Northeastern University International Relations Council Summer Executive Board Meeting #1 Date: August 3, 2014 1:49 PM Location: PoliSci Conference Room Present: Cam, Sarah, Phil, Rawan, Elise Absent: Evan HD and NATO Chair Selection Process/Feedback Cam: unique challenge, must choose 2 NATO Chair positions and create new process for HD selection. Application process is no longer efficient. HD Selection Process: o 1. Call for nominations: Reply to e-mail stating interest in HD position and rank at least 2 conferences in order of preference o 2. Consolidate nominees: 1) E-board discusses applicants; weave out unqualified; send out list of recommendations irrespective of conference to Phil; Phil makes final selection; reports to President so there’s an open discussion between Phil and President about final selection Yes unanimous Yes with reservation No with rights Outright rejection of application 2) Phil gets applications, goes through them, and sends the shortened out stack to us o Sarah: How much description within list of recommendation provided to Phil? It must be transparent. Cam: As much description/explanation as the application necessitates. o Elise: What about individual recommendations without an e-board discussion? Cam: Yes, submit private comments to Phil. o Biggest challenge: who will it bounce to if President is selected? If the President is not selected, he/she can self-advocate o Sarah: What are the standards? Must revisit. Elise: Should have been to preferred conference before Sarah: Preparation is important; should require position papers; ability to read a lot of papers and give back constructive criticism; good with conflict, partnership tensions, and crazy faculty advisors; good academic background Elise: Meet outside of class time Rawan: Less quantifiable but should hold respect from team members; past awards should be in consideration to assess quality of debate Elise: Diverse qualifications, including organizational experience and past chairing experience Phil: Someone who is a good ambassador for the program; focus more on organization/leadership experience; prior conference behavior Compartmentalize requirements: been to conference, conference behavior, organizational background on campus or displayed leadership capacity. Favorably upon/we value: diverse background, experience in organizing NATO Chairs o Similar self-nomination process; required past chair experience at preferred conference including JCC cabinet leaders and default class chairs; no separate BoD position for NATO Chairs i.e. no voting privileges; responsible for chair training purposes o Rawan: We need to standardize chair training o Phil: NATO Chair will also manage chair paradigm for classes because they know who’s been trained Sarah: Although it is usually EVP’s responsibility to determine class chairs, Sarah’s comfortable sharing that authority with the NATO Chairs as long as chair training and in-class chairing are up to our usual standards Phil: Lack of progression/direction in IRC. In other words, there’s no existing clear pathway for new members and “mid-ground” members to recognize how to best realize leadership/chairing goals. Future conferences: o NUMAL: 1 HD, we select assistant o NATO: 2 HDs, maybe one assistant o McMUN: 2 co-HDs because level of work is much higher. Caveat is based on what the assignments end up being. o CARMAL: 1 HD o NERMAL: TBD BoD Selection Parliamentarian: Gavin Jones Webmaster: Katie Braggins…put Keely in contact with her Retention: Jillian Whelan SGA: Alex Carlin (tentative) Fundraising: Miranda Beggin Conference Recruitment: Merlinda Xharda Travel and Try-Out Paradigm Must book all rooms at once (use numbers from last year), Cam and Evan working on it; we’re a month ahead of schedule Phil: Participation in NERMAL is mandatory as either staff, delegates, or chairs. Phil: Try-outs don’t have to be before NERMAL, selection can even be done before NERMAL but won’t be announced until after that weekend Phil: One big try-out that fills all of NATO, McMun, and 50% of Nationals…for Nationals, it doesn’t have to be specific but we need to have 9 people ready and set to go and to guarantee experience and division of talent for Nationals In the Spring, they will assign the 9 names for Nationals and their committees Selection Committee comprised of Phil, all HDs, and e-board representative. Elise: What about a multi-step process to accommodate for several conferences? Not all HDs need to be concerned with the micro-details of other conferences. Phil: Strongly suggests all HDs be included because we are concerned with the overall well-being of IRC performance abroad. Suggestion: Not tell HDs their conference? Rest of e-board is uneasy. Tentative Solution: Do it all in the same room; split people by conference; Phil and e-board rep floating; highly experimental Miscellaneous Graduate students: cannot run for e-board position; can fill BoD; can be HD; can travel; must pay a Grad Student fee + lab fees Always CC e-mails with IRC account Do not arbitrarily call for an e-board meeting—it’s Phil/Cam’s responsibility EVP Summer: o Surveys: chose topics by picking the top answers UN: Disarmament and international security; political affairs and decolonization; international law/conflict and peace building. NATO: Political affairs; defense planning; emerging security threats A lot of interest in crises o Improvements/Weaknesses: NATO: Resolution/research skills UN: Formal speeches, resolution writing, and caucusing o Video: basically done, missing minor adjustments o Speakers: Working with Beyond Conflict, bring a panel possibly, market the club, German Consulate for NATO o Mentorship: good experience for mid-ground members to mentor new members VP Finance: o Budget is in works o SERMAL payment to be checked on/completed ASAP; Elise will e-mail Janet, Cam to go to Savo (?) NERMAL: all is well so far. Agenda for Next Meeting Next meeting: August 11th 6:30PM at PoliSci Conference Travel logistics Further discussion on Travel Try-Out Paradigm New mentorship program between Cam, Phil, and Sarah