Humanities and Social Sciences Developing Discipline-Specific Learning Outcomes from the Graduate Attributes Developing a coherent and justifiable Discipline-Specific Learning Outcomes statement for a major is a critical aspect of the broad process of embedding Graduate Attributes in the curriculum. The process uses the learning outcomes of the major (DSLOs) as the organising framework for the constituent courses, rather than the aggregation of individually conceived and constructed courses that constitute a major. This gives greater coherence to the student learning experience and is a defensible and transparent expression of the curriculum. The approach is to use the Indicators as a scaffold to generate rich statements which describe the student outcomes of the major. These statements are then the basis for the development of courses within the major, so that by undertaking the constituent courses students achieve the stated outcomes of the major. The Discipline Specific Learning Outcomes statements incorporate: relevant Australian Standards University priorities perspectives from stakeholders appropriate aspects of international discipline/major outcomes statements other useful resources such as statements from comparable universities AQF Learning Outcomes U of A Graduate Attributes Generic Indicators Australian Standards Discipline Specific Learning Outcomes stakeholder perspectives International statements other relevant resources EU SQF Social Science EU SQF Humanities Developing Discipline-Specific Learning Outcomes March 2014 University priorities Page 1 Australian Standards Australian Discipline Standards The Office of Learning and Teaching (OLT) formerly the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) has commissioned a number of discipline Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs). Where the TLOs exist for a discipline, these must be reflected in the curriculum. Currently available TLOs relevant to the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences include: History Geography Learning and Teaching Academic Standards: Geography and History Sociology Creative and Performing Arts (creative writing, music) Other Standards Where awards are accredited or linked to professional registration of graduates, the curriculum must comply with these requirements. University Priorities In addition to Graduate Attributes, the University has identified a number of other priorities for inclusion in the curriculum. These include: emphasis on research including Small Group Discovery Experiences research skills capstone courses systematic teaching of academic literacies inclusion of e-Experience Stakeholder Perspectives Stakeholder consultation is an important process for ensuring that university awards remain relevant to external bodies, key groups and individuals who have a vested interest in characteristics of graduates. Stakeholders vary across the disciplines but may include: other schools and faculties of the University which have an interest in your major academics from other universities with appropriate discipline expertise professional associations students graduates employers community-based groups funding bodies Views of these groups may vary considerably and even be in conflict because they reflect highly specific and sometimes unique interests. Determining whether ideas are incorporated into the statement requires judgment which is defensible in the context of other contributions. Developing Discipline-Specific Learning Outcomes March 2014 Page 2 International Discipline/Major Outcomes Statements A number of countries around the world are engaged in quality assurance processes similar to those occurring in Australia. These include subject statements equivalent to the Australian Threshold Learning Outcomes. Where the Australian TLOs do not exist, international statements can be a particularly useful resource for developing the DSLOs. They also provide international benchmarks or comparisons and can be used as an indicator of quality. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education in the UK (QAA) has developed Subject Benchmark Statements which can be found under honours degrees, the equivalent to Australian undergraduate programs. The European Quality Framework (EQF) has developed statements under its Tuning Process. Quality agencies in other countries have also developed benchmarking statements which also often using the term Tuning (ie Tuning USA, Tuning Latin America, Tuning Canada, Tuning Africa, Tuning Russia, etc.) Other Relevant Resources Many other resources are available to support development of majors, especially in devising assessment and in supporting assessment through learning and teaching. A particularly valuable resource is the Higher Education Academy in the UK which has many discipline-based resources on line. The Australian Government Office of Learning and Teaching (OLT) (formerly the Australian Learning and Teaching Council and the Carrick Institute) have many projects and resources specific to disciplines. Developing Discipline-Specific Learning Outcomes March 2014 Page 3