MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ETME 491 Fall 2015 Wind Energy Engineering R. Larson Lab 4: Wind Turbine Component Vibration Discussion: Loading scenarios in wind turbines can often result in component vibration. As outlined in the Manwell text, turbine towers and individual turbine blades are essentially cantilever beams. In this laboratory, students will investigate harmonic response of structures, and utilize advanced measurement equipment to analyze vibration modes of representative components. Equipment: Laser Vibrometer with associated computer DAQ system and power electronics Power Amplifier Function Generator Mini-Shaker and Brass rod test article Small wind turbine blade test articles (2) Ruler / calipers Exercise: OBJECTIVE: Determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes of beams from experiment, and compare theoretical predictions with experimental results. both from theory and, and compare the results. Observe the phenomena of nodes and resonance. DATA: The mass and relevant geometry of test rods: use 8.4 Mg/m and 110 GPa for the mass density and elastic modulus of brass, respectively, 3.18 mm (0.125 in) diameter, and 450.9 mm (17.75 in) length (verify in the lab). 2) Determine the first three natural frequencies of the brass rod detailed above in fixed-free configuration. LAB PROCEDURE: 1) Take the round brass rod and center it in the shaker clamp (which now simulates two cantilevered beams). Measure the length of the rod in this configuration. 2) Knowing approximately where to look, find experimentally the first natural frequency of the brass cantilever beam by increasing the frequency of the shaker and noting the changes in the mode shape as a natural frequency is encountered. Note the magnitude of the first natural frequency. 3) Now excite the beam to mode 2. Note the magnitude of the mode 2 frequency and record the position of the corresponding node(s) on the beam. Repeat for mode 3. QUESTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: 1) Compute the theoretical natural frequencies of the round brass beam and compare these to the measured values (% difference). From theory, predict the nodal locations and compare to the measured nodal locations (% difference). Assemble these results in a table and discuss the comparisons. 2) Why is it important that a mechanical designer know the mode shapes and node locations of a vibrating beam or other structure? Give specific examples. Results: 1. Calculate theoretical wind power. (You'll need to use the Ideal Gas Law ρ=p/RT to find density) 2. Determine power produced from measurements of voltage and current. 3. Calculate system efficiency. as a function of KEwind versus Wind Turbine Kinetic Energy (i.e. Power produced during some known time period:The time period can be found from a sample of your data, knowing sample rates and point count you can determine time.) 4. Report on availability and capacity factor: For your Availability calculation, use the percentage of time that your completed rotor assembly is ready to produce power -versus- the entire 1hour 50 minute lab duration. For your Capacity Factor calculation, you'll need a turbine output power rating: For this exercise, RATE your turbine at 5 milli-watts nameplate capacity. 5. Submit an ELECTRONIC lab report via D2L Drop Box, using proper format. One report per group. List all participating group members.