Faculty of Education and Health Interview Form for Secondary Education Programmes Applicants Name……………….…………………………………………………………… ……………… Programme……School Direct (Salaried/NonSalaried)*………………………….………. Subject………………………………………….……………………………… ………………………………. ID Number…………………………… Please delete as appropriate* English and Mathematics applicant has indicated on the GTTR/UCAS form that they have achieved a standard equivalent to a grade C in the GCSE examination in English and Mathematics. Circle as appropriate Degree Requirement in the case of postgraduate courses the applicant should hold a degree of a United Kingdom higher education institution or equivalent qualification. References Seen Accept Seen See conditions Please tick if seen Academic Other Accept with Conditions Conditions: please tick as appropriate: comments Reject Please specify any other conditions Attend enhancement course Attend booster course Evidence of GCSE Maths equivalent Evidence of GCSE English equivalent Recommendations Spend( ) days in a secondary school department Provide evidence of research into: Subject Specific NC Please specify any other recommendations Very Good enthusiastically active beyond degree courses comprehensive depth, breadth across subject articulates transferable skills with confidence Subject Knowledge Subject Application Awareness of Schools and Curriculum Good conveys own subject interests convincingly substantial and secure breadth of knowledge understands how to research topics Reservations rehearses what has been learnt in degree aware of limited breadth of knowledge and need to address this demonstrates how to make knowledge accessible to pupils across age/ability range using interactive approaches offers perceptive analysis of issues grounded in research and experience demonstrates synthesis of idealism and realism understands issues involved in making knowledge accessible and suggests some appropriate strategies appropriate research and experience has been carried out; informed understanding is evident has imagined herself/himself in the teacher’s role understands that different versions of the subject exist in universities and schools and can articulate own position Weak limited accuracy and breadth misconceptions or vagueness does not fully understand importance of subject knowledge understands pupils will need to be engaged, and with prompting, makes some practical suggestions limited research and experience, but offers genuine engagement with issues perceptions largely based on own school experience has narrow attitude towards the subject, but recognises need to develop conceptual understanding blinkered attitude to subject including some values or positions inappropriate to teaching thinks own interest in material means pupils should be interested sees teacher as the receptacle of knowledge very limited research and experience dependent on media version of what happens in schools Attitude to Subject voices coherent philosophy of subject teaching compatible with the PGCE programme Reasons for Teaching pupil learning, empowerment, and enjoyment, subject value immediate rapport with audience articulate and persuasive very dynamic original and critical perspective synthesis of analysis of material and own experience working with pupils enthusiasms for pupils and subject ‘variety of the work’ ‘passing on subject’ no mention of pupils no sense of value of subject relates to audience and is responsive interesting and dynamic limited awareness of audience matter of fact or dull poor eye contact with interviewer hesitant with poor body language well organised, making several points well coherent discussion of material and ideas from own experience is able to reflect critically on experience and shows evidence of metacognition ‘manages change’ ‘makes a difference’ evidence of being able to show respect for a wide range of others ‘assimilation’ disconnected points in a list few points overlaboured misconceptions or limited personal perspective recommended action is able to respond to challenge and articulates some necessary attributes ‘responsive’ has supported others but out of self-interest, e.g. for their CV, ‘family members’ some empathy demonstrated ‘recognition’, ’awareness’ with prompting can suggest personal organisational strategies ‘coping’ is aware of different leadership styles cannot easily exemplify from own experience ‘guiding’ Presentation/ Communication Skills Written Communication and Literacy Resilience and adaptability Support and respect well-developed ability to stay composed and to adapt to dealing with difficult situations proactive in responding to the needs of others able to accommodate other views ‘negotiation’ Self-organisation and proficiency Leadership and passion well-developed ability to cope with high workload and competing priorities ‘capable’ can articulate how they have used different leadership styles and the impact of these on others ‘inspiring’ can provide examples of how they have managed their time and resources effectively ‘managing’ awareness of the range of leadership approaches available and when each style is appropriate can provide examples from own experience ‘motivating’ Interviewer (1)…………………………………… Interview ……………………….. short descriptive response to material lack of understanding or personal perspective action needed finds it hard to illustrate resilience or does not easily respond to challenge ‘frustration’ appears intolerant of others and/or holds positions inappropriate to teaching ‘conflict’ limited experience and/or limited range of coping strategies ‘drowning’ has narrow attitude to leadership e.g. ‘directing’ ……………………………… Date of Interviewer (2) ………………………………….. Interview ……………………….. ……………………………… Date of (Please print name and sign) Please remember that this document is available, on request, to the candidate (tick box as appropriate)