Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report March 2013 Table of Contents Background and Overview 1 Revenue Generation 2 A. B. C. D. Current Capacity Constraints Filling Current Capacity – The Need for More Students Tuition and Financial Aid Grant Funding Cost Control A. B. C. D. 3 4 7 8 9 Athletics High School Electives Class Size Administration, Business and Technology Services 1. Administration 2. Business and Technology Services Conclusion 9 9 10 10 12 12 13 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Members of the committee: Mark Cooper Maya Klein Frank Fristoe Michael Potter Nicole Grayson Paul Strassmaier Dean Griffith Brent Hutchings, resigned mid-project due to job out-of-area Committee Support: Kathy Rodeman Michael Taylor Fiscal Advisory Committee Final Report Background Superintendent MacNamara appointed the committee to advise her in ways to increase revenues and reduce expenditures for the next several years. The committee was asked to continue working with Interim Superintendent Taylor to meet its charge. The committee met nine times to request and review information. Discussions were considered confidential and frank conversations were held. As a starting point, members reviewed costs per student based on information available from the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) and the ChalkBoard Project Open Books (Appendix A). Districts were selected for comparison that appeared to provide accredited educational programs and with similar populations. Given that Riverdale’s socioeconomic status ranks higher than other Oregon districts, we also considered similar populations based on percentage of students with disabilities, English-Language Learners, and poverty. Other data was gathered and shared as requested (Appendix B). The committee reviewed data including Colton and Corbett school districts and in the end concluded that those districts were not good matches for Riverdale because they do not offer accredited high school programs. As well, there were concerns about the level of “off-budget” funding that occurred when a charter school was co-located in a traditional school facility. Mark Cooper compiled information obtained directly from ODE for all Oregon districts and shared his analysis of the percentage of support service costs to instruction based on the ODE definitions (Appendix C), small school average costs (Appendix D), and the 2011-12 budgeted costs by Open Books category (Appendix E). Michael Potter and Maya Klein developed a model to help look at capacity, enrollment, and related teaching costs that they shared (Appendix F). Overview In making these recommendations, the Committee recognizes that these are starting points and that the Superintendent will be in the best position to determine whether they are possible or desirable changes. The intent behind these recommendations is to provide an independent look at the way the district operates and how it might continue to support the quality education of Riverdale students in the future. Our analysis and recommendations consider two broad categories: Revenue Generation Cost Control Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 1 REVENUE GENERATION The main sources of revenues for the Riverdale School District (RSD) are the State School Fund Formula (SSF), Tuition Revenues, Contributions from the Riverdale Schools Foundation, and the Local Option Levy. The largest share of revenues is based upon the number of students attending Riverdale Schools. Riverale School District General Fund Operating Revenues 2012-13 Local Option All other 4% Levy 7% Foundation 13% Tuition 21% SSF 55% SSF RSD is unique in Oregon public schools in that only 334 of the current 545 students reside inside the RSD boundary. Enrollment patterns for resident students attending the grade school show a decline over the past 10 years from 292 in 2002-03 to 225 in 2012-13. At the same time, the number of resident students attending the high school has increased from 45 to 109. Community members pay school district property taxes that help fund the SSF. Inter-district transfer students also count towards the SSF. Inter-district transfers bring 92 students to RSD. Two types of transfer students are allowed under state law: mutually agreed upon between both districts and unilateral “Open Enrollment” transfers with the limiting factor as the number of seats declared open by the receiving district. Financial troubles have prompted many districts to decline mutually agreed upon transfers to withdrawing students. There are risks associated with opening enrollment without the ability to screen applicants. In 2002-03, RSD had 135 transfer students, this year there are 92. The current population of transfer students generates over $500,000 annually in state school fund revenues. (See Enrollment as of February 15, 2013 in Appendix G) The SSF allocates about $6,200 per resident student to Riverdale District plus additional funds for students with special needs. Only resident and transfer students generate funding under the SSF. In addition, the total resident and transfer students at Riverdale High School are combined to determine the school’s “small high school” status. This status provides RSD with additional financial resources. Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 2 Tuition RSD also admits 120 students who pay tuition of $11,120 to $11,950 annually to attend Riverdale schools. This student group has increased from 59 in 2002-03. RSD is allowed to charge no more than actual cost per student as tuition. The local community support from the Local Option Levy and the Foundation are captured as part of the tuition cost to attend. In the 2013 legislative session, a bill was introduced that would hamper RSD’s ability to continue tuition students. Although it was later amended, this type of legislation could severely affect RSD revenues and programs. In order for RSD to continue to maintain current levels of service, increased emphasis on tuition paying students must be a high priority. We have analyzed the top-down capacity of the district to determine the potential revenue opportunity that exists within our facilities. A. Current Capacity Constraints RSD maintains two learning facilities – a Riverdale Grade School (“RGS”) and Riverdale High School (“RHS”). Riverdale High School is leased from the Portland Public School District on a long-term land lease. RSD acquired the former elementary school building and refurbished it through a bond issue. Since it was originally purposed as an elementary school, the classrooms are smaller than those in most high schools, less land is available on site for sports fields, parking is limited and fewer classrooms overall are located on site. The monthly lease payments of $12,433 are treated as operating costs in the General Fund. This $149,000/year expense is reported as a Support Services cost per student and increases at 2% each year per the lease agreement. Board target for maximum class size at the high school level is 27, but the physical size of the classrooms places a practical limitation on class size, especially for lab science classes limited to 23 students at a time. The lease agreement restricts the number of Portland Public School students who can attend Riverdale High School to 75 at any time. The agreement further limits the overall number of students that can attend to 360. Currently, 243 students attend Riverdale High School. Currently, the high school is operating at 66% of its designed student capacity, and 68% of its permitted capacity. Riverdale High School Capacity Description Calculation Physical Capacity 14 classrooms X 27 Students – 2 X 4 (smaller science classrooms) Lease Maximum Practical Capacity 23 max students in science classes Current # Students Available Seats Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Capacity 370 Percent Capacity Used 66% 360 68% 322 75% 243 79 to 127 Page 3 Riverdale Grade School was rebuilt and the new building opened in fall 2010. The Multnomah County conditional use permit restricts capacity to 350 students. Limited parking and other traffic concerns would need to be addressed to apply for an increased capacity. Currently, there are 314 K-8 students enrolled. The grade school is operating at 60% of design capacity, and 90% of permitted capacity. Discounting the four classrooms used for the preschool program, art program, resource room and computer lab, there are 20 available classrooms. Riverdale Grade School Capacity: Description Calculation 520 Percent Capacity Used 60% Permitted Capacity 350 90% Current # Students Available Seats 314 36 to 206 Physical Capacity 20 classrooms X 26 Students Capacity Student capacity at each school is limited by current use permits and agreements. There are currently fewer students attending than allowed. In addition, at RHS, there is a potential disincentive to having too many in-district and transfer students, which could reduce the subsidy that RHS receives for being a “small high school”. The costs to maintain the facility and grounds and to administer the buildings are being carried by fewer students, increasing the cost per student in comparison with other districts. Recommendations: B. Capacity: Administration needs to set the target capacity for each building and the number of available student seats. Capacity: The District should work to remove the legal limitations on student capacity at both schools. At RHS, a balance should be struck to continue focus on recruiting tuition paying students. At RGS, staff should pursue an amendment or modification to the conditional use permit to allow more than the maximum 350 students. Reducing Operating Costs: Negotiate with Portland Public Schools to buy-out the High School lease, fund with bonds or some campaign to remove the costs from the operating budget. Instead of spending operating dollars on the lease, it could fund 1.5 teaching positions. Filling Current Capacity – The Need for More Students Marketing and Recruitment Strategy To continue to attract new students, Riverdale School District budgeted $204 per student for marketing and communications. The average of the comparator districts is $5 per student. Committee members interviewed the marketing consultant and admissions coordinator about marketing efforts. RHS has depended on marketing and recruitment since it began in 1996. Prospective parents and students are attracted to the smaller school size, the richness of the extracurricular activities and the Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 4 strength of the academic program with an emphasis on science and humanities, the variety of electives and small class sizes, student engagement in critical thinking and independent learning, parent teacher communications, and that every student attending RHS has made a conscious choice to attend. At the ninth grade, many resident students opt to attend private schools and transfer to other public schools. Riverdale loses 35% to 50% of its 8th grade resident students to other schools. RHS does not offer a football program and some students transfer out in order to play sports at higher division schools. Very few students choose to enter the high school at upper grades; a few students leave during or after ninth grade and that attrition means smaller upper grades. While this attrition of resident students may appear problematic, it opens a number of seats at RHS to tuition paying students. If the entire cohort of in-district 8th graders were to attend RHS in one year, the revenue loss could be as much as $80,500 ($11,950 Tuition - $6,200 SSF X [34 Resident Students – 60% of Resident Students])). Additionally, RHS would lose some of the “small high school” correction funding, reducing another $44,050 from SSF. If that were to occur each year for four years, the total annual revenue reduction could be as high as $124,550. RHS has depended on marketing since it began and receives potential students on a regular basis. Teachers always welcome students in each class and volunteer parent greeters meet with the parents of visiting students and answer questions they might have. Our interviews indicate that the RHS PTC organizes this effort, and that it is not part of the official marketing and admissions strategy. The marketing consultant shared survey results showing that people are looking for a stronger foreign language program at the high school. She also felt that increasing financial aid would help families choose to attend. At RGS, the main entry points have been determined by staff to be primarily at Kindergarten and 6th grade, with additional activity at the 1st grade level. Prospective parents are looking for smaller class sizes especially compared to neighboring public schools, specialists teaching art and music programs, and services for students with special education needs. To build entries at kindergarten, the district offers a preschool fee-based program. The committee heard that offering an outstanding kindergarten and primary grade program is critical to keeping non-resident students in the upper grades. Many parents of private school students begin looking for a 6th grade experience that will help prepare their students for high school. At Riverdale, the 6th grade class is blended with the 5th grade. It is uncertain whether this attracts or deters potential students. RGS marketing is not as formalized as those efforts at RHS. At the grade school, some visiting students and parents have not felt welcomed. Furthermore it has been reported that some of the teachers do not welcome the students. No system is in place for parent greeters. Our interviews suggest that typically the principal at RGS has been the primary promoter for the school and that no broad strategy of recruitment exists. There appear to be few links between RGS and RHS creating a sense of district unity in curriculum, sports, and other activities. According to the marketing and admissions interviews, factors that would improve the marketability of RGS would be an aligned, district oriented curriculum; stability in leadership; word-of-mouth reputation shared by other parents; and faculty welcoming the potential students. To encourage positive parent recruitment, a rebate to parents who referred new Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 5 tuition students might generate more students. The committee acknowledges that the requirement to support in-district students poses some challenges to grade level recruiting at RGS. Recommendations: Marketing: o RSD Superintendent should establish specific, measurable targets for enrollment for each grade early in the recruiting year, which we understand to mean by the end of November and evaluate the district’s efforts in meeting those targets. o As well, there should be specific emphasis on pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten recruiting year round. o Setting a higher target of 80 students for the 9th grade class would allow for some natural attrition in later years. o Consideration should be given to offering referral rebates and establishing a more welcoming atmosphere at the Grade School by implementing a unified site observation plan communicated to teachers and staff with the expectation that it is fully supported. o One of the ideas is to rename the high school to emphasize academic preparation for college – Riverdale Preparatory Academy. o District should evaluate reasons for student attrition, and implement changes as appropriate to mitigate future student attrition. o RSD Superintendent should consider forming a marketing advisory committee similar to this effort to work with staff and marketing consultant in establishing marketing targets and evaluating efforts. Increase number of tuition students - RHS is currently 56 students below its practical capacity and RGS is 36 seats underutilized. If those seats were filled with tuition paying students, more than $1 million additional dollars in revenues would be generated. As students are added, the district should hire teachers to maintain Board maximum class size requirements so that the resulting impact is an increase to net revenues. Facility Grant: The RSD Budget Committee and Board have allocated one-time Facility Grant funds to pay for five to six years (2011 to 2016-17) of staff development, curriculum adoption, technology replacement, and major repairs to the High School. In making this designation, they considered that the Oregon economy was likely to lag the national economy in recovery and that it could take that long before K-12 funding significantly improved. The designated items were considered critical to maintain the highest quality academic programs and school safety. The district is currently in the second of the five to six years and is facing a serious budget issue in 2013-14 as PERS rates increase and other General Fund revenues decline. Committee members questioned this direction and the effect on marketing and ability to attract more tuition students. The policy of the spending horizon should be accelerated over the next two years, in order to subsidize the current level of service Connecting the Schools: Committee members felt that some of the natural connections built in other districts between the grade schools and high schools were missing at Riverdale. For instance, middle school sports teams could create a stronger link to the high school teams if the Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 6 high school coaches were helping the middle school students or if the team names were linked. Additionally, activities such as the drama camp using high school students as mentors should continue to be supported. Finally, as an internal marketing tool, RHS needs to share the successes and achievements of its students as effectively as possible to the district as a whole. This may help parents and students fully understand what the high school is about and what is offered as they make a decision about where to attend. c. Tuition and Financial Aid Riverdale charges tuition for those students living outside the district’s boundary who are not attending on an inter-district transfer. Tuition paying students have grown from 49 in 2002-03 to 120 as of February 2013, representing nearly $1.4 million in revenues and 21% of the operating budget. The district budgets 90% of the estimated tuition amounts, allowing for fluctuation in estimates, students who exit the schools before year end and those who are delinquent paying tuition. Annual tuition rates are set in early fall (for the following school year) by the school board to recover the cost of educating each student, which is the legal maximum that may be charged: Kindergarten $ 5,560 for the ½ day program st th 1 through 4 Grades 10,120 th th 5 through 12 Grades 11,950 Families with multiple children receive a 5% discount on the second and subsequent children attending on tuition basis. There are 12 siblings receiving the 5% discount in 2012-13. Financial aid is granted on a needs basis up for up to 50% of the annual tuition. The Riverdale Foundation has set aside about $70,000 for a three-year period to support financial aid. As that funding ends, the district is tasked with finding another way to continue providing financial aid in future years. Financial aid can help increase student body diversity both ethnic and socioeconomic. The district’s marketing consultant observed that competing private schools offer more financial aid to students, supporting families with up to $165,000 annual income. Committee members discussed whether funding financial aid through increased tuition rates would be advisable as well as whether lowering tuition rates would increase students. As mentioned in the earlier section, one of the side effects of depending upon tuition as a revenue stream is that Riverdale must continue to invest in marketing costs. Review of student applications and hosting potential students adds one FTE to the district’s overhead. Another added cost is related to the processing and collection of tuition receivables in the business office. Both costs are unique to RSD as a public school, and should be considered in their proper context as an investment. Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 7 2012-13 Tuition Rate Samples Enrollment Grade School 543 $11,120 1154 -- School Riverdale Jesuit Type K-8/HS HS Catlin Gabel Oregon Episcopal French American Portland Jewish Academy GS/MS/HS K-12 GS/MS/Feeder PK-8/Feeder 729 840 395 340 $21,550 $21,410 $14,820 $14,740 Middle School $11,950 -$23,050 $24,620 $15,950 $15,240 High School $11,950 11,525+2,600 + Books $24,750 $25,340 --- Recommendations: Lock in Tuition Revenues - The superintendent should evaluate ways to reduce exposure to bad debts in tuition such as requiring payment in full by July or August, working with a financial institution to loan money to those needing to pay monthly, and/or requiring tuition insurance from all families not paying in full – naming the district as the recipient. Evaluate Tuition Rates - The Board should consider an in-depth review of tuition rates that models what might happen if rates are lowered, if sibling discounts are increased, if rates are raised to generate additional financial aid. Emphasize and Encourage suggested level giving to Foundation – currently, a significant portion of in-district families do not participate in suggested level giving to the foundation, or do not give outright. A big part of what makes the Riverdale education experience special is the additional funding from the Local Option levy and the strong foundation contributions. Tuition students pay their share as it is built into tuition rates. Resident student and transfer student families need to recognize that paying their fair share is what helps create the positive learning environment. The Foundation needs to clearly identify what contributions support and encourage participation. D. Grant Funding The district has applied for few grants for curriculum and programs. No one person in the district is assigned to research grant possibilities and match them to district needs. The older High School facility needs window replacements for energy efficiency. Solar energy could offset some of the electric bills if it were eligible for tax credits or grants. Each of these energy/utility projects needs capital funding and could provide operating savings. Recommendations: Grants - Pursue special grant funding for energy related projects to help reduce operating costs. These might be able to work into elective opportunities for students to help design the projects. Grants – Actively pursue grants to enhance STEM curriculum and equipment Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 8 COST CONTROL The district is funded mainly from the State School Fund Formula that pays for resident and transfer students. As Oregon has been in recession and is slowly recovering, the revenues have not kept pace with cost increases such as PERS rates and automatic pay increases for instructional staff. The committee discussed options for the district to reduce operating and program costs in the near future. A. Athletics The athletic director shared information about the cost of athletics at the high school compared to the grade school. The Grade School offers school sponsored soccer, volleyball, basketball, and track and field at a participation fee of $300 per student. This year 149 middle school students are participating in these after school activities. The cost of providing middle school athletics is $50,780 and fees generate $44,700, leaving a General Fund subsidy of $6,080. Fees would need to increase to $345 to eliminate the subsidy. At the High School, 222 students participate in soccer, volleyball, cross country, basketball, golf, tennis and track and field at a fee of $350 per student. RHS operates a no-cut program allowing every interested student to participate. The cost to offer these athletic activities is $192,300 and fees recover $77,700. The General Fund subsidizes $114,600 for student participation. As mentioned in the Marketing discussion, many high school students consider athletic participation a critical part of their experience. The committee wondered if the subsidy should be considered an investment. Recommendation: Athletics - The deficit in athletic programming should be cut in half. Consider a combination of increasing participation fees, capturing gate receipts. Athletics – The committee felt that an increase to the Grade School athletic fee should be considered as recovering the cost most likely would not impact the number of students participating in the sports program. Athletics – The committee felt that recovering the full cost for the high school programs would most likely be excessive and result in a substantial reduction in student participation. It may benefit the district to have the amount of program subsidy clearly identified and recognize that it contributes to the overall high school experience and most likely has a positive impact on student retention and recruiting efforts at the high school. B. High School Electives Some students at the High School require the Algebra I and Geometry courses. Elective offerings at the High School have suffered since the district switched to three trimester math courses required of lower Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 9 level math students. Previously, these students were taught two trimesters of math and teachers taught one trimester of electives. The emphasis on math has led to not enough qualified teachers teaching electives to accommodate all students. The High School has been creative in dealing with this issue by assigning more students to independent studies and using parent volunteers to assist teaching electives under the direction of licensed teachers. Students participating in the Templeton Scholars program through Lewis and Clark also help reduce the scheduling burden. Recommendation: Electives - Look at reallocating existing staff to provide more elective offerings. Re-evaluate the decision to require three trimesters of lower level math. Consider requiring proficiency classes outside the school day as pre-requisites for students lagging in math skills. Partnerships - Leverage outside groups to provide more opportunities for students. Student teachers from Lewis and Clark, joint venture programs with neighboring colleges, outside groups like Saturday Academy for special classes to convert the fixed costs of teaching staff to variable costs based on the number of students served. C. Class Size Riverdale Grade School has reportedly emphasized small class sizes to prospective parents. According to the marketing and admissions staff, incoming parents are looking mostly for alternatives to their local public schools. The Oregonian has reported class sizes in neighboring school districts range from 25 to 37 at elementary schools, 32 to 46 at middle schools, 40-52 at high schools. In contrast, Riverdale has primary 1-2 blended classrooms averaging 16 students per teacher, 3-4 classrooms averaging 24 students, and 5-8 classrooms averaging 20 students. The smaller Riverdale class sizes have been subsidized by the Local Option levy, Foundation contributions, and deficit spending (drawdown of ending fund balances). As costs increase with PERS rates, other cost reductions must be implemented and/or tuition revenue must increase to fully offset this expenditure. Recommendation: Increase class size to full capacity - Some Grade School classes have 16 students while other are over 24 students. Increase the number of students in the 16 student class to a full class size of 24. Evaluate the cost of continuing small class sizes and how that is funded. Evaluate the impact to changes in class size, both the effect on desired programs and specifically the potential negative impact on revenue related to the ability to maintain and increase the number of tuition paying students. Consider the Marketing Team’s comments that small class sizes are a draw to potential parents. Improve margin mix in class - Fill open positions with tuition paying students. D. Administration, Business and Technology Services Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 10 In comparing Riverdale School District spending per pupil to other Oregon districts, Riverdale spends more on the categories of Central Administration, Principal’s Office, and Business/Technology Services than any of the other comparison districts. Further breakdown by function is found in Appendix G. Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 11 Comparison of 2011-12 Budgeted Expenditures per Student # students Gaston SD 511J 463 Central Admin $ 281 Business Svc/Technology Principal’s Office $ 817 $ 611 Total Administrative Support Services $ 1,709 Sisters SD 6 1,211 259 559 526 1,343 Philomath SD 17J 1,631 162 499 341 1,002 Ashland SD 5 2,784 288 705 756 1,749 Sherwood SD 88J 4,959 201 497 650 1,347 Corvallis SD 509J 6,364 176 649 426 1,251 Lake Oswego SD 7J 6,750 175 591 264 1,031 8,479 147 498 254 244 586 454 $ 1,285 941 $ 2,427 West Linn-Wilsonville SD 3J AVG Riverdale SD 51J 574 Amount to reduce to meet next highest district # new tuition students needed to offset $ 474 $ 1,012 $ $186X574=$106,764 $195X574=$111,930 $185X574=$106,190 9.3 9.7 9.2 899 Source: ODE data Fiscal Advisory Committee reviewed Colton and Corbett districts information and found the districts not comparable with Riverdale since the high schools are not accredited. Categories based on ChalkBoard Project, Open Books Although the Oregon Department of Education requires that all districts use the same chart of accounts, there may be some variation among districts. Also, the information includes only money that flows through district bank accounts, not support from the ESD. There are economies of scale in per student costs as the number of students increase. As well, some small school districts achieve economies of scale by having adjacent learning facilities, thereby reducing duplicative staffing. Riverdale budgeted for 574 students, only 22 other Oregon districts fall in the student range of 400 to 700. In reviewing the cost per student, the committee kept in mind that smaller districts have a proportionately larger cost per student for administrative functions. Also, the committee considered the effects of increasing students to help reduce the cost per student for overhead items. Reviewing total expenditures grouped by category offers a way to see the bigger picture about district spending taking into account the variation. Open Books developed the categories based on input from school professionals, business people, and parents to help the public gain deeper insight into school finance. The Central Administration category includes the amounts budgeted for the School Board, Superintendent’s Office, planning, grant writing, statistics, central special education administration. Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 12 Principal’s Office includes amounts budgeted for the Principal, School Secretary, copier, and other general school supplies. Business Services and Technology category includes general business services , human resources, purchasing support, communications, marketing, and technology. The committee found that RSD budgets to spend more per student in each of these administrative categories than the comparison districts. While some of the variation is due to geographic cost differences, the committee recommends that the Superintendent consider ways of reducing these administrative costs. D.1. Administration Riverdale currently operates with a full-time Superintendent, Grade School Principal, and High School Principal for a total of 3.0 FTE. The Oregon staffing average for districts with 400 to 700 students is 2.6 FTE total (Appendix H). Many parents expect the Principals and Superintendent to respond to concerns immediately and to make exceptions in programs, curriculum and schedules throughout the school year. This level of service is more expensive than in other districts. The goals of the district to provide an excellent individualized education, align the curriculum, and continue to attract tuition paying students add costs to the administrative functions. To match the next highest district in spending on Central Administration, Riverdale would need to reduce $39,606. The kinds of expenditures in this area are the legal fees, audit fees, election expenses, membership in Oregon School Boards Association, the Superintendent, and the Superintendent/Board executive assistant. In the Principal’s Office category, Riverdale would need to reduce by $111,930 to match the next highest district. Recommendations D.2. Reduce Administrative Costs - Committee members recommend that the Superintendent look at various scenarios to reduce overall administrative costs such as: a part-time Superintendent – or part-time principal, assigning some of the current administrative functions to less expensive counseling staff, one combined superintendent/principal position with a vice principal at each school. Given that in comparison to administrative staffing at other districts is less than that of Riverdale, the Superintendent needs to evaluate the structure and find a creative way to maintain high quality programs at a reduced cost. While the committee did not feel that it had enough hands on knowledge to determine which way might work best, our hope is to inform future decisions regarding both the Superintendent position and the Grade School Principal position openings. Business Services and Technology In the Business Services and Technology category, Riverdale outspends the next highest district by $185 per student or $106,190. Riverdale has artificially increased its Business Services and Technology category (Human Resources) budget by $42,500 by assigning district-wide unemployment costs to a central account. Distributing these costs by the function of the staff claiming unemployment would move them to the Teaching and Student Resources category and reduce the Human Resources costs by Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 13 $74/per student. Staff plans to make this change beginning with the 2013-14 budget. Additionally, Marketing costs add about $200 per student to Riverdale’s Business Services and Technology category. Riverdale is unique in its reliance upon tuition paying students and transfer students to continue to provide programs especially at the high school level. Specific marketing suggestions will show in a separate set of recommendations. Recommendation: Reduce Cost of Business/Technology - Further outsourcing of business/technology support functions should be pursued to determine whether it could result in less cost and/or better services. The committee recognizes again that each of these possible changes would need to be fully explored for any potential adverse effects prior to outsourcing. Specific areas to consider include: technology services from key specialized providers (for computer lab, system, software, hardware, website, network, data storage), the payroll processing to a third party provider, tuition collection to a financial institution. A shared services agreement for business or maintenance functions that other districts/MESD may be able to provide at lower cost. Marketing support is included in the table of costs per student, but recommendations are covered in an earlier section. Conclusion Committee members respectfully submit these recommendations to the Superintendent for his review. The suggestions offered are not intended to replace careful administrator scrutiny and professional expertise. The intent is that these suggestions will help guide the district through difficult budget preparation for the next several years. Fiscal Advisory Committee – Final Report Page 14