Writing Rubrics

advertisement
2-Point Rubric—Short-Response
Score
2 Point
1 Point
0 Point
Response Features
The features of a 2-point response are
Valid inferences and/or claims from the text where required by the
prompt
Evidence of analysis of the text where required by the prompt
Relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, and/or other information
from the text to develop response according to the requirements of the
prompt
Sufficient number of facts, definitions, concrete details, and/or other
information from the text as required by the prompt
Complete sentences where errors do not impact readability
The features of a 1-point response are
A mostly literal recounting of events or details from the text as required
by the prompt
Some relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, and/or other
information from the text to develop response according to the
requirements of the prompt
Incomplete sentences or bullets
The features of a 0-point response are
A response that does not address any of the requirements of the prompt
or is totally inaccurate
No response (blank answer)
A response that is not written in English
A response that is unintelligible or indecipherable
If the prompt requires two texts and the student only references one text, the response can be scored no higher than a 1.
New York State Grade 6-8 Expository Writing Evaluation Rubric
CRITERIA
CCLS
CONTENT AND ANALYSIS:
the extent to which the
essay conveys complex
ideas and information
clearly and accurately in
order to support claims in
an analysis of topics or
texts
W.2
R.1–9
COMMAND OF EVIDENCE:
the extent to which the
essay presents evidence
from the provided texts to
support analysis and
reflection
COHERENCE,
ORGANIZATION, AND
STYLE: the extent to which
the essay logically
organizes complex ideas,
concepts, and information
using formal style and
precise language
CONTROL OF
CONVENTIONS: the extent
to which the essay
demonstrates command of
the conventions of
standard English grammar,
usage, capitalization,
punctuation, and spelling
W.9
R.1–9
W.2
L.3
L.6
W.2
L.1
L.2
3
Essays at this level:
— clearly introduce a topic in a
manner that follows from the task
and purpose
SCORE
2
Essays at this level:
—introduce a topic in a manner that
follows generally from the task and
purpose
1
Essays at this level:
—introduce a topic in a manner
that does not logically follow from
the task and purpose
—demonstrate grade-appropriate
analysis of the text(s)
—demonstrate a literal
comprehension of the text(s)
—demonstrate little understanding
of the text(s)
—develop the topic with relevant,
well-chosen facts, definitions,
concrete details, quotations, or other
information and examples from the
text(s)
—develop the topic with relevant
facts, definitions, details,
quotations, or other information and
examples from the text(s)
—partially develop the topic of the
essay with the use of some textual
evidence, some of which may be
irrelevant
—demonstrate an attempt to use
evidence, but only develop ideas
with minimal, occasional evidence
which is generally invalid or
irrelevant
—provide no evidence or
provide evidence that is
completely irrelevant
—sustain the use of varied, relevant
evidence
—sustain the use of relevant
evidence, with some lack of variety
—use relevant evidence
inconsistently
—exhibit clear organization, with the
skillful use of appropriate and varied
transitions to create a unified whole
and enhance meaning
—exhibit clear organization, with
the use of appropriate transitions to
create a unified whole
—exhibit some attempt at
organization, with inconsistent use
of transitions
—exhibit little attempt at
organization, or attempts to
organize are irrelevant to the task
—exhibit no evidence of
organization
—establish and maintain a formal
style, using grade-appropriate,
stylistically sophisticated language
and domain-specific vocabulary with
a notable sense of voice
—establish and maintain a formal
style using precise language and
domain-specific vocabulary
—establish but fail to maintain a
formal style, with inconsistent use
of language and domain-specific
vocabulary
—lack a formal style, using
language that is imprecise or
inappropriate for the text(s) and
task
—use language that is
predominantly incoherent or
copied directly from the text(s)
—provide a concluding statement or
section that is compelling and follows
clearly from the topic and information
presented
—provide a concluding statement
or section that follows from the
topic and information presented
—provide a concluding statement
or section that follows generally
from the topic and information
presented
—provide a concluding statement
or section that is illogical or
unrelated to the topic and
information presented
—do not provide a concluding
statement or section
—demonstrate grade-appropriate
command of conventions, with few
errors
—demonstrate grade-appropriate
command of conventions, with
occasional errors that do not hinder
comprehension
—demonstrate emerging command
of conventions, with some errors
that may hinder comprehension
—demonstrate a lack of command
of conventions, with frequent
errors that hinder comprehension
—are minimal, making
assessment of conventions
unreliable
4
Essays at this level:
—clearly introduce a topic in a
manner that is compelling and
follows logically from the task and
purpose
—demonstrate insightful analysis of
the text(s)
0
Essays at this level:
—demonstrate a lack of
comprehension of the text(s) or
task
If the prompt requires two texts and the student only references one text, the response can be scored no higher than a 2.
If the student writes only a personal response and makes no reference to the text(s), the response can be scored no higher than a 1.
Responses totally unrelated to the topic, illegible, incoherent, or blank should be given a 0.
A response totally copied from the text(s) with no original student writing should be scored a 0.
Download