Table for Dryad

advertisement
Table 1: Literature survey: observed proportion of total investment in seed production (pre-pollination + post-pollination
costs) that is allocated during the pre-pollination period.
Species
Plant group
Observed proportion of total
Reference
investment in seed
production allocated to prepollination costs
Callitris muelleri
gymnosperm
0.0008
Lord and Westoby 2011
Araucaria bidwillii
gymnosperm
0.0010
Lord and Westoby 2011
Cedrus deodara
gymnosperm
0.0013
Lord and Westoby 2011
Ginkgo biloba
gymnosperm
0.0015
Lord and Westoby 2011
Actinostrobus arenarius
gymnosperm
0.0023
Lord and Westoby 2011
Sequoia sempervirens
gymnosperm
0.0044
Lord and Westoby 2011
Cupressus sp.
gymnosperm
0.0052
Lord and Westoby 2011
Juniperus thurifera
gymnosperm
0.0078
Montesinos et al. 2012
Taxus baccata
gymnosperm
0.0124
Lord and Westoby 2011
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana
gymnosperm
0.0212
Lord and Westoby 2011
Podocarpus spinulosus
gymnosperm
0.0344
Lord and Westoby 2011
Pinus halepensis
gymnosperm
0.0478
Ne'eman et al. 2011
Macrozamia communis
gymnosperm
0.4702
Lord and Westoby 2011
Casuarina distyla
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0050
Lord and Westoby 2006
Pistacia lentiscus
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0500
Milla et al. 2006
Spinifex hirsutus
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0570
Lord and Westoby 2006
Platanus racemosa
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0610
Lord and Westoby 2006
Dodonea triquetra
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0650
Lord and Westoby 2006
Corema album
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.0780
Guitián et al. 1997
Schiedea salicaria (bisexual)
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.1457
Sakai et al. 2007, Weller and Sakai 2005
Caustis recurvata
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.2040
Lord and Westoby 2006
Schiedea salicaria (female)
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.2289
Sakai et al. 2007, Weller and Sakai 2005
Rumex acetosella
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.2305
Korpelainen 1992
Rumex acetosa
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.2320
Korpelainen 1992
Schiedea adamantis (bisexual)
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.4243
Campbell et al. 2010
Schiedea adamantis (female)
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.5490
Campbell et al. 2010
Carex picta
Wind-pollinated angiosperm
0.9102
Delph et al. 1993
Smilax glycophylla
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0220
Lord and Westoby 2006
Solanum dulcamara
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0230
Cruden and Lyon 1985
Borderea pyrenaica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0275
García and Antor 1995
Micrantheum ericoides
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0290
Lord and Westoby 2006
Stephania japonica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0310
Lord and Westoby 2006
Ilex aquifolium
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0419
Obeso and Retuerto 2002
Oemleria cerasiformis
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0450
Antos and Allen 1994
Cucurbita foetidissima
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0505
Kohn 1989
Phyllanthus thymoides
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0680
Lord and Westoby 2006
Dioscorea japonica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0778
Mizuki et al. 2005
Nyssa sylvatica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0799
Cipollini and Stiles 1991
Aucuba japonica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0808
Abe 2002
Hesperis matronalis
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0866
Cruden and Lyon 1985
Wurmbea dioica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.0869
Barrett et al. 1999
Gilia achilleifolia
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1024
Schoen 1982a,b
Diospyros australis
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1050
Lord and Westoby 2006
Smyrnium olusatrum
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1101
Lloyd 1980
Ilex leucoclada
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1113
Torimaru and Tomaru 2012
Aconitum gymnandrum
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1129
Zhao et al. 2008
Rubus chamaemorus
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1234
Agren 1988
Lathyrus vernus
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1250
Ehrlén 1991
Oxalis violacea
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1318
Cruden and Lyon 1985
Clutia pulchella
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1338
Thompson and Edwards 2001
Sisyrinchium campestre
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1370
Cruden and Lyon 1985
Acer japonicum
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1375
Sato 2002
Hepatica nobilis
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1385
Ehrlén 1991
Stylidium armeria
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1443
Brookes et al 2008, 2010
Silene alba
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1497
Gross and Soule 1981, Ehrlén 1991
Siparuna grandiflora
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1527
Nicotra 1999
Geranium maculatum
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1568
Cruden and Lyon 1985
Rhus trichocarpa
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1827
Matsuyama and Sakimoto 2008
Rhus javanica
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.1950
Matsuyama and Sakimoto 2008
Hebe subalpina
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.2227
Delph 1990
Gynatrix pulchella
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.2438
Leigh et al. 2006
Asclepias quadrifolia
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.2512
Chaplin and Walker 1982
Leucopogon melaleucoides
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.2797
Vaughton and Ramsey 2011
Narthecium asiaticum
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.2895
Ishii and Sakai 2002
Zanthoxylum ailanthoides
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3101
Matsuyama and Sakimoto 2010
Leucopogon melaleucoides
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3112
Vaughton and Ramsey 2011
Limnanthes douglasii
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3130
this study
Cirsium arvense
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3160
Lord and Westoby 2006
Ligularia virgaurea
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3708
Zhang et al. 2012
Aciphylla simplicifolia
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.3878
Pickering and Arthur 2003
Blandfordia grandiflora
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.4220
Ramsey 1993
Impatiens hypophylla v. microhypophylla
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.4708
Sato and Yahara 1999
Impatiens biflora
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.4758
Schemske 1978
Ipomopsis aggregata
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.5510
Cambell 1997
Clematis microphylla
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.5600
Lord and Westoby 2006
Phacelia linearis (bisexual)
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.6025
Eckhart 1992a, b
Impatiens hypophylla v. hypophylla
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.6113
Sato and Yahara 1999
Impatiens pallida
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.6179
Schemske 1978
Lomandra longifolia
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.6260
Lord and Westoby 2006
Phacelia linearis (female)
Animal-pollinated angiosperm
0.7065
Eckhart 1992a, b
References
Abe, T. 2002. Flower bud abortion influences clonal growth and sexual dimorphism in the understory dioecious shrub Aucuba japonica
(Cornaceae). Annals of Botany 89:675-681.
Ågren, J. 1988. Sexual differences in biomass and nutrient allocation in the dioecious Rubus chamaemorus. Ecology 69:962-973.
Antos, J. A., and G. A. Allen. 1994. Biomass allocation among reproductive structures in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis – a
functional interpretation. Journal of Ecology 82:21-29.
Barrett, S. C. H., A. L. Case, and G. B. Peters. 1999. Gender modification and resource allocation in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica
(Colchicaceae). Journal of Ecology 87:123-137.
Brookes, R. H., L. K. Jesson, and M. Burd. 2008. A test of simultaneous resource and pollen limitation in Stylidium armeria. New
Phytologist 179:557-565.
Brookes, R. H., L. K. Jesson, and M. Burd. 2010. Reproductive investment within inflorescences of Stylidium armeria varies with the
strength of early resource commitment. Annals of Botany 105:687-705.
Campbell, D. R. 1997. Genetic correlation between biomass allocation to male and female functions in a natural population of Ipomopsis
aggregate. Heredity 79:606-614.
Campbell, D. R., S. G. Weller, A. K. Sakai, T. M. Culley, P. N. Dang, and A. K. Dunbar-Wallis. 2010. Genetic variation and covariation in
floral allocation of two species of Schiedea with contrasting levels of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 65:757-770.
Chaplin, S. J., and J. L. Walker. 1982. Energetic constraints and adaptive significance of the floral display of a forest milkweed. Ecology
63:1857-1870.
Cipollini, M. L., and E. W. Stiles. 1991. Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica: sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and
nutrient flux. Oecologia 86:585-593.
Cruden, R. C., and D. L. Lyon. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems.
66:299-306.
Delph, L. F. 1990. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. Ecology 71:1342-1351.
Delph, L. F., Y. Lu, and L. D. Jayne. 1993. Patterns of resource allocation in a dioecious Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany
80:607-615.
Eckhart, V. M. 1992a. The genetic of gender and the effects of gender on floral characters in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis
(Hydrophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 79:792-800.
Eckhart, V. M. 1992b. Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolution
46:1313-1328.
Ehrlén, J. 1991. Why do plants produce surplus flowers? A reserve-ovary model. American Naturalist 138:918-933.
García, M. B., and R. J. Antor. 1995. Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). Oecologia
101:59-67.
Gross, K. L., and J. D. Soule. 1981. Differences in biomass allocation to reproductive and vegetative structures of male and female plants
of a dioecious, perennial herb, Silene alba (Miller) Krause. American Journal of Botany 68:801-807.
Guitián, P., M. Medrano, and M. Rodríguez. 1997. Reproductive biology of Corema album (L.) D. Don (Empetraceae) in the northwest
Iberian Peninsula. Acta Botanica Gallica 144:119-128.
Ishii, H. S., and S. Sakai. 2002. Temporal variation in floral display size and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium
asiaticum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 89:441-446.
Kohn, J. R. 1989. Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation, and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima HBK
(Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 43:1424-1434.
Korpelainen, H. 1992. Patterns of resource allocation in male and female plants of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Oecologia 89:133139.
Leigh, A., M. J. Cosgrove, and A. B. Nicotra. 2006. Reproductive allocation in a gender dimorphic shrub: anomalous female investment in
Gynatrix pulchella? Journal of Ecology 94:1261-1271.
Lloyd, D. G. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive
session. New Phytologist 86:69-79.
Lord, J. M., and M. Westoby. 2006. Accessory costs of seed production. Oecologia 150:310-317.
Matsuyama, S., and M. Sakimoto. 2008. Allocation to reproduction and relative reproductive costs in two species of dioecious
Anacardiaceae with contrasting phenology. Annals of Botany 101:1391-1400.
Matsuyama, S., and M. Sakimoto. 2010. Sexual dimorphism of reproductive allocation at shoot and tree levels in Zanthoxylum
ailanthoides, a pioneer dioecious tree. Botany 88:867-874.
Milla, R., P. Castro-Díez, M. Maestro-Martínez, and G. Montserrat-Martí. 2006. Costs of reproduction as related to the timing of
phenological phases in the dioecious shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Plant Biology 8:103-111.
Mizuki, I., K. Ishida, and K. Kikuzawa. 2005. Sexual and vegetative reproduction in the aboveground part of a dioecious clonal plant,
Dioscorea japonica (Dioscoreaceae). Ecological Research 20:387-393.
Montesinos, D., P. García-Fayos, and M. Verdú. 2012. Masting uncoupling: mast seeding does not follow all mast flowering episodes in a
dioecious juniper tree. Oikos 121:1725-1736.
Ne’eman, G., S. Goubitz, M. J. A. Werger, and A. Shmida. 2011. Relationships between tree size, crown shape, gender segregation and sex
allocation in Pinus halepensis, a Mediterranean pine tree. Annals of Botany 108:197-206.
Nicotra, A. B. 1999. Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Siparuna grandiflora, a dioecious Neotropical
shrub. Journal of Ecology 87:138-149.
Obeso, J. R., and R. Retuerto. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in holly Ilex aquifolium: cost of reproduction, sexual selection or physiological
differentiation? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75:67-77.
Pickering, C. M. and J. M. Arthur. 2003. Patterns of resource allocation in the dioecious alpine herb Aciphylla simplicifolia (Apiaceae).
Austral Ecology 28:566-574.
Ramsey, M. 1993. Floral morphology, biology and sex allocation in disjunct populations of Christmas bells (Blandfordia grandiflora,
Liliaceae) with different breeding systems. Australian Journal of Botany 41:749-762.
Sakai, A. K., S. G. Weller, T. M. Culley, D. R. Campbell, A. K. Dunbar-Wallis, and A. Andres. 2007. Sexual dimorphism and the genetic
potential for evolution of sex allocation in the gynodioecious plant, Schiedea salicaria. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:18-29.
Sato, T. 2002. Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum. Ecology 83:12261238.
Sato, H., and T. Yahara. 1999. Trade-offs between flower number and investment to a flower in selfing and outcrossing varieties of
Impatiens hypophylla (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86:1699-1707.
Schemske, D. W. 1978. Evolution of reproductive charateristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and
chasmogamy. Ecology 59:596-613.
Schoen, D. J. 1982a. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant. Oecologia 53:255-257.
Schoen, D. J. 1982b. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36:352360.
Thompson, D. I., and T. J. Edwards. 2001. Breeding biology, resource partitioning and reproductive effort of a dioecious shrub, Clutia
pulchella L. (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 226:13-22.
Torimaru, T., and N. Tomaru. 2012. Reproductive investment at stem and genet levels in male and female plants of the clonal dioecious
shrub Ilex leucoclada (Aquifoliaceae). Botany 90:301-310.
Vaughton, G., and M. Ramsey. 2011. Reproductive allocation and costs in gynodioecious Leucopogon melaleucoides (Ericaceae):
implications for the evolution of gender dimorphism. Plant Biology 13:888-895.
Weller, S. G., and A. K. Sakai. 2005. Selfing and resource allocation in Schiedea salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), a gynodioecious species.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:301-308.
Zhang, G., T. Xie, and G. Du. 2012. Variation in floral sex allocation, female success, and seed predation within racemiform
synflorescence in the gynomonoecious Ligularia virgaurea (Asteraceae). J. Plant Res. 125:527-538.
Zhao, Z. G., J.-L. Meng, B.-L. Fan, and G.-Z. Du. 2008. Size-dependent sex allocation in Aconitum gymnandrum (Ranunculaceae):
physiological basis and effects of maternal family and environment. Plant Biology 10:694-703.
Download