ESG775 New Media Literacies Reflective Journal Topic 2 New Literacies What are the so-called “new literacies”? When reflecting on what is ‘new’ for this entry I first went to Anstey and Bull (2009) to re-read the chapter, “Changing Times, Changing Literacies’. This reminded me that in my lifetime my own literacy practices have not been static since I have needed to engage with evolving literacy forms, technology and practices to further my own understanding and to suit the demands of changing curricula. For example, the ease of accessing film in the classroom for study purposes has progressed from the annual trek into the Launceston Cinema to watch that year’s designated film with a class (1980) or watching multiple reels on a projector in the classroom (and hoping you hadn’t got the film spool on backwards, to crowding around the television to watch a crackly VHS (1985) before the invention of the DVD. The rise of effective media study and critical literacy approaches with regard to film really became viable once we had access to data projectors in classes so students could experience wide screen images. And of course, film is now ubiquitous in our students’ lives so film literacy has become an important feature of the English syllabus. I liked the discussion of what is ‘new’ about the New Literacies and found that Jenkins’ points were really useful as a starting place. He reassured me that, ‘Reading and writing competence are still critical but not sufficient,’ and, ‘Students also need to practice technology mastery though this is not an end in itself- just as holding a pen does not lead to good composition.’ Lankshear’s description of the New Literacies being characterised as being more to do with participation, collaboration and distribution, and involving changes in values, priorities and cultural relations, helped me to make some sense of the changing concepts of these literacies. I could see there was a shift away from the narrow definition of literacy as a set of basic skills in isolation from context or purpose. Key points from readings Jenkins et al, Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Media Education in the 21st Century New Media Consortium suggest they are, ‘the set of abilities and skills where aural, visual and digital literacy overlap” (p.19) including understanding, manipulate and transform, distribute and adapt to new forms. Jenkins asserts key importance is also textual literacy which is supplemented by and supplanted by media literacies. Second point is that new media literacies should be regarded as a social skill (p.19). New literacies should support and expand existing first literacy competence, not replace. Opportunities for continued improvement through new literacy participation, feedback, public audiences (p.19). Sharyn Lawrence Page 1 Build on expanded definition of literacy as moving beyond decoding and making meaning to distinguishing between fact and fiction, (although new literacies may blur this easy distinction???), to construct arguments and assess the reliability of information. Also known as media literacy????? Effects of open source culture: sampling, appropriation, transformation and repurposing that challenge traditional understanding of ownership, authorship, personal expression. Understanding and competence is necessary for the formation of a coherent world. Core media skills: play, simulation, performance (meaning use of multiple identities), appropriation, multi-tasking, distributed cognition (expanding mental capacities), collective intelligence, exercising judgement, transmedia navigation, networking, negotiation Lankshear and Knobel, New Literacies Literacy has extended its meaning from the ability to read and write to “the ability to understand information however presented’ (p. 21). Media literacy involves matching the choice of medium of communication with the kind of information and the intended audience. Some authorities have interpreted media literacy with ITC and ability to write and reply to an email, file and understand jargon eg joystick, mouse. 2 key ways of characterising new literacies: (a) paradigmatic – new paradigm of understanding as opposed to old psycholinguistic approach and (b) ontological meaning the kind of literacy (its character and stuff) are new eg they contain concepts and practices not present in old literacies including globalisation of technology, manufacture and communication (p.24). These include new social practices prompted/ supported by the new literacies eg constructing hyperlinks, text messaging on a mobile phone NOT limited to electronic media but includes popular game playing card games, paper zines and manga, print-based fanzines, scenario-building etc. These include features of the new mindset. Comparison of mindsets (p.38). Anstey and Bull, Teaching and Learning Multiliteracies Embrace definition by Luke and Freebody (2000) that literacy is ‘the flexible and sustainable mastery of a repertoire of practices with the texts of traditional and new communications technologies via spoken, print and multimedia.’ To be literate now means being effective in multiple modes and contexts (p.21). people need to recognize the context and identify the purpose, genre and form and required response so that discourse refers to modes of literacy such as speaking, viewing, composing etc while Discourse refers to the attitudes and behaviours associated with the discourses (p. 21) . It means being cognitively AND socially literate. 4 identified practices of reading: code breaker, meaning maker, text user and text analyst (p.44). Sharyn Lawrence Page 2 My own literacies practices New Literacy forms Observed Tried Email Internet Wikipedia Internet gaming Avoided/ Rejected/ Not interested Personal contact with friends Work purpose/ contact with business sites Work purpose: use and insert links in documents Information Entertainment source, on-line shopping Hyper links Social media Embraced Son (19) - his former girlfriend created his Facebook page. He updates and communicates through the page every day. Some Year 11-12 students’ obsession with it. College Production class has LC Face book page to communicate with cast. Dealt with several cases of student Facebook/ texting harassment Son plays ‘Fiesta’ with teams from around the world; son spends ‘real’ money buying weapons to use online Sharyn Lawrence Facebook to communicate with some family and past students Use as first source of info; have added content Silly arguments about its veracity as a source In May LC senior staff decided to create an official Facebook page after considerable debate Friending current students Not interested in regular communicationtoo much of a tie Not interested in games or playing in a team. No patience for acquiring basic skills to reach proficiency. I enjoy reading for relaxation (solitary activity) Page 3 Office Communicat or Trial video conference with colleagues at LC Video conferencing UTas Global Ed Project joint Launceston/ Hobart meeting (March) Easy access, ability to make changes and share key documents with colleagues Storage of shared files, information, announcements Common central files on LC hard drive LC Intranet SharePoint Program (staff and students) LC display video screens Sharing of information, photos with students Weblog 2 blogs: educational reflection and fiction Wikispace YouTube Most other staff are not interested or not hooked up Son and friends regularly upload film of their activities and search for entertaining sites Sharyn Lawrence Not interested in maintaining professional blog or making new contacts except with people I have met Wiki for 2 classes of Student Directed Inquiry 3 Wiki for assessment for Unit Educational Inquiry Wiki for Unit Multi literacies Access educational tutorials, famous speeches, embed in wiki Not interested in posting entertainment or teaching segments Page 4 Clickview program for video sharing on LC server Mobile Friends and students phone who embrace a range of functions Tutorials for student use Phone as voice device (traditional use) Fan fiction Manga Zines Graphic novels Media literacy/ critical literacy Music sampling Complicated phones with complex functions. Not interested in increased connectivity or email access or communications Not interested except as insight into student reading practices Reviewed Hamlet for The Examiner. Read several for pleasure. Work and home Students, son E- reader Not interested in music Downloaded several books from the Tas Library Books on CD for use in the car Regular use due to time taken to down load, lack of opportunity to browse book before committing I found this to be a really useful activity because since I first drew up the table at the beginning of the unit I have added to, and updated, quite a few comments. It has helped me to track my progress and continuing experimentation. Analysing my responses enabled me to realise that as a person with quite an introverted personality the communication and collaboration aspects of New Literacies are not very appealing to me. I value my solitude and time to do things (including reading and watching TV/ film) by myself without having to bother about other people. I have quite separate home/ work practices since I am keen to Sharyn Lawrence Page 5 stay abreast of educational leanings that can help me to improve my teaching, and that of my colleagues, but I don’t necessarily want to practice them in life outside work. This has implications for teaching students with a similar personality to mine: will they be disadvantaged by not embracing social media and collaborative online practices? Should teaching them these skills be regarded as a useful, but not essential life practice, like learning trigonometry in Maths or the characteristics of cells in Biology? Or perhaps with increasing globalisation and the development of shared on-line learning perhaps I should regard proficiency as an essential component of all student education? I will have to think more about this concept. Sharyn Lawrence Page 6