Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine
Performance Development Review Form: Academic Staff (please append your Individual Report Template and Education Database
Statement). In completing the paperwork for, and conducting the PDR, the reviewee and reviewer should utilise the Academic Performance Framework to
benchmark contribution and performance, at https://internal.kcl.ac.uk/medicine/staff-new/pdr/as/docs/APF-guidance.pdf
Section A: Personal and post details
Name
Job title and grade
Date of appointment to current post
Division/Department
FT / PT (if PT specify %)
Name of reviewer and position
Review period and date of meeting
Section B: Review of activity and plans for the next year
B1: Education – your appended Education Database Statement provides quantitative information (which is augmented by summary data in the Individual
Report Template). Within the following sections you should focus on the quality of your contribution, utilising student or other feedback to underline how
your contribution has benefited the student experience, as well as outlining your plans for the coming year.
Please paste in specific actions from last year’s PDR and comment on how you
have addressed these actions. Please refer to your Education Database Statement
to support your commentary, but do not repeat all of the figures that are
contained within it.
Please outline your forward plans and any new initiatives for the coming academic
year, including a commitment to increase your education contribution where you
are starting from a low level.
B2: Research –your appended Individual Report Template provides quantitative information regarding grant information and PhD supervision.
Within the following sections you should focus on the quality of your research, ensuring that you comment specifically on your own contributions to
research grants and outputs (see below), as well as the broader research agenda such as the successful supervision of PhD students and research staff who
may have secured fellowship funding. You may also wish to comment on your broader success, for example, in attracting industry funding and support that
is not reflected in PURE/REF returnable income, but does contribute to the broader impact/engagement agenda.
Please paste in specific actions from last year’s PDR and comment on how you
have addressed these actions. Please refer to your Individual Report template to
support your statement, but do not repeat all of the figures that are contained
within it.
Please outline your forward plans and any new initiatives for the coming academic
year, including a commitment to increase your research contribution where you
are starting from a low level.
Research Outputs- please insert details regarding your ‘best five’ publications during the period 1 January 2010 until now.
You can look up your publications in Scopus: http://www.scopus.com
You can calculate the citations percentiles in your field using: https://internal.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/Metrics/FindingPercentiles.aspx
PAPER 1
DOI number
Citations
Output Title
Journal
Authors (in order)
Percentile & subject area
Journal IF
Comments
PAPER 2
DOI number
Citations
Output Title
Journal
Authors (in order)
Percentile & subject area
Journal IF
Comments
PAPER 3
DOI number
Citations
Output Title
Journal
Authors (in order)
Percentile & subject area
Journal IF
Comments
PAPER 4
DOI number
Citations
Output Title
Journal
Authors (in order)
Percentile & subject area
Journal IF
Comments
PAPER 5
DOI number
Citations
Output Title
Journal
Authors (in order)
Percentile & subject area
Journal IF
Comments
B3: Management and academic leadership additional to any roles already highlighted above-please highlight specific contributions, which
may embrace all aspects of service. As with other sections, particular emphasis should be given to the quality of your contribution, as opposed
to simply listing the range of committees attended.
Contribution type
Achievements/successes over the last year
Plans for the next academic year
B4: Knowledge dissemination and impact-the public understanding of science, scholarship and promoting King’s reputation, nationally and
internationally, are some aspects of this rich and increasingly important agenda, which you are encouraged to comment on in your PDR.
Contribution type
Teaching-related
Research-related
Third stream e.g. industry-related
Other
Achievements/successes over the last year
Plans for the next academic year
Section C: Career progression
Contributions against expectations. Please refer to the Academic Performance Framework at https://internal.kcl.ac.uk/medicine/staffnew/pdr/as/docs/APF-guidance.pdf
Reviewee’s comments
Reviewer’s comments
Promotion: does the performance warrant consideration for promotion to the next grade? If no, please indicate areas to develop/focus on in the next
year. Please refer to the university’s guidance regarding academic promotion https://internal.kcl.ac.uk/hr/promotions/index.aspx
Reviewee’s comments
Reviewer’s comments
Section D: Future plans (please include any training and support needs in this section)
Key actions
1
2
3
4
5
By when
We agree that the above represents a fair and accurate record of the outcomes of the review meeting.
Signed……………………………………Date…………………………(Member of staff)
Signed……………………………………Date…………………………
1. Head of Division (or nominee)
Signed……………………………………Date…………………………
2. Head of Teaching Department (or nominee)
Section E: Special circumstances - please provide any information relating to the last year that you think may be relevant
Please delete as applicable before signing:
I (reviewee) agree that section E can be shared with Senior Faculty Managers.
I (reviewee) disagree that section E can be shared with Senior Faculty Managers.
Signed……………………………………Date…………………………(Member of staff)