Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the wild `Duli

advertisement
Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the wild ‘Duli’ pear (Pyrus betulaefolia
Bunge)
*
Jia Tian1, Bin Zeng1, Mengwen Liu1, Shuping Luo2, Xiugen Li3, Jiang Li1
1
Collage of Forestry and Horticultural, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, P.R.China
2
Collage of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, P.R.China
3
Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450009,
P.R.China
E-Mails:
terrisay@163.com (J. T), zbxnd@163.com (B. Z), liumw1007@163.com (M.-W. L),
luoshuping2008@163.com (S.-P. L), lixiugen@sina.com (X.-G. L), lijiangxnd@163.com (J. L).
*Corresponding author: Jiang Li
Tel: +86-0991-8762363
Fax: +86-0991-8762363
Abstract
Wild Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge in China is threatened by excessive land reclamation and utilization. To
facilitate studies of wild P. betulaefolia Bunge biodiversity, 150 microsatellite markers were
developed by the whole-genome sequencing data of P. bretschneideri Rehd and tested in eight
individual trees from three provinces. There were 25 polymorphic SSRs with four to eight alleles. The
polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.371 to 0.864. The observed (Ho) and expected
(He) heterozygosities ranged from 0-0.750 and 0.492-0.875, respectively. These microsatellite
markers can improve strategies and conservation measures for wild P. betulaefolia Bunge diversity
hotspot.
Keywords: Wild Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge; SSR; genetic biodiversity
Wild ‘Duli’ pear (Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge) with developed root system, belonging to the Rosaceae,
Maloideae, is mainly distributed in northern China and has strong resistance. Moreover, it has well
grafting affinity with Asian pear and European pear, and is the source of good characteristics of Pyrus
plants as well as the important part of biodiversity. With the impacts of global warming, excessive
land reclamation and utilization, the genetic diversity of the wild P. betulaefolia Bunge is suffering
serious threat (Zong et al., 2013). To conserve this species, microsatellite or simple sequence repeat
(SSR) markers are required to facilitate genetic characterization.
To develop and characterize markers, 8 individuals of wild P. betulaefolia Bunge were collected in
Liaoning, Shandong and Gansu provinces, China. The genomic DNA were extracted from young
leaves using the CTAB method described by Bokszczanin (Bokszczanin and Przybyla, 2008). 150
primers were designed based on the whole-genome sequencing data of Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd
(Wu et al., 2013).
All the primer pairs were validated using the M13-tail technique by polymerase chain reactions
(PCRs), which assessd the polymorphism of the amplified products. Three primers including 5' M13tailed forward primer, reverse primer and fluorescently labeled M13 primer were synthesized in the
genotyping experiments. Fluorescently labeled M13 primers carrying four fluorescent labels (FAM,
HEX, TAMARA, and ROX) were used independently. PCR was carried out in a 10 μl volume containing
20 ng DNA, 0.4 pmol forward primer, 1.6 pmol reverse primer, 1.6 pmol fluorescently labelled M13
primers and 2×PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs) under the following conditions: 94℃ for 5
min; 25 cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 40 s; 10 cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 53°C for 45
s, an 72°C for 40 s; and a final 7 min extension at 72°C. The products of PCR were analyzed by the ABI
3730 Prism Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
144 of 150 loci showed the strong expected fragment size, while other loci failed to amplify any
product. Through the test of capillary electrophoresis, of the 144 loci, 94 showed clear, single peaks
for each allele, of which 25 were polymorphic and 69 were monomorphic.
The raw data was analyzed with GeneMarker ver. 2.6.3 (Soft Genetics, State College, PA, USA),
and the number of alleles, observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) were
calculated with GenAlEx ver. 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012). The number of alleles for these 25 SSRs
per locus ranged from four to eight alleles. Ho and He ranged from 0-0.750 and 0.492-0.875,
respectively. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of each locus was calculated with Cervus
ver. 3.0 (Kalinowski et al., 2007) and ranged from 0.371 to 0.864 (Table 1). 25 microsatellite loci
target sequences are showed as supplementary material (SM1)
The 25 polymorphic loci developed in this report can be used to facilitate estimation of genetic
diversity and population genetic structure in wild Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge, as well as to develop a
conservation strategy for this species.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Quanxin Bi for assistance in experiment. We also thank Dr. Jianfeng Mao for analyzing
Illumina sequence data, and his helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National High
Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2011AA10020604), the Pomology
Major Projects of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 201130102–1) and the Special Research
Projects of National Forestry Industry of Public Benefit (No. 201304701–1). The funders had no role
in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
Zong Y, Sun P, Niu Q F et al (2013) Distribution situation and assessment of morphological diversity of wild
Pyrus betulaefolia in Northern China. Journal of Fruit Science 30(6): 918-923.
Bokszczanin K, Przybyla, AA. (2008) New simple and efficient method of DNA isolation from pear leaves
rich in polyphenolic compounds. International Journal of Horticultural Science 12(4): 21–24.
Wu J, Wang Z W, Shi Z B et al (2013) The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome
Research 23: 396-408.
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5:genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for
teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539.
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodate
genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106.
Download