2013-2014 Dean’s Assessment Response to Departments – Levels of Accomplishment Department/Program: Counselor Education Date: 10-10-14 _______________________________________________________________________________________ The dean has reviewed the department’s Assessment and Closing the Loop Report for the 2013-2014 AY. The department’s assessment efforts have been evaluated using the rubric below. Our goal is to assist all departments/ programs in moving to stage 5. Deans will provide this feedback to departments by October 1, 2014. Assessment Stage 5 4 3 2 1 0 Description of Stage There is evidence that the department’s/program’s assessment project has reached Level Four and that the department has integrated on-going assessment of SLOs, reporting, closing the loop actions, dissemination of results, as sustainable processes into its standard yearly operating procedures. Results of the assessment project are reported to and reviewed by the departmental faculty (and noted in the assessment report). The faculty have recommended action(s) for improvement of their curriculum and instruction based on their assessment results. Any actions the department has taken or plans to take as a result of the current assessment results are described in the department’s Assessment and Closing the Loop Report to the school dean. The assessment projects implemented involve direct assessment – expert evaluation of actual products of student work (Brockport faculty or appropriate outside consultants); assessment data demonstrate in a specific way the degree to which each outcome under study is being achieved. Departments keep written or electronic records of assessment data and file assessment reports on time as required by the Academic Assessment System. The department has implemented a plan that will result in the assessment of all student learning outcomes within a 3.5-year cycle. 2012-2013 AY is the initial period of that cycle. The department has a written set of student learning outcomes stated in a form that can be assessed. There is a written plan for assessment of all SLOs in a three-year cycle (3.5 years for current cycle). These materials are filed (and kept up-to-date) with the department/program, and reviewed by school dean, vice provost, and Academic Assessment Committee. The department has no student learning outcomes stated in a form that can be assessed. [continue to page 2] Assessment Feedback Form Dean to Department 07 01 14 version.docx Evaluation Achieved x Not Achieved Achieved Not Achieved Achieved Not Achieved Achieved Not Achieved Achieved Not Achieved Dean’s comments on this department’s assessment project(s) in the 2013-2014 AY: 1. Meaningfulness of the assessment results reported: Focused on SLOs that are critically important to the profession and that are convincingly linked to the standards of the profession. Range of direct assessments of student performance related to SLOs and standards Careful and thoughtful strategies for looking at department level SLOs across the three programs. 2. Appropriateness of the closing the loop actions proposed: Actions are clearly and convincingly grounded in rigorous data analysis and interpretation. Actions include continued monitoring, curricular and pedagogical changes, and further investigation Raised important questions about what constitutes developmentally appropriate expectations for student performance at different points in the program. 3. Availability of resources to address action items (if requested by department): Resources used: Tremendous amount of faculty time, support of assessment office (Keith Nobles and Leigh Robinson), TK20, Brendan Post (TK20 and Blackboard), graduate students in EDC 606 Resources needed: More faculty time, more faculty in the department, additional graduate assistants, additional PEU and IT staff to support college assessment, compensation for assessment coordinators that recognizes the increased workload, continue to need the resources used in past year 4. Any general comments on this year’s assessment work: Presentation demonstrates that the department has made a strong commitment to successfully integrating meaningful, robust assessment throughout all aspects of its work. Assessment committee comprised on senior faculty members, involvement of all faculty. Engaged students in investigating assessment findings as part of research coursework, e.g., engaging graduate students in EDC 606 in researching possible causes for targeted assessment findings, with findings reported at the department’s fall scholarly conference. 5. Suggestions for improvement for next year’s assessment work: Assessment Feedback Form Dean to Department 07 01 14 version.docx NOTE: A special meeting of the dean and the school’s faculty will be scheduled to discuss the 2013-2014 assessment projects. This meeting will take place as scheduled by the dean’s office in Fall 2014. Signed: Date: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Deans will send the completed form to the department chair with a copy to the vice provost’s office for use by the Academic Assessment Committee. Assessment Feedback Form Dean to Department 07 01 14 version.docx