Throughout document

advertisement

Summary of Changes to

MedDRA

®

TERM SELECTION:

POINTS TO CONSIDER

ICH-Endorsed Guide for MedDRA Users

Release 4.4

Based on MedDRA Version 15.1

1 October 2012

1

The following is a listing of changes made between releases 4.3 and 4.4 of

MedDRA Term Selection: Points to Consider :

Throughout document

1) Correction of general spelling, punctuation, spacing, and format errors

2) Replacement of references to MedDRA Version 15.0 to Version 15.1

3) Update of examples based on MedDRA version changes

4)

Title page

The original copyright statement and IFPMA contact information has been replaced with an updated disclaimer, copyright notice and MedDRA trademark statement.

2.4

– Always Select a Lowest Level Term

In the “LLT Selected” column of the Example table, the PT listed in the last row –

PT Gingivitis – was changed to PT Gingival inflammation .

3.4.2 Ambiguous information

The wording in the “Comment” column of the Example table:

Comment

“GU” could be either “genito-urinary” or “gastric ulcer”. Since “pain” is definite, select LLT Pain

Was changed as follows:

Comment

Effort should be made to obtain clarification of the meaning of "GU" from the source so that more specific term selection may be possible. “GU” could be either “genito-urinary” or “gastric ulcer”. If additional information is not available, then select a term to reflect the information that is known, i.e., LLT Pain

2

3.4.3 Vague information

The wording in this section:

For information that is vague, attempt to obtain more specific information.

If clarification cannot be achieved, select an LLT that reflects the nonspecific nature of the reported event.

Was changed as follows:

For information that is vague, attempt to obtain clarification. If clarification cannot be achieved, select an LLT that reflects the vague nature of the reported event.

In addition, wording the Example table:

Example

Reported LLT Selected

Congestion Unevaluable event

Comment

“Congestion” reported alone is vague; this can refer to multiple organs and physiologic processes

Was changed as follows:

Example

Reported LLT Selected

Turned green Unevaluable event

Comment

“Turned green” reported alone is vague; this could refer to a patient condition or even to a product (e.g., pills)

3.6.1 MedDRA term includes age and event information

An additional example was added to the Example table as follows:

3

Reported

Developed psychosis at age 6 years

LLT Selected

Childhood psychosis

3.8.2 No available MedDRA term includes both microorganism and anatomic location

Wording in this section:

The preferred option is to select a term that best represents the microorganism specific infection .

Alternatively, select a term that reflects the anatomic location or select more than one term that together reflect both the microorganism specific infection and the anatomic location.

Each organization should consider their specific products and select the location of infection if that is the most appropriate option.

Was changed as follows ( PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF PREFERRED OPTION) :

The preferred option is to select terms for both the microorganism specific infection and the anatomic location.

Alternatively, select a term that reflects the anatomic location or select a term that reflects the microorganism specific infection. Medical judgment should be used in deciding whether anatomic location or the microorganism specific infection should take priority.

In addition, the Example table:

Example

Reported LLT Selected

Preferred

Option

Comment

Respiratory chlamydial infection

Chlamydial infection

Respiratory infection

Represents microorganism specific infection

Represents locationspecific infection

4

Reported LLT Selected

Preferred

Option

Comment

Chlamydial infection

Respiratory infection

Represents both microorganism specific infection and anatomic location

Was changed as follows to reflect the designation of the new preferred option .

Example

Reported LLT Selected

Preferred

Option

Comment

Respiratory chlamydial infection

Chlamydial infection

Respiratory infection

Chlamydial infection

Respiratory infection

Represents microorganism specific infection

Represents locationspecific infection

Represents both microorganism specific infection and anatomic location

3.16 – Transmission of Infectious Agent via Medicinal Product

The heading of this section:

Transmission of Infectious Agent via Medicinal Product

Was changed as follows (to reflect the addition of the new PT Transmission of an infectious agent via product in MedDRA v15.1):

5

Transmission of Infectious Agent via Product

3.26.1 Off label use when reported as an indication

Wording in the second paragraph:

If a medical condition is reported as an indication along with “off label use”, the preferred option is to select a term for the medical condition for the “indications” field. Alternatively, select terms for the medical condition/indication and LLT Off label use or other appropriate LLTs linked to PT Off label use. Select LLT Off label use alone only if it is the only information available.

Was changed as follows ( PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF PREFERRED OPTION) :

If a medical condition is reported as an indication along with “off label use”

, the preferred option is to select terms for the medical condition and LLT Off label use or other appropriate LLTs linked to PT Off label use for the “indications” field. Alternatively, select a term for the medical condition/indication alone . Select LLT Off label use alone only if it is the only information available.

In addition, the Example tables:

Example

Reported LLT Selected

Hypertension; this is off label use

Hypertension

Hypertension

Off label use

Preferred Option

Example

Reported

Off label use

LLT Selected

Off label use

Off label use in paediatric patients Drug use in unapproved population

6

Were changed as follows to reflect the designation of the new preferred option and the addition of a new example and a “Comment” column:

Example

Reported

Hypertension; this is off label use

LLT Selected

Hypertension

Hypertension

Off label use

Preferred Option

Example

Reported

Off label use

LLT Selected

Off label use

Comment

Off label use in paediatric patients

Drug use in unapproved population

Refers to a population of patients

Drug X given to a 10 year old boy; the drug is not indicated for use below 18 years

Adult product administered to child

LLT Adult product

administered to child is linked to PT Off label use

3.26.2 Off label use when reported with an AR/AE

Wording in this section:

If an AR/AE occurs as a result of off label use, the preferred option is to select LLT Off label use , or other appropriate LLTs linked to PT Off label use , and a term for the AR/AE; alternatively, select a term for the AR/AE.

Was changed as follows:

If an AR/AE occurs as a result of off label use, the preferred option is to select LLT Off label use , or other appropriate LLTs linked to PT Off label use, and a term for the medical condition for the “indications” field in addition to a term for the AR/AE. Alternatively, select a term for the medical condition for the “indications” field and a term for the AR/AE in the

“AR/AE” field.

7

In addition, the Example table:

Example

Reported

Patient was administered a drug off label for pulmonary hypertension and suffered a stroke

LLT Selected

Stroke

Stroke

Intentional use for unlabeled indication

Preferred Option

Was changed with the addition of a “Comment” column as follows:

Example

Reported

Patient was administered a drug off label for pulmonary hypertension and suffered a stroke

LLT Selected Preferred Option

Stroke

Pulmonary hypertension

Stroke

Off label use

Pulmonary hypertension

Comment

Record LLT Stroke in an AR/AE field.

Record LLT Pulmonary

hypertension in an

indications field.

Record LLT Stroke in an AR/AE field.

Record LLT Off label

use and LLT Pulmonary

hypertension in an

indications field.

4.1.1 Versioning methodologies

An additional paragraph was added to the end of this section as follows:

The MSSO and JMO provide tools to assist the user in comparing the changes between MedDRA versions. The Version Report (provided by the MSSO and JMO) is a spreadsheet listing all changes between the current version of MedDRA and the one previous to it; this spreadsheet is provided with each new release of MedDRA. The MSSO also provides the MedDRA Version Analysis Tool (MVAT) that facilitates identification and understanding of the impact of changes between any two MedDRA versions, including non-consecutive ones. Links to these tools are in the

Appendix, Section 4.2.

8

4.1.2 Timing of version implementation

Wording in this section:

For single case reporting, the sender and receiver of the data need to be in synchrony regarding MedDRA versions. There are MSSO recommendations for the timing of the implementation of a new MedDRA release for both individual case safety reporting and clinical trial data (See

Appendix, Section 4.2).

Was changed by the addition of a new sentence to the end of this section as follows:

For single case reporting, the sender and receiver of the data need to be in synchrony regarding MedDRA versions. There are MSSO recommendations for the timing of the implementation of a new MedDRA release for both individual case safety reporting and clinical trial data.

Specific transition dates for single case reporting for the next MedDRA versions are provided. (See Appendix, Section 4.2).

4.2 – Links and References

Two new links were added to this table as follows:

Document

MedDRA Version

Analysis Tool

(compares any two versions) *

Transition Date for the Next

MedDRA Version http://www.meddramsso.com/subscriber_download_tools_mvat.a

sp

Link http://www.meddramsso.com/index_subscriber.asp

* Requires user ID and password to access

4.3.1 Current members of the ICH Points to Consider Working Group

Morell David ’s name was replaced by Sarah Vaughan’s for the Commission of the European Communities membership.

9

The names of Nogusa Takahara, Daisuke Tanaka and Go Yamamato were replaced by Shinichi Okamura, Makiko Isozaki, Hideyuki Kondou and Shinichi

Watanabe for the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare membership.

Susan M. Lorenski’s name was replaced by Anna-Lisa Kleckner for the

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America membership.

Toni Piazza-

Hepp’s name was removed for the US Food and Drug

Administration membership.

4.3.2 Former members of the ICH Points to Consider Working Group

Morell David’s name was added for the Commission of the European

Communities membership.

The names of Nogusa Takahara, Daisuke Tanaka and Go Yamamato were added for the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare membership.

Susan M. Lorenski’s name was added for the Pharmaceutical Research and

Manufacturers of America membership.

Toni PiazzaHepp’s name was added for the US Food and Drug Administration membership.

10

Download