Criteria Judgements ○ No ○ Probably Benefits & harms of the options Problem no Is there a problem priority? What is the overall certainty of this evidence? ○ Uncertain ○ Probably yes Additional considerations Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is major morbidity of preterm infants associated with post-discharge mortality, respiratory problems, and neurodevelopmental impairment later in life.1 Ventilator-induced lung injury is an important factor for the development of BPD and non-invasive (non-ventilator) respiratory management such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) started soon after birth has been drawing attention in recent years.2 ● Yes ○ Varies Ref. 1: Van Marter LJ. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Dec;14(6):358-66 Ref. 2: Carlo, WA. Early Hum Dev. 2012 May;88 Suppl 2:S81-3 ○ No GRADE Evidence profile Table included studies ○ Very low ○ Low ● Moderate ○ High ○ Important uncertainty or variability Is there important uncertainty about how much people value the main outcomes? Research evidence ● Possibly important uncertainty or variability ○ Probably no important uncertainty of variability ○ No important uncertainty of variability ○ No known Event rates Outcomes NCPAP Effect Intubate Relative & IPPV (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI) Quality Importance 41 fewer per 1000 ⨁⨁⨁◯ (0 fewer−77 MODERATE fewer) Critical (8) RR 0.92 (0.82 to 1.03) 30 fewer per 1000 ⨁⨁⨁◯ (11 more−68 MODERATE fewer) Critical (7) RR 0.82 (0.66 to 1.03) 23 fewer per 1000 ⨁⨁⨁◯ (4 more−43 MODERATE fewer) Critical (9) Death or BPD 493/1193 531/1165 RR 0.91 (41.3%) (45.6%) (0.83 to 1) BPD 370/1070 384/1018 (34.6%) (37.7%) Death 123/1193 147/1165 (10.3%) (12.6%) BPD: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, CI: confidence interval, RR: relative risk Criteria Judgements undesirable Research evidence GRADE Evidence profile Table Event rates Outcomes Severe IVH ● No ○ Probably no Are the desirable anticipated effects large? ○ Uncertain ○ Probably yes ○ Yes ○ Varies ○ No ○ Probably no Are the undesirable anticipated effects small? ● Uncertain ○ Probably yes ○ Yes ○ Varies Additional considerations NCPAP Intubate & IPPV Effect Relative (95% CI) 125/1167 112/1134 RR 1.09 (10.7%) (9.9%) (0.86 to 1.39) Absolute (95% CI) 9 more per 1000 (14 fewer−39 more) Air leak 85/1192 (7.1%) 67/1165 RR 1.24 14 more per 1000 (5.8%) (0.91 to 1.69) (5 fewer−40 more) Severe ROP 80/703 (11.4%) 72/656 RR 1.03 (11.0%) (0.77 to 1.39) NEC 3 more per 1000 (25 fewer−43 more) Quality Importance ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW Critical (7) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Important (5) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Critical (7) ⨁⨁⨁◯ 113/1183 92/1148 RR 1.19 15 more per 1000 (9.6%) (8.0%) (0.92 to 1.55) (6 fewer−44 more) MODERATE Critical (7) CI: confidence interval, IVH: intraventricular hemorrhage, NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis, ROP: retinopathy of prematurity, RR: relative risk Criteria Judgements Research evidence ○ No ○ Probably Are the desirable effects large relative to undesirable effects? no ● Uncertain ○ Probably yes ○ Yes ○ Varies ○ No ○ Probably no Are the resources required small? ○ Uncertain ● Probably yes Resource use ○ Yes ○ Varies Is the incremental cost small relative to the net benefits? ○ No ○ Probably no ○ Uncertain ○ Probably yes ● Yes CPAP requires less resource and cost than intubation & IPPV because it reduces the surfactant administration 1,2,3 and shorten the duration receiving mechanical ventilation 1. Ref 1: Morley CJ, et al.N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):700-8 Ref 2: Finer NN, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9 Ref 3: Dunn MS, et al. Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1069-76 Additional considerations Criteria Judgements ○ Varies ○ Increased ○ Probably Equity increased What would be the impact on health inequities? ○ Uncertain ● Probably reduced ○ Reduced ○ Varies Acceptability ○ No ○ Probably no ○ ● Is the option Uncertain acceptable to key Probably stakeholders? yes ○ Yes ○ Varies Research evidence Additional considerations Criteria Judgements Research evidence Additional considerations Both CPAP and intubation and IPPV are widely used in neonatal units and implementation would be straightforward. ○ No ○ Probably Feasibility no Is the option feasible to implement? ○ Uncertain ○ Probably yes ● Yes ○ Varies Recommendation Balance of consequences Type of recommendation Undesirable consequences clearly outweigh desirable consequences in most settings Undesirable consequences probably outweigh desirable consequences in most settings The balance between desirable and undesirable consequences is closely balanced or uncertain Desirable consequences probably outweigh undesirable consequences in most settings Desirable consequences clearly outweigh undesirable consequences in most settings ○ ○ ○ ● ○ We recommend against offering this option We suggest not offering this option We suggest offering this option We recommend offering this option ○ ○ ● ○ Recommendation For spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress requiring respiratory support in the delivery room we suggest initial use of CPAP rather than intubation and IPPV (weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). Values and preference statement: In making this suggestion we recognize that the absolute reduction in risk of adverse outcome associated with starting with CPAP is small and that infants recruited to the trials had a high rate of treatment with antenatal steroids but we favor the less invasive approach. The balance of risks and benefits of this approach in infants who have not received antenatal steroids is unknown. For the critical composite outcome of “death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia” we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for imprecision) from 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) enrolling 2358 preterm infants born at < 30 weeks gestation in the first 15 minutes after birth showing modest potential benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R. 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 – 1.00). For the critical outcome of “death” we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for imprecision) from the same 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) showing modest potential benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R. 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 – 1.03). For the critical outcome of “bronchopulmonary dysplasia” we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for imprecision) from the same 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) showing modest potential benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R. 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 – 1.03). For the critical outcome of “air leak” we have identified low quality evidence (downgraded for inconsistency and imprecision) from the same 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) showing no benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R 1.24, 95% CI 0.91 – 1.69). For the critical outcome of “severe intraventricular haemorrhage” we have identified very low quality evidence (downgraded for inconsistency and very serious imprecision) from the same 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) showing no benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R 1.09, 95% CI 0.86 – 1.39). For the important outcome of “necrotizing enterocolitis” we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for imprecision) from the same 3 RCTs (Morley 2008 700, Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) showing no benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R 1.19 95% CI 0.92 – 1.55). For the important outcome of “severe retinopathy of prematurity” we have identified low quality evidence (downgraded for very serious imprecision) from 2 RCTs (Finer 2010 1970, Dunn 2011 e1069) enrolling 1359 infants showing no benefit to starting treatment with CPAP (R.R 1.03 95% CI 0.77-1.39). Justification Ref 1: Morley CJ, et al.N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):700-8 Ref 2: Finer NN, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9 Ref 3: Dunn MS, et al. Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1069-76 Subgroup considerations Implementation considerations Monitoring and evaluation A further trial of CPAP versus intubation and IPPV in high risk preterm infants at lower gestations is required to determine the risks and benefits more clearly. It is not clear whether there is a significant effect on mortality. The confidence intervals for the other morbidities of prematurity leave open the possibility that any benefit in relation to bronchopulmonary dysplasia might still be balanced by a small increase in risk of severe intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotizing enterocolitis. The utility of using an INSURE approach to facilitate early stabilization on CPAP soon after birth has been compared with CPAP alone in at least 2 trials and this should be the subject of a future worksheet. Research possibilities