Rapid near term emissions reductions renewable energy_Final KS

advertisement
Rapid Near-Term Emissions Reductions
Renewable Energy
José Goldemberg
Renata Grisoli
University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil
May, 2014
One of the strategies to reduce the amount of GHGs resulting from energy
production is to increase the share of renewable energy sources in the world’s energy
mix.
Renewable energy sources today represent approximately 19.04% of the world’s
final energy consumption. The remaining 80.96% originate in fossil fuels and nuclear
energy (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The world’s final energy consumption in 2011 (Total: 338 EJ)
Source: based on Appendix I
However, almost one half of the renewable energy is “traditional biomass”
(9.29%) used mainly for cooking in very inefficient and primitive cookstoves
generating health problems related to the soot produced in inefficient burning. Solving
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
these problems, either improving cooking stoves or using better fuels, which – will lead
to modernizing cooking – is an important challenge which could make biomass
available for better uses.
The remaining (4.92%) main contribution comes from “modern biomass” (bio
heat, bio power, ethanol and biodiesel). Hydropower represents 3.74%, the remaining
1.08% coming from “new” renewable (Wind, Solar photovoltaic- PV, Concentrated
solar thermal power - CSP, Ocean, Solar thermal and Geothermal).
Table I. Non fossil final energy demand*
Total world's final
renewable energy
consumption (EJ)
Renewable energy share of
global final energy consumption
9.29%
Fraction of the world’s energy
demand
1. Traditional biomass
31.40
2. Modern biomass
2.1. bioheat
2.2. bio power
2.3. ethanol
2.4. biodiesel
16.60
12.70
1.17
1.97
0.79
4.92%
3. Hydropower
4. New Renewables
4.1.Wind power
4.2.Solar thermal
Hot water
CSP
4.3.Geothermal
Heat
power
4.4.PV
12.65
3.65
1.88
0.75
0.74
0.1
0.74
0.49
0.25
0.28
3.74%
5. Nuclear
9.56
2.83%
Total
73.90
21.9%
1.08%
*The world’s total final energy demand is 338EJ (REN21, 2013).
Source: based on Appendix I
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
Despite their small contribution, the annual growth of renewables is very impressive
and they could certainly play a very significant role in the next few decades.
Figure 2 shows the growth of all renewable energy source hydro, modern
biomass, and “new” renewables in the period 2008-2011.
Figure 2. Renewable energy sources
35
30
25
New Renewables (18%*)
EJ
20
Modern biomass (22%*)
15
Hydropower (2%*)
10
Total (12%*)
5
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
YEAR
(*) Average annual growth rates of renewable energy (2008-2011)
Source: based on Appendix I
Figure 3 shows the evolution of each of the main “new” renewables.
Figure 3. Contribution of “new” renewable energy sources and ethanol and
biodiesel (EJ) (2008-2011)
2.5
2
Wind (19%*)
PV (51%*)
1.5
EJ
Solar heat (21%*)
Geothermal (12%*)
1
Ethanol (6%*)
0.5
Biodiesel (9%*)
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
YEAR
(*) Average annual growth rates of renewable energy (2008-2011)
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
Source: based on Appendix I
These sources of energy are not entirely neutral regarding GHG emissions since
fossil fuels are used in some parts of their life cycle. However their emissions per EJ are
usually less than 10% of emissions from fossil fuels (IPCC, 2011).
Investments in renewable energies have grown considerably in recent years
(Figure 4a) particularly in the area of electricity generation as shown in Figure 4b.
Figure 4. Global new investment in renewable energy by technology, developed
and developing countries, 2012
(a)
(b)
Source: REN21 (2013)
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
The obvious strategy to near-term emissions reductions is therefore to increase
the contribution of biomass and new renewable energy sources. Although they represent
only approximately 6% of the present world’s energy supply their contribution is
growing at rate of 9% per year more rapidly than fossil fuels consumption (at
approximately 2% per year) which still represents the main source of energy used
presently.
However despite the obvious advantages from being, in principle, non-polluting
and inexhaustible – in clear contrast to fossil fuels use – some renewables energies face
serious problems in expanding their share due to cost considerations. Most of
technologies involved were established in the last century but they were noncompetitive until recently, except for hydroelectricity.
What we learned in the last few decades, however is that there are steep
“learning curves” for most renewables: each time production doubles the cost is reduced
by approximately 20%. There is a clear evidence for that behavior for PV electricity,
biofuel production and wind.
Figures 5. Learning curves for PV (a) and ethanol (b)
(a)
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
(b)
Source: (a) BNEF (2012); (b) GOLDEMBERG et al. (2004) updated
What this means is that in the initial stages of the introduction of such
technologies regulatory and financial instruments are needed to nudge the growth of
energy system in the right direction.
The key to the introduction and success in the use of renewables is mass
production. This is why the early attempts of demonstration projects of wind and PV in
many developing countries didn’t lead to significant cost reductions.
Great strides in the direction of reducing costs was only achieved when
industrialized countries (Germany, Denmark, Spain, US the UK and others) adopted
energy policies that opened the way for the increased use of renewables.
By early 2013, policy targets for the increased deployment of renewable energy
have been identified in at least 138 countries, worldwide, including all 27 European
Union member states (REN21, 2013). Targets exist for shares of total primary or final
energy supply, specific installed capacities of various technologies, or total amounts of
energy production from renewables, including heat. Targets also exist for biofuels in
many countries.
As an example the European Union aims to have 20% of its gross final
consumption of energy and a 10% of each member state’s transport energy come from
renewable sources by 2020 (EC, 2009).
The main policy instruments to implement these policies are: feed-in tariffs
(FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) for power generation; and blending
mandates for the transport sector.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
FEED-IN TARIFFS (FIT) is a policy mechanism that (a) sets a fixed, guaranteed
price over a stated fixed-term period when renewable power can be sold and fed into the
electricity network, and (b) usually guarantees grid access to renewable electricity
generators. Some policies provide a fixed tariff whereas others provide fixed premium
payments that are added to wholesale market- or cost-related tariffs. Other variations
exist, and feed-in tariffs for heat are evolving.
As of early 2013, feed-in tariff policies had been enacted in 71 countries and 28
states/provinces (REN21, 2013).
A RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS (RPS) is a measure requiring
that a minimum percentage of total electricity or heat sold, or generation capacity
installed, be provided using renewable energy sources. Obligated utilities are required to
ensure that the target is met; if it is not, a fine is usually levied.
In early 2013, RPS or “quotas” are in place in 22 countries and 54
states/provinces in United States, Canada and India (REN21, 2013).
The adoption of Renewable Portfolio Standards seems to work better when the
number of existing actors involved is small (such as electricity companies or car
manufacturers). The advantage of the feed in approach (FIT) is that it can attract a large
number of new small investors once adequate prices and contract terms are in place. It
works better with small units and is quite adequate for decentralized systems such as
wind and PV.
Mainly for the transport sector BLENDING MANDATES/OBLIGATION
require designated parties (consumers, suppliers, generators) to meet a minimum, and
often gradually increasing, target for renewable energy, such as a percentage of total
supply or a stated amount of capacity. Costs are generally borne by consumers.
Mandates can also include renewable portfolio standards (RPS); building codes or
obligations that require the installation of renewable heat or power technologies (often
in combination with energy efficiency investments); renewable heat purchase
requirements; and finally requirements for blending biofuels into transport fuel.
In early 2013, biofuels blending mandates have been identified in 27 countries at
the national level and in 27 states/provinces (REN21, 2013).
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
Recommendations for short term actions
1. An analysis of Table I indicates that “biomass heat” and ethanol are the
main contributors to renewable energy (approximately 5% of the world’s
energy use) and growing rapidly. This trend should be encouraged
(including pellets). Biofuels represent today 3% of the energy used in
transportation but this share could double or triple in 10 years.
2. Hydropower is the main contributor to renewable energy consumption
after biomass (approximately 4% of the world’s energy use) and there are
many opportunities for its expansion mainly in Africa and Latin
America.
3. Of the “new renewables” wind and PV are growing very rapidly but their
contribution is still small (less than 1% of the world’s final energy
consumption).
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
REFERENCES
BNEF - Bloomberg New Energy Finance (2012). Bloomberg New Energy Finance Summit.
Available at: http://about.bnef.com/summit/content/uploads/sites/3/2013/11/ BNEF_2012-0320-ml_keynote.pdf
EC - European Commission (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources
and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/ 30/EC.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; COELHO, S. T.; NASTARI, P.; LUCON, O. Ethanol learning curve:The
Brazilian experience. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2004, Vol. 26 (/3) pp. 301-304
IPCC (2011). IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change
Mitigation. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1075 pp
REN21 – Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21th Century (2013). Renewables
2013.Global Status Report. Paris.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
Appendix I
Non fossil energy sources demand in Exajoules (EJ)
(2000-2012)
GOLDEMBERG, J.; GRISOLI, R. (2014)
Download