Art 10 2014 name:______________________ Grid Drawing: Charcoal Portrait 4- Above Average 3- Average 2-Satisfactory 1- Poor The artist is proficient in demonstrating tonal variations. The final piece demonstrates an expert use of a full tonal scale. The artist is able to show light, shading, and/or reflections with outstanding accuracy. The final piece is extremely detailed throughout the entire piece. The artist was able to expertly portray texture and detail in their piece. The portrait is easily recognizable and comparable to the reference used. The artist is well practiced in demonstrating tonal variations. The final piece demonstrates an above average use of a full tonal scale. The artist is able to show light, shading, and/or reflections accurately. The final piece is very detailed in most areas. The artist was able to proficiently portray texture and detail in their piece. The portrait is recognizable and comparable to the reference used. The artist demonstrated mediocre colour and tone in their piece. The final piece demonstrates an acceptable use of a full tonal scale. The artist is able to show light, shading, and/or reflections fairly accurate. The final piece shows some detail in certain areas. The artist was able to portray some texture and detail in their piece. The portrait is somewhat recognizable and comparable to the reference used. The final piece lacks tonal variations. The artist is not able to show correct lighting, shading, and/or reflections. The artist expertly created a successful and dynamic composition that is interesting to the viewer. There is no paper showing unless intentional. All grid squares are even and to scale. There are no empty or overfilled spaces. The artist created a successful and dynamic composition that is interesting to the viewer. There is very little paper showing unless intentional. Most of the grid squares are even and to scale. There are barely any empty or overfilled spaces. The artist created a mediocre composition. There is some paper showing that is not intentional. The paper may not be used to its full potential. Some of the grid squares are uneven and distorted. There are some empty or overfilled spaces. There are no unintentional smudges, fingerprints, rips, etc. The viewer is not able to see any grid lines. Student included their name on their work. There are barely any unintentional smudges, fingerprints, rips, etc. The viewer can see little of the grid that was used. Student included their name on their work. There are minor unintentional smudges, fingerprints, rips, etc. The viewer can see some of the grid that was used. Student included their name on their work. The final piece has differentiations in tone, but not a full tonal scale. The artist is not able to fully show correct lighting, shading, and/or reflections. The final piece is lacking in detail overall. The artist portrayed little texture or detail in their piece. The portrait is hard to recognize and has major differences compared to the reference used. The artist created a poor composition. There is a lot of paper showing that is not intentional. There is a lot empty or overfilled space. The paper is not used to its full potential. Most of the grid squares are uneven and distorted. There are noticeable unintentional smudges, fingerprints, rips, etc. The viewer can see most of the grid that was used. Student did not include their name on their work Craftsmanship Composition Detail/ Texture Tone/Gra dient 5-Excellent C: ?: Mark The final piece has little to no detail or textures drawn. The portrait is unrecognizable and does not look like the reference used. The paper has not been utilized to its full potential. The majority of the page is empty and is lacking colour/detail ect. The image is extremely distorted. The piece is incomplete or unresolved. The viewer can see the entire grid that was used. There are unintentional smudges, fingerprints, and rips that take away from the piece. No name on the work. /10 /10 /2.5 /2.5