July 2012
PROJECT REVIEW FORM CRITERIA (Process B)
PROJECT DOCUMENTS CRITERIA…
TIME & TRAFFIC SUBMITTAL &
ALL SPECIAL PROVISIONS SUBMITTAL
COOP. AGR. TIMELY SUBMITTAL
COOP. AGR. COMPLETE SUBMITTAL
POOR
TRANSITIONAL
Less Than 9 wks
(12 wks PS&E/Complex)
N/A
EXCEPTIONAL
Prior to 9
(Prior to 12)
Less than 11 weeks
N/A
Prior to 11 weeks
These are based on COMPLETE submittals from the original letting date.
Incomplete
maint not determined,
no info. beyond
submittal package,
major changes
after submittal
Enough info.
to get started
SEQ not complete
missing minor info
cost justification
can’t be determined
QM/QC COMPLETENESS
No final form
is signed or exists
N/A
REASON FOR LETTING DATE MOVE
A District reason
N/A
PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA…
POOR
Submittal + SEQ+
colored layout + no
pertinent plan sheets,
maint. determination
The final form is
completely signed
Reason outside the
Districts control.
=========================================================================================
TRANSITIONAL
EXCEPTIONAL
PAY ITEMS & SPEC BOOK
COMPLIANCE
Over 6%
3-6% Corr.
0-2 % Corr.
Conformance to pay items as shown in the Spec. Book and on TRNS*PORT
list. The Specifications and Basis of Payment are complied with.
TYPICAL SECTIONS
Over 5
1-5 Corr.
No Corr.
Are they complete and of sufficient detail to accomplish the intent of the
plan?
PLAN DETAILS
Over 5%
1-5% Corr.
No Corr.
Do the details tell enough, are complete and relevant to the plan?
CONFORMS TO DESIGN
STANDARDS
Over 4
2-4 Corr
0-1 Corr.
Conformance with Standard Plans and Plates, Alignment, Profiles, Slopes,
Taper lengths, Br. Width, Clear Zones, Sight Distances.
TABULATIONS
Over 5%
3-5% Corr.
0-2% Corr.
Is there an orderly arrangement of Tables of items and are Tabulations
provided for items difficult to total.
PLAN CROSS REFERENCE
Over 1
1 Corr.
No Corr.
Do the Plans show sheet Reference from Estimate to Tabulations?
PLAN & PROFILE COMPOSITION
Over 2
1-2 Corr.
No Corr.
Composite of all Trunk Highway features complete to make accurate
pictorial views.
PLAN REVISIONS
Over 3
1-3 Corr.
No Corr.
How many times do revised sheets come in once the original has been
submitted for review.
PLAN RATING
Composite of all ratings
Composite of all plan ratings and the overall acceptability of the Plan .
Based on above questions and subjective scrutiny.
DISTRICT ADDENDUMS
Over 1
1 Addendum
No Addendum
How many Addendums are written before letting due to Design related
revisions (i.e. not things out of their control).
=======================================================================================
PLAN RATING OVERALL
Composite of all plan ratings and the overall acceptability of the Plan
and addendums. Based on above questions and subjective scrutiny. If
the addendum is….
 an E then the plan rating stays the same
 a T and only one district addendum then plan rating stays the same, if it is >1 district
addendum then it cannot be and E, otherwise stays the same.
 a P then the plan rating drops a level, if already a P then stays a P.
PROJECT RATING OVERALL
Composite of all ratings and the overall acceptability of the Plan and
Documents. Based on above questions and subjective scrutiny.
The following Point values are given for the PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
items and PLAN RATING OVERALL…
o E = 15
o T = 10
o P=5
The averages of these will be taken and added to the PLAN RATING
OVERALL value. This sum will be divided by two to get the average (this
makes the plan rating a higher value than the project documentation).
This gives a value for the PROJECT RATING OVERALL.
The following criteria apply for the values of the PROJECT RATING
OVERALL.
o P ≥ 7.5
o T = 7.6 – 12.5
o E ≥ 12.6