.

This list is not exhaustive and will be complemented through the normal risk review processes undertaken by General Managers and Managers as part of Council’s annual budget development, as well as the service reviews undertaken as part of Council’s Best

Value program. Identified risks will be recorded on the Strategic and Operational Risk

Registers, managed by the Risk Management and OHS Units.

Employees and members of the public are also to be encouraged to report potential risk exposures.

8.5 Assessment

A full, accurate and objective assessment of any identified risk must be undertaken to:-

Evaluate existing controls;

Determine the likelihood of an incident;

Determine the consequences of the risk;

Establish the risk rating;

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 15 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Identify any physical hazards; and

Develop remedial actions.

These assessments may be undertaken by Council’s Risk Management Unit, Council’s

Internal Auditors, Council Managers and Coordinators, Designated Workgroups or by external consultants.

Risk assessments will be undertaken by using the assessment criteria and matrix shown in Attachment 1 .

An assessment of risks should be carried out three times during the life of the risk:

Stage 1 - Inherent risk (Absolute) – the risk exposure prior to management controls being put in place;

Stage 2 - Managed risk – the risk exposure with the current level of management controls; and

Stage 3 - Residual risk – when no further controls are required and the level of residual risk is tolerable.

8.6 Risk Appetite

The City of Stonnington determines its risk appetite across four distinct areas of its operations and performance namely Cultural, Outcome, Expectation and Liability.

8.6.1 Cultural

Our cultural risk appetite defines our behaviour and the principles to be applied across Council but is not necessarily measurable or actionable. The Cultural

Risk Appetite is: a)

Council has a very low tolerance for reputational risk exposure that negatively impacts on its standing or image. Steps to minimize the likelihood of adverse reputational impact should always be taken; b)

Council will promptly take action to address ratepayer/customer complaints and regulatory concerns; c)

Council will not engage in any activity that will put its long-term values or reputation at risk. The Council will meet the ratepayers ’/customers’ expectations of providing efficient, considerate and cost-effective services; and d)

Council is an equal opportunity employer that employs skilled and experienced employees in positions with clearly defined roles and responsibilities.

8.6.2 Outcome

Our outcome risk appetite specifies the limits or maximum impact/outcome within

Council which is considered to be reasonable and acceptable where such risk is measurable. The Outcome Risk Appetite is defined by compliance to: a)

Council ’s Business and Strategic Plan; b)

Council ’s annual budget; and c)

defined Divisional, Departmental and Unit Business Plans.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 16 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.6.3 Expectation

Council’s expectation risk appetite defines its tolerance for strategic and operational actions. These risks, specific to activities or known risks, are measurable and supported by mitigation controls and actions. The Expectation

Risk Appetite is: a)

Council has a low tolerance for Strategic Risks. These risks are to be mitigated and controlled as far as practicable down to a low or medium risk rating. b)

Council has zero tolerance for harm or injury to its employees or visitors and these harms will be mitigated and controlled down to a low risk; c)

Council has zero tolerance for internal/external fraud or deception activities; d)

Council has a low tolerance for operational risk. These risks will be mitigated and controlled to where the cost of control is equal to the marginal cost of the risk; e)

Council has a low tolerance for information technology outages. There is no tolerance for outages that exceed one week.

8.6.4 Liability

Council’s liability risk appetite defines the level of liability for which it is prepared to accept using internal mitigations or management processes before it seeks external support or remedies to resolve matters. Such risks are measurable and reportable.

The Liability Risk Appetite is restricted to the deductible excess as stated on each of the insurance policies as issued by each insurer and may be adjusted as required from time to time against Council ’s tolerance for risk exposure.

8.7 Treatment

To control a risk, there is a need for it to be correctly and realistically evaluated to determine the best option for risk removal or minimisation, with plans prepared and implemented to rectify or mitigate any problem areas.

Risk control options (which are not necessarily mutually exclusive or appropriate in all circumstances) include the following:

Risk Avoidance – avoid the identified risk by deciding not to proceed with the activity likely to generate risk (where this is practicable);

Risk Transfer – reducing exposure by transferring the risk to another party e.g. contracting to a business that has the requisite qualifications and skills;

Reduce the likelihood of occurrence through measures such as audit compliance programs, contract conditions, preventative maintenance, engineering controls, inspections, process policies and procedures; and

Reduce the consequences through measures such as contingency planning, disaster recovery plans, contractual arrangements, financial management controls and risk exposure minimisation plans.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 17 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.8 Implementation

Risk Management across the Council will be implemented and managed through effective governance controls including:

Monitoring of adherence to internal controls;

Conducting risk assessments of Council assets and activities;

Applying a corporate risk management strategy;

Promoting adherence to this Policy and related Policies by all employees and contractors;

Providing employee training opportunities on relevant risk issues;

Providing induction training and ongoing workshop sessions;

Instructional information available to employees upon request;

Providing adequate fundi ng for risk reduction initiatives in Council’s budget; and

Undertaking an annual review of identified risks.

The Risk Management Unit is part of the Risk Management and Contract Compliance

Department and is available for advice and guidance on risk and insurance matters.

8.9 Performance Measuring

Performance measures to track progress in implementing risk treatment plans within

Divisions, Departments and Business Units should be established and reviewed by the relevant area Managers and reported to the Risk Management Unit annually.

The tracking process should include;

The inherent risks;

The existing control measures;

Actions to be undertaken;

Due date of the actions;

Outcomes to be achieved;

Responsible officer; and

Acceptance of the residual risk.

A risk profile for each Department will be established and implemented as a live working document that will provide a clear snapshot of the actual risk position and of the possible or likely future risks.

The progress of implementing the treatment plans will form part of the reporting structure of the Risk Management Unit on an exception basis via the process listed in 8.10 of this

Policy.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 18 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.10 Monitoring and Review

Monitoring of risk is the responsibility of the respective General Manager, Manager and

Coordinator, as an element of their overall responsibilities.

Monitoring of risk, with the support of the Risk Management Unit, will include, but not be limited to:

 the analysis of insurance claims;

 on-going risk assessment and risk minimisation as part of standard management practice;

 advice and input into contract specifications and documentation;

 advice and input into risk assessments of new Council programs;

 on-going review of existing Council programs and facilities, as required;

 reviewing documentation of inventories, hall or facility hire agreements, Committees of Management Deeds of Delegation;

 compliance with all complementary Council Policies and Procedures; and

 periodic review of Council’s complementary Policies and Procedures.

The Risk Management Unit via the Risk Management & Contracts Compliance

Department will report as follows:

Reporting To Items of Report Frequency

Executive Statistics regarding incidents, activities, training and insurance claims and advice and analysis of risk trends.

Monthly

Executive

Audit

Committee

Report on High and Extreme risks with existing control measures and recommendations for further mitigation.

Quarterly

Council

Statistics regarding incidents, activities, training, insurance claims, analysis of risks trends.

Quarterly

Report on High and Extreme risks with existing control measures and recommendations for further mitigation.

Status Report of internal audit recommendations.

Statement of position regarding the Council ’s Risk

Management program and management of High and

Extreme Risks.

Bi Annual

Significant risk issues will be brought to the attention of the Chief Executive Officer and the relevant General Manager and, where required, Council.

Risk reviews formally undertaken by Council’s internal auditors, will be reported to

Council’s Audit Committee as part of its charter.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 19 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

8.11 Records

Reference to the records relating to the management of Risks will be maintained in;

 the Division, Department or Unit where the risk resides;

Council ’s Records Management System;

Council ’s relevant Risk Register; and

Council ’s insurance portfolio where relevant.

9.0 REVIEW

This document is to be reviewed by the Risk Management Coordinator every year from date of adoption by Council, with each review to be approved via the CEO Notice Paper.

10.0 ATTACHMENTS

This Policy is supported by detailed attachments that further define graphically the methods and process of risk management.

The attachments are;

 Attachment 1. Risk Consequence Criteria

 Attachment 2.

 Attachment 3.

 Attachment 4.

 Attachment 5.

 Attachment 6.

Risk Controls Criteria

Risk Likelihood Criteria

Risk Matrix

Risk Ratings Definitions

Definition of Risk Status

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 20 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Attachment 1

– Risk Consequence Criteria

City of Stonnington - RISK CONSEQUENCE CRITERIA

CONSEQUENCE

CONSEQUENCE

RATING

Description Safety Financial Environmental Outrage & Media Regulatory

INSIGNIFICANT

MINOR

MODERATE

MAJOR

CATASTROPHIC

• Effect is minimal

• Event requiring moderate levels of resources and input

• Significant event with long reaching effect

• Critical event

• Disaster with potential to lead to collapse or to have a profound effect

No Treatment

Applied

• First-Aid

Treatment

Only

Medical treatment,

Ambulance, or admission to hospital of less than 2 days

Hospitalisation of more than 2 days, or long term injury or disability

• Single or multiple fatalities

• Up to $10k financial loss

(.007% of

Budget)

• >$10 k - $50k financial loss

(.037% of

Budget)

• >$50 k - $500k financial loss

(.37% of

Budget)

• >$500 k - $5 m financial loss

(3.75% of

Budget)

• >$5 m financial loss

(>3.75% of

Budget)

• No detrimental environmental effect

• Environmental discharge controlled, and of a minor nature

• Localised environmental impact, causing community annoyance, and requiring remedial action

• Long-term detrimental environmental or social impact

• Long-term environmental or social impact on community

• Issue raised by residents and/or local press

• Resident and/or media concern/local media coverage

• Embarrassment for Council, including adverse media coverage

• Reputation of

Council severely affected in the long-term.

• Government intervention required

• Activity does not follow established industry standards

• Activity does not follow "Best Practice"

• Activity does not meet all of the requirements of the relevant Australian

Standards

• Activity does not meet all of the requirements of relevant legislation

• Activity does not meet any of the requirements of relevant legislation and Regulations

1. Consider the consequence for each category i.e.; Safety, Financial, Environmental, outrage and Media, Regulatory and Business Continuity.

2. Determine the CONSEQUENCE RATING based on overriding definition i.e.; “worst” (or highest) category.

Business

Continuity

• Business disruption, but no loss of service delivery

• Brief service loss

• Productivity loss for up to 5 days

• Critical service loss for up to 1 month

• Loss of service for a critical period of time

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 21 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Attachment 2

– Risk Controls Criteria

City of Stonnington - RISK CRITERIA

CONTROL RATING

TOTALLY EFFECTIVE

VERY EFFECTIVE

EFFECTIVE

INEFFECTIVE

DESCRIPTION

Effectiveness of existing control measures

Significant control over the risk.

Substantial reduction in risk.

Improvements are possible.

Satisfactory risk reduction.

Improvements are possible.

PARTIALLY EFFECTIVE

Marginal risk reduction.

Improvements should be considered.

Minimal risk reduction, if any.

Improvements required.

Measuring Risk: CONTROLS

SYSTEM CONTROL/DESIGN CONTINGENCY PLAN

Affects frequency of occurrence

Reduces severity of consequence of an event

Total confidence.

Excellent system with total implementation.

No variance in control quality.

Not confident.

Only partly introduced or no attempt.

Substantial variance.

Total confidence in an effective plan.

Fully tested and documented.

Very confident.

Full system with effective implementation.

Little or no variance in control quality.

Very confident.

Fully tested and documented.

Quite confident.

Satisfactorily implemented.

Some variance in control quality.

Just effective - open to some weaknesses.

Not fully tested, quite good documentation.

Moderately confident.

Fair implementation only.

Quite a degree of variance in performance.

Not really effective plan.

Not tested problems.

– open to substantial

No plan at all or very inadequate preparation.

INFORMATION

SYSTEM

Supports the action and capability for monitoring

Well proven data base, robust system, very user friendly.

Mainly as above but improvements are possible.

Mostly good but not yet robust. Some flaws in supporting effective risk action.

Fair to poor database / performance in risk reduction. Not very user friendly.

Very poor / inadequate / nonexistent.

Process

Consider the effectiveness of current controls when determining the three levels of risk. The rating given should be based on the lowest of control ratings applied.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 22 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Attachment 3

– Risk Likelihood Criteria

Measuring Risk : LIKELIHOOD

LIKELIHOOD

RATING

RARE

UNLIKELY

POSSIBLE

LIKELY

ALMOST CERTAIN

CRITERIA

Event MAY occur only in EXCEPTIONAL circumstances. There is LITTLE opportunity for the event to recur. Chance of risk occurring is 0-10%

Event COULD occur at SOME time. There is a REASONABLE opportunity for the event to recur.

Chance of risk occurring is 11-40%

Event SHOULD occur at SOME time. There is SOME opportunity for the event to recur.

Chance of risk occurring is 41-60%

Event will PROBABLY occur in MOST circumstances. There is CONSIDERABLE opportunity for the event to recur. Chance of risk occurring is 61-90%

Event is EXPECTED to occur in MOST circumstances. There is a STRONG likelihood of the event recurring. Chance of risk occurring is 91-100%

Process

1. Determine the LIKELIHOOD RATING based on the overriding criteria definition

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 23 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Attachment 4

– Risk Matrix

Consequence for Organisation

Likelihood

Insignificant Minor

Almost Certain

Likely

Possible

Moderate

11.00

Moderate

7.00

Low

4.00

High

16.00

Moderate

13.00

Unlikely

Rare

Low

2.00

Low

1.00

Moderate

8.00

Low

5.00

Low

3.00

Moderate

High

20.00

High

17.00

Moderate

15.00

Moderate

9.00

Low

6.00

Major

Extreme

23.00

High

22.00

High

19.00

Moderate

14.00

Moderate

10.00

Catastrophic

Extreme

25.00

Extreme

24.00

High

21.00

High

18.00

Moderate

12.00

Process:

Plot the rating box for each of Absolute, Managed and Residual risk.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 24 | P a g e

RISK CATEGORY

LOW

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Descriptor

Attachment 5

– Risk Rating Definitions

Manage by routine procedures and be mindful of changes to nature of risks. Consider the implementation of any cost effective internal controls.

MODERATE

Management to ensure that the control environment, consequence and likelihood do not substantially change. Consider the implementation of any additional cost effective controls.

HIGH

EXTREME

Process

1. Choose appropriate CONSEQUENCE RATING

2. Determine appropriate CONTROL RATING

3. Choose appropriate LIKELIHOOD RATING

Ascertain risk category

Executive attention required to assess the acceptability of remaining net risk or required/planned mitigation measures. Management to ensure that necessary mitigation actions are carried out and the risk does not increase by actively monitoring any changes to the control environment, consequence and likelihood.

Extreme risk is generally unacceptable. Comprehensive consideration by the Executive is required to ensure that the net risk remaining is consistent with Council ’s objectives and acceptance of risk.

If not, detailed research and planning is required to mitigate risk.

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 25 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Attachment 6 – Definition of Risk Status

Operational

Definition of Risk Status

Risk which occurs in, hampers, or impacts upon an individual

Division, Department, Service Unit or area of an organisation.

Strategic Risk which will impact upon or hamper across the organisation its ability to operate or deliver its policy, strategy or services.

Risk such as a failed contract or business relationship. Commercial

Technical

Financial &

Systems

Compliance

Risk such as failed equipment and managing assets.

Risk posed to Council’s financial systems and controls such as fraud.

Risks to meeting regulatory obligations.

Source: Managing Risk Across the Public Sector - Good Practice Guide – Auditor General Vic 2004

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 26 | P a g e

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P OLICY 2013

Version:

Author:

Owner:

Document Control

3.0

Manager, Risk Management &

Contracts Compliance

Risk, Coordinator

Risk Management and Contracts

Compliance Department

Date:

QA:

Review

Period:

17 November 2015

Business Support

Officer

Annual

Date

18 March

2013

23

September

2014

17

November

2015

Revision Details

Update Details Reviewed QA

Adoption of Policy

Annual administrative review of document and insertion of Internal Audit recommendations regarding Risk Tolerance and the roles of the Audit

Committee and EMT.

Annual administrative review.

Risk

Coordinator

Risk

Coordinator

Manager,

Risk

Management

& Contracts

Compliance

Manager,

Risk

Management

& Contracts

Compliance

Risk

Coordinator

Manager,

Risk

Management

& Contracts

Compliance

Approved

Council

Chief

Executive

Officer

Chief

Executive

Officer

Adopted by Council on 18 March 2013 27 | P a g e

Download