Site Response Form – From :_NCC Archaeology Department_____________________
Site Reference Number from SHLAA Map:
1. Are there natural features of the site,
trees, landform, buildings or
structures on the site which should be
preserved and which may be
negatively affected by development?
2. Is the site unsuitable for reasons such
as Infrastructure Deficiency, Flood
Risk, destruction of habitat, or any
other reason?
3. Is the Site unsuitable from the point of
view of Access, and future
contribution to Traffic
congestion/pollution?
4. Would a development on the Site
affect the local character – harm, no
real change, enhance?
5. Would development on the site have
a positive or negative effect on the
Conservation Area in the Village?
6. Would development on the Site affect
important views out of the Village?
7. Does the site include any designated
heritage assets, listed buildings,
archaeological features?
8. Are there any other features of Local
historic interest, or is it adjacent to
any designated heritage asset or
area?
Site SNC561 – No known archaeological activity
Site SNC276.-. earthworks possibly manorial
investigation in association with the flood
defences in 2003 identified extensive
archaeological remains
Site SNC635 – Former allotments (northern
extent) no known archaeological activity: south of
the river extensive ridge and furrow earthworks.
Site SNC581 –No known archaeological activity
but the south eastern corner is adjacent to a
cluster of Bronze age activity. Potential for activity
in this area further information would be needed.
Site SNC340 –. The site has a number of
planning applications is within a potentially
archaeologically sensitive area. It lies between
the known historic core of the village and an area
of prehistoric settlement on the south eastern side
of Camp Lane. Previous advice was a condition
for archaeological investigation.
Site SNC636 –Iron Age and Romano British
activity highly possible and also ridge and Furrow
earthworks.
Site SNC301 – Ridge and furrow earthworks
Site SNC302 – Ridge and Furrow earthworks
Site SNC397 –Iron Age activity identified by
archaeological investigation in the north extent
potential for this to extend.
Site SNC637 – No known archaeology potential
unknown
SNC 276 Church of St Luke Grade 1, The Old
Rectory Grade II * Conservation Area
SNC 635 partially in the Conservation Area
SNC 340, SNC 636, SNC,301 and SNC 397
adjacent to the Conservation Area.
9. Are there significant habitats on site,
or does the site form a link with a
wider network of habitats?
10. Is the site used by any protected
species?
11. Does the site have a potential use
which is more valuable than a
housing development?
12. Is there any other reason why the site
may not be suitable.
Please answer below, if you prefer, giving your views on the site and whether you think it is
suitable or unsuitable, and why.
Sites with ridge and furrow should be excluded from development Site SNC635, Site
SNC636, Site SNC301, Site SNC302. This corresponds with Policy BN5- Historic
Environment and Landscape 1 b. of the West Northants Joint Core Strategy.
The other sites could be suitable if the appropriate archaeological assessment was
undertaken in line within NPPF Section 12 Conserving and Enhancing the Historic
Environment.
There are not
Please return this form to:
Tim Ward at timwarduk@aol.com