Name: __________________________________________________________ CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU Containment to Regime Change – Part 3 In 1991 at the end of the Persian Gulf War, the United States decided not to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein. The US policy became to stop Hussein from rebuilding a strong military, this policy was referred to as “containment.” There were three ways the USA attempted to stop Hussein from rebuilding his strength; military force, economic sanctions, and weapons inspections. Weapons Inspections Between 1991 and 1998 (when Iraq stopped allowing them), inspections from the United Nations would come into the country and search Iraqi facilities for weapons of mass destruction. During this time, they destroyed large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. Military Force The USA and Great Britain (and France for a time) created “no-fly” zones in Northern and Southern Iraq, where the Kurds (North) and Shi’a (South) lived. The stated reason for this policy was to protect the people from attacks by their own government. The USA, Great Britain (and France for a time) used aircraft to patrol the areas and frequently bombed Iraqi targets to enforce the no-fly zones. The USA and Great Britain also led a large bombing campaign in Iraq in 1998 aimed at Iraq’s weapons facilities. Economic Sanctions The USA convinced the United Nations to put economic sanctions on Iraq that would limit the sale of Iraqi oil around the world. These sanctions remained until May 2003. Sanctions The United Nations put sanctions on Iraq in 1990 to pressure Iraq to leave Kuwait. These sanctions stayed on even after the war in order to stop Saddam Hussein from gaining more power. The United Nations knew that Iraq had WMDs and put the sanctions on Iraq to pressure them into continuing to allow weapons inspectors to come into the country and destroy these weapons. —Rolf Ekeus, UNSCOM director (1991- 1997), February 24, 2000 interview ---------------------------------------------------------------------- These sanctions cut Iraq off from the world economy. They banned all imports (with exceptions from some medicine and food) and also banned the sale of oil, which was a really important part of the Iraqi economy. The sanctions also prevented all international flights to and from Iraq. -------------------------------------------------------------- “ There was deep concern about the Iraqi weapons capability.... Sanctions were the way to convince Iraq to cooperate with inspectors. Why should Iraq have cooperated with inspectors if there was no carrot and no stick?... Sanctions were the backing for the inspections, and they were what sustained my operation almost for the whole time.” How did sanctions affect Iraq? These economic sanctions aimed at stopping the government had huge negative effects on the Iraqi citizens. At this time, much of the infrastructure of Iraq had been destroyed by the Persian Gulf War. Without key imports, Iraq did not have the materials it needed to rebuild. Homes, schools, agriculture, the ability to produce and distribute clean water, hospitals and many other things needed for day to day life had been destroyed, and were not able to be properly fixed without imports that Iraq could not get because of the sanctions. Furthermore, prior to the Persian Gulf War, Iraq imported 2/3rds of its food, and this food shortage cause a number of health problems for Iraqi people. As a result of all these things, the Iraqi economy collapsed, unemployment went way up, and diseases spread. The structures that Iraq had to deal with these problems had disappeared and life for every day Iraqis became very difficult. Crime, smuggling, black market exchanges, and corruption all became common. As many as two million Iraqis would leave the country during this time. Saddam Hussein, the person who these sanctions were largely aimed at, grew wealthier. The crime and black market trading benefited him, and his personal wealth grew. He also used the money he gained to gain more power. Those that were loyal during this time had greater access to food, wealth and other necessities that the rest of the country was not getting. -------------------------------------------------------------- “ How ironic...that the same policy that is supposed to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction has itself become a weapon of mass destruction.” —Hasmy Agam, Malaysian ambassador to the UN, March 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eventually, the countries around Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Iran and Jordan for example, started ignoring the sanctions and traded with Iraq anyway. The USA and Great Britain insisted that the United Nations continue them, though, and so they remained. Who was responsible for the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq during the 1990s? At this time, there was a great debate about who was responsible for the problems in Iraq, Saddam Hussein or the USA and Great Britain. Those that supported the economic sanctions claimed that Hussein was responsible. He had the money to support his people, but chose to spend it on himself and his military. They argued that if Saddam Hussein would just agree to all the things the United Nations was asking of him, then the sanctions would be lifted, therefore the problems were things he alone could solve. Critics of the United States said that there was never a reason to believe that Saddam Hussein would use his wealth to help his people. They believed that harming the civilian population was not a fair way to put pressure on a dictator, and in fact the USA should have expected Saddam Hussein to react this way. Most Iraqis resented the United States and the UN and considered them at fault for the problems in Iraq. Saddam Hussein promoted this view in order to shift blame away from himself. Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. officials and United Nations weapons inspectors accused Iraq of interfering with and not complying with the weapons inspections however the weapons inspectors continued to be allowed in the country. In 1998 this relationship got worse. In 1998, Iraq came to the UN to make an agreement. If they completed complied with everything the UN weapons inspectors were asking for, would the UN stop the sanctions. On October 30th 1998, the USA turned down a UN proposal to stop the sanctions if Iraq complied completely with the weapons requirements. At this time, believing that there was no way to please the USA and end the sanctions, Iraq stopped doing anything that the weapons inspectors were requiring. In response, the USA and Great Britain launched a series of air strikes called Operation Desert Fox. The strikes were aimed at weapons facilities throughout Iraq. The president of the USA at this time was Bill Clinton, he explained that the strikes were happening as a result of Iraq not complying with the weapons inspectors and he was worried about what would happen if Saddam Hussein ended up with WMDs. “Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbords or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas, or biological weapons… Left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again… The conclusions (of the recent inspections) are stark, sobering and profoundly disturbing…. The international community gave Saddam one last chance to resume cooperation with the weapons inspectors. Saddam has failed to seize the chance. And so we had to act and act now.” President Clinton December 16th 1998 According to US officials, the air strikes were a success and hurt Saddam Hussein’s weapons programs, and his control over the country. At this time, UN weapons inspectors were forced out of the country, and US information about what Iraq was doing became very limited. The actions were received with a lot of criticism both within the USA and from abroad. Many called it an inappropriate and unnecessary use of force that ultimately would hurt the world’s attempt to disarm Saddam Hussein, and that put Iraqi civilians at risk. Weapons Inspectors would not be allowed into the USA again.