Legal Philosophers Slideshow Presentation Task: TASK 1- Research one of the assigned philosophers using textbooks and the internet. Use the information to assemble and present a 5 – 10 minute PowerPoint or Prezi slideshow for your classmates. These presentations will form the basis of your notes for this segment of the course. TASK 2- Research the SAME assigned philosopher using your textbooks and the internet to write a 1 – 2 page report. Your report should include the following: 1) A title page (in APA format) 2) An intro paragraph featuring background information & general description of theory 3) Comparison of theory against another theorist of your choice. 4) Explanation of what you learned that you liked about your theorist 5) Explanation of aspects of theory that you did not like about your theorist 6) Application of theory to a current issue. (Information should be cited in APA format) 7) References page (APA Format) Legal Theorists Socrates Plato Aristotle Cicero Hugo Grotius David Hume Immanuel Kant Jean Jacques Rousseau St. Thomas Aquinas Thomas Hobbes Benjamin Franklin John Locke Jeremy Bentham John Austin HLA Hart John Rawls Your research you are conducting should cover the key points, including: Time period in history and background Category of philosophy: natural or positive law. Explain how their philosophy fits in a particular area. A summary of this person’s views on the law (contributions, viewpoints, influence, what role should it play in society etc, who should obey laws etc). Slides should be organized and categorized appropriately (labels, headings). Applicability of this person’s thinking still to present day law or legal issue. For instance, show how the theorists view would apply to a current law in Canadian society. Your presentation must have between 5 to 10 slides. You should include a fill in the blank handout for your classmates to complete as you complete your slideshow. You should include creative illustrations or images in your presentation. You are also responsible for putting this information in your own words (i.e. you CANNOT cut and paste from the internet – this is plagiarism) and organizing your slideshow to educate your classmates. Information should be edited down into key point form (well edited and point form). Each group member should alternate slides when presenting information. Timeline: Presentations take place on _______________________ You have 2 classes to research and begin assembling your presentation. Computers with internet access are available. You are responsible for uploading your presentation and one page report to the teacher on the day the assignment is due (Either by email or by USB submission) I should have your handout by this date also. Overall Expectations Heritage 1: explain the historical and philosophical origins of law and their connection and relevance to contemporary society. Heritage 2: evaluate different concepts, principles, philosophies, and theories of law. Heritage 3: describe the relationship between law and societal values. Heritage 4: assess the influence of individual & collective action on the evolution of law. Methods 1: use appropriate research methods to gather, organize, evaluate, and synthesize information. Methods 2: apply the steps in the process of legal interpretation and analysis. Methods 3: explain, discuss, and interpret legal issues using a variety of formats and forms of communication. REPORT RUBRIC Total value: 30 marks in the report task category. Your report will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Level 1 Content (K) Analysis (T) Mechanics (C) Comparisons (A) Student does not have grasp of information; students cannot answer questions about subject. Limited insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. Students’ report had significant spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. Ability to compare theorist with limited ability Level 2 Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Some insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. The report had some spelling and grammatical errors. Ability to compare theorist with moderate ability Level 3 Level 4 /5 Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate. Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) with explanations and elaboration. Considerable insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. The report shows considerable grammatical, punctuation and spelling accuracy. Ability to compare theorist with considerable ability High degree of insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. The report shows a high degree of grammatical, punctuation and spelling accuracy. Ability to compare theorist with a high degree of ability /10 TOTAL /30 /5 /10 PRESENTATION RUBRIC Total value: 70 marks in the performance task category. Your slide presentation will be evaluated on the following criteria: Level 1 (50 – 59%) Organization (K) Content (K) Analysis (T) Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. Student does not have grasp of information; students cannot answer questions about subject. Limited insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. Level 2 (60 – 69%) Level 3 (70 – 79%) Level 4 (80 – 89%) Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. /10 Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate. Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) with explanations and elaboration. /10 High degree of insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. /15 Presentation shows a high degree of grammatical, punctuation and spelling accuracy. /5 Some insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. Considerable insight regarding the usefulness of theorist views today. Presentation shows considerable grammatical, punctuation and spelling accuracy. Mechanics (C) Students’ presentation had significant spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. Presentation had some spelling and grammatical errors. Delivery (C) Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. Student reads directly off slide and does not seek to explain. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Student reads directly off slide and does not seek to explain. Students’ voice is clear. Students pronounce most words correctly. Student does not rely on side and seeks to explain. Student used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms. Student engages class with presentation skill. Strong eye contact and high ability to explain information /10 Student used no visuals. Student occasionally used visuals that rarely support text and presentation. Visuals related to text and presentation. Student used visuals to reinforce screen text and presentation. /20 Technology (A) Knowledge /20 Thinking /15 Communication /15 Application TOTAL /20 /70