Key Issue Geography To what extent is the global South an area of similarity or diversity? 1987: Brandt report published, describes countries below the line as the global South But many successive and cumulative changes since then: Development of the new international division of labour Emergence of some countries Creation of trade-blocs in the South... Changed the reality of this so-called global South: to what extent is it still an area of similarity? I. - Emergence of extremes from original similarity Economy: originally poor Wealth: Saudi Arabia’s GDP is $440bn just below Sweden; Kuwait GDP of $130M; Angola GDP of $90M Trade: Shanghai is the busiest port in the world with 590mt moved in 2009, China 1st economy in the world since 2014 Development: originally low (HDI lower than 0.8) HDI: South Korea is 0.891 higher than France 0.884 Life expectancy: 63 in Ethiopia, 80 in South Korea Education: Georgia has the highest literacy rate in the world, Mali lowest 26,2 Income: 13,000$Int (dollar international) GDP per capita in PPP in Algeria, 2,700 in Kenya Demography: originally rapidly increasing (stage 2-3) Birth rate: Korea lowest birth rate in the world 1.2; Angola highest 7 II. - Subdivisions: similarity in diversity Manufacturing countries, emerging countries China Resources, OPEC Trade blocs, MERCOSUR (or UNASUR?) Culture: experience of colonisation, US influence, common language (Spanish and Portuguese) Objective: greater integration from economic to political, modelled by the EU Geography, Sub-Saharan Africa Artificial groupings, BRIICS, MIKT BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa; MIKT Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey: similar economic potential, grouping elaborated by the bank Goldman Sachs for portfolio investors III. - The global South, by opposition to the Global North Political domination: Comparative stability while the South is subject to great turmoil (war, conflict, poverty, anarchy, tyranny) Permanent seats at the UN; greater weight at the IMF, World Bank, WTO Technological domination: 80% of FDI and TRIAD represents 85% of world research Economic domination: Wealth: 20% richest live in North, control 85% of the wealth, 20% poorest in the South Trade: Triad represents 80% of world trade Cultural domination: Urban life: own all of the world’s global cities, except Johannesburg in Africa Consumption: owns 75% of the first 500 TNCs Conclusion: The global South as described in the 1987 Brandt report is no longer relevant: South comprises the two extremes in economy, demography and development But, still possible to find sub-divisions within the South between country groupings following various criteria (economic growth rate, resources, economic agreements, geography, investment) Plus, South can still be identified by opposition to the North, through forms of domination: political, technological, economic and cultural So in conclusion, today the South is a juxtaposition of areas of similarity, creating an inner diversity that fades in the face of the outer North