Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership August 2013 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Analysis of projections ....................................................................................................... 3 3. Analysis of projections for the AME sector only ............................................................ 17 4. Growth scenario testing .................................................................................................... 23 5. Summary and conclusions ............................................................................................... 26 Contact: Rebecca Pates Tel: Approved by: Christine Doel Date: 0161 475 2112 email: rpates@sqw.co.uk 23/08/13 Director www.sqw.co.uk Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 1. Introduction 1.1 This paper – prepared by SQW – presents an analysis of projections provided by Cambridge Econometrics (CE) through its Local Economy Forecasting Model (LEFM). It is one of a series of outputs from a study commissioned by Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership (CWLEP) and completed by SQW. The wider study is concerned with the LEP’s economic evidence base and the priorities for additional evidence gathering that ought to be defined going forward. Overview of LEFM 1.2 LEFM has been developed by Cambridge Econometrics in collaboration with the Institute for Employment Research (IER) at the University of Warwick. The model has been designed to project economic indicators for a local area by explaining the output of local industries through expenditure flows in that area and their links with the world outside the local area. LEFM provides a database of economic, labour market and demographic data, including projections for 45 sectors. 1.3 The baseline LEFM projections are based on historical growth in the local area relative to the region or UK (depending on which area it has the strongest relationship with), on an industry-by-industry basis. Thus, if an industry in the local area outperformed the industry in the region (or UK) as a whole in the past, then it will be assumed to do so in the future. Similarly, if it underperformed the region (or UK) in the past then it will be assumed to underperform the region (or UK) in the future. 1.4 The forecasts for the region and UK come from CE's Regional Multi-sectoral Dynamic Model (MDM) of the UK economy. The projections for Coventry and Warwickshire reported in this paper are consistent with the forecasts for the region and UK published by CE in May 2013. The GVA and productivity data throughout this paper are in 2009 constant prices. Structure of this paper 1.5 Based on data from LEFM, this paper analyses the following indicators across the economy as a whole: Population Gross Value Added (GVA) GVA per head Employment Sector prospects analysis – “expanders”, “shrinkers” and “adjusters” Productivity Occupations. 1 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 1.6 In addition, it presents a bespoke analysis of the Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) sector which has been identified as a priority locally. 1.7 The analysis is presented for the following geographies: Coventry and Warwickshire (CWLEP area) – defined as the local authority districts of North Warwickshire, Coventry, Nuneaton and Bedworth, Stratford-on-Avon, Rugby, and Warwick North+ – North Warwickshire, Rugby, and Hinckley and Bosworth (the latter district is not part of CWLEP but is part of the City Deal bid) Central – Coventry, and Nuneaton and Bedworth South – Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick UK. 1.8 In the main, the projections presented here are “business as usual” baseline projections. This means that they are “policy-on” in that they assume broad policy continuity, certainly at a local level. The projections take account of known forthcoming policy changes at a national level (such as the change in retirement age), but they do not take account of planned local interventions that represent a change from “business as usual”, or their associated impacts. The exception is for the AME sector analysis, where CE have produced both a baseline projection for the sector and a bespoke growth scenario. 1.9 The remainder of the report is structured as follows: 1.10 Section 2 provides an analysis of baseline projections for population, GVA and GVA per head, employment, productivity and occupations Section 3 presents an analysis for the AME sector only, in terms of baseline projections Section 4 presents an analysis of a growth scenario for the AME sector, and implications for the wider economy Section 5 summarises the main findings and provides some short concluding comments. Annex A provides further details on the LEFM. 2 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 2. Analysis of the baseline projections from LEFM 2.1 In this section we present an analysis of baseline projections for population (an input to LEFM, based on ONS projections) and LEFM outputs relating to GVA and GVA per head, employment, productivity and occupations Population 2.2 Historical data show that between 2000 and 2012, the population of Coventry and Warwickshire grew by 0.7% pa – a rate that matched the UK average – to 873,200 residents in 2012. Within the LEP area, population growth was faster in the south (0.9% pa) and slowest in the central area (0.5% pa). 2.3 Looking forward, CWLEP area’s population is projected to grow more quickly through to 2015 (at a rate of 1.0% pa) than it has done in 2000-12 period. It is also projected to grow more quickly than the UK average (by 0.3pp pa), so by 2025, Coventry and Warwickshire’s population is expected to rise to around 993,800 residents. Within this geography, the population of the central area is projected to grow most quickly (1.1% pa) between 2012 and 2025. Figure 2-1: Absolute level of population by area Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Table 2-1: Population growth, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.3 North+ 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.1 3 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) Central 0.5 -0.1 1.1 0.4 South 0.9 0.2 0.9 0.1 UK 0.7 0.7 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 2.4 The graphic below shows population growth in each area, indexed to 2000. Again, this shows rapid growth in the south and slower growth in the central area over the last decade, but the CE projections suggest that population growth across the CWLEP area and the north+/central/south areas all exceed the UK average from around 2018 onwards. Figure 2-2: Population growth rate (indexed 100=2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Gross Value Added (GVA) 2.5 In 2012, CWLEP area’s GVA was around £21bn according to CE data. The central area accounted for the largest share of GVA, followed by the south and then north+ (note again though that north+ includes Hinckley and Bosworth which is outside of the LEP geography). 4 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-3: Absolute levels of GVA in CWLEP and north, central and south areas Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 2.6 Since 2000, GVA has increased more quickly across CWLEP area as a whole (at 1.9% pa) than the UK average (1.8% pa). However, at a sub-LEP level, the analysis suggests that while GVA in the north+ and south had increased more quickly than the UK (0.1pp pa and 0.9pp pa respectively), GVA in the central area had increased at a much slower rate (0.7pp pa behind the UK). 2.7 In future, GVA in Coventry and Warwickshire is expected to continue growing on a similar trajectory – at 1.9% pa, slightly above the UK average (by 0.1pp pa). As before, the south is projected to grow more quickly than the UK and the central area more slowly, but the gap with the UK will narrow in both areas – so the south will grow 0.3pp pa quicker than the UK (rather than the 0.9pp pa above the UK in historical trends) and the central area will grow 0.1pp pa slower than the UK (rather than 0.7pp pa slower, as seen between 2000 and 2012). Table 2-2: GVA growth, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area 1.9 0.1 1.9 0.1 North+ 1.9 0.1 1.8 0.0 Central 1.1 -0.7 1.8 -0.1 South 2.6 0.9 2.1 0.3 UK 1.8 1.8 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 5 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-4: GVA growth (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections GVA per head 2.8 Historically, GVA per head has tended to be below the UK average across the CWLEP area, largely due to under-performance in the central area. In 2012, GVA per head was £18,906 based on CE’s data, compared to £20,111 for the UK. At the sub-LEP level, GVA per head ranged from £16,281 in the central area, through to £19,312 in north+ (including Hinckley and Bosworth) and £22,099 in the south. 2.9 In future, GVA per head is expected to remain below the UK average for the LEP area as a whole, so by 2025, GVA per head in Coventry and Warwickshire will be £21,352 compared to £23,106 for the UK. However, GVA per head in both the north+ and south areas is expected to exceed the UK, and the central area remains below the UK. Figure 2-5: GVA per head Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 6 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 2.10 Historically, GVA per head has grown slightly more quickly (at 1.2% pa) across the CWLEP area than the UK average (1.1% pa) between 2000 and 2012. This suggests that some progress – albeit small – was made in closing the GVA gap over this period. However, this masks much faster GVA per head growth in the north+ and south (0.8% pa and 0.6% pa respectively), but much slower growth in the central area (0.6% pa). The inference might be that while Coventry and Warwickshire as a whole is closing the gap with the national average, differences within the LEP area are increasing. 2.11 In future, CE’s projections suggest that GVA per head in the CWLEP area will grow at a rate of 0.9% pa, 0.1pp pa more slowly than the UK average. Therefore the gap in GVA per head will open up again. Whilst the projected growth rates for Coventry and Warwickshire’s population and GVA are both expected to exceed the UK average between 2015 and 2025, the rate of population growth is much higher than at the national level (0.3pp pa higher) compared to GVA growth (0.1pp pa higher than the UK) – this deflates the relative growth in GVA per head compared to the UK. GVA per head in the north+ and south areas is expected to grow more quickly than the UK, and the central area more slowly. Table 2-3: GVA per head growth, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area 1.2 0.1 0.9 -0.1 North+ 1.9 0.8 1.8 0.7 Central 0.6 -0.5 0.6 -0.4 South 1.7 0.6 1.3 0.2 UK 1.1 1.1 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Figure 2-6: GVA per head growth rate, Indexed 100=2000 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 7 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Employment 2.12 According to CE data, CWLEP area was home to 462,000 jobs in 20121, up from 352,000 in 2000. By 2015, the number of jobs is expected to rise to 511,000. Figure 2-7: Absolute levels of employment (jobs) in CWLEP and north, central and south areas Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 2.13 Between 2000 and 2012, job growth across Coventry and Warwickshire, at 1.1% pa, outpaced the UK average by 0.4pp pa, largely due to rapid growth in the south over this period (of 1.7% pa). Looking forward, jobs will continue to grow more quickly in the CWLEP area than the UK through to 2025, but the rate of growth will slow to 0.8% pa (0.2pp pa above the UK). All three sub-areas are expected to observe faster growth in jobs than the UK average. Table 2-4: Employment growth, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP 1.1 0.4 0.8 0.2 North 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.3 Central 0.4 -0.2 0.6 0.1 South 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.3 UK 0.6 0.5 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections This compares to 410,000 in 2010 in Coventry and Warwickshire in the Local Economic Assessment published in 2011 (also based on Cambridge Econometrics modelling). 1 8 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-8: Employment growth (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Sectoral change: “Expanders”, “shrinkers” and “adjusters” 2.14 2.15 In the table below we have categorised Coventry and Warwickshire’s sectors according to their projected performance: (a) expanders: sectors with projected growth in GVA and employment (2012-2025) (b) adjusters: projected growth in GVA and decline in employment (2012-2025) (c) shrinkers: sectors with projected decline in GVA and employment (2012-2025). Some of Coventry and Warwickshire’s major sectors in terms of their current GVA contribution are expected to be “expanders” over the next 13 years, such as finance and insurance, IT services, construction, business support services, retail trade and health. The education sector, another major GVA contributor, is expected to be an “adjuster” (although the expected decline in employment is negligible). Three sectors are projected to ‘shrink’ in terms of GVA and jobs – although at present they make a relatively small contribution to overall GVA. 9 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Table 2-5: Expanders, shrinkers and adjusters in CWLEP (2012-25) Expanders % change % change GVA in in GVA in empl. 2012 (£) Adjusters % change in GVA % change in empl. GVA in 2012 (£) 32 Financial & insurance 35% 4% 1,158 40 Education 14% -4% 1,291 31 IT services 74% 27% 1,124 39 Public Admin. & Def. 15% -5% 524 20 Construction 35% 25% 1,057 21 Motor vehicles trade 12% -1% 506 38 Business support services 22% 20% 1,014 15 Motor vehicles etc 84% -4% 345 23 Retail trade 20% 7% 935 14 Machinery etc 1% -15% 340 41 Health 33% 26% 812 24 Land transport 13% -3% 263 27 Warehousing & postal 12% 19% 632 3 Food drink & tobacco 36% -11% 215 22 Wholesale trade 6% 5% 595 10 Non-metallic min. prods 6% -3% 143 42 Residential & social 17% 576 2 Mining & quarrying 50% -22% 114 36 Archit. & engin. 33% services 1% 567 30 Media 9% -2% 76 45 Other services 1% 428 12 Electronics 33% -20% 59 11 Metals & metal prods. 6% 15% 354 8 Chemicals etc 39% -8% 50 29 Food & beverage services 33% 29% 349 25 Water transport 58% -20% 8 33 Real estate 56% 261 9 Pharmaceuticals 15% -11% 3 19 Water sewerage & waste 12% 22% 235 Shrinkers % change in GVA % change in empl. GVA in 2012 35 Head offices & manag. cons. 17% 15% 224 16 Other trans. Equipment -4% -27% 193 34 Legal & accounting 24% 16% 192 6 Printing & recording -19% -51% 42 21% 10% 185 4 Textiles etc -9% -35% 27 25% 16% 159 23% 17% 148 12% 11% 15% 7% 28% 1% 101 86 66 73% 0% 53% 55% 3% 39% 65 26 6 28 Accommodation 44 Recreational services 37 Other prof. services 13 Elect. equipment 43 Arts 1 Agriculture etc 17 Other manuf. & repair 5 Wood & paper 26 Air transport 2.16 25% 11% 125% The diagram below shows the expanders, shrinkers and adjusters graphically, with percentage change (2012-2025) in GVA on the x-axis, percentage change (2012-2025) in employment on the x-axis, and the size of the bubble representing GVA values in 2012. 10 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-9: Expanders, shrinkers and adjusters (2012-2025) Source: SQW analysis of CE data. Notes: size of bubble indicates GVA in 2012 11 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Productivity 2.17 In 2000, productivity (proxied as GVA per job) was £32.6k across Coventry and Warwickshire. This had increased to £35.7k in 2012. By 2025, it is expected to rise to £41.5k. Productivity across the CWLEP area, and the three sub-areas, has continually tracked below the UK average. The north+ area has historically performed better than elsewhere in the LEP area, but this advantage is gradually being eroded. Since 2000, the gap between productivity in the CWLEP area as a whole and the UK has widened and this trend is projected to continue: GVA per job was 92% of the UK average in 2000; 89% in 2012; and it is projected to be 87% of the UK figure in 2025. Figure 2-10: GVA per job, £k Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 2.18 As shown in the table below, growth in productivity in Coventry and Warwickshire (of 0.8% pa) and all the sub-areas, was slower than the UK average (1.1% pa) between 2000 and 2012. In future, productivity will continue to grow more slowly in the LEP area than across the UK, but the gap will narrow from -0.3pp pa (2000-12) behind the UK to -0.1pp pa (2012-25). The south is expected to perform best in terms of future productivity growth - at 1.3% pa, it will match the UK growth rate. Table 2-6: Productivity growth, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area 0.8 -0.3 1.2 -0.1 North+ 0.8 -0.3 1.0 -0.3 Central 0.6 -0.5 1.1 -0.1 South 1.0 -0.1 1.3 0.0 UK 1.1 1.3 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 12 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-11: Productivity growth (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Occupations 2.19 CE’s projections include a demand-side assessment of occupations, i.e. a projection that the economy is likely to generate demand for particular numbers of jobs in certain occupations. LEFM assumes that these jobs will be filled – although in practice there may be issues around effective labour supply and/or skills shortages. 2.20 For the purposes of this paper, the occupational projections produced by CE have been grouped into five broad categories, as illustrated below. Managerial/professional/associate professional occupations accounted for the greatest share of jobs in 2012 (38%, 176,000 jobs), followed by plant, operatives, elementary trades (21%, 96,000 jobs). 13 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-12: Absolute levels of employment by occupational groups in CWLEP SQW analysis of CE projections 2.21 Since 2000, the number of managerial/professional/associate professional occupations in Coventry and Warwickshire has risen quickly – at 3.2% pa (0.9pp higher than the UK), and employment in care, sales, customer services also grew rapidly (2.6% pa, 1.0pp faster than the UK). Employment in plant, operatives, elementary trades remained static, but this compared to a national average decline of 0.8% pa in these occupations. The number of skilled trades occupations fell dramatically (at -3.3% pa), and more quickly than the UK average. 2.22 Looking forward, occupational projections are expected to be as follows: the number of jobs in managerial/professional/associate professional occupations in Coventry and Warwickshire is expected to increase (at a rate of 1.5% pa) through to 2025, but only slightly quicker than the UK average employment in care, sales, customer services is also expected to rise (at a rate of 1.3% pa), but again the gap with the UK growth rate will narrow skilled trades will continue to decline by 1.2% pa – and do so more quickly than the UK average – and the number of plant, operatives, elementary trades will also begin to fall by 0.4% pa. Table 2-7: Employment by occupation growth in CWLEP compared to the UK, 2000-12 and 201225 Historical trends 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Future projections Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 14 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Historical trends Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) Managers, professionals & assoc. professionals 3.2 0.9 1.5 0.1 Admin, secretarial, culture, bus/public services -0.3 -0.2 0.6 0.9 Skilled trades -3.3 -2.1 -1.2 -0.8 Care, sales, customer services 2.6 1.0 1.3 0.3 Plant, operatives, elementary trades 0.0 0.9 -0.4 0.1 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 2.23 The graphics below compare projected growth in each broad occupational group in Coventry and Warwickshire (in the top graph) to the UK average (bottom graph), both indexed to 2000. Overall, these data suggest growth among higher and lower level occupational jobs, but some “hollowing out” in the middle. 15 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 2-13: Employment by occupation growth in Coventry and Warwickshire compared to the UK, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Coventry and Warwickshire UK Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 16 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 3. Analysis of baseline projections for the AME sector 3.1 In this section we present an analysis of CE’s baseline projections for the Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) sector only. 3.2 The Analytics Team at CWLEP selected seven of CE’s 41 sectors as a ‘best-fit’ set of sectors to represent AME. These are: 3.3 12 Electronics 13 Electrical equipment 14 Machinery etc 15 Motor vehicles etc 16 Other transport equipment 17 Other manufacturing & repair 36 Architectural and engineering services All references to AME in the section below refer to these seven sectors in aggregate. Baseline projections for the AME sector GVA in the AME sector 3.4 In 2012, the AME sector generated £1.67bn in GVA in Coventry and Warwickshire, which represented 10% of the total GVA (down from 13% of total GVA in 2000). By 2025, the AME sector is expected to generate around £2.2bn in GVA, which will still account for 10% of the area’s total GVA2. Table 3-1: GVA in the AME sector – levels and shares of employment 2000 2012 2025 GVA generated by the AME sector CWLEP area 1,770 1,670 2,220 North+ 613 609 745 Central 967 740 969 South 419 621 849 UK 64,428 71,431 93,112 GVA for the north, central and south do not sum to the LEP total as the north includes Hinckley and Bosworth (which lies outside of the CWLEP area). This explains why the proportion of GVA generated by the AME sector for the LEP area as a whole in 2025 (10%) is lower than the proportion of GVA generated by the AME sector in each sub-area. 2 17 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 2000 2012 2025 Share of total GVA generated by the AME sector CWLEP area 13% 10% 10% North+ 15% 12% 11% Central 15% 10% 11% South 10% 11% 11% UK 6% 6% 6% Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 3.5 Overall, over the period from 2000 to 2012, GVA generated by the AME sector declined in real terms by 0.5% pa compared to growth of 0.9% pa in the UK. However, the picture varied considerably at the sub-LEP level – the north+ and central areas saw a fall in GVA generated by the AME sector (of -0.1% pa and -2.2% pa respectively) whereas the baseline projections suggest that the south saw substantial growth of 3.3% pa. 3.6 Looking forward to 2025, GVA generated by the AME sector across Coventry and Warwickshire is projected to increase by 2.2% pa, slightly above the UK average. All sub-areas are projected to observe growth in AME GVA, but performance is diverging: the north+ will continue to grow more slowly than the UK (by -0.5pp pa); the south will grow more quickly than the UK (by 0.4pp); and growth in the central area will match the UK average. Table 3-2: GVA growth in the AME sector in CWLEP compared to the UK, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical performance Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area -0.5 -1.3 2.2 0.2 North+ -0.1 -0.9 1.6 -0.5 Central -2.2 -3.1 2.1 0.0 South 3.3 2.5 2.4 0.4 UK 0.9 2.1 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 18 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 3-1: GVA in AME sector growth (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Employment in the AME sector 3.7 According to CE data, the AME sector accounted for 7% of employment across Coventry and Warwickshire in 2012 (34,000 jobs) compared to 10% of GVA. Over time, the proportion of jobs in the sector has declined, from 14% in 2000 to 7% in 2012. It is projected to continue to decline but much more slowly – to 6% in 2025. Table 3-3: Employment in the AME sector – levels and shares of employment 2000 2012 2025 Employment in the AME sector (000s) CWLEP area 59 34 33 North+ 21 12 11 Central 30 15 15 South 14 12 12 UK 1,919 1,484 1,445 Share of employment in the AME sector CWLEP area 14% 7% 6% North+ 16% 8% 7% Central 16% 8% 7% South 11% 8% 7% UK 7% 5% 4% Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 3.8 Between 2000 and 2012, CE’s data suggest that employment in the AME sector fell by 4.6% pa, much more quickly than the UK average for this sector (-2.1% pa). All of the sub-areas 19 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership saw a fall in employment – in the north+ and central areas, the decline was greater than the UK average, but the pace of decline was slower in the south. 3.9 In future, employment in the AME sector is projected to fall at -0.2% pa, the same rate as the UK. The north+ and central areas are expected to see a decline in AME employment, but levels in the south are projected to remain static. Table 3-4: Employment growth in the AME sector in Coventry and Warwickshire compared to the UK, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical performance Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area -4.6 -2.4 -0.2 0.0 North+ -4.6 -2.5 -0.3 -0.1 Central -5.4 -3.3 -0.4 -0.2 South -1.2 0.9 0.0 0.2 UK -2.1 0.0 -0.2 0.0 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Figure 3-2: Employment in AME sector growth (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Expanders, adjusters and shrinkers in the AME sector 3.10 As in section 2, we have mapped “expanders, shrinkers and adjusters” (2015-2025) for the AME sectors across Coventry and Warwickshire. In summary, the “expanders” are expected to be architecture and engineering services (a sector which accounted for a large share of AME GVA in 2012, as illustrated by the large bubble), electrical equipment and other manufacturing and repairs. Motor vehicles, machinery and electronics are “adjusters”, so GVA is projected to increase but employment will fall. And finally, other transport 20 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership equipment is classed as a “shrinker”, where both employment and GVA are projected to decline. Figure 3-3: Expanders, shrinkers and adjusters (2012-2025) in the AME sub-sectors across Coventry and Warwickshire Source: SQW analysis of CE projections. Notes: size of bubble indicates GVA in 2012 Productivity 3.11 The modelling completed by CE suggests that productivity (GVA per job) for the AME sector in 2012, at £50k per job, is slightly above the UK average. However, this varies within the LEP geography, from £48k per job in the central area up to £50k and £52k in the south and north+ respectively. CE’s data suggest that over time, CWLEP’s AME sector has improved its productivity position from 90% of the UK average in 2000, to 103% in 2012 and up to 105% in 2025. Table 3-5: Productivity in the AME sector (£k per job) 2000 2012 2025 CWLEP area 30 50 68 North+ 30 52 66 Central 32 48 67 South 29 50 68 UK 34 48 64 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 3.12 Since 2000, productivity in the AME sector in Coventry and Warwickshire and all three subregions has improved, and has done so at a faster rate than the UK average (thereby closing the gap, as noted above). In future, the area’s productivity in the AME sector is projected to increase by 2.4% pa (2012-25) – this is much slower than the rate of improvement seen in the past (4.3% pa, 2000-12) but is still above the UK growth rate. However, at the sub21 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership LEP area level, there is a mixed picture – in the north+, productivity improvements are projected to lag behind the UK, whereas in the central and south areas productivity improvements will outpace the UK. Table 3-6: Productivity change in the AME sector in Coventry and Warwickshire compared to the UK, 2000-12 and 2012-25 Historical performance Future projections 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) 2012-2025 (CAGR % pa) Difference with the UK (pp) CWLEP area 4.3 1.2 2.4 0.1 North+ 4.8 1.7 1.9 -0.4 Central 3.4 0.4 2.5 0.3 South 4.6 1.5 2.4 0.2 UK 3.0 2.3 Source: SQW analysis of CE projections Figure 3-4: Productivity change in AME sector (Indexed to 2000) Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 22 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 4. Growth scenario testing 4.1 CE was asked by the Analytics Team to model the impact of a 20% increase in GVA in the AME sector3 on the CWLEP economy as a whole. In this section we present the findings from this scenario modelling, and compare the GVA and employment impacts of the scenario to the baseline “business as usual” projection, both for the AME sector and wider economy. Consequences for GVA 4.2 As shown in Table 4-1, according to CE’s model, a 20% uplift in GVA in the AME sector translates into an additional £459m generated by the AME sector alone each year. Due to the multiplier effects of this uplift on other sectors, the additional impact on Coventry and Warwickshire’s economy as a whole would be an additional £653m pa – the economy would be 3% bigger in 2025 than under the “business as usual” baseline projection. The analysis suggests that under the growth scenario, GVA generated in nonAME sectors would increase by £194m pa, and the sectors benefiting most – in absolute terms – from the uplift in AME would be finance and insurance (an uplift of £27m in GVA pa), business support services and wholesale trade (both up £20m pa), IT services (up £18m pa). The warehousing and postal, education and construction sectors also benefit to a lesser extent. Table 4-1: GVA growth across Coventry and Warwickshire and the sub-areas - baseline projections and growth scenario 2012 GVA £m 2025 GVA Baseline projection £m 2025 GVA Growth scenario £m GVA difference £m CWLEP area 1,670 2,220 2,679 +459 North+ 609 745 907 +162 Central 740 969 1,163 +194 South 621 849 1,023 +174 CWLEP area 16,508 21,219 21,872 +653 (459 due to AME, 194 due to multipliers) North+ 5,214 6,594 6,819 +225 (162 due to AME, 63 due to multipliers) Central 7,304 9,164 9,439 +276 (194 due to AME, 82 due to multipliers) South 5,760 7,574 7,819 +244 (174 due to AME, 71 due to multipliers) AME sector only Whole economy Source: SQW analysis of CE data The 20% increase has been applied to the seven AME sectors only, and builds up from 2014 and remains constant from 2020 3 23 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 4-1: GVA change in Coventry and Warwickshire, 2012-2025, comparing baseline projection to growth scenario AME sector only Whole economy Source: SQW analysis of CE data Consequences for employment 4.3 As shown in Table 4-2, under the growth scenario, employment in the AME sector is projected to increase by around 7,000 jobs by 2025 across Coventry and Warwickshire. Due to the multiplier effects of this uplift on other sectors, the additional impact on employment across the economy as a whole would be around 12,000 jobs, 2% higher in 2025 than under the “business as usual” baseline projection. Therefore, the growth scenario would generate around 5,000 additional jobs in non-AME sectors due to the multiplier effect, particularly in business support services (c.800 of these jobs) and wholesale trade (600 jobs). Table 4-2: Employment growth in CWLEP and the sub-areas - baseline projections and growth scenario 2012 Employment 000s 2025 Employment 000s - Baseline projection 2025 Employment 000s - Growth scenario Employment difference 000s CWLEP area 34 33 40 +7 North+ 12 11 14 +2 Central 15 15 17 +3 South 12 12 15 +3 CWLEP area 462 511 523 +12 (7 due to AME, 5 due to multipliers) North+ 143 159 163 +4 (2 due to AME, 2 due to multipliers) Central 204 221 226 +5 (3 due to AME, 2 due to multipliers) South 161 180 185 +5 (3 due to AME, 2 due to multipliers) AME sector only Whole economy Source: SQW analysis of CE data 24 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Figure 4-2: Employment change in Coventry and Warwickshire, 2012-2025, comparing baseline projection to growth scenario AME sector only Whole economy Source: SQW analysis of CE data 4.4 An analysis of productivity for the AME sector and wider economy shows that there is very little difference in productivity between the baseline projection and growth scenario. The only exception to this is the central area, where productivity in the AME sector expected to improve. 25 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership 5. Summary and conclusions Summary Baseline projections for the economy as a whole 5.1 The table overleaf summaries projected growth rates for population, GVA and GVA per head, employment and productivity, and compares Coventry and Warwickshire and the three subareas to expectations for the UK. 5.2 From the baseline projections, there are a number of key messages for the future growth prospects of the Coventry and Warwickshire economy: 5.3 Population is expected to grow more quickly than in the past, and more quickly than the UK average (historically since 2000, population growth matched the UK) GVA will continue to grow at the same rate as during the 2000-12 period, slightly above the UK average Between 2000 and 2012, GVA per head grew more quickly than the UK, closing the GVA per head gap, but projections to 2025 suggest growth will lag behind the UK so the gap will re-open Jobs are expected to grow more slowly than in the past. The growth rate will still exceed the UK average, but by a smaller margin in future. Productivity improvements will continue to lag behind the UK average, although the gap with the UK is expected to close slightly In terms of occupations, the number of managerial/professional/associate professional and care/sales/customer services occupations are expected to increase, more quickly than the UK average. Skilled trades will continue to decline (at a faster rate than the UK), and the number of plant/operatives/elementary trades will fall. At a sub-LEP level projections through to 2025 suggest that: in the North+4, population is expected to grow slightly slower than for Coventry and Warwickshire (but still slightly quicker than the UK) and GVA growth will match the UK rate. Overall GVA per head will grow more slowly than the UK, so the gap will widen. The rate of growth in jobs will exceed the UK average, but productivity performance will lag behind the UK considerably, so the productivity gap will also continue to widen. in the central area, population is expected to grow more quickly than the UK, but GVA and GVA per head are expected to grow more slowly than the UK, so the GVA per head gap will widen. Growth in jobs will be slightly quicker than the UK average, but productivity performance will lag behind the UK, so the productivity gap will also continue to widen. 4 Please note, the north includes Hinckley and Bosworth 26 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership In the south, the picture is somewhat different – population, GVA and GVA per head, and jobs are all expected to grow more quickly than the UK. Productivity improvements will match the UK average. 27 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Table 5-1: Baseline projections – comparing past trends to future projections, and the differential in growth with the UK CWLEP North Central South UK 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 pp diff with UK 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.2 2012-2025 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 1.9 1.9 1.1 2.6 pp diff with UK 0.1 0.1 -0.7 0.9 2012-2025 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.1 0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.7 pp diff with UK 0.1 0.1 -0.5 0.6 2012-2025 0.9 1.0 0.6 1.3 -0.1 -0.1 -0.4 0.2 1.1 1.0 0.4 1.7 pp diff with UK 0.4 0.4 -0.2 1.0 2012-2025 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.0 1.1 pp diff with UK -0.3 -0.3 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 2012-2025 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 Population 0.7 (CAGR % pa) pp diff with UK GVA 2000-2012 1.8 (CAGR % pa) 1.8 (CAGR % pa) pp diff with UK GVA per head 2000-2012 1.1 (CAGR % pa) 1.1 (CAGR % pa) pp diff with UK Jobs 2000-2012 0.6 (CAGR % pa) 0.5 (CAGR % pa) pp diff with UK Productivity 2000-2012 (CAGR % pa) (CAGR % pa) pp diff with UK Source: SQW analysis of CE projections 28 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Baseline projections and growth scenario for the AME sector 5.4 5.5 Under the baseline “business as usual” projections, the key messages for the AME sector are as follows: The share of GVA generated by the AME sector is not expected to change: it represented 10% of GVA in 2012 and is projected still to account for 10% of total GVA in 2025. However, the share of jobs in the AME sector will fall from 7% in 2012 to 6% in 2025. GVA generated by the AME sector in Coventry and Warwickshire is expected to increase to 2025, at a slightly faster rate than the UK average (compared to a decline in GVA generated by the AME sector between 2000 and 2012). However, employment in the AME sector is expected to fall at the same rate as the UK. Productivity will therefore improve relative to the UK, shifting from below the UK in 2000 to above it in 2012 and 2025. Growth projections vary across the sub-areas: in terms of GVA generated by the AME sector, the north+ will continue to grow more slowly than the UK to 2025 and the south will grow more quickly (in the central area growth will match the UK); in terms of employment, the north and central areas are expected to observe a fall in AME employment, whereas in the south, employment will remain static. The growth scenario, of a 20% uplift to GVA generated by the AME sector by 2025, is projected to lead to an additional £459m generated by the AME sector alone each year, and around 7,000 jobs by 2025 across Coventry and Warwickshire. The additional impact on CWLEP area’s economy as a whole is £653m pa due to the multiplier effects of this AME uplift on other sectors (the economy would be 3% higher in 2025 than under the baseline projection) and around 12,000 jobs (2% higher in 2025 than the baseline projection). The sectors benefiting most from the uplift in AME would be finance and insurance (an uplift of £27m in GVA pa), business support services (up £20m pa in GVA and c.800 jobs), wholesale trade (up £20m pa in GVA and c.600 jobs), and IT services (up £18m pa). Conclusions 5.6 The projections presented in this paper should be treated with caution. They are projections – not a calibrated forecast. They have been produced through a model based on a “business as usual”, policy-on context, and there are many reasons why the outcomes in Coventry and Warwickshire might be different from the modelled projections. 5.7 The projections from LEFM do, nonetheless, provide a useful perspective on the potential growth trajectory in Coventry and Warwickshire if nothing changes. Critically, the GVA per head and productivity gaps with the UK will continue to widen overall. Within this picture, there are key sub-area variations: on most indicators, the projections for the south are more bullish than those for the north+ and, particularly, the central area. The challenge for the LEP is that whereas the south appears to be growing more quickly than the national average, the areas further north seem to be slipping backwards, creating tensions and challenges within the LEP geography. An important additional observation relates to the “hourglass” 29 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership that appears to be emerging in relation to the occupational profile – with growth among higher and lower level occupations and contraction within the skilled trades. 5.8 In relation to AME, the projections suggest that the sector is expected to see “jobless growth” in future. However within this, there are again some important intra-area contrasts. The south appears really quite buoyant with growth projected particularly in the service-related elements of the AME sector. The multipliers linked to this are significant in the south. Growth prospects – in absolute and relative terms – are weaker further north. Hence both spatial and sectoral restructuring appear – on the face of it – to be underway. 5.9 All of these issues raise important questions for the forthcoming Growth Strategy and its priorities. CWLEP will also need to think through what might need to change in order to achieve anything like the magnitude of change modelled through the growth scenario – of 7,000 AME jobs in order to generate an additional £459m in GVA from that sector – and, indeed, whether this is achievable. Specifically, consideration will need to be given to whether the proposals developed through the City Deal will – in fact – have an impact of that scale; and if not, how they might be developed and/or supplemented. In a sector that is integrated with the wider economy, there is substantial scope for knock-on benefits in sectors such as finance and insurance, business support services, wholesale trade and IT services. 30 Coventry and Warwickshire Economic Review – Strand 1: Employment and GVA projections A report to Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership Annex A: LEFM overview A.1 LEFM has been developed by Cambridge Econometrics Ltd in collaboration with the Institute for Employment Research (IER) at the University of Warwick. A.2 LEFM has been designed to project economic indicators for a local area by explaining the output of local industries through an explicit representation of expenditure flows in that area, and their links with the world outside the local area. In this, it differs from other methods of local economy modelling which typically link local output or employment (by sector) directly to national or regional output or employment. Such methods include shiftshare or econometrically estimated equations. While these methods allow a user to derive projections for local output or employment growth from national or regional projections, they offer little scope for introducing an explanation of local performance relative to these higher levels, and they are typically not suitable for analysing the indirect effects on the local economy arising from the opening of a new enterprise or the closure of an existing one. A.3 LEFM is also distinguished from other modelling approaches by its sectoral detail. It identifies 45 sectors (defined on SIC2007), allowing (for example) electronics to be distinguished from electrical engineering & instruments, and computing from other business services. Detailed disaggregation by sector is usually valuable because different sectors have different prospects (e.g. technological change is driving much faster growth in electronics and computing than in the other sectors with which they are commonly combined), because they have different employment characteristics, and also because it allows local knowledge about specific firms to be more easily factored in to the forecast. There is, however, a cost to working in such detail: most variables in the model have to be disaggregated by sector (or a similar classification: see below for more details). A.4 The main input assumptions used in LEFM are forecasts for the UK and region in which the local economy lies for selected variables, including: the components of domestic final expenditure, disaggregated into spending by function as published in the UK National Accounts components of personal incomes gross output, value-added and employment by 45 sectors matrices to convert the components of domestic final expenditure into commodity demand for 45 sectors input-output coefficients and projected changes projected changes in occupational structure and gender forecasts for the local economy population by 5-year age band and gender participation rate by gender for a constant level of unemployment (these are then adjusted by the model in response to actual changes in unemployment). A-1