1 Phase Ratio Variation approach for the study of partitioning behavior of volatile organic compounds in 2 polymer sample bags: Nalophan case study 3 4 Jim Van Durme*, Bas Werbrouck 5 6 Research Group Molecular Odor Chemistry, KU Leuven Campus Ghent, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, B-9000 7 Ghent, Belgium 8 * Corresponding author: Tel.: +32 (0)9 265 86 39; Fax: +32 (0)9 265 86 38; E-mail address: 9 jim.vandurme@kuleuven.be 10 11 Abstract 12 Sorption of volatile organic compounds on the inner surface of polymer sampling bags leads to important 13 underestimations of the real headspace concentration. Introducing a wide range of volatiles in a two-phase 14 system containing Nalophan, revealed that recoveries decreased down to 57% in a period of 22 hours. In this 15 work a Phase Ratio Variation approach is investigated to quantify the degree of scalping, and thus enabling to 16 compensate for sorption phenomena. This method requires limited measurements, without the need for time- 17 consuming calibrations. By spiking identical amounts of volatiles in three two-phase systems, each having 18 unique polymer volume/mass ratios , individual partitioning coefficients could be 19 experimentally determined for a wide range of compounds. Additionally, a correlation was found between these 20 partitioning coefficients and the liquid molar volume for a number of aliphatic, aromatic and oxygenated 21 compounds. 22 23 Keywords: scalping, sampling, polymer, partitioning, volatile organic compound, environmental analysis 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 1. Introduction 32 In the field of environmental analysis, researchers rely on the accurate qualitative and quantitative assessment of 33 odorous compounds in the gas phase. In recent years, attention has been mainly given to advanced hyphenated 34 analytical techniques and the development of new detectors (e.g. e-noses, SIFT-MS, etc.). However, the sample 35 collection step is equally important and strongly influences reproducibility and accuracy. Despite the availability 36 of multiple sorbent media (Solid Phase MicroExtraction, Stirbar Sorptive Extraction, sorbent tubes) and 37 cryocondensation techniques, whole air sampling using polymeric bags is still one of the most frequently used 38 sample collection methods in the field, due to the ease by which they can be manipulated, their reduced cost and 39 the possibility of reuse (Alonso and Sanchez, 2013). In accordance with the European Standard “Air quality – 40 Determination of odor concentration by dynamic olfactometry” (EN 13725; CEN, 2003), Tedlar (polyvinyl 41 fluoride) and Nalophan (polyethylene terephthalate) are frequently used for whole air sampling (Del Pulgar, 42 Carrapiso, Reina, Biasioli, & García, 2013; Heynderickx, Huffel, Dewulf, & Langenhove, 2013, Hansen et al., 43 2011). Other polymeric materials used for gas sampling are Kynar, Flexfilm, Teflon (Mochalski et al 2013). 44 The degree of scalping, which is defined as sorption of the volatiles on the inner surface of polymeric sampling 45 bag, is often underestimated, in particular in the field of environmental sampling. Today, no simple method is 46 available to estimate this degree of scalping for individual compounds on polymeric materials. Once volatile 47 organic compounds (VOC) are collected inside gas sampling bags, a number of other phenomena can influence 48 the final concentration of volatile compounds (Alonso and Sanchez 2013). Mochalski et al. (2009) reported how 49 Tedlar polymer materials emit residual compounds (e.g. N,N-dimethylacetamide, phenol, carbonyl sulfide, 50 carbon disulfide), making it obligatory to sufficiently rinse the sampling bags with clean air prior to headspace 51 storage. Next, chemical reactions can cause biases such as oxidative reactions initiated by ambient ozone or 52 photochemical conversions when exposed to ambient or artificial light. Also physical phenomena such as 53 leakages or the transfer of volatiles to condensed water vapor in sampling bags strongly influence the final 54 headspace concentration (Groves and Zellers 1996). Most of the abovementioned phenomena can be resolved by 55 adapting the sample collection protocol. An excess of water in the sampled air can for example be reduced by 56 condensation over dry ice, or by forcing it through a packed tube filled with hygroscopic salts (K 2CO3, MgCO3, 57 Mg(ClO4)2) or water-sorbing polymers (e.g. Nafion) (Dewulf et al 1999). 58 As mentioned earlier, the most critical parameter, however, is the tendency of certain polymer materials to sorb 59 volatile compounds. This phenomenon is well described in the food packaging industry (Nielsen and Jägerstad 60 1994). Next to migration of residual volatiles (Helmroth et al 2002) and permeation of gases through the 2 61 packaging, sorption of aroma compounds may explain the change in aroma intensity or the development of an 62 unbalanced flavor profile of packaged foods (Nielsen and Jägerstad 1994; Mentana et al 2009; Pati et al 2010). 63 Pau Balaguer et al (2012) determined the sorption and transport properties in gliadin and chitosan films with 64 respect to four representative food aroma compounds (ethyl caproate, 1-hexanol, 2-nonanone and α-pinene). 65 Laor et al (2010) reported how the average odor concentration of coffee originated volatiles stored both in Tedlar 66 and Nalophan bags, decreased by a factor 4-5 after 24 hours storage. 67 In recent years, growing attention has been given to the abovementioned sorptive and diffusive losses during 68 environmental sampling. Harreveld (2003) determined that the odor concentration of samples in Nalophan bags 69 decreased to about half the initial concentration after 30 hours of storage. Sironi et al (2014) studied the diffusion 70 rate of ammonia through the Nalophan film, considering storage times ranging from 1 to 26 h. Kim & Kim 71 (2013) determined sorptive losses of five volatile fatty acids (acetic, propionic, n-butyric, i-valeric, and n-valeric 72 acid) on the surface of both stainless steel and quartz tubes. Hansen et al (2011) collected humid and dried air 73 samples from a pig production facility in both Tedlar as Nalophan sampling bags. Chemical measurements 74 revealed that concentrations of carboxylic acids, phenols, and indoles decreased by 50 to >99% during the 24 h 75 of storage in both Tedlar and Nalophan bags. The concentration of hydrogen sulfide decreased by approximately 76 30% during the 24 h of storage in Nalophan bags, whereas in Tedlar bags the concentration of sulfur compounds 77 decreased by <5% (Hansen et al 2011). 78 Mochalski, King, Unterkofler, & Amann (2013) evaluated the stability of 41 selected breath constituents in three 79 types of polymer sampling bags; Tedlar, Kynar, and Flexfilm. Findings yielded evidence of better performances 80 of Tedlar bags over the remaining polymers in terms of background emission, species stability (up to 7 days for 81 dry samples), and reusability. From the abovementioned studies, it was concluded that the scalping effects 82 resulted in systematic biases leading to an underestimation of the true concentration of the targeted pollutants. 83 The aim of this study is to introduce the Phase Ratio Variation (PRV) method as a fast and efficient manner for 84 predicting the degree of scalping for individual compounds in a complex gas mixture. Reported methods to 85 quantify the scalping effect are inverse gas chromatography (Boutboul et al 2002) or by quantitative structure– 86 property relationships (QSPR) (Tehrany and Fournier 2006). These methods are however technologically 87 complex and labor-intensive. The proposed PRV method is based on the relationship between the partitioning 88 coefficient and the phase ratio (ratio gas and polymer phase volumes) (Jouquand et al 2004). In food research, 89 the PRV method has been used to determine partitioning coefficients of six migrants (ethyl acetate, 90 acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, methyl ethyl ketone, isopropyl acetate and butyraldehyde) between four food 3 91 simulants (water, 10% ethanol, 3% acetic acid and 95% ethanol) and two polymers (polyamide and polyethylene 92 terephthalate) (Tehrany and Mouawad 2007). In the field of environmental research, this technique has 93 successfully been used to determine Henry’s constants of other volatiles (Jouquand et al 2004). To the best of 94 our knowledge, applications of the PRV method to understand and predict polymer/volatile interactions in 95 environmental sampling have not yet been described. 96 97 2. 98 2.1. Nalophan Materials and methods 99 Nalophan with 20 µm thickness was purchased from Kalle Gmbh, Wiesbaden, Germany. Small pieces (1 cm²) 100 were cut and cleaned by flushing for 8 hours with pure inert nitrogen gas at 40°C to remove the adsorbed 101 compounds. The cleaned polymer material was stored in a closed vial which was kept in the dark and under 102 atmospheric conditions (1 atm, 25°C). 103 2.2. Standards: Volatiles Organic Compounds 104 The Japanese Indoor Air Standard mix (Sigma Aldrich, Belgium) was used for both calibration and sorption 105 experiments. This standard consisted of 50 volatile organic compounds in methanol at certified concentrations 106 (100 μg/mL each component). To create a stock solution, the reference solution was diluted 1:40 in methanol 107 (99%, Sigma Aldrich, Belgium) resulting in individual solute concentrations of 2.5 µg/mL. 108 2.3. Preparation of two-phase systems 109 From this stock solution 4.5 µL was injected in a preconditioned 20 mL glass vial in which polymeric material 110 was added. In this way 11.25 ng of each compound was introduced in the system, resulting in individual 111 headspace concentrations of 560 µg/m³. 112 It is noteworthy to mention that such spiking method results in methanol (solvent) background headspace 113 concentrations that are much higher than those of the targeted analytes. This is not a problem, since this specific 114 gas matrix is only used as case study for the applicability of PRV to quantify scalping effects in complex gas 115 mixtures. Nevertheless, some additional experiments were performed to verify to which degree the elevated 116 methanol headspace concentrations influenced partitioning of higher molecular weight volatiles on both the 117 SPME fiber material, as well as on the Nalophan polymer (competitive adsorption). As expected from literature, 118 it was observed that SPME extraction efficiencies decreased with increasing methanol headspace concentration 4 119 (results not shown). However, since the amount of injected methanol was identical throughout the experiments, 120 interaction phenomena during extraction are similar and results can be compared with each other. 121 Limam et al (2005) studied sorption and diffusion of organic solvents in polyethylene terephthalate. Although 122 some swelling phenomena due to methanol sorption occurs, it was concluded that sorption dramatically depends 123 on the chemical microstructure of the polymer (amorphous or oriented). It was concluded that highly crystalline 124 polyethylene terephthalate polymers (e.g. Nalophan) show lower sorption of organic solvent and are generally a 125 good barrier to alcohols. Nevertheless, an experiment was conducted to verify the impact of methanol vapor on 126 the partitioning coefficient of volatiles on the used Nalophan material. Both ‘high methanol’ and ‘low methanol’ 127 20 mL systems were prepared, each being spiked with 560 µg/m³ of the individual volatiles. The first series of 128 systems was made as abovementioned (injection of 4.5 µL 1:40 standard methanol solution), while the second 129 series of systems was prepared by injecting 1.1 µL 1:10 standard methanol solution. Each series consisted of 130 polymer-free vials (n=3) and Nalophan containing vials (0.025 g, n=3). After a 15 hour incubation at 25°C, peak 131 ratios were measured for a selection of volatiles in both systems. As will be discussed in more detail further in 132 this work, significant scalping was measured (§3.1.) in both series. However, no significant differences were 133 observed in the measured scalping degree between the ‘low methanol’ and ‘high methanol’ systems (p > 0.05). It 134 can be therefore concluded that competitive sorption between methanol and volatiles on the polymer surface are 135 of less importance. 136 Similar as described for methanol, humidity could have an influence on the investigated sorption phenomena. 137 Ajhar et al (2010) found that the headspace concentration of siloxanes in sampling bags were only 4% higher 138 when humidified gas (90% RH at 37°C) was used, compared to experiments in a dry nitrogen atmosphere. 139 Performing the same experiments (90% RH) at 20°C had no significant impact on the total signal compared with 140 experiments performed in dry air. For this study the partitioning coefficients under normal atmospheric 141 conditions (70% RH at 25°C) were determined. 142 2.4. Chemical analytical methodology 143 Pre-concentration of the introduced volatiles was performed by using a Gerstel MPS2 autosampler, equipped 144 with a headspace-solid phase microextraction unit. The conditions were as follow: the required amount of 145 polymer material was hermetically sealed in 20-mL vials and incubated for 30 minutes at 25°C in a thermostated 146 agitator. After equilibration for 30 min, the headspace was extracted on a well-conditioned CAR/PDMS SPME 147 fibre for another 30 minutes. 5 148 The chemical-analytical setup used in this work consisted of a fully automated sample preparation unit (multi- 149 PurposeSampler® or MPS®, Gerstel®, Mülheim an der Rur, Germany) mounted on a 6890/5973 GC-MS 150 system (Agilent Technologies®, palo Alto, CA). Helium was used as carrier gas (1 mL/min). Injector and 151 transfer lines were maintained at 250°C and 280°C, respectively. The total ion current (70 eV) was recorded in 152 the mass range from 40-230 amu (scan mode) using a solvent delay of 2 min and a run time of 5 min. For GC- 153 MS profiling, the cross-linked methyl silicone column (HP-PONA), 50 m x 0,20 mm I.D., 0,5 µm film thickness, 154 Agilent Technology®) was programmed: 40°C (5 min) to 160°C at 3°C/min, from 160°C to 220°C at 5°C/min, 155 held 3 minutes. Identification of volatile organic compounds in the vegetable oil headspace was performed by 156 comparison of the mass spectra with the Wiley ® 275 library. Since analytical standards are used no additional 157 measurements are necessary to confirm the compound identification. 158 Although 50 volatiles were injected in the two phase systems, results are discussed for a selection of 36 159 compounds. The reason for this is that a number of the volatiles were too volatile to be sufficiently extracted 160 using the described SPME method (e.g. ethanol, methylene chloride,…), while others had a low volatility and 161 have to be classified as semi-volatiles (e.g. tridecane, tetradecane, pentadecane, …). Using the chemical– 162 analytical data, paired comparison tests (t-test) were performed using SPSS Statistics 21 software to evaluate if 163 the observed differences in headspace concentrations were significant. Significances for the differences were 164 established at an alpha risk of 5%. 165 2.5. PRV-method 166 The sorptive uptake of a volatile by a polymer can be described by sorption isotherms. In the most simple model 167 the equilibrium headspace concentration (Cg) is directly proportional to the equilibrium concentration on the 168 polymer surface (CA). In this case a partitioning coefficient K can be derived by the ratio between C g and CA. If 169 sorption isotherms are nonlinear, partitioning coefficients depend on the initial concentration (C g, CA). Langmuir 170 sorption isotherm are applicable in the case of a logarithmic decrease of the adsorption enthalpy with increasing 171 sorption on the polymer surface. The Langmuir model describes adsorption on a surface where the monolayer 172 coverage represents the maximum adsorbed concentration on the surface CA,max as; 173 C A,t eq 174 Where KL the Langmuir sorption coefficient K L C A,max C g ,t eq 1 K L C g ,t eq 175 Cg,t=eq the gas headspace concentration after equilibrium (in mol/m³) 176 CA,t=eq the concentration of the volatiles on the surface after equilibrium (expressed in mol/m²) [1] 6 177 CA,t=max the maximum concentration of sorbed volatiles on the surface after equilibrium (in mol/m²) 178 For very low concentrations and KL.Ct=eq <<1 equation [1] predicts a linear relationship and a partitioning 179 coefficient equals K = Cg,t=eq/CA,t=eq can be defined. Assuming that during whole air sampling a linear sorption 180 model can be assumed, the PRV-method can be applied which is based on the following mass balance equation: 181 C g ,t 0 Vg C A,t eq S A C g ,t eq Vg 182 Where Cg,t=0 the initial gas headspace concentration (expressed in mol/m³) 183 Vg the gas volume (expressed in m³) 184 SA the surface area of the adsorbent (expressed in m²) [2] 185 Assuming a volume ratio factor = SA/Vg (m²/m³) and the partition coefficient K = Cg,t=eq/CA,t=eq 186 ((mol/m³)/(mol/m³)) and after dividing by Vg, equation [2] can be rewritten as: 187 C g ,t 0 C A,t eq C A,t eq K C A,t eq ( K ) 188 or 189 Taking the reciprocals of both sides, and taken into account that the area of a gas-chromatograph peak 190 (=PeakArea) is proportional to the equilibrium headspace concentration (Peak Areat=eq=fi x Cg,t=eq with fi = 191 proportional factor) equation [4] can be rewritten as (Tehrany et al 2007): 192 C A,t eq Cg ,t eq K [3] Cg ,t 0 [4] K 1 1 1 PeakAreat eq f i Cg ,t 0 f i K Cg ,t 0 [5] 193 As will be shown further in this manuscript experiments were only done in a concentration range in which a 194 linear decrease of concentration was observed in function of increased amount of introduced polymer surface. 195 Hence, it can be assumed that the partitioning coefficient K is constant in this range. Thus, equation [5] can be 196 corresponds to a linear equation of the following type: 1/PeakArea = a + b . 197 Where a = 1/(fi.Cg) and b = 1/(K.fi.Cg) and thus K = a/b. 198 Using the above equations K can be calculated from the values of a and b obtained by plotting 1/PeakArea t=eq 199 against different corresponding values (Jouquand et al 2004). [6] 7 200 3. 201 3.1. Sorption in function of contact time and Nalophan mass Results and discussion 202 Figure 1a presents the average relative headspace concentrations in the two-phase system (n=3) as a function of 203 contact time with 0.025g Nalophan for some randomly selected volatiles from different VOC classes. The closed 204 two-phase systems were simultaneously spiked with a wide range of volatiles, each at an identical initial 205 headspace concentration of 560 µg/m³. For n-heptane (aliphatic compounds), toluene (aromatic compounds), 206 limonene (terpenoids), trichloroethylene (chlorinated compounds), and ethyl acetate (oxygenated compounds), 207 the concentration compared to the initial headspace concentration proved to significantly decrease (p < 0.05) 208 over a period of 22 hours incubation at dark and ambient conditions (298.15K, 1 atm, 70% relative humidity). It 209 was chosen only to study the scalping effect at 298.15K since this is a realistic storage temperature of sampled 210 bags. It is noticeable that the degree of scalping after 22 hours differs depending on type of molecule; a recovery 211 of 91% was found for n-heptane and limonene, while only 77% recovery was measured for trichloroethylene and 212 ethylacetate. Also for the other spiked volatiles the raw average peak areas (n=3) obtained at 10 different 213 sampling times over a period of 22 hours were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. In agreement with the results 214 presented in Figure 1a scalping was also measured for the other volatiles (results not shown) with scalping 215 degrees varying between 57% and 102%. These differences in sorption behaviour are expected and can be 216 explained by unique adsorption behavior of a compound depending on electrostatic forces which are influenced 217 by specific hydrogen bonding, polarity, and van der Waal’s interactions (McGarvey and Shorten 2000; Pau 218 Balaguer et al 2012). 219 To verify whether these decreasing concentrations are not attributed to diffusive losses or chemical-physical 220 conversions (e.g. ozone reactions, photolysis) identical experiments were done on similar systems in the absence 221 of polymeric material, showing no significant decrease in headspace concentration (p>0.05). Therefore, it can be 222 assumed that during our experiments, observed effects are mainly related to sorption. 223 Figure 1b represents the relative headspace concentration of the selected volatiles in function of the introduced 224 mass of Nalophan measured after 15 hours incubation. As it was already reported earlier that the ratio of the 225 sample volume to the bag film area is an important factor influencing scalping on polymers (Beghi and Guillot 226 2008). Again for each individual volatile the initial headspace concentration was 560 µg/Nm³. Triplicate two- 227 phase systems were prepared by introducing respectively 0.000g, 0.025g, 0.050g, 0.075g and 0.100g of 228 Nalophan in 20 mL glass vials. Taking into account a surface/mass ratio of 668.9 cm²/g for the used Nalophan 229 material (experimentally determined), calculated gas/polymer volume ratios for the different two-phase 8 230 systems are respectively 80.9 m²/m³; 161.8 m²/m³; 242.8 m²/m³ and 323.7 m²/m³. Results as represented in Table 231 1 and Figure 1b indicated that the equilibrium headspace concentration for the different volatiles significantly 232 decreases with increasing amount of Nalophan mass. This trend was expected, as Ajhar et al (2010) measured 233 increasing amount of siloxane sorption on Tedlar material with higher surface-to-volume ratios. In agreement 234 with previous results, clear differences in recovery were noticed among the spiked volatiles. 235 Experimental results illustrated in Figure 1b can be explained by the Langmuir Adsorption Isotherm that 236 correlates the partitioning coefficient with the fractional coverage A as: 237 A 238 The fractional coverage A can be defined as the fraction of total surface adsorption sites that are occupied by the 239 sorbed volatiles. Equation 7 explains that at low headspace concentration C g, the fractional surface coverage is 240 proportional to Cg with a proportionality constant of K (partitioning coefficient), whereas at high headspace 241 concentrations, the surface coverage goes to unity and becomes independent of Cg (i.e. saturation of the available 242 sites). It is clear that sorption kinetics will be different depending on the degree of coverage A. This Langmuir 243 sorption behavior is also reflected in Figure 1b in which initially a significant decrease in equilibrium headspace 244 concentration with increasing amounts of Nalophan is observed. However in the case that more than 0.050 g ( = 245 161,8 m²/m³) is introduced, a different sorption behavior is observed. Since in reality values are typically 246 below 100 m²/m³ (0.5 L sampling bag (sphere) = 0.03046m² /0.0005m³ = 61), it is chosen only to use data 247 obtained from two-phase systems with the lowest values, more specific those containing 0.000g ( = 0.0), 248 0.025g ( = 80.9 m²/m³) and 0.050g ( = 161.8 m²/m³) of Nalophan. K Cg 1 K Cg [7] 249 3.2. Experimental determination of partitioning coefficient using Phase Ratio Variation approach 250 In Figure 2, the inverse peak areas (n=3) for a selection of volatiles are shown in function of varying values, 251 while other experimental conditions (25°C, 70% RH, initial headspace concentration 560 µg/m³) are maintained 252 constant. Results are shown for a selection of chlorinated compounds (tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 253 1,2-dichloropropane), aliphatic compounds (n-nonane, n-heptane, 2,4-dimethylpentane), aromatic compounds 254 (1,2,3-trimethylbenzene, o-xylene, toluene) and oxygenated compounds (4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-propanol, 255 ethyl acetate). 9 256 Figure 2 shows that within each VOC class linear correlations are observed between the equilibrium headspace 257 concentrations and the corresponding values. Similar, Table 1 represents average reciprocal peak areas (n=3) 258 for all spiked volatiles in function of value. Again, for the majority of compounds a linear regression was 259 found based on the three data points with correlations R² varying between 1,00 and 0,76. Since for the majority 260 of volatiles R² correlation above 0.95 are observed, it can be concluded that the theory of Phase Ratio Variation 261 can indeed be applied to evaluate and predict sorption behavior of individual volatiles in sampling bag materials. 262 263 Table 1 represents the calculated partition coefficients K for a wide range of volatiles, ranging from 10,73 (n- 264 undecane) to 0,14 (tetramethylbenzene). It is noteworthy that for a limited amount of volatiles (styrene, 265 tetramethylbenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, n-butanol and nonanal) experimentally determined partitioning 266 coefficients are lower than one, indicating that concentrations are increasing with higher amount of introduced 267 Nalophan. This phenomenon might be explained by impurities in the vials or on the fiber, or due to VOC 268 emission from the material into the headspace despite the flushing of the Nalophan material during the sample 269 preparation. Next, Tromelin et al. (2012) described that for some compounds the calculation of partitioning 270 coefficients using the described first order PRV model can be disappointing, in those cases the application of a 271 second-order PRV method could be an interesting alternative. 272 Based on the theory of adsorption potential, Wang et al (2012) derived a correlation between partitioning 273 coefficient, K, and the liquid molar volume, Vl, as: ln(K) = k Vl + b, where, k and b are constants for VOCs with 274 similar function groups and chemical bonds for the same material. Wang et al. (2008) reviewed how for different 275 building materials the natural logarithmic partition coefficients are linearly correlated against the molar volume 276 for various categories of VOCs with more than 0.91 fitting degree. The results obtained in this study revealed a 277 similar behavior between volatiles and polymeric material. In Figure 3 this linear correlation between ln K and 278 the molar volume is shown for aliphatic, aromatic and oxygenated compounds. 279 For the aliphatic (2,4-dimethylpentane; n-heptane, n-nonane, n-decane, n-undecane), aromatic (toluene, 280 ethylbenzene, xylenes, 2- and 3-ethyltoluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 4-ethyltoluene, 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene) 281 and oxygenated (2-propanol, ethylacetate, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, n-butylacetate) compounds linear correlations 282 were measured with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.9751 and 0.9195. In the case that linear 283 correlations can be found for specific VOC classes, it is possible to correct measurement data for the degree of 284 scalping after whole air sampling in polymeric bags. No general lineair correlations could be made for terpenes 10 285 since results were only obtained for three compounds (-pinene, -pinene, limonene). Although not presented in 286 Figure 3, a linear correlation was also found for the chlorinated compounds 1,2-dichloropropane, 287 trichloroethylene, 1,2-dichloroethene, however no general trend was observed in our measurements. 288 As confirmed by our measurements, deviations from the general correlation can be expected within each VOC 289 class. Adsorption is the result of both Van der Waals interactions, as specific proton donor-acceptor interactions. 290 The presence of certain functional groups may strongly effect the relative importance of each type of interaction 291 in the overall sorption process, causing deviations from the general sorption behavior in a certain VOC class. 292 Indeed, particular properties such as the presence of an extra double bound or substituded groups might 293 significantly affect the interaction between volatiles and polymeric surface. Next, not all compounds can easily 294 be attributed to a certain class, which is for example the case for 1,4-dichlorobenzene, being both an aromatic as 295 chlorinated compound. Due to its mixed character, no fit was found for 1,4-dichlorobenzene in both classes. The 296 same was observed in the class of chlorinated compounds in which deviating results were for measured for 297 tetrachloroethene. This might be explained by a high density of chloro-groups, possible causing shielding and 298 different intermolecular forces. Similar observations were made by Wang et al (2008) who described a poor 299 correlation between the partition coefficient of seven benzene compounds and polyurethane, with a fitting degree 300 of only 0.67. It was seen that styrene and chlorobenzene deviated from the regression line due to the presence of 301 some unique characteristics such as double bond for styrene or a chloro-group for chlorobenzene. 302 303 4. Conclusions 304 Measurements using a two-phase system containing polymer material used for whole air sampling, revealed 305 significant scalping for a wide range of volatiles. Results illustrated that scalping of volatiles on Nalophan leads 306 to significant underestimation of effective headspace concentrations. Therefore it is of great importance that the 307 degree of scalping is evaluated systematically to compensate analytical variability and biases during the 308 sampling stage. 309 A relatively easy methodology, the Phase Ratio Variation method, has been studied to quantify the degree of 310 sorption for individual volatiles in a complex gas mixture. It is shown that using the PRV approach, individual 311 partitioning coefficients could be determined. Moreover, for some important classes of volatiles a correlation 312 was illustrated between the individual partitioning coefficient, and the liquid molar volume. Depending on the 313 presence of particular functional groups deviations were observed from this general correlation. Such deviation 314 sorption behavior is the result of interactions between Van der Waals interactions and specific proton donor- 11 315 acceptor interactions. The availability of quantitative information on individual sorption behavior, enables to 316 compensate for the inevitable sorption losses during storage of loaded polymer sampling bags. 317 The advantages of a PRV approach is that based on limited measurements, and without the need of time- 318 consuming calibrations, the partitioning coefficients of individual volatiles can be quantified in a complex gas 319 mixture. As many gas sampling bags are homemade, two-phase systems having different values but identical 320 initial volatile concentrations can easily be made by enclosing additional masses of Nalophan in the sampling 321 bags prior to collecting equal gas volumes. 322 Our experiments were performed in controlled conditions, with relative humidity, temperature and light 323 intensities held constant throughout the experimental process. As it is accepted that fluctuations in temperature 324 may result in accelerated sample transformation (e.g. chemical reactivity), this is the focus of current ongoing 325 work. Next, it should also be further investigated whether the observed relationship between partitioning 326 coefficient and liquid molar volume can be generalized for specific polymer materials, or if this correlation is 327 dependent on the gas composition and concentration. Finally, it needs to be pointed that a sampling bags consist 328 of different surface materials (e.g. stainless steel) and/or contain chemical species (e.g. particulate matters, 329 reactive chemical compounds, etc.) that can both potentially influence the equilibrium headspace concentrations 330 during the sample post collection. 331 332 333 5. Acknowledgements The authors kindly acknowledge dr. Melissa Dunkle for the support of this work. 334 12 335 6. References 336 337 Ajhar M, Wens B, Stollenwerk KH, et al (2010) Suitability of Tedlar® gas sampling bags for siloxane quantification in landfill gas. Talanta 82:92–98. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.001 338 339 Alonso M, Sanchez JM (2013) Analytical challenges in breath analysis and its application to exposure monitoring. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 44:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.11.011 340 341 342 Beghi S, Guillot J-M (2008) Use of poly(ethylene terephtalate) film bag to sample and remove humidity from atmosphere containing volatile organic compounds. Journal of Chromatography A 1183:1–5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.051 343 344 Boutboul A, Giampaoli P, Feigenbaum A, Ducruet V (2002) Influence of the nature and treatment of starch on aroma retention. Carbohydrate Polymers 47:73–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00160-6 345 346 347 Del Pulgar JS, Carrapiso AI, Reina R, et al (2013) Effect of IGF-II genotype and pig rearing system on the final characteristics of dry-cured Iberian hams. Meat Science 95:586–592. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.044 348 349 Dewulf J, Langenhove H Van, Everaert P (1999) Determination of Henry’ s law coefficients by combination of the equilibrium partitioning in closed systems and solid-phase microextraction techniques. 830:353–363. 350 351 352 Groves WA, Zellers ET (1996) Investigation of Organic Vapor Losses to Condensed Water Vapor in Tedlar® Bags Used for Exhaled-Breath Sampling. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 57:257–263. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014981 353 354 Hansen MJ, Adamsen APS, Feilberg A, Jonassen KEN (2011) Stability of Odorants from Pig Production in Sampling Bags for Olfactometry. 1096–1102. 355 356 Harreveld A (2003) Odor concentration decay and stability in gas sampling bags. Journal of the Air & Waste Management. 357 358 359 Helmroth E, Rijk R, Dekker M, Jongen W (2002) Predictive modelling of migration from packaging materials into food products for regulatory purposes. Trends in Food Science & Technology 13:102–109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00031-6 360 361 362 Heynderickx PM, Huffel K Van, Dewulf J, Langenhove H Van (2013) Application of similarity coefficients to SIFT-MS data for livestock emission characterization. Biosystems Engineering 114:44–54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.10.004 363 364 365 Jouquand C, Ducruet V, Giampaoli P (2004) Partition coefficients of aroma compounds in polysaccharide solutions by the phase ratio variation method. Food Chemistry 85:467–474. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.023 366 367 368 Kim Y-H, Kim K-H (2013) Extent of Sample Loss on the Sampling Device and the Resulting Experimental Biases When Collecting Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs) in Air Using Sorbent Tubes. Analytical Chemistry 85:7818–7825. doi: 10.1021/ac401385m 369 370 Laor Y, Ozer Y, Ravid U, et al (2010) Methodological Aspects of Sample Collection for Dynamic Olfactometry. Chemical Engineering Transactions. doi: 10.3303/CET1023010 371 372 373 Limam M, Tighzert L, Fricoteaux F, Bureau G (2005) Sorption of organic solvents by packaging materials: polyethylene terephthalate and TOPAS®. Polymer Testing 24:395–402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.09.004 13 374 375 McGarvey LJ, Shorten C V (2000) The Effects of Adsorption on the Reusability of Tedlar® Air Sampling Bags. AIHAJ - American Industrial Hygiene Association 61:375–380. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984546 376 377 378 Mentana A, Pati S, La Notte E, Del Nobile MA (2009) Chemical changes in Apulia table wines as affected by plastic packages. LWT Food Science and Technology 42:1360–1366. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.03.022 379 380 Mochalski P, King J, Unterkofler K, Amann A (2013) Stability of selected volatile breath constituents in Tedlar{,} Kynar and Flexfilm sampling bags. Analyst 138:1405–1418. doi: 10.1039/C2AN36193K 381 382 383 Mochalski P, Wzorek B, Śliwka I, Amann A (2009) Suitability of different polymer bags for storage of volatile sulphur compounds relevant to breath analysis. Journal of Chromatography B 877:189–196. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.12.003 384 385 Nielsen T, Jägerstad M (1994) Flavour scalping by food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology 5:353–356. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(94)90212-7 386 387 388 Pati S, Mentana A, La Notte E, Del Nobile MA (2010) Biodegradable poly-lactic acid package for the storage of carbonic maceration wine. LWT - Food Science and Technology 43:1573–1579. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.06.025 389 390 391 Pau Balaguer M, Gavara R, Hernández-Muñoz P (2012) Food aroma mass transport properties in renewable hydrophilic polymers. Food Chemistry 130:814–820. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.052 392 393 Sironi S, Eusebio L, Capelli L, et al (2014) Ammonia Diffusion Phenomena through Nalophan TM Bags Used for Olfactometric Analyses. 949–961. 394 395 Tehrany EA, Fournier F (2006) Simple method to calculate partition coefficient of migrant in food simulant / polymer system. 77:135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.055 396 397 Tehrany EA, Mouawad C (2007) Food Chemistry Determination of partition coefficient of migrants in food simulants by the PRV method. 105:1571–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.075 398 399 400 Tehrany EA, Mouawad C, Desobry S (2007) Determination of partition coefficient of migrants in food simulants by the PRV method. Food Chemistry 105:1571–1577. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.075 401 402 403 Tromelin A, Ayed C, Lubbers S, Pagès-Hélary S, Androit I, Guichard E (2012) Proposed alternative phase ration variation method for the calculation of liquid-vapour partition coefficients of volatiles. Journal of Chromatography A 1263:158-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.039 404 405 406 Wang X, Zhang Y, Xiong J (2008) Correlation between the solid/air partition coefficient and liquid molar volume for VOCs in building materials. Atmospheric Environment 42:7768–7774. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.030 407 408 409 Wang Z-W, Wang P-L, Hu C-Y (2012) Investigation in Influence of Types of Polypropylene Material on Diffusion by Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Packaging Technology and Science 25:329–339. doi: 10.1002/pts.983 410 411 412 413 14 414 7. 415 Fig. 1 Relative average headspace concentration (n=3) in function of (a) incubation time 416 after introduction of 0.025g Nalophan polymeric material in 20 mL vial (darkness, T = 25°C; 417 relative humidity = 70%) and (b) introduced mass of Nalophan in 20 mL vial (darkness, 418 T=25°C, RH = 70%) measured after 15 hours of incubation (samples analysed in triplicates, 419 RSD <5%) Figures and Tables Relative headspace concentration (%) 120 100 80 n-heptane Toluene 60 Limonene 40 20 0 0 420 5 10 15 20 Incubation time (hours) 8. a Relative headspace concentration (a.u.) 120 100 80 n-heptane Toluene 60 Limonene 40 Trichloroethhylene Ethyl acetate 20 0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 mass Nalophan added in 20mL vial (g) 421 422 b 15 423 Fig. 2 Inverse average peak area values (n=3) in function of volume ratio factor (darkness, T = 424 25°C; relative humidity = 70%, incubation time=48 hours) 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 16 441 Fig. 3 Natural logarithmic partition coefficient on Nalophan in relation the molar volume 442 (darkness, T = 25°C; relative humidity = 70%) 443 3 2.5 R² = 0.9329 2 ln K (-) 1.5 R² = 0.9751 aliphatic compounds 1 aromatic compounds 0.5 Oxygenated compounds R² = 0.9195 0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 -0.5 -1 Molar volume (ml/mol) 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 17 459 Table 1. Average repriprocal peak area values in function of volume ratio factor . Intercept, 460 rico and correlation R² after linear regression is represented, which was used to determine 461 individual partitioning coefficients K for each volatile (T = 25°C; relative humidity = 70%, 462 incubation time=48 hours) Molar volume (mL/mol) =0 = 80,9 = 161,9 rico (a.u.) Intercept (a.u.) R² K lnK 2,4-dimethylpentane 148,9 9,071E-06 1,017E-05 1,137E-05 1,422E-06 9,053E-06 1,00 6,36 1,85 n-heptane 146,5 4,167E-06 4,512E-06 5,184E-06 6,287E-07 4,112E-06 0,97 6,54 1,88 iso-octane 162,5 1,666E-06 1,435E-06 1,980E-06 1,940E-07 1,537E-06 0,33 7,92 2,07 n-nonane 178,6 5,535E-07 5,550E-07 6,460E-07 5,714E-08 5,386E-07 0,76 9,43 2,24 n-decane 194,9 2,461E-07 2,529E-07 2,845E-07 2,371E-08 2,420E-07 0,88 10,21 2,32 n-undecane 211,2 1,464E-07 1,489E-07 1,680E-07 1,338E-08 1,436E-07 0,84 10,73 2,37 Benzene 89,2 3,767E-06 4,292E-06 5,860E-06 1,293E-06 3,593E-06 0,92 2,78 1,02 Toluene 106,3 1,272E-06 1,566E-06 2,161E-06 5,489E-07 1,222E-06 0,96 2,23 0,80 Ethylbenzene 122,5 4,979E-07 6,416E-07 9,118E-07 2,556E-07 4,768E-07 0,97 1,87 0,62 o-xylene 120,6 4,840E-07 6,442E-07 8,695E-07 2,382E-07 4,731E-07 0,99 1,99 0,69 m-xylene 123,4 4,673E-07 6,476E-07 8,590E-07 2,420E-07 4,621E-07 1,00 1,91 0,65 4,766E-07 1,039E-06 1,911E-06 8,863E-07 4,249E-07 0,98 0,48 -0,74 Compound Aliphatic Compounds Aromatic Compounds Styrene p-xylene 123,4 3,933E-07 5,173E-07 7,320E-07 2,092E-07 3,782E-07 0,98 1,81 0,59 3-ethyltoluene 135,5 1,986E-07 2,575E-07 4,000E-07 1,244E-07 1,847E-07 0,95 1,48 0,39 2-ethyltoluene 135,5 2,164E-07 2,935E-07 4,490E-07 1,436E-07 2,034E-07 0,96 1,42 0,35 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 136,6 1,943E-07 2,481E-07 3,891E-07 1,204E-07 1,798E-07 0,94 1,49 0,40 1,751E-07 2,215E-07 2,992E-07 7,667E-08 1,699E-07 0,98 2,22 0,80 1,726E-07 2,599E-07 3,749E-07 1,250E-07 1,680E-07 0,99 1,34 0,30 1,402E-07 2,051E-07 3,239E-07 1,135E-07 1,312E-07 0,97 1,16 0,15 7,449E-08 1,200E-07 1,905E-07 7,167E-08 7,032E-08 0,98 0,98 -0,02 1,013E-05 1,295E-05 1,457E-05 2,745E-06 1,033E-05 0,98 3,76 1,33 4-ethyltoluene 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 1,2,4,5tetramethylbenzene 136,6 154,6 Chlorinated Compounds Chloroform 1,2-dichloroethane 79,2 1,852E-05 2,599E-05 4,024E-05 1,342E-05 1,740E-05 0,97 1,30 0,26 1,2-dichloropropane 97,4 6,234E-06 6,869E-06 9,138E-06 1,794E-06 5,962E-06 0,90 3,32 1,20 Trichloroethylene 90,0 4,294E-06 5,473E-06 8,129E-06 2,369E-06 4,048E-06 0,95 1,71 0,54 Tetrachloroethene 102,4 9,998E-07 1,362E-06 1,755E-06 4,667E-07 9,945E-07 1,00 2,13 0,76 2,194E-07 8,214E-07 1,887E-06 1,030E-06 1,422E-07 0,97 0,14 -1,98 1,4-dichlorobenzene Oxygenated Compounds Acetone 73,4 4,801E-06 5,798E-06 6,787E-06 1,227E-06 4,802E-06 1,00 3,91 1,36 2-propanol 76,5 1,703E-05 2,264E-05 2,469E-05 4,732E-06 1,762E-05 0,93 3,72 1,31 Ethyl acetate 98,2 n-butanol 4-methyl-2-pentanone 124,9 5,920E-06 7,603E-06 9,004E-06 1,905E-06 4,296E-06 7,882E-06 1,665E-05 7,630E-06 1,847E-06 2,338E-06 3,143E-06 8,003E-07 5,967E-06 3,433E-06 1,795E-06 1,00 0,94 0,98 3,13 1,14 0,45 -0,80 2,24 0,81 18 n-butylacetate 132,0 1,273E-06 1,640E-06 2,315E-06 6,440E-07 1,222E-06 0,97 1,90 0,64 Nonanal 172,0 2,080E-07 2,799E-07 5,154E-07 1,899E-07 1,807E-07 0,91 0,95 -0,05 (1S)-(-)-alpha-pinene 158,8 2,605E-07 2,613E-07 3,231E-07 3,872E-08 2,503E-07 0,76 6,46 1,87 beta-pinene 158,8 2,240E-07 2,275E-07 2,670E-07 2,653E-08 2,180E-07 0,81 8,22 2,11 (R)-(+)-Limonene 162,0 1,543E-07 1,748E-07 2,157E-07 3,792E-08 1,509E-07 0,96 3,98 1,38 Terpenes 463 464 19