Bremen HS District #228 1 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft School Psychologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance with Critical Attributes DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Performance Levels Component 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist demonstrates little or no knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students. Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments to evaluate students. Psychologist uses 5–8 psychological instruments to evaluate students and determine accurate diagnoses. Psychologist uses a wide range of psychological instruments to evaluate students and knows the proper situations in which each should be used. Critical Attributes Uses incorrect or inappropriate data sources. Demonstrates no knowledge of test purpose, ages assessed, and administration technique. Uses inappropriate or outdated instruments to evaluate educational needs, interventions, and progress. Relies on limited data sources. Demonstrates limited knowledge of test purpose, ages assessed, and administration technique. Suggests inappropriate instruments to evaluate educational needs, interventions, and progress. Relies on a breadth of data sources. Demonstrates knowledge of test purpose, ages assessed, and administration technique. Accurately selects this information to suggest appropriate instruments that evaluate educational needs, interventions, and progress. Sample Artifacts: Case study psychological evaluation/report Narrative of how we explain the evaluations or other data to those participating at an IEP meeting RtI planning Use of psych test Planning Conference Questions #2, 6 and 9 Relies on a breadth of data sources. Accurately selects information to make specific recommendations for effective instruments that evaluate educational needs, interventions, and progress. Selects evaluation instruments based on specific student needs. Bremen HS District #228 2 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development and psychopathology Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist demonstrates little or no knowledge of child and adolescent development and psychopathology. Psychologist demonstrates basic knowledge of child and adolescent development and psychopathology. Critical Attributes School Psychologist is insensitive or unaware of the unique characteristics of the population. School Psychologist makes assumptions or designations of students/families with limited information. School Psychologist grouping and placement of students to provide services is inappropriate School Psychologist does not share this knowledge with colleagues through collaboration or trainings. School Psychologist allows inappropriate assumptions or designations of students/families to occur in the school setting. School Psychologist inconsistently groups students or provides services based on their needs and characteristics. Sample Artifacts: BIP’s case study psychological evaluation/report Training of staff – agendas, notes and sign-in sheets IEP meetings and assessments Planning Conference Questions #1, 8 and 9 Proficient Psychologist demonstrates thorough knowledge of child and adolescent development and psychopathology. School Psychologist remains current with the latest research in the field via DSM updates, research articles, attending conferences. School Psychologist applies and shares the most current knowledge with staff or colleagues. Students are grouped for services with consideration given to their developmental level, learning style, disabilities, and background. Excellent Psychologist demonstrates extensive knowledge of child and adolescent development and psychopathology and knows variations of the typical patterns. School Psychologist remains current with the latest research in the field regarding characteristics of students/families. School Psychologist formally presents the latest research or information about student/family characteristics to staff or colleagues. School Psychologist consistently gives consideration to the unique characteristics of students when they are grouped or services are provided and this is monitored throughout the school year. Bremen HS District #228 3 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 1c:Establishing goals for the psychology program appropriate to the setting and the students served Unsatisfactory Psychologist has no clear goals for the psychology program, or they are inappropriate to either the situation or the age of the students. Goals are not appropriately aligned to meet the needs of the student population. School Psychologist does not collaborate with school or district colleagues in order to develop goals for direct services. IEP goals for direct social work/psychology services are generic and not observable or measureable. Grouping and placement of students to provide services is inappropriate by not giving consideration to their unique needs. Needs Improvement Psychologist’s goals for the treatment program are rudimentary and are partially suitable to the situation and the age of the students. Goals are not always appropriately aligned to meet the needs of the student population. School Psychologist inconsistently collaborates with school or district colleagues in order to develop goals for direct services. IEP goals for direct social work/psychology services are sometimes specific, observable, and measurable. School Psychologist inconsistently groups students based on their needs and characteristics. Sample Artifacts: Accommodated profile for case study psychologist reports IEP’s RtI intervention Planned follow-up Student referrals to outside agency PALS work Planning Conference Questions #2 and 9 Proficient Psychologist’s goals for the treatment program are clear and appropriate to the situation in the school and to the age of the students. Goals are consistently aligned to meet the needs of the student population. School Psychologist makes an effort to collaborate with school or district colleagues in order to develop goals for direct services. IEP goals for direct social work/psychology services are specific to the needs of students and are observable and measurable. Students are grouped with consideration given to their unique needs and characteristics. Excellent Psychologist’s goals for the treatment program are highly appropriate to the situation in the school and to the age of the students and have been developed following consultations with students, parents, and colleagues. School Psychologist initiates and takes responsibility for meeting the needs of the student population through appropriately aligned goals. School Psychologist conducts a needs inventory or consult with staff/ administration in order to develop school-wide goals for psychology services. IEP goals for direct social work/psychology services are specific, observable, and measurable. Consideration is consistently given to the unique needs and characteristics of students when they are grouped for direct service. Bremen HS District #228 4 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 1d: Demonstrating knowledge of state and federal regulations and of resources both within and beyond the school and district Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist demonstrates little or no knowledge of governmental regulations or of resources for students available through the school or district. Psychologist displays awareness of governmental regulations and of resources for students available through the school or district, but no knowledge of resources available more broadly. The School Psychologist has little or no knowledge of governmental regulations The School Psychologist uses only school or districtprovided materials, even when more variety would assist some students. The School Psychologist does not seek out resources available to expand his/her own skill. Although the School Psychologist is aware of some student needs, he/she does not inquire about possible resources The School Psychologist is aware of governmental regulations The School Psychologist uses materials within the school or district but does not search beyond the school or district for resources. The School Psychologist participates in workshops offered by the school and district but does not pursue other professional development. The School Psychologist locates materials and resources for students that are available through the school and district but does not pursue any other avenues. Proficient Psychologist displays awareness of governmental regulations and of resources for students available through the school or district and some familiarity with resources external to the district. The School Psychologist is aware of governmental regulations Resources are at varied levels. Resources are supplemented by guest speakers and field experiences. The School Psychologist facilitates the use of Internet resources. Resources are multidisciplinary. The School Psychologist expands his/her knowledge through professional learning groups and organizations. The School Psychologist pursues options offered by universities. The School Psychologist provides lists of resources outside the school for students to draw on. Excellent Psychologist’s knowledge of governmental regulations and of resources for students is extensive, including those available through the school or district and in the community. The School Psychologist’s knowledge of governmental regulations is extensive. Resources are matched to student skill level. The School Psychologist has ongoing relationships with colleges and universities that support student articulation. The School Psychologist maintains a log of resources for student reference. The School Psychologist pursues apprenticeships to increase discipline knowledge. The School Psychologist facilitates student contact with resources outside the school. Sample Artifacts: Completion of SSI paperwork (social security) eligibility timelines Dissemination/organizations and collection of appropriate materials for programming for individualized students (i.e. resource packets) Jobs 2l Department Rehabilitation Service ACT paperwork; PowerSchool (EPAS, historical grades, current grades) Emails to parents or staff Workshops; Professional Development; CEU’s Planning Conference Questions #3 and 9 Bremen HS District #228 5 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 1e: Planning the psychology program, integrated with the regular school program, to meet the needs of individual students and including prevention Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist’s plan consists of a random collection of unrelated activities, lacking coherence or an overall structure. Psychologist’s plan has a guiding principle and includes a number of worthwhile activities, but some of them don’t fit with the broader goals. Psychologist has developed a plan that includes the important aspects of work in the setting. Guiding principle(s) exist for the school psychology program Learning activities are moderately challenging. Learning resources are suitable, but there is limited variety. Instructional groups are random, or they only partially support the goals of the school psychology program. Learning activities are uneven or don’t fit with broader goals. There is minimal integration with the regular school program Plan exists that includes important aspects of the school psychology program. Learning activities are matched to the goals of the school psychology program. Learning activities provide opportunity for higher-level thinking and planning Instructional student groups are organized thoughtfully to maximize learning and build on students’ strengths. The plan for the school psychology program is well structured, with reasonable time allocations. There is some integration with the regular school program. There is no evidence of a plan for the school psychology program Learning activities are unrelated and/or not well aligned to the goals of the school psychology program. Materials are not engaging or do not meet the goals of the school psychology program Instructional groups do not support learning. Plans are not structured or sequenced and are unrealistic in their expectations. There is no integration with the regular school program. Sample Artifacts: PPS team Sophomore Assistance Program PALS/HAWKS/PRIDE follow-up, notes, groups Summary of student types in group session Copies of emails sent to teachers in group purpose Proficient Outlook calendar Invitation to staff and parents Purpose of group for individual students Summary notes from RtI meeting Permission slips Excellent Psychologist’s plan is highly coherent and preventive and serves to support students individually, within the broader educational program. Plan supports students individually and in groups Learning activities permit student choice. Learning experiences and activities connect to the broader educational program. The plan for the school psychology program differentiates for individual student needs. There is full integration with the regular school program. N S-lead to group work Lessons (group) Development of RtI teams Planning Conference Questions #3, 4, 6 and 9 Bremen HS District #228 6 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 1f: Developing a plan to evaluate the psychology program Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist has no plan to evaluate the program or resists suggestions that such an evaluation is important. Psychologist has a rudimentary plan to evaluate the psychology program. Psychologist’s plan to evaluate the program is organized around clear goals and the collection of evidence to indicate the degree to which the goals have been met. Psychologist’s evaluation plan is highly sophisticated, with imaginative sources of evidence and a clear path toward improving the program on an ongoing basis. Counselor Assessments lack criteria. No evaluation plans for the program have been designed. School Psychologist resists suggestion to develop evaluation plans for the counseling program Counselor A limited evaluation plan exists. Only some of the instructional outcomes for the school psychology program are addressed in the planned assessments. Evaluation criteria for the program are vague. Counselor An evidence-based evaluation plan exists All the learning outcomes for the school psychology program have a method for assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results match learning expectations. Evaluation plans indicate modified assessments when they are necessary for some students. Evaluation plan criteria are clearly written. Counselor A sophisticated evaluation plan exists and includes imaginative sources of evidence. Assessments included in the evaluation plan provide opportunities for student choice. School Psychologist-designed evaluation plans and assessments are authentic, with real-world application as appropriate. Evaluation results indicate a path toward improving the program on an ongoing basis. Sample Artifacts: LEA bi-monthly Special Education Meetings CPDU’s South Suburban Psych Meeting District Psych Meeting ISPA Summary notes Contributions to the meetings Special education team meetings Planning Conference Questions #7 and 9 Bremen HS District #228 7 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft DOMAIN 2: THE ENVIRONMENT Performance Levels 2a: Establishing rapport with students Unsatisfactory Psychologist’s interactions with students are negative or inappropriate; students appear uncomfortable in the testing center. Critical Attributes The School Psychologist is disrespectful toward students or insensitive to students’ ages, cultural backgrounds, and developmental levels. Student body language indicates feelings of hurt, discomfort, or insecurity. The School Psychologist displays no familiarity with, or caring about, individual students. The School Psychologist disregards disrespectful interactions among students. Sample Artifacts: Student/Parent emails Case notes Narratives Log entries Planning Conference Questions #5 and 8 Needs Improvement Psychologist’s interactions are a mix of positive and negative; the psychologist’s efforts at developing rapport are partially successful. The quality of interactions between School Psychologist and students, or among students, is uneven, with occasional disrespect or insensitivity. The School Psychologist attempts to respond to disrespectful behavior among students, with uneven results. The School Psychologist attempts to make connections with individual students, but student reactions indicate that these attempts are not entirely successful. Proficient Psychologist’s interactions with students are positive and respectful; students appear comfortable in the testing center. Talk between School Psychologist and students and among students is uniformly respectful. The School Psychologist successfully responds to disrespectful behavior among students. Students participate willingly, but may be somewhat hesitant to offer their ideas in front of classmates. The School Psychologist makes general connections with individual students. Students exhibit respect for the School Psychologist. Excellent Students seek out the psychologist, reflecting a high degree of comfort and trust in the relationship. The School Psychologist demonstrates knowledge and caring about individual students’ lives beyond the class and school. Students seek out the School Psychologist. There is no disrespectful behavior among students. When necessary, students respectfully correct one another. Students participate without fear of put-downs or ridicule from either the School Psychologist or other students. The School Psychologist respects and encourages students' efforts. Bremen HS District #228 8 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 2b: Establishing a culture for positive mental health throughout the school Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist makes no attempt to establish a culture for positive mental health in the school as a whole, either among students or teachers, or between students and teachers. Psychologist’s attempts to promote a culture throughout the school for positive mental health in the school among students and teachers are partially successful. Psychologist promotes a culture throughout the school for positive mental health in the school among students and teachers. The culture in the school for positive mental health among students and teachers, while guided by the psychologist, is maintained by both teachers and students. School Psychologist is disengaged from and has limited knowledge of the culture and climate of the school. School Psychologist inconsistently participates in school-wide committees, leadership teams, or problem-solving teams. School Psychologist has limited participation in or demonstrates limited knowledge of the planning and/or implementation of Tier 1 social/emotional and behavioral supports and interventions. School Psychologist is aware of and actively makes attempts to enhance the culture and climate of the school. School Psychologist participates in school-wide committees, leadership teams, or problemsolving teams. School Psychologist is involved in and demonstrates knowledge of the planning and implementation of Tier 1 social/emotional and behavioral interventions. School Psychologist is invested in establishing a positive culture and climate throughout the school. School Psychologist assumes a leadership role in school- wide committees, leadership teams, or problem-solving teams. School Psychologist is actively involved in and demonstrates a vast knowledge of the planning and implementation of Tier 1 social/emotional and behavioral interventions. School Psychologist assists in the development and/or implementation of a needs assessment in order to determine which areas of climate and culture need support. School Psychologist neither is unaware of nor invested in the culture and climate of the school. School Psychologist does not participate in school-wide committees, leadership teams, or problem-solving teams. School Psychologist does not participate in nor have knowledge of the planning and/or implementation of Tier 1 social/emotional and behavioral supports and interventions. Sample Artifacts: Training/Workshops SIP Institute presentations Planning Conference Question #8 Bremen HS District #228 9 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 2c: Establishing and maintaining clear procedures for referrals Unsatisfactory No procedures for referrals have been established; when teachers want to refer a student for special services, they are not sure how to go about it. School Psychologist frequently leaves confidential materials in view of others and does not take proper measures to dispose of confidential materials. Materials are lost, misplaced, or unsecured. School Psychologist does not respect copyright laws pertaining to assessment materials. District procedures for maintaining student files/protocols are not followed. Timelines are regularly not met by School Psychologist. Sample Artifacts: Easy IEP initial documents RtI forms Any procedures set up by administration PPS referral form Needs Improvement Psychologist has established procedures for referrals, but the details are not always clear. School Psychologist occasionally leaves confidential materials in view of others and improperly disposes of confidential materials. Materials are not easily accessible and not always secured. School Psychologist inconsistently adheres to copyright laws that pertain to assessment materials. District procedures for maintaining student files/ protocols are followed inconsistently. Timelines are occasionally not met by School Psychologist Proficient Excellent Procedures for referrals and for meetings and consultations with parents and administrators are clear to everyone. Procedures for all aspects of referral and testing protocols are clear to everyone and have been developed in consultation with teachers and administrators. Confidential materials are appropriately stored and disposed of properly (e.g., shredding). Materials are readily available and secured. Copyright laws pertaining to assessment instruments and protocols are respected. District procedures for maintaining student files/protocols are followed. Timelines are met by School Psychologist. Specific protocols of practice are used to ensure that materials are kept confidential and disposed of properly. Materials are readily available and consistently secured. Copyright laws pertaining to assessment instruments and protocols are consistently respected. District procedures for maintaining student files/protocols are consistently followed. School Psychologist coordinates team efforts to meet special education timelines. Bremen HS District #228 10 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 2d: Establishing standards of conduct in the testing center Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient No standards of conduct have been established, and psychologist disregards or fails to address negative student behavior during an evaluation. Standards of conduct appear to have been established in the testing center. Psychologist’s attempts to monitor and correct negative student behavior during an evaluation are partially successful. Standards of conduct have been established in the testing center. Psychologist monitors student behavior against those standards; response to students is appropriate and respectful. Critical Attributes No apparent standards of conduct are in place. School Psychologist does not monitor student behavior. School Psychologist's response to misbehavior is ineffective. Standards of conduct are not evident. Student behavior is generally inappropriate. School Psychologist inconsistently monitors student behavior. School Psychologist's response to misbehavior is inconsistent. Sample Artifacts: Narrative on how we test students and establish rapport Notification to others when testing Planning Conference Questions #5 and 8 Standards of conduct are established. Student behavior is generally appropriate. School Psychologist frequently monitors student behavior. School Psychologist's response to misbehavior is effective. Excellent Standards of conduct have been established in the testing center. Psychologist’s monitoring of students is subtle and preventive, and students engage in selfmonitoring of behavior. Based on standards of conduct established, students independently use appropriate social communication strategies in therapy session. Students respectfully intervene with peers at appropriate moments to ensure compliance with standards of conduct. Student behavior is appropriate; any misbehavior is handled on an individualized basis. Bremen HS District #228 11 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels 2e: Organizing physical space for testing of students and storage of materials Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent The testing center is disorganized and poorly suited to student evaluations. Materials are not stored in a secure location and are difficult to find when needed. Materials in the testing center are stored securely, but the center is not completely well organized, and materials are difficult to find when needed. The testing center is well organized; materials are stored in a secure location and are available when needed. The testing center is highly organized and is inviting to students. Materials are stored in a secure location and are convenient when needed. Critical Attributes There are physical hazards in the office, testing area, or classroom, endangering student safety. The physical environment of the office, testing area, or classroom is in disarray or inappropriate to the planned activities. Available technology is not being used even if it is available and its use would enhance the lesson or activity Confidential documents are not maintained securely. The physical environment in the office, testing area, or classroom is safe but limited in scope for the planned activities. The physical environment is not an impediment to learning but does not enhance it. The School Psychologist makes limited use of available technology and other resources Confidential documents are maintained securely. The office, testing area, or classroom is safe, and appropriate for the planned activities The office, testing area, or classroom is arranged to support the school psychology program’s goals and learning activities. The School Psychologist makes appropriate use of available technology. Confidential documents are arranged and maintained securely. Sample Artifacts: Narrative on protocols, room set-up and storage Planning Conference Question #5 Reflection Conference Question #3 Modifications are made to the physical environment of the office, testing area, or classroom to accommodate students with special needs. There is total alignment between the learning activities and the physical environment of the office, testing area, or classroom. Students take the initiative to adjust the physical environment of the office, testing area, or classroom, or they have contributed ideas to the physical arrangement. The School Psychologist and students make extensive and imaginative use of available technology. Confidential documents are arranged and maintained securely. Bremen HS District #228 12 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft DOMAIN 3: DELIVERY OF SERVICE Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 3a: Responding to referrals; consulting with teachers and administrators Unsatisfactory Psychologist fails to consult with colleagues or to tailor evaluations to the questions raised in the referral. Knowledge of students' needs and interests does not drive recommendations. Has very limited approaches within his/her repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations, School Psychologist does not assist. Needs Improvement Proficient Psychologist consults on a sporadic basis with colleagues, making partially successful attempts to tailor evaluations to the questions raised in the referral. Psychologist consults frequently with colleagues, tailoring evaluations to the questions raised in the referral. Knowledge of students' needs and interests does not drive recommendations; rather, School Psychologist adheres to a predetermined approach. Has limited approaches within his/her repertoire to address diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations, School Psychologist responds only when directed by administration. Sample Artifacts: Consultation with outside doctors, specialists and feeder schools Emails to teachers on students returning from OD Weekly PALS and/or RtI meetings Emails with teachers/administrators Log entries PPS follow-up notes Sophomore Assistance Program IEP’s Dealing with behavior specialists Knowledge of students' needs and interests drives recommendations. Has a variety of approaches within his/her repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations, School Psychologist responds flexibly with usage of his/her time and adjustment of priorities. Excellent Psychologist consults frequently with colleagues, contributing own insights and tailoring evaluations to the questions raised in the referral. Knowledge of students' needs and interests consistently drives recommendations. Has a multitude of approaches within his/her repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations, School Psychologist responds flexibly with usage of his/her time and adjustment of priorities and assists other schools and/or staff within the district as needed. Bremen HS District #228 13 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 3b: Evaluating student needs in compliance with National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) guidelines Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist resists administering evaluations, selects instruments inappropriate to the situation, or does not follow established procedures and guidelines. Psychologist attempts to administer appropriate evaluation instruments to students but does not always follow established time lines and safeguards. Psychologist administers appropriate evaluation instruments to students and ensures that all procedures and safeguards are faithfully adhered to. Psychologist selects, from a broad repertoire, those assessments that are most appropriate to the referral questions and conducts information sessions with colleagues to ensure that they fully understand and comply with procedural time lines and safeguards. School Psychologist does not use appropriate assessment materials. School Psychologist does not follow standardized procedures when evaluating. School Psychologist’s reports are full of errors, are unclear, and contain professional jargon. School Psychologist’s evaluation results do not inform or guide interventions, eligibility, or supports. School Psychologist has limited knowledge about available assessment materials or uses inappropriate assessments. School Psychologist follows standardized procedures for evaluation inconsistently. School Psychologist’s reports are a mixture of professional jargon and "layman's" terms and are unclear to parents and staff. School Psychologist’s evaluation results provide limited guidance in the development of interventions, eligibility, or supports. School Psychologist is knowledgeable about available assessments and uses the appropriate instruments to answer questions based upon student characteristics. School Psychologist follows standardized administration procedures. School Psychologist’s reports rely on the use of "layman's" terms to ease comprehension for parents and staff. School Psychologist’s evaluation results inform and guide interventions, eligibility, and supports. School Psychologist is knowledgeable about a variety of assessments and selects the most appropriate instruments for addressing unique student characteristics. School Psychologist assesses a variety of student needs (e.g., autism, nonverbal, executive functioning, and cognitive impairments). School Psychologist builds rapport with students during assessment in order to obtain valid results. School Psychologist’s reports are understandable to parents and staff and include examples of student performance. School Psychologist’s results meaningfully contribute to the determination of interventions, eligibility, and supports. Sample Artifacts: Narrative on the testing materials available to the psychologist Domain meetings RtI; 504 meetings Bremen HS District #228 14 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 3c: Chairing evaluation team Unsatisfactory Psychologist declines to assume leadership of the evaluation team. School Psychologist refuses to be a part of the problemsolving team or does not participate in discussions about student concerns. Fails to make data-based decisions regarding instruction and interventions. Does not collaborate with other staff. Reports are inaccurate or inappropriate to audience. Sample Artifacts: Copy of IEP/chairing IEP meetings Reflection Conference Question #2 Needs Improvement Psychologist assumes leadership of the evaluation team when directed to do so, preparing adequate IEPs. Participation on the problemsolving team is inconsistent, and school psychologist rarely participates in discussions about student concerns. Has limited knowledge of tools and processes to effectively collect data and monitor progress. Uses incorrect or superfluous data for instructional planning or decision making. Reports are accurate but lack clarity and are not always appropriate to the audience Proficient Psychologist assumes leadership of the evaluation team as a standard expectation; prepares detailed IEPs. Regularly participates on the problem-solving team and makes meaningful contributions to discussions about student concerns. Consistently uses tools and processes to effectively collect data. Uses accurate data sources to assist with instructional planning, progress monitoring, and decision making. Reports are accurate, appropriate to audience and are written professionally Excellent Psychologist assumes leadership of the evaluation team and takes initiative in assembling materials for meetings. IEPs are prepared in an exemplary manner. Provides leadership to the problemsolving team and facilitates the process so that all members can provide meaningful contributions to discussions about student concerns. Effectively and consistently uses tools and processes to collect data and monitor progress. Mentors and/or guides others in the use of tools and processes to collect data and monitor progress. Relies on a variety of data sources to drive instructional planning, progress monitoring, and decision making Reports are accurate, clearly written using professional language and tailored for the audience. Bremen HS District #228 15 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 3d: Planning interventions to maximize students’ likelihood of success Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist fails to plan interventions suitable to students, or interventions are mismatched with the findings of the assessments. Psychologist’s plans for students are partially suitable for them or are sporadically aligned with identified needs. Critical Attributes School Psychologist either refuses to attend or does not contribute in appropriate ways to meetings in which interventions are developed for students. Grouping and placement of students to provide services is inappropriate. Services provided to students are inappropriate and do not address their unique needs. School Psychologist does not meet the required minutes that are designated in the problemsolving plan/504/IEP for social work/psychology services. School Psychologist provides limited, meaningful contributions to meetings in which interventions are developed for students. School Psychologist inconsistently groups students based on their unique needs and characteristics. Services are limited or not individualized to meet unique student needs. School Psychologist inconsistently meets the required minutes that are designated in the problemsolving plan/504/IEP for social work/psychology services. Proficient Psychologist’s plans for students are suitable for them and are aligned with identified needs. Sample Artifacts: Narrative of involvement with RtI process and the intervention available to our team Accommodation plans 504 plans Group and individual counseling Reflection Conference Question #2 School Psychologist regularly participates in meetings in which appropriate interventions are developed for students. Students are grouped with consideration given to their unique needs and characteristics. Services provided to students are evidence- based and planned out to meet their unique needs. School Psychologist consistently meets the required minutes that are designated in the problem-solving plan/504/IEP for social work/psychology services. Excellent Psychologist develops comprehensive plans for students, finding ways to creatively meet student needs and incorporate many related elements. School Psychologist provides leadership during meetings in which appropriate interventions are developed for students. Consideration is consistently given to the unique needs and characteristics of students when they are grouped for direct service. Services provided to students are individualized, based on thorough data collection, and monitored throughout the school year. School Psychologist always meets the required minutes that are designated in the problem-solving plan/504/IEP for social work/psychology services. Bremen HS District #228 16 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 3e: Maintaining contact with physicians and community mental health service providers Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist declines to maintain contact with physicians and community mental health service providers. Psychologist maintains occasional contact with physicians and community mental health service providers. Critical Attributes Little or no information regarding students or the services that are provided are available to community agencies. Community agencies are not aware of student progress. School Psychologist does not respond to communication requests made by community agencies. Communication during meetings or consultation is ineffective or disrespectful. School Psychologist does not advocate for the best interests of the student. Limited information regarding students or services that are provided and articulated to community agencies. Community agencies are minimally aware of student progress. School Psychologist is slow to respond to communication requests made by community agencies. School Psychologist inconsistently advocates for the best interests of the student. Sample Artifacts: Release of information obtained by psychologist and through IEP meetings Department rehabilitation service packets Educational consultant for hospitalized students (communication) Phone logs Schedule of follow-up meetings Proficient Psychologist maintains ongoing contact with physicians and community mental health service providers. Information regarding students and the services that are provided are regularly articulated to community agencies. Community agencies are aware of student progress. School Psychologist is knowledgeable about the services of community agencies and makes attempts to involve and communicate student progress with them. School Psychologist responds to communication requests made by community agencies in a timely fashion. School Psychologist advocates for the best interests of the student. Excellent Psychologist maintains ongoing contact with physicians and community mental health service providers and initiates contacts when needed. Information regarding students and the services that are provided are initiated by the School Psychologist and well-articulated to community agencies. Community agencies are engaged in conversations about student progress and feedback is valued. School Psychologist is highly knowledgeable about the services of community agencies and makes multiple attempts to involve and communicate student progress with them. School Psychologist initiates communication and responds to requests made by community agencies in a timely fashion. School Psychologist always advocates for the best interests of the student. Bremen HS District #228 17 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 3f: Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness Unsatisfactory Psychologist adheres to the plan or program, in spite of evidence of its inadequacy. When improvisation becomes necessary, School Psychologist is unable to adjust the lesson. School Psychologist’s knowledge of students’ needs and interests does not drive lessons. School Psychologist has very limited approaches within their repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations (e.g., crisis response), the School Psychologist does not assist. School Psychologist does not adjust interventions based on data as a result of a lack of progress monitoring. Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist makes modest changes in the treatment program when confronted with evidence of the need for change. Psychologist makes revisions in the treatment program when it is needed. Psychologist is continually seeking ways to improve the treatment program and makes changes as needed in response to student, parent, or teacher input. When improvisation becomes necessary, School Psychologist inconsistently makes adjustments to the lesson. School Psychologist’s knowledge of students’ needs and interests does not drive lessons; rather, the psychologist adheres to a pre-determined approach. School Psychologist has limited approaches within their repertoire to address diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations (e.g., crisis response), the School Psychologist responds only when directed by administration. School Psychologist continues with interventions at all Tiers regardless of information provided by data collected When improvisation becomes necessary, School Psychologist makes adjustments to the lesson. School Psychologist’s knowledge of students’ needs and interests drive lessons. School Psychologist has different approaches within their repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations (e.g., crisis response), the School Psychologist responds flexibly with usage of their time and adjustment of priorities. School Psychologist adjusts interventions at all Tiers based on ongoing and appropriate progress monitoring results. Sample Artifacts: Emails to teachers/staff and parents regarding IEP changes; Amendments to IEP’s PD evaluation from students about small group work When improvisation becomes necessary, School Psychologist quickly makes adjustments to the lesson based on data. School Psychologist’s knowledge of students’ needs and interests consistently drive lessons. School Psychologist has a multitude of approaches within their repertoire to address the diverse needs of students. During unexpected situations (e.g., crisis response), the School Psychologist responds flexibly with usage of their time and adjustment of priorities and will assist other schools and/or staff within the district as needed. School Psychologist assumes a leadership role when adjustments to interventions are needed and ensures that this occurs at all Tiers based on ongoing and appropriate progress monitoring results Bremen HS District #228 18 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft DOMAIN 4: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES Component 4a:Reflecting on practice Performance Levels Unsatisfactory Psychologist does not reflect on practice, or the reflections are inaccurate or self-serving. Critical Attributes School Psychologist does not assess the effectiveness of services provided. School Psychologist is unable to communicate personal strengths and weaknesses or ways that services can be improved School Psychologist makes no suggestions for improvement Needs Improvement Psychologist’s reflection on practice is moderately accurate and objective without citing specific examples, and with only global suggestions as to how it might be improved. School Psychologist inconsistently assesses the effectiveness of services provided. School Psychologist ineffectively communicates personal strengths and weaknesses or ways that services can be improved. School Psychologist offers general modifications for future service. Sample Artifacts: Reflection survey results Narrative on particular students we work with Emails requesting further information on students Reflection Conference Questions #1-7 Proficient Excellent Psychologist’s reflection provides an accurate and objective description of practice, citing specific positive and negative characteristics. Psychologist makes some specific suggestions as to how the counseling program might be improved. Psychologist’s reflection is highly accurate and perceptive, citing specific examples that were not fully successful for at least some students. Psychologist draws on an extensive repertoire to suggest alternative strategies. School Psychologist accurately assesses the effectiveness of services provided citing specific evidence. School Psychologist is able to effectively communicate personal strengths and weaknesses, as well as ways that services can be improved. School Psychologist draws upon appropriate resources to suggest alternate strategies to refine own performance. School Psychologist regularly and accurately assesses the effectiveness of services provided citing specific indicators of effectiveness. School Psychologist engages in dialogue with administration and/or colleagues about personal strengths and weaknesses, as well as ways that services can be improved. School Psychologist’s suggestions for improvement draw on an extensive repertoire. Bremen HS District #228 19 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 4b: Communicating with families Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Psychologist fails to communicate with families and secure necessary permission for evaluations or communicates in an insensitive manner. Psychologist’s communication with families is partially successful; permissions are obtained, but there are occasional insensitivities to cultural and linguistic traditions. Critical Attributes Little or no information regarding the school psychology program is available to parents. School Psychologist fails to secure necessary permission for evaluations Families are unaware of their children's progress. Family engagement activities are lacking. There is some culturally inappropriate communication. Proficient Psychologist communicates with families and secures necessary permission for evaluations and does so in a manner sensitive to cultural and linguistic traditions. School- or district-created materials about the school psychology program are sent home. School Psychologist obtains permission for evaluations, with occasional insensitivities School Psychologist sends home infrequent or incomplete information about the school psychology program. School Psychologist maintains school-required contacts but does little else to inform families about student progress. Some of the School Psychologist's communications are inappropriate to families’ cultural norms. Sample Artifacts: Emails/narratives Domain paperwork with documented signatures Invitations Permission slips School Psychologist regularly makes information about the school psychology program available. School Psychologist secures necessary permission for evaluations sensitive to culture and linguistics. School Psychologist regularly sends home information about student progress. School Psychologist develops activities designed to engage families successfully and appropriately in their children’s progress and learning. Most of the School Psychologist's communications are appropriate to families’ cultural norms. Log of parent meetings Easy IEP Phone logs Excellent Psychologist secures necessary permissions and communicates with families in a manner highly sensitive to cultural and linguistic traditions. Psychologist reaches out to families of students to enhance trust. School Psychologist communicates with families in a variety of ways. School Psychologist secures necessary permissions in a manner highly sensitive to cultural and linguistic traditions. School Psychologist seeks out avenues and means to further improve communication with families. School Psychologist ensures that a variety of means of access are available to families. All of the School Psychologist's communications are highly sensitive to families’ cultural norms. Bremen HS District #228 20 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 4c: Maintaining accurate records Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist’s records are in disarray; they may be missing, illegible, or stored in an insecure location. Psychologist’s records are accurate and legible and are stored in a secure location. Psychologist’s records are accurate and legible, well organized, and stored in a secure location. Psychologist’s records are accurate and legible, well organized, and stored in a secure location. They are written to be understandable to another qualified professional. Critical Attributes There is no system for either instructional or noninstructional records. Record-keeping systems are in disarray and provide incorrect or confusing information. Sample Artifacts: Copy of IEP’s Outlook calendar or personal calendar Narrative of the filing system EL IEP 504 plans The School Psychologist has a process for student records. However, it may be out of date or may not permit students to access the information. The School Psychologist's process for tracking student progress is cumbersome to use. The School Psychologist has a process for tracking some, but not all, noninstructional information, and it may contain some errors. The School Psychologist's process for student records is efficient and effective; students have access to information about completed and/or missing components. The School Psychologist has an efficient and effective process for recording student attainment of learning goals; students are able to see how they’re progressing. The School Psychologist's process for recording noninstructional information is both efficient and effective. School Psychologist maintains records that are well organized. School Psychologist's reports are accurate on a consistent basis. School Psychologist consistently meets deadlines and is able to complete reports efficiently. School Psychologist serves as a model for record keeping and completion of reports. Bremen HS District #228 21 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Performance Levels Component 4d: Participating in a professional community Unsatisfactory Psychologist’s relationships with colleagues are negative or selfserving, and psychologist avoids being involved in school and district events and projects. Critical Attributes School Psychologist does not seek opportunities for continued professional development such as professional readings, attending district in- services, or on-going dialogue with colleagues. School Psychologist is aversive to feedback from colleagues and administration. School Psychologist does not participate in building- level Professional Learning Communities. School Psychologist does not attend department meetings. Needs Improvement Psychologist’s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and psychologist participates in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. School Psychologist rarely seeks opportunities for continued professional development such as professional readings, attending district in- services, or on-going dialogue with colleagues. School Psychologist inconsistently accepts feedback from colleagues and administration. School Psychologist participates in building- level Professional Learning Communities, but does not contribute. School Psychologist inconsistently attends and rarely participates in department meetings. Proficient Psychologist participates actively in school and district events and projects and maintains positive and productive relationships with colleagues. School Psychologist seeks opportunities for continued professional development such as professional readings, attending district in-services, or on-going dialogue with colleagues. School Psychologist accepts feedback from colleagues and administration in order to improve practice. School Psychologist regularly participates in building-level Professional Learning Communities and makes contributions. School Psychologist consistently attends and participates in department meetings. School Psychologist provides inservices or presentations to team. School Psychologist participates on and contributes to buildinglevel committees as requested. Excellent Psychologist makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and projects and assumes leadership with colleagues. School Psychologist seeks opportunities for continued professional development such as professional readings, attending conferences/workshops, or ongoing dialogue with colleagues in order to improve practices. School Psychologist solicits feedback from colleagues and administration in order to improve practice. School Psychologist assumes a leadership role in building-level Professional Learning Communities. School Psychologist consistently attends and contributes to in department meetings. School Psychologist provides inservices or presentations to staff, parents, department, colleagues, or other professionals outside of the district. School Psychologist participates on and contributes to district-level committees. Bremen HS District #228 22 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Sample Artifacts: (For 4d) ISPA Professional Development CEU’s, CPDU’s, etc. Faculty meetings SIP day participation Conferences Presentation at October Institute Collaboration with colleagues NASP memberships South Suburban Psych Association – narratives of our involvement in these communities Documentation of other CPDU’s Psychologist twice meeting as a small community to discuss case studies Sharing resources – handouts, teaching materials, PowerPoints, websites, workshops Mentoring/sharing knowledge and resources Building relations in professional community School events/volunteering Bremen HS District #228 23 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 4e: Engaging in professional development Unsatisfactory Psychologist does not participate in professional development activities, even when such activities are clearly needed for the ongoing development of skills. Does not seek opportunities for continued professional development. Does not participate in any activity that might enhance knowledge or skill. Purposefully resists discussing performance with supervisors or colleagues. Makes no effort to participate in professional organizations. Sample Artifacts: Conferences SIP meetings Joining professional organizations Curriculum revision committees Workshops Cohorts/taking classes Trying new things in the classroom Mentoring Reflection logs Observing colleagues Needs Improvement Psychologist’s participation in professional development activities is limited to those that are convenient or are required. Rarely seeks opportunities for continued professional development. Participates in professional development when required. Reluctantly accepts feedback from supervisors and colleagues. Rarely participates in professional organizations. Proficient Psychologist seeks out opportunities for professional development based on an individual assessment of need. Seeks regular opportunities for continued professional development. Welcomes colleagues and supervisors into the classroom for the purposes of gaining insight from their feedback. Actively participates in organizations designed to contribute to the profession. Excellent Psychologist actively pursues professional development opportunities and makes a substantial contribution to the profession through such activities as offering workshops to colleagues. Seeks regular opportunities for continued professional development, including initiating action research. Actively seeks feedback from supervisors and colleagues. Takes an active leadership role in professional organizations in order to contribute to the profession. Online communities (web 2.0) Webinars CPDU Certificates Transcripts Goals UbD units PowerPoints or handouts from presentations (SIP/Institute) Advanced degrees Published articles/books ACT training Bremen HS District #228 24 Psychologist Rubric 2014 - Draft Critical Attributes Performance Levels Component 4f: Showing professionalism Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent Psychologist displays dishonesty in interactions with colleagues, students, and the public and violates principles of confidentiality. Psychologist is honest in interactions with colleagues, students, and the public, plays a moderate advocacy role for students, and does not violate confidentiality. Psychologist displays high standards of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality in interactions with colleagues, students, and the public, and advocates for students when needed. Psychologist can be counted on to hold the highest standards of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality and to advocate for students, taking a leadership role with colleagues. School Psychologist is dishonest. School Psychologist does not notice the needs of students. School Psychologist engages in practices that are selfserving. School Psychologist willfully rejects district regulations. School Psychologist is not aware of NASP’s Principles for Professional Ethics School Psychologist is honest. School Psychologist notices the needs of students, but is inconsistent in addressing them. School Psychologist does not notice that practices are ineffective or that they result in poor outcomes for students. School Psychologist minimally complies with district regulations or only when prompted. School Psychologist inconsistently adheres to NASP’s Principles for Professional Ethics Sample Artifacts: Maintaining good peer relationships Respectful interactions Connecting with colleagues to plan Modeling professional behavior for students Sharing information Achieving common goals Being consistent – demonstrate fairness School Psychologist is honest and known for having high standards of integrity. School Psychologist actively addresses student needs. School Psychologist actively works to provide opportunities for student success within the psychological practice. School Psychologist complies with district regulations. School Psychologist adheres to NASP’s Principles for Professional Ethics. Proper communication Timely response to correspondence Returning phone calls Joining professional organizations Timeliness and punctuality Attentiveness at meetings Attendance at school and meetings School Psychologist is considered a leader in terms of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality. School Psychologist proactively addresses student needs. School Psychologist makes a concerted effort to ensure opportunities are available for student success within the psychological practice. School Psychologist takes a leadership role regarding district regulations. School Psychologist always adheres to NASP’s Principles for Professional Ethics. Committee participation Advocate for students – decision making ability Respectful to students Responding to student/parent needs or concerns