MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: Proceedings – Air Force Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council (CSA-ARC) - Management Session
GENERAL: – The Air Force Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council (CSA ARC) Management Session convened
May 28, 2014 at Volk Field, Wisconsin hosted by the Combat Readiness Training Center (CRTC), Wisconsin Air
National Guard.
MANAGEMENT SESSION PROCEEDINGS FOR 28 MAY, 2014
A. Remarks/Objectives/Introductions: Brig Gen Baker (OK ANG) and Colonel Brown (OH ANG) welcomed
everyone to Volk Field and thanked them for working on providing and maintaining training airspace.
B. National Perspective - Brig Gen Siana (CT ANG - National ARC Co-Chair) welcomed everyone and added that
he was very pleased with the number of attendees.
1. ARC Meetings - since last year with large budget cuts the ARCs are more streamlined this year with a change
from 5 to 3 regional meetings annually.
 With the other stakeholder agencies being able to support all of the meetings - we think it is a good change.
2. Why we are here - Airspace Actions - The length of time it takes to get an airspace action approved is very
frustrating and we continue to work on streamlining the process.
 Special Use Airspace is very important for our combat readiness.
 New Weapon Systems with increase performance and range require larger training airspace.
 The Volk Airspace Proposal is the first ANG proposal to follow the entirely new Air Force process has been
briefed to the Air Force Steering Group - it is going well.
 Condor Airspace Proposal started over 10 years ago. Latest requirement is a letter to the Penobscot Indian
National required by the Section 106 process which recommended one additional contact with the tribe. The Air
National guard is keeping the dialog open and trying to mitigate their concern.
 We are re-writing our Airspace Process instructions that will improve the process.
3. Encroachment
 Radio Spectrum is also very critical - the telephone and Wi-Fi industry is working on a huge expansion in
wireless coverage.
 The Navy's Boardman Range in Oregon is an example of major encroachment.
 The Range is the major Electronic Warfare training range in the NW and they have massive problems with
Wind Energy towers. The graphic below indicates the wind energy installations surrounding Boardman Range.
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
1
 There has been a drop of 92 % in the growth in wind turbines due to the current success of the natural gas
industries increase production
4. Civil use of Special Use Airspace is a special emphasis issue with recent direction from the Guard Bureau.
Special Use Airspace is for military use. The airspace can be assigned by the FAA for other purposes when not
actively supporting the military training mission.
5. ADS-B OUT - is very expensive to modify by 2020. There are plans but it is a big issue for the Air Force.
C. F-16 Capabilities and Airspace Utilization - Lt Col Moses (180th OSS/CC)
1. 180th FW Mission: Provide combat ready Airmen (Warriors!) for federal, state, and community missions
 Maintain F-16 Combat readiness to deploy with limited notice anywhere in the world
 Maintain 24/7 Air Sovereignty Alert from Toledo
 Navigation with a TACAN and basic Inertial/GPS that are non-RVSM
2. If money exists to upgrade the F-16, it will NOT be spent on better navigation systems such as ADS-B unless
mandated in the future by the FAA.
3. General F-16C Information - 180th FW Stingers fly Block 42 F-16Cs
 Single-seat, single-engine, multi-role tactical fighter w/ full air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities, 27,500
Lbs Gross Weight, powered by the F100-PW-229 Engine with 29,000 Lbs of Thrust
 Max Airspeed 800 Kits - 2.05 Mach
 Digital Flight Control Computer - Fly By-Wire System with Side-stick control
 9.0G Capable airframe
 Maximum fuel capacity - 13,890 lbs
4. Combat Fuel Considerations
 High (20,000’-30,000’MSL - 480-510 KTAS), Low 100-5000’AGL - 480-540 KGAS), High = 450 NM
 Extended Range with Air to Air Refueling with KC-135 and KC-10
5. Avionics
 APG-68 Radar
 Full Air-to-Air Capabilities
 Full Air-to-Ground Capabilities
 ALR-69 Radar Warning Receiver
 ALE-47 Countermeasures Dispenser Set (Chaff and Flares)
 Replaced by ALQ-213 in the coming months
 ALQ-184 Jamming Pod
 Auto IFF (Identification Free or Foe) Transponder Interrogator (installed next year)
 ARC-210 (UHF / VHF-AM/FM / SATCOM / HQ / SECURE / SINCGARS) with 2nd dedicated UHF only
radio
 The reason you have an occasional F-16 pilot ask ATC for the non-standard VHF ATC frequency – he’s
in a D-model without the ARC-210.
 IFF, ILS, TACAN, and GPS w/ INS Backup
 Fire Control Computer (FCC) - Fully Computed Weapons Delivery
 Up-Front Controls and Heads Up Display (HUD)
 Color Multi-Function Displays
 Full Hands on Throttle and Stick (HOTAS)
 LANTIRN / SNIPER / LITENING Pods
 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (HMCS)
 Night Vision Goggles
 Link-16 Data Link with other flight members and other mission aircraft
6. Armament
 9 External Stores Stations
 Air to Air Weapons - Up to 6 Air-to-Air Missiles
 AIM-120 AMRAAM Typical load out 2 or 4
 AIM-9M/X Sidewinder Typical load out 2
 Internal 20mm Cannon (M-61A1) - 510 Rounds (About 100 Rounds a Second)
 Air-to-Ground Weapons
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
2



General Purpose Bombs (MK-82,84, BLU-109, BSU-49,50 CBU-87,89)
All variants AGM-65 Maverick Missiles
Rockets
a. Laser Guided Weapons (GBU-10, 12, 24)
b. Inertially Aided Munitions (IAMS) (GBU-31, 38)
c. Combined Laser/IAM (GBU-54)
 AGM-88 w/ HARM Targeting System Pods
 Gun
7. Air-to-Air Missions
 Offensive and Defensive Counter Air and Air Escort
 Protect specific points on the ground or High Value Airborne Assets
8. Air-to-Ground: Offensive Counter Air / Strategic Attack / Air Interdiction, Close Air Support, Strike
Coordination and Reconnaissance
9. Specialized Missions: Combat Search and Rescue, Airborne Forward Air Control, and Joint CAS. “CAS is air
action by fixed and rotary-wing aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces and that
require detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of those forces”
10. General Employment
 Air-to-Air
 Employ as Four-Ships as Basic Fighting Force
 Maintain Primarily Visual Formations until Tactic Execution, then Element Visual Mutual Support
 Prefer Support from Off board Assets (AWACS, GCI), but not required
 Air-to-Ground
 Employ as Four-Ships as Basic Fighting Force
 Primarily Medium Altitude, PGM Attacks
 Prefer Night Operations due to Reduced Threats
 Easily Incorporated into Large Force Employment Scenarios
 FAC(A) Mission: Coordinate and control CAS, providing detailed integration of air power with ground
fire to support the ground commander’s intentions
11. Targeting Pods - Gives capability to engage specific and deliberate targets and provide battle hit assessment post
engagement.
 Third-Generation Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) imagers with excellent resolution for target ID with a
very long range capability.
 Geo-Coordinate Generation provides target coordinates for other users.
12. How we train
 We can’t stay combat mission ready without training airspace availability
 Every mission drives different airspace requirements
 During the course of a year, we use a phased based training program and typically focus on one mission at
time (with some exceptions)
 Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM) – 2-ship dog fighting
 MOA/ATCAA – Min required: 10,000 AGL – FL190, 10-15NM ring
 Desired: 5,000 AGL – FL230
 Air Combat Maneuvers (ACM) – 4-ship dog fighting
 MOA/ATCAA – Min required: 10,000 AGL – FL190’, 25-30NM long rectangle
 Desired: 5,000 AGL to FL300
 Close Air Support (CAS) – close integration with friendly ground forces
 MOA/ATCAA – Min required: 2000’ medium altitude block
 Desired: SFC to FL200
 Diverse airspace requirements depend on training objectives
a. Dense Urban environment – downtown major cities
b. Mountainous terrain – simulating current conflict environment
c. Over water maritime airspace to target fast boat swarms
d. Open rural areas to target fast moving vehicles and motorcycles
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
3
 Our objectives are ALWAYS changing and we need a broad spectrum of varying airspace options to meet
these requirements
 2-ship night sparkle/strafe vs. moving target with NVGs/TGP
 Concerns – finding/hitting the target in the darkness while flying 500kts at low altitude / hitting the
ground / location of friendly forces (FRAT) / collateral damage concerns…oh and airspace borders
 Defensive Counter Air (DCA) / Tactical Intercepts – protect high-value area on the ground or high-value
airborne asset
 MOA/ATCAA – Min required: 8,000 AGL – FL300, 50NM x 25NM min
 Desired: SFC to FL500, 70NM+ x 30NM+
 Tactics involved in complex A-A scenarios depend heavily on available airspace
a. Ability to climb and descend for both offensive and defensive maneuvering
b. Ability to go supersonic
c. Chaff/Flare/ECM usage
 Typically involve 8 aircraft in a 4v4 (4 blue vs. 4 red fighters with continuous regeneration is typically
4v16+)
a. Concerns – flying tactical formation with 3 other blue fighters / staying visual with the tiny F-16 /
using offensive avionics systems to find/track/engage threats / using defensive systems to protect own
aircraft from incoming missiles / do all this without hitting any other airplane or the ground / protecting
the high value target
 Air Interdiction (AI) / Opposed Surface Attack (OPSAT) – engage/destroy enemy air and ground targets deep
inside hostile territory
 MOA/ATCAA – Min required: 8kAGL – FL300, 50NM x 25NM min
 Desired: SFC to FL500, 70NM+ x 30NM+
 Tactics involved in complex A-A/A-G scenarios depend heavily on available airspace – similar to
requirements in DCA
a. Ability to climb and descend for both offensive and defensive maneuvering
b. Ability to go supersonic
c. Chaff/Flare/ECM usage
 Typically involve 8 or more aircraft in a 4v4 (4 blue vs. 4 red regenerating fighters)
a. Concerns – flying tactical formation with 3 other blue fighters / staying visual with the tiny F-16 /
using offensive avionics systems to find/track/engage both air and ground threats / using defensive
systems to protect own aircraft from incoming surface-to-air and air-to-air missiles / do all this without
hitting any other airplane or the ground / hitting the one target you are driving through bad guy land to
destroy
13. The “Spin-up Process”
 Over the past 13 years, we have typically used the 3-6 month timeframe prior to a combat deployment to
“spin-up” for specific combatant commander objectives required of each pilot in the combat zone
 The latest requirement has been urban and/or mountainous terrain CAS
 Tracking and engaging moving vehicles/motorcycles through urban and mountainous terrain (day and
night)
 Tracking and targeting specific individuals or groups of people evading in mountainous or urban terrain
(day and night)
 On-the-fly weaponeering of diverse targets with significant collateral damage concerns
 Night sparkle-strafe with one jet marking the target with an IR marker while the other strafes the moving
mark point with NVGs
14. Temp Airspace during the Spin-up
 Temp MOA/ATCAA/ALTRAV over specific environments on the ground (urban/water/mountains)
 Previous deployment to Horn of Africa / Jordan, the 180th setup a Temp MOA/ATCAA over the city of
Tucson
 Even though recent history has been heavy in CAS training, this should NOT be used as a predictor for future
training objectives and requirements
 Large scale / Major Combat Operations will require larger pieces of airspace (both laterally and
vertically).
15. 180th FW Airspace
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
4





Three primary areas
 North – Alpena airspace complex
 South – Buckeye/Brush Creek/Charlie-ATCAA
 West – Hilltop/12-mile/Atterbury/Jefferson
Utilization
 Weather is the biggest driver in the selection of which airspace we use each day (Alpena/Buckeye are
more than 300 miles apart and one weather pattern is quite often better than the other)
 Weather being equal – 180th typically flows to Buckeye due to simpler airspace transit requirements
a. Stinger departures/recoveries to the Alpena Airspace complex are actively being worked through the
Optimization of Airspace and Procedures (OAPM) in the Metroplex for the Detroit area.
b. The process has been highly successful and collaborative to work solutions to ATC facility and
industry/military user issues
Near term desires
 Buckeye/Brush Creek/Charlie-ATCAA temporary use additions
a. Create temp MOA below the Charlie shelf A/B ATCAA (e.g. 5,000 or 8,000 AGL to FL180)
b. Have successfully increased C-A/B ATCAA to FL350 on temporary basis for specific mission
requirements
 Alpena Airspace Complex
a. Increase Steelhead ATCAA to FL350 to match ATCAAs above Pike (Lumberjack and Firebird
ATCAAs)
b. Temp increase of Alpena ATCAAs to FL500
 Temp MOA in the vicinity of Findlay, OH for ACM/BFM/CAS usage during specific training events
over the course of the year
a. Strong desire to have airspace close to Toledo for this requirement
(1). 5,000 AGL – FL230, approx 30NM long x 10-15NM wide
b. Only used for specific missions/phases with prior coordination
Future requirements
 Mission changes in the near term could include a much greater emphasis on Suppression of Enemy Air
Defenses (SEAD)
a. Find/Fix/Track/Target/Suppress/Destroy enemy surface to air missile systems
b. Much higher emphasis on training in airspace with real world and training emitters
Long-term F-35 transition
 The future of the AF is the F-35
 Will require larger airspace
a. Longer looks – both vertically / laterally: 80NM+ x 30NM+
 Super-cruise requirements
D. RQ-7 Shadow UAV Demonstration
1. The Airspace/Range Council attendees proceeded to the Volk Field flight-line for a flight demonstration
of the Shadow unmanned aerial vehicle flown by the Wisconsin Army National Guard
2. The Shadow Aircraft:
 Wingspan: 20' 4" (6.20 m)
 Length: 11' 10" (3.60 m)
 Weight: 185.2 lbs (84 kg)
 Range: 68 miles (109 km)
3. The demonstration included multiple approaches to the field and landing
4. The control van was available to viewing
5. The personnel provided a brief introduction to the Shadow mission answered questions.
6. The ARC attendees returned to the conference room to resume the afternoon session.
E. Introductions: Lt Colonel Steinbicker (OH ANG/CGL ARC Exec)
1. The Management Session resumed with everyone introducing themselves and includes there unit/organization.
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
5
F. FAA Central Service Area Update Mr. Rizzio (CSA ATREP) It is good to work with both the Central-Great
Lakes and Southwest Regions of the Central Service Area.
1. Abutting Airspace Coordinates: If a proposed SUA boundary shares points with an existing SUA, use the
lat/longs from the existing SUA in the JO 7400.8 (Special Use Airspace) legal definition to describe the new SUA’s
shared points.
2. Synchronization (JO 7400.2 - Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters) - We want to have an airspace proposal proceed
though both sides near simultaneously.
 Aeronautical
 Pre-Coordination (unit reach out Center early)
 Submit proposal to FAA (OSG), circ/NPRM, aero study
 Address comments
 OSG final review and aero recommendation
 Environmental (communicate with the Service Area early)
 Cooperating Agency, Preliminary Draft EA/EIS
 Draft EA/EIS & public comment
 Address comments, final EA/FONSI or EIS
 OSG final review and EA/FONSI or EIS adoption recommendation
3. Letters of Agreement
 For LOA’s involving military ATC facilities:
 “The ATREP will be a signatory to agreements made pursuant to Article I, Section C”
 We will start doing what the order requires.
 JO 7610.4 Appendix 2, Article IV, paragraph B
 1969 MOA
4. Facility Evaluations
 ATC
 Two ATREPs (north and south) will be invited to accompany HHQ inspection teams as augmentees.
They work with units on airspace proposal and daily management.
 Participation will depend on scheduling, budget, etc.
 ATREPs will review ATC inspection reports for all facilities
 We work with the AFREPS and units on airspace proposals and daily airspace management.
 MRU
 Every two years
 Preferably with HHQ inspection team
5. Contact information
 Mr. Michael Rizzo: michael.rizzo@faa.gov, 817-321-7733
 Mr. John Witucki: john.witucki@faa.gov, 817-321-7734
 Mr. Daisy Mather: daisy.mather@faa.gov, 817-321-7719
G. FAA Regional Issues - FAA ARTCC Reps
1. Kansas City Center - Mr. Mullinax (Support Mgr. Airspace FAA Kansas City ARTCC)
 Last year the budget was our biggest issue and the number of new controllers that we were getting.
 Currently we are training as many controllers as we can but we are still losing people at a fast rate
 This year ERAM has been the major issue.
 There was a lot of testing and training
 Kansas City Center set the bench mark as the shortest time to adapt.
 There are still some bugs to work out but it is very stable.
 There are still 5 of the 20 centers still to convert to ERAM
 The 509th BW, Whiteman AFB's B-2 mission is a challenge for Kansas City Center.
 They get target changes and desire to work from FL 380 to FL 420 with random operations that conflict
with civilian traffic.
 Smokey Hill Range and the City of Salina along with Kansas City Center worked to create an exercise.
 The Lindberg MOA, R4501 and the Ada MOAs are now underutilized.
 Question about ADS-B operations.
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
6
 The FAA is now in the initial operating phase with all centers having ADS-B turned on and receiving
feeds from the system
 Procedures are still being developed - We cannot use ADS-B data received that is below our radar
coverage.
 We are excited about the system capabilities.
2. Minneapolis Center Issues - Hughes
 We have been working on airspace issues
 Working with Volk Field on the development of new airspace
 Last year we discussed altimeter settings for operations that transited FL 180. There has been a lot of progress
and we will be finalizing the Letters of Agreements for Special Use Airspace.
3. Indianapolis Center Issues  The Center is working on airspace issues at R-3403 and Muscatatuck to expand UAS operations.
 Working on the Buckeye MOA/ATCAA procedures
 Communication is the key to getting things accomplished (don't be afraid to give us a call)
4. Chicago Center Issues  Chicago Center's airspace is very compact - when the military airspace is hot if affects how we operate.
 Our work force is much younger now with very little military experience and a short time with the FAA.
 Our controllers have no idea what is going on in Special Use Airspace.
 Comments: General Harris added that the FAA Centers get a real benefit from Warfighter Briefings
 General Siana mentions that next we hope to have the regional meetings at Air Traffic Center locations to
have more involvement with the controllers.
TASK ARC Co-Chairs to coordinate Warfighter Briefings for ATC Centers to educate the new controllers on mission
and training conducted in Special Use Airspace.
H. Experimental Aviation Association - Mr. Harger (Government Advocacy Specialist, EAA)
1. EAA represents aviation enthusiasts, home-built operators with about 185,000 members and over 1,000 chapters
worldwide.
2. ADS-B is a concern with most EAA members operating below the 10,000 MSL ADS-B cutoff altitude.
 There is a lot of doubt ADS-B operations
 The Cost is very high and a major concern
 EAA focuses on the fun of aviation and has about a 50% member overlap with AOPA
 EAA does not have a government advocacy program such as AOPA has.
 General Harris suggested that the ARC incorporate the local EAA chapters into airspace proposals and ARC
meetings.
I. MQ-1 Predator Warfighter Brief - Lt Col Steinbicker (178 OSS/XP, Springfield, OH)
1. Remotely Piloted Aircraft Significance
 Operations have grown rapidly from 83,000 flight hours in 2007 to over 220,000 hours in 2011.
 Predator units always support the Joint Force Commander
2. Capabilities
 MQ-1 is similar in size to a Cessna 172 with a max altitude of 25,000 ft. MSL and a payload of 300 lbs
 Max Speed of 120 knots and 24 hours endurance
 MQ-9 is similar in size to an A-10 with a max altitude of 50,000 ft. MSL and a payload of 3,000 lbs
 Max Speed of 240 knots and 18 hours endurance
 Communications
 Sense and Avoid (man in the loop) systems
 Radio, Telephone and internet Chat
 Sensors: Electro-Optical and Infrared with laser system and IR pointer
3. Limitations
 Single Airborne Radio (UHF/VHF/FM)
 Lack of See and Avoid capability
 Limited Weather Operations
 Limited Divert Capability (dependent of Launch and Recovery element)
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
7
4. Lost Link
 It does not happen very often - it is very reliable
 We can handoff control to another control station if we have to evacuate.
 automatic if control link is broken
 commanded if needed and the RPA will have a planned crash
5. Accomplishments
 Over 1 Million Combat Hours Flown
 Very Low safety incident rates
 Outstanding Combat Capability
 Reliable Humanitarian Support
J. Session Wrap up - Lt Col Steinbicker
1. Everyone was invited to dinner arranged at the “German Haus” Restaurant
2. ‘No Host’ Social to follow dinner at “The Runway’s Edge” the Volk Field Club for an informal
opportunity to meet with attendees.
MANAGEMENT SESSION FOR MAY 28 ADJOURNED AT 5:00 PM
MANAGEMENT SESSION RESUMED MAY 29 AT 8:00 AM
A. Welcome to the Management Session - Colonel Baker opened the morning session by welcoming everyone back
for the second day.
1. ARC Meeting Locations: A discussion concerning where to host the 2015 ARC included:
 The preferred location would be at an FCC Air Traffic Control Center
 The ARTCCs may not have sufficient conference space to host the meeting within the Center Facility
 The Central Service Area will be in a new office in the fall of 2015 and after that time would have sufficient
room to host the ARC.
 Hosting the ARC at Ft. Worth Center along with the Center Service Area is possible.
B. National Park Service - Overflights Issues - Ms. Ward (Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division)
1. History of NPS and Overflights
 1872 Yellowstone National Park is established – America’s first national park (and first national park in the
world!)
 Trivia question: What agency managed Yellowstone until 1918?
 1903 World’s first successful airplane flight
 1908 - Grand Canyon National Monument established
 1916 National Park Service established to protect park resources unimpaired for future generations
 1927 – first commercial air tour over Grand Canyon
 1949 President Truman issues executive order restricting aircraft below 4,000 AGL over the Boundary
Waters Canoe Area
2. More Overflights History
 1987 Overflights Act – mandate to restore natural quiet at Grand Canyon National Park
 1995 Report to Congress on the Effects of Aircraft Overflights on the National Park System
 2000 National Parks Air Tour Management Act
 2002 US Air Force and National Park Service Sourcebook
 It still has a lot of good information about the two agencies.
 Want to update the collaborative information.
 http://www.nature.nps.gov/sound/resources.cfm
 NPS now has a brochure on peace and quiet.
 In 2012 NPS accepted an agreement to work with air tour operators and FAA to coordinate flight plans
3. NPS Organizational Structure
 Over 400 park units
 Director – appointed by the President
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
8

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
7 Regional offices
 The NPS Midwest Region with a Regional Office in Omaha is the same as the ARC's Central Great Lakes
region plus Arkansas.
 The NPS Intermountain Region with an office in Santa Fe includes New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas
of the ARC's Southwest Region.
 Park superintendents report to Regional Director
 Park superintendent is the equivalent of an installation commander
 Washington or Regional support offices provide services or resource expertise not available at parks
Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division
 Overflights Program – Provide technical support and advice to park managers
 Air Tour Management
 Airport Enhancement Projects
 Next Gen Airspace Design
 Military Liaison – low level flights, airspace proposals
 Technical Assistance – acoustic monitoring
 Aircraft Noise Modeling
 Unmanned Aerial Systems (drones) – policy and use by NPS or by park visitors, e.g. “A Boy and His
Drone”. Parks are trying to protect the visitor experience. the NPS is working on a policy.
Military Liaison
 Promote early cooperation with NPS during scoping and pre-NEPA project planning
 Work with parks to identify issues with military actions and develop approach for resolving issues at the local
level
 Promote building relationships with military services
 The Cheyenne MOA is a good example of working early with the military to resolve issues with
Regional Projects
 Powder River Training Complex/Ellsworth AFB – negotiated avoidance of Little Bighorn Battlefield National
Monument
 White Sands National Monument –
 NPS cooperating agency with Holloman AFB on EA for conversion to F-16s
 Portions of monument closes during missile tests at White Sands Missile Range
Airport Enhancement/Airspace Design
 Denver Area / Rocky Mountain National Park: The FAA made an agreement to move the path to reduce the
noise impact over the wilderness areas within the park. Placing the route over the existing highway mitigated the
noise impact on park visitors.
 FAA came to the NPS very early in the EIS process for Denver.
 The ARCs are helpful in getting a heads up on new proposals
Questions:
 Does the NPS have to consider the military airspace when a creating or making changes to an installation?
 Changes in designation from monument to park require legislative action.
 Ms. Ward did not believe there was a requirement for airspace coordination on installation changes
 Is European style sound monitoring coming to the US?
 Europe is ahead of the US in measuring the impacts on humans. The US is now looking at noise impacts
more closely.
 Mr. Stone (Airspace Mgr. AF 28th BW / OSS, Ellsworth AFB, SD) added that through working with the
NPS a warning was added to flight restrictions included in the Powder River MOAs requiring all flights to avoid
Devil's Tower NM by 5 nautical miles and 18,000 feet.
Contact info:
 Email: vicki_ward@nps.gov ,
 Phone: 970-267-2117,
 Web Site: http://www.nature.nps.gov/sound_night/
C. BLM/USFS Wilderness Fire Issues - Mr. Rose (BLM/USFS Airspace Coordinator for Ms. Stewart, National
Airspace Program Manager)
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
9
1. The BLM/USFS Airspace Program began in the 1980's to prevent midair collisions.
2. Mid-Air Avoidance - Ms. Stewart's job is to make sure all fire aviation people are aware of the mid-air hazards.
Airspace Coordinators insure the fire, military and civilian aviation is aware of the fire location and activity as well as
the establishment of a TFR associated with the fire.
3. 2014 Fire Potential - is a concern in the upper Midwest and in east Texas
 Fire activity has already started in the Southern Region.
 And there is a major concern in the draught areas of the pacific coast.
4. US Forest Service Aviation
 Owns and operates 27 aircraft & helicopters
 Contracts with over 800 aircraft & helicopters annually
 Missions Include:
 Fire surveillance
 Aerial reconnaissance
 Air Attack
 Delivery of smokejumpers
 Firefighter and cargo transport
 Aerial delivery of retardant and water
 Natural Resource Management
 Research
5. BLM Aviation Program
 Exclusive-Use Fire Helicopter fleet
 Type II and Type III helicopters
 Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs)
6. Our Lands (National Forest and BLM land and DoD Special Use Airspace are nearly the same.
7. Every fire can be a unique challenge
8. Certain tools were developed specifically to ENHANCE airspace coordination
 Interagency Airspace Coordination Guide (2003) - will be revised soon
 Interagency Airspace Website - www.airspacecoordination.com
 Links to Interagency Coordination Guide
 FAA
 DoD Airspace Websites
 We use DINS but there are some issues with the website, (No graphics!!)
 1255 National Fire Fighting Transponder Code
 Fire Traffic Areas (FTA) - Similar to Class B airspace with defined altitude separation and radio contract
required prior to entry
 Automated Flight Following (AFF.Gov password required for authorized users)
 Valuable in assessing Airspace Usage & Impacts on other National Airspace users
 Google Earth applications
 Benefits of using AFF with Google Earth are valuable with 3D depiction of Temporary Flight Restriction
(TFR) airspace and fire aircraft.
 3D depiction of Special Use airspace including Military Training Routes (MTRs) with actual route width
(boundaries)
 What is the fire doing? (MODIS) provides near real-time infrared heat detection.
 Fire Perimeters that are produced by the fire GIS staff are available with daily updates.
 Airspace Coordinators
 Assist in deconflicting Airspace for Initial Attack
 Assess Fire Perimeters and Develop TFRs for IMTs
 Coordinate/and Consolidate TFRS
 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) – 14CFR 91.137(a)(2)…
 A “TFR” is a TEMPORARY flight RESTRICTION enacted by the FAA, at the request of a responsible
party, in order to enhance aviation safety. Codified in 14CFR 91.137, 14CFR 91.138, 14CFR 91.141, 14CFR
91.143, 14CFR 91.145 and 99.7
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
10
 The TFR is the Fire fighting working environment to provide safe environment for operation of disaster
relief aircraft.
 91.137 (a) 2 Exceptions
a. Aircraft is participating in relief activities under the direction of the official in charge of on-scene
emergency response activities
b. Operating under ATC approved IFR flight plan
c. Law Enforcement Aircraft
d. VFR Airport Traffic
e. Accredited Media
 Computer Based Training (Two Modules)
 A-103 Basic Airspace
 A-203 TFRs and NOTAMs
9. MOUs or LOAs - Fire fighting MOUs with major training area like Edwards and Nellis
10. Special Use Airspace (SUA) consists of Prohibited Areas, Restricted Areas, Military Operations Area,
Controlled Firing Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Area, National Security Area and Prohibited Area (PA)
 When viewing all of the special use airspace it is obvious that many wildland fire aviation operations will
conflict with some military training airspace.
11. Additional Airspace Complexities that must be considered for Fire Fighting Operations
 Multiple Air Route Traffic Control Centers may be affected
 Victor Airways and Airport Traffic Airspace
 Glider & Parachute Areas
 Smoke Stack Buildings
 Tethered Aerostats – 18 in the US
 Wind Resource Centers
 13,000+ of California’s Wind Turbines are located in three primary regions: Altamont Pass, Tehachapi
and San Gorgonio.
 Banner Towing Operations
 Electronic News Gathering (NEHA)
12. Flying Near the Border
 We coordinate all aviation operations near the border with Air and Marine Operations Center (AMOC)
13. Major Migratory Flyways - Bird Damage could be SEVERE!
14. Special Conservation Areas Overflights
 Pilots are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 (or 3,000) feet above the surface of: National
parks, Monuments, Seashores, Lake shores, Recreation areas, and Scenic river ways
15. How do we organize our Fire Response? Through a systemized Dispatch response which tracks all resources
assigned to an incident.
 National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC/NICC) in Boise, ID
 11 Geographical Area Coordination Centers
 Air Operations Organization
 Unit Aviation Officer
 Aircraft Dispatcher
 Airspace Coordinator
 Air Operations Branch Director (AOBD)
 Air Support Group Supervisor (ASGS)
 Air Tactical Group Supervisor (Air Attack)
 Helibase Manager
16. Current airspace issues:
 Monday thru Friday normal work hours are usually not a problem in contacting Military Schedulers.
 But some numbers in FLIPS are out of date!
 Weekends, after hours and Holidays are a major issue in contacting Military Schedulers to confirm active
routes
 FAA Website not always current on evenings and weekends.
 TFRs on electronic devices are not always current.
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
11
17. Unmanned Aircraft
 UAS will be a game changer but right now we are not using them on fires.


FS started in UAS Operation in 2004 when a UAS was used in Alaska
In 2007 Global Hawk type system was evaluated.
 The high altitude operations works well by keeping him outside of the fire traffic aircraft.
 Currently Fire Operations are fine with high altitude assets that operate above FL 180.
 Currently the FAA requires a 48 hour lead on where we operate UAS and we do not know where they will be
needed 48 hours ahead.
 The US Forest Service is taking a very conservative approach with an established evaluation of the use and
effectiveness of UAS in the fire environment. For the near future UAS operations will not be conducted by the
Forest Service.
 The Department of Interior that includes the BLM has established three centers of excellence; Alaska, Boise,
and Colorado to evaluate UAS effectiveness. They have flown many flights. There is no effort at this time to
begin UAS flight operations on fires.
 In the future we can expect UAS operations associated with fire.
 CAL Fire was the lead for the RIM Fire and there was a lot of coordination.
18. Contact: Julie Stewart, 503-780-0097, j5stewar@blm.gov
D. The Requirement for Training - Mr. Hebner (D3 Air and Space Operations - NGB/A3A)
1. Why Develop Requirements?
 We Didn’t Win World War II Because of Our Blinding Technological Superiority or number of aircraft.
 The German Focke-Wulf 190-D was superior to the British Spitfire and every American fighter prior to
the P51. The P-51 Mustang entered the war in the final year and it only had a 1,500 foot ceiling altitude
advantage.
 The German industry was building thousands of aircraft monthly only months before the end of the war.
 It was the quality of training that provided the advantage
 Operation Bodenplatte, Jan 1945 was the largest Luftwaffe Operation of the war undone by poor
execution and low German pilot skill
a. Allied - 10 killed, 16 shot down uninjured
b. German -143 killed/missing, 70 shot down captured, 21 wounded
c. 9 to 1 kill ratio
 Mariana Turkey Shoot, June 1944
a. Battle of the Philippine Sea – the lopsided outcome attributed to improvements in US pilot training
and tactics
b. 64 to 0 kill ratio in the air
 In Korea - Highly trained American pilots achieved 10-1 kill ratio over the superior Mig 15
2. Why Institutionalize Requirements?
 Viet Nam – the kill ration started at 2 to1 – we had to rediscover the same things…
 Report of the Air-to-Air Missile System Capability Review, the “Ault Report” Nov. 1968
a. Training and Readiness – A key issue in this area is the commitment of fighter squadrons to air-toground missions in Southeast Asia and the consequent dilution of air-to-air training and readiness.
b. Realization of improved aircrew performance should be possible through…more realistic air combat
maneuvering training…
3. Validation of Requirements
 The “Ault Report” led to the creation of “Top Gun” and Red Flag with ACMI
 The Kill Ratio at the end of the war had improved to 10 to 1
 The requirement to train as we fight, to use realistic training made the difference.
4. What Requirements Bought
 The Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority and Training Surprise, Jan. 2001
 “In the last decade we surprised not only others but ourselves with our warfare proficiency. There is
evidence that the culture of our first training revolution is itself trainable. A new enemy might also
capitalize on the new training revolution. Training Superiority is ours to lose and for others to gain.”
5. Maintaining Requirements in Challenging Fiscal Environments
 Quarterly Defense Review (QDR) – Sept 30, 2001
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
12
 The uniquely American Superiority in training is eroding, particularly as evident in the aging
infrastructure and instrumentation of U.S. training ranges.
 Defense Planning Document 2004-2009
 Comprehensive and realistic combat training is an asymmetric advantage for US military forces that
contribute more to effective combat power than any single new system.
6. Why We Still Need to Train to the Most Stringent Requirements
 Cope India ‘04 –
 “the US F-15C’s were defeated more than 90% of the time…” (Feb 26 House Appropriations
Subcommittee)
 “Another surprise was the quality of training the Indian Pilots received. USAF fighter pilots log
about 250 flight hours a year. The Indian fighter pilots said they’ve been getting as many as 300 flying
hours per year and that the majority of those hours were spent in full-up training.
 In most USAF aerial combat training, the service has “dumbed down” adversarial equipment and training
to simulate what it believed to be the level of enemy competence.” (Air Force Magazine, July 2004 vol. 87
no. 7)
7. Training can be scalable
 In golf:
 sometimes you need the putting green
 Sometimes the driving range
 And sometimes an entire course
8. Airspace Requirements Development—The Whole Enchilada and...Scalability
 Sentry Savannah is an example of the graduate level training we need to maintain our combat advantage.
Large Force Exercise (LFE)
9. Defending Requirements - “If the minimum wasn’t good enough, it wouldn’t be the minimum” may be
accurate for PT and PME Testing but…
 Is the minimum Good Enough?
 If it fills RAP squares is it good training?
 Does it provide Realistic Mission Oriented Training?
 Do we need to “train as we fight”?
10. Flying a Tactical Aircraft… is not like riding a Bike
 The Busy Cockpit - Heads Up Display of:
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
13

 Airspeed, Heading, Altitude, Angle of Attack, Radar Operation and Missile Parameters, Steer Point,
Radio Frequencies…Then add:
 Formation Flying and Flight Maneuver for Tactical Positioning
 Threat Engagement
 Data Link Displays
 Opposition Aircraft – Missile Employment and Defensive Tactics
 GCI / AWACS
 Communications and Radar Jamming
 Targeting Pod and Target Identification
 Laser Designator
 Range Procedures
Busy Radio...Busy Mission...
E. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Update FAA - Ms. Jackson (Manager, UAS Tactical Operations Section)
has taken over from Doug Gould.
1. FAA Vision for UAS Integration - Safe, efficient, and timely integration of UAS into the airspace
 Safe - Because safety is the FAA’s primary mission
 Efficient - FAA is committed to reduce delays and increase system reliability
 Timely - FAA is dedicated to supporting this exciting new technology
2. FAA UAS Organization - FAA UAS Integration Office
 To promote UAS-NAS integration, the FAA established a division-level organization reporting to the
Director of Flight Standards
 Single executive focal point
 Matrixed organization that combined former Air Traffic and Flight Standards UAS offices
 Standup complete May 2013
3. The FAA’s UAS Roles
 FAA is a Regulator - Must assure the safety of all aircraft, people, and property (safety is first)
 The FAA Flight Standards District Offices (FSDO) are tracking unauthorized operations.
 FAA is a Service Provider - Must ensure the safety and efficiency of all the National Airspace System and
international airspace delegated to U.S. (safe separation between aircraft)
 Insure that operators have a valid method of operations.
 Successful UAS integration requires BOTH roles - FAA has established a single integration office because it
had to do both areas of responsibility.
4. Getting to Integration
 Today - Accommodation  Up until last year “integration” was all about public (governmental) aircraft accommodation via
Certificates of Waiver or Authorization (COA)
 In August 2012, the FAA received the first civil certification application; once the certification process
has been put to the test, modified for UAS, and the first civil UAS is certified, it will open up another avenue
for NAS access
 Med-term - Transition to NAS Integration  Releasing and then finalizing the small UAS rule
 Implementing NAS Voice System
 Standardizing procedures
 Long-term - Integration into the NextGen NAS
5. UAS Integration – Critical Issues
 There are many critical integration issues and See and Avoid (Sense and Avoid) is just one of them.
 The Current State is via Individual COA, the future integration will achieve "File and Fly"
 NSA Architecture: Lost Link Procedures, Sense and Avoid and ATC Procedures
a. FAR 91.113 requires pilots to “see and avoid” interpreted as “eyeballs only”
 UAS Operations: Link Reliability and UAS Reliability
a. Initial DoD UAS were not up to reliability of manned aircraft and posed risk to other aircraft and
people on the ground)
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
14

Regulatory Issues: Certification, Standards and Training
a. Certification Standards needed for unique aspects of UAS
(1). Electronic Sense and Avoid (Detect and Avoid - 91.113)
(2). A/G command and control
(a). Safety spectrum use
(b). Information security
(c). Redundancy
b. Requirement for NextGen-NAS Voice System - What automation is needed?
c. Operations issues w / speed, duration, Lost Link? - Wake turbulence
d. Spectrum allocated (MLS-C band, DME-L band)
(1). Not characterized
(2). Under pressure to sell
e. Pilot standards. Are there limitations on manned aircraft regulations that will not apply to UAS?
6. Who is Operating UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS)?
 Public
 Most operators are US Federal agencies with aviation programs
 Department of Defense is a major player – self certify
 NASA is an operator AND conducts UAS research
 Public universities – Attorney General letter
 Must be conducting governmental function
 Law Enforcement
 This area is expected to grow significantly
 Civil
 All experimental airframe manufacturing and testing
 Special AW for R&D, Crew training, market surveys
 FAA issues AW certificate
 FAA has approved limited small UAS commercial operations in Arctic
7. Where are UAS Operating?
 UAS are operated in most classes of airspace (not in Class B and the airspace directly underneath it due to
traffic density, under exceptional circumstances)
 Flight over populated areas must be approved on a case-by-case basis
 No COA required for restricted, warning and prohibited areas
8. Types of UAS Authorization
 Public (governmental)
 Activities completely contained in active Special Use Airspace (Restricted and Warning Areas)
 Certificate of Authorization or Waiver (COA)
 Civil (non-governmental)
 Type Certifications
 Existing type certifications with Insitu (Boeing) and Aerovironment
 Both small UAS
 May be used for commercial operations
 Special Airworthiness Certificate in the Experimental Category and Special Flight Permits for production
flight testing
 Currently used for development, marketing and research
 Rules limit commercial use
 Private recreational use (toys, model aircraft)
9. Arctic UAS Language in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)
Public Law 112-95, Section 332(d)(1-3)
 …“Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan and
initiate a process to work with relevant Federal agencies and national and international communities to designate
permanent areas in the Arctic where small unmanned aircraft may operate 24 hours per day for research and
commercial purposes”…
10. The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) stated: “…the Administrator shall establish a
program to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system at six test ranges…”
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
15

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Test Site Locations
 University of Alaska - Includes test ranges in Hawaii and Oregon
 State of Nevada
 New York Griffiss International Airport - Includes test range locations in Massachusetts
 North Dakota Department of Commerce
 Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi
 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) - Includes test ranges in New Jersey
(partnered with Rutgers University)
 Test Site Research
 General Research and Development (R&D) goals for Test Sites include, but are not limited to:
a. System safety and data gathering
b. UAS aircraft certification
c. UAS command and control link
d. UAS control station layout and certification standards
e. UAS ground and airborne sense and avoid technologies
f. Assess environmental impacts of UAS operations
 No FAA funding
Law Enforcement is a Growing Area for small UAS
 More local agencies are getting UAS to assist in their operations.
 Most have manned programs
 Follow the same process as routine COA request.
 Implementation of the ”Common Strategy Approach”
 Walk / Run approach also used with some local fire departments
Agricultural is Forecast to be a Large Growth Area for UAS Applications
COA Process
 Five Phase Process (60 business days)
 Admin Review - 5 days
 ATC Feasibility - 10 days
 AFS Review - 20 days
 ATC Facility Coordination - 20 days
 Signature - 5 days
 Emergency COAs - 4 hours
 The unit must have an existing COA and only the designated airspace must be updated to issue the COA.
 The UAS Office is monitoring the emergency via the news.
 Colonel Brown commended the FAA for the timely response for a Tornado Emergency in Ohio
 Colonel Dougherty added that North Dakota has a pre-prepared Emergency COA for Red River Flooding.
 Renewals - 15-30 days
 DoD streamlined process - 35 days
 Good for 2 years
COA Applications Submitted by Proponent
 Academia - 49%
 DoD - 25%
 Test Sites - 6%
 Law Enforcement - 2%
 Other - 18%
Small UAS Rule
 Remains a key initiative for introducing commercial UAS operations safely into the National Airspace
System
 Target release for draft rule later in 2014
FAA UAS Accomplishments FY13/14 (as required by Reauthorization)
 Streamlined COA application process for public operators
 Developed “Common Strategy” to expedite local law enforcement small UAS authorization
 Published Arctic small UAS expansion plan
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
16




First authorized commercial small UAS flights (in Arctic)
Published UAS Roadmap
Published UAS Comprehensive Plan (JPDO)
Selected six UAS Test Sites
F. Northern Plains Unmanned Aircraft Systems Test Site - Colonel Dourghty briefed for Mr. Becklund, Directory
1. Mission: Collaborate with FAA and industry partners to develop equipment, systems, rules, and procedures to
safely integrate unmanned aircraft into the NAS without negatively impacting existing general or commercial
aviation.
 Agriculture is important to North Dakota and the UAS effort began with that issue.
2. Organization: The North Dakota Lt Governor chair the group that includes:
 University of North Dakota Aerospace
 North Dakota Aeronautic Commission
 North Dakota Department of Commerce
 North Dakota Aviation Council (General Aviation)
 State Office of The Adjutant General
 North Dakota State University
3. Recent Accomplishments
 First FAA UAS Test Site declared operational - Effective 4/21/2014
 NP UAS TS first to fly under FAA Test Site procedures - 5/5/2014
4. NP UAS TS Goals
 Near-Mid Term
 Conduct research in accordance with FAA’s requirements
 Work closely with agencies with equity in UAS: FSDOs, ARTCCs, AOPA, etc.
 Expand research and business development
 Build infrastructure and business model to support enduring R&D activities
 Long Term
 World-renowned leader in R&D, DT&E, OT&E for Unmanned Systems
 NP UAS TS is industry’s go-to site
5. Regional UAS Assets
 Univ. of North Dakota (Grand Forks, ND)
 Largest collegiate training program in the world
a. 120+ a/c(fixed, rotor); 120,000+ flight hrs/yr
b. All equipped with ADS-B
c. Safety Management System (SMS) Level 3
d. Extensive international training heritage
e. 1st undergrad degree in UAS (120+ students)
f. UAS Center of Excellence
 North Dakota State University (Fargo, ND)
 School of Agriculture (and USDA Ag Extension)
 School of Engineering & Architecture
 Center for Nanoscale Science & Engineering
 Northern Great Plains Transportation Institute
 Grand Forks Air Force Base
 USAF – RQ-4 Global Hawk Block 40
 ND ANG – MQ-1 Predators
 CBP – MQ-9 Predator Bs
 Northland Comm & Tech College (Thief River Falls, MN)
 2 yr A&P + UAS Maintenance
 2 yr Imagery Analyst
 Lake Region Comm & Tech College (Devils Lake, ND)
 Precision Agriculture
 Law enforcement and first responder
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
17
6.
7.
8.
9.
 Local Industry Partners
 Annual RRVRC UAS Summit
Test Site Resources
 Attractive Test Site Geography
 Low population, mostly rural
 Flat to rolling terrain
 4-season climate
 Unencumbered Airspace
 Class A, D, E, G
 Low average air traffic density
 History of successful COAs (30+)
 Low-use airports with hard surface runways
 UAS models
 Scan Eagle
 Sandshark (2 systems)
 Draganflyer
 Raven
 Cube
 Facilities
 Support Equipment
Areas of RDT&E
 Research with industry partners and government agencies will focus on:
 UAS DAA: Ground and airborne detect and avoid, cooperative airspace
 UAS C2: Command and control links, avionics systems
 UAS systems safety, aircraft certification
 Control station layout and certification
 Initial application areas include:
 Precision agriculture
 Energy
Initial DAA Flight Testing – LD-CAP
 Limited Deployment-Cooperative Airspace Project (LD-CAP)
 Multi-partner research effort (MITRE, NASA Langley, Draper Labs, others)
 Aircraft
 NASA Langley SR22 as surrogate UAV
 UND Cessna 172 as intruder aircraft
 Flight tests
 281 encounters during 2 flight campaigns (2012, 2013)
 Compared 3 ADS-B based Self Separation algorithms (MITRE, UND, Draper)
 ADS-B Efforts
 ADS-B installation for approximately 80 GA aircraft
 Electronics miniaturization effort
NP UASTS Summary
 Statewide effort, with operations centered in Grand Forks, ND
 Open unencumbered airspace, UAS-friendly environment
 The FAA is referring to the airspace as a "Special Activity Area" and not segregated "Special Use
Airspace"
 NP UASTS is working closely with the military to ensure a relationship exists to promote good use of the
airspace in northeast North Dakota.
 The Test Site needs airspace for data collection.
 Ms. Jackson added that if an environmental evaluation is required that would be the responsibility of the
test site.
 Heritage of UAS research, education and training
 First operational FAA UAS Test Site
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
18
 Looking to ensure relationships with general/commercial aviation, all levels of the FAA, professional
associations (AOPA), industry, etc, remain strong!
G. Air Force Representative to FAA Central Service Area - Lt Col Miller (CSA AFREP)
1. The AFREP Office
 The Office is not the Air Force Representative to the FAA. The office also represents other agencies with the
FAA like the Dept of Interior, National Park Service and others.
 It is the first place to call if you have an airspace question
2. Powder River Airspace Proposal
 A very large airspace complex in Montana and North Dakota - The public scoping is complete.
3. Volk Field Airspace Proposal
 The first proposal to go through the new Air Force process
 The Sec of Air Force has approved the proposal to proceed.
4. Temporary MOAs - 180 days required by FAA is insure airspace is approved
 Northern Lightening Temp MOA for exercise
 Grayling Temp MOA for exercise
5. Cheyenne MOA, UTTR Airspace and Oregon Airspace are active proposals in the Northwest Region
H. The New Mexico State University UAS Fight Test Center - Mr. Zaklan (Deputy Director NMSU UAS FTC)
1. Background
 A UAS is a truck; it is a tool we need to learn how to use it.
 NMSU is a UAS Test Center
 Things move slowly - five years ago we could not operate UAS
 NMSU started with balloon flights to very high altitude.
 In 1998 NMSU had a COA to operate UAS.
2. Southwest New Mexico Airspace
 Excellent year-round flying conditions
 Uncongested airspace
 Highly varied terrain
 Military airspace adjacent and slightly smaller than Connecticut – 7,105 square miles
 USAF air traffic control from “surface to space”
3. NMSU UAS Research Activities
 Flight Test Center - UAS operations and data collection
 Engineering - UAS Design including Small and Micro UAS
 Demonstrations
 Human Factors - Trust in Automation, Control Reversal, and workload
 Regulatory - Engine Test Cell - Arctic Airspace Operations and Procedures
4. Airworthiness Certification Accomplishments
 Unmanned aircraft must be shown to be airworthy to conduct flight operations in the national airspace system
 NMSU Airworthiness Process Based on MLHBK 516 and FAA Special AW Cert for UAS
 Modified 3 times as UAS changed
 NMSU’s Process is accepted by the FAA and a version is now used by the 6 new FAA UAS Test Sites
5. Historical Efforts - Operating UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS)
 Access 5
 Small UAS ARC 1
 FAA UAPO (Crawl – Walk – Run)
 NMSU UAS FTC
 XCOM
 UASIO
 Small UAS ARC 2
 FAA Regulatory - in the past 1.5 years more has been done compared to the 10 previous years.
 Many Technical, Design, , and Operations Efforts
 Unfocused Research, including individual advances
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
19
 Federal Judge Ruling
6. NMSU UAS Accomplishments
 Assisted DOD in Initial Global Hawk Airspace Requirements
 DHS in OT&E of SUAS
 DOI/USGS in Initial UAS Raven Training
 USDA in use of UAS for Scientific Research
 Disaster Distribution Line procedures and process
 Civil UAS Applications Research
 UAS Corridor Safety Case and Procedures
 Visual Observer Procedure Changes
 8900.227 Collaboration and Procedure Requirements/Validation
7. UAS ISSUES Needing Addressing
 FAA UAS in the NAS
 Safety of Flight
 Technology Cert
 FAA Regulations/Policy
 Civil vs. Public
 Who can Fly – Requirements
 For What Purposes
 Where - How – When
 Safety: Size – Location – Mission
 System Abilities
8. UAS TOOL - Right Tool for the Right Job
9. Path Forward
 Test sites will walk then run
 FAA Works Policy and NAS Procedures
 Regulations - Approves Standards
 Oversees Safety
 UAS FTC & UAS Test Sites (Semi-Independent)
 Address community needs
 Provide test findings to guide standards
 Central Community Group
 Community
 Research – New Technology – Feedback
 FAA Guidance & Oversight
10. Point of Contact
 Dennis Zaklan, Deputy Director, NMSU UAS Flight Test Center
 (575) 646-9417 - 575-635-1030
 dzaklan@psl.nmsu.edu
I. Wrap Up/Adjourn by General Baker and Colonel Brown
1. Colonel Brown thanked everyone for attending this year's combined Central Great Lake and Southwest Regions
Airspace/Range Council. He ask that attendees provide inputs for improvements in the Airspace/Range council
meetings and agenda items to meet the needs of all stakeholders involved with Special Use Airspace.
2. General Siana, the NGB A3A Staff, Kansas City and Minneapolis Centers thanked Colonel Brown for his
support of the Airspace/Range Councils. He was presented with coins and a Minuteman recognition.
3. Next Meeting Location/Date/Host
 Meeting will be May 2015 within the Southwest Region with a tentatively hosted by Houston Center.
4. National Airspace/Range Executive Council (NAREC) Date/Place
 December 10-11, 2014 hosted by the Air National Guard at JB Andrews, MD
5. TASKS
 TASK ARC Co-Chairs to coordinate Warfighter Briefings for ATC Centers to educate the new controllers on
mission and training conducted in Special Use Airspace.
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
20
MANAGEMENT SESSION FOR MAY 29 ADJOURNED AT 12:00 PM
APPROVED
// Signed //
GLEN BAKER,
Brig General , USAF
HQ OK Air National Guard Chief of Staff
Co-Chairman, Southwest Region Airspace/Range
Council
// Signed //
ZANE, BROWN
Colonel, USAF
HQ OH Air National Guard A3
Co-Chairman, Central-Great Lakes
Council
Airspace/Range
Attachments
1. Agenda
2. List of Attendees
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
21
AGENDA
Central Service Area
Airspace and Range Council
Volk Field, WI
May 2014
28 May PM – Joint Management Session
1330 Welcoming Remarks & Introductions
Brig Gen Siana / Col Baker /
Col Brown
1345 National Overview
Brig Gen Siana
1400 The Requirement for Training
Readiness Aircrew Program (RAP)
Mr. Hebner
LtCol Steinbicker
1415 Warfighter Briefings
1445 Unit/MAJCOM/Service Briefings
Col Baker / Col Brown /
Unit/MAJCOM/Service Reps
- C/GL – ND, SD, MN, WI, MI, NE, IA, IL, IN, OH, KS, MO
- S/SW – NM, OK, AR, TX, LA
1530 - BREAK 1600 FAA Regional Issues
FAA ARTCC/CSA Reps
1615 FAA Airspace Management Plan
Mr. Moore
1630 NAS Users Perspectives
- AOPA
- NBAA
- State Aviation Officers
-Other Civil Stakeholders
Ms. McCaffrey
Mr. Lamond
1700 Session Wrap-up
Col Baker / Col Brown
1800 Dinner at “German Haus” Restaurant
- ‘No Host’ Social to follow @ “The Runway’s Edge”
All Invited
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 1 - 1
AGENDA
Central Service Area
Airspace and Range Council
Volk Field, WI
May 2014
29 May AM – Joint Management Session
0800 Opening Remarks
0815 Public Agency Perspectives
BLM – NPS – CBP
0900 FAA updates
- ARTCC Airspace Concerns
- ATSCC
- NSAAP Project/SWIM
- DINS/NOTAM
- ERAM
- HARP
Brig Gen Siana / Col Baker /
Col Brown
TBD
Mr. Perkins
1000 - BREAK 1030 FAA Designated UAS Test Site Program
Mr. Bob Becklund - ND
Mr. Dennis Zakland - NM
Mr. Randy Willis – FAA
1100 Round Table Discussion
Col Baker / Col Brown
1200 Joint Session Wrap Up / Breakout Options
Tour Options
Brig Gen Siana / Col Baker /
Col Brown
1215 - LUNCH -
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 1 - 2
ATTENDEE LIST
Captain Carl P Abbott
Asst. Airspace Mgt AF 522 OSS / OSOR
7513 Sentry Blvd, Suite 203
Tinker AFB OK 73145-
DSN: 884-7414
Comm: (405) 734-7414
Cell: (816) 560-0616
Email carl.abbott.1@us.af.mil
Mr. David Allen
Airspace & Range Scheduler AF 307 OSS
1333 Twining Dr.
Barksdale AFB LA 71110-
DSN: 331-3171
Comm: (318) 529-4395
Cell: (253) 272-1906
Email david.allen.13@us.af.mil
Brig Gen Glen Baker
SW Co-Chair ANG OKANG Chief of Staff
5624 Air Guard Drive
Oklahoma City OK 73179-
DSN: 720-5221
Comm: (405) 686-5221
Cell: (405) 517-2861
Email glen.baker@ang.af.mil
Mr. Joseph Bassett
Airspace Mgr ANG Eastern Air Defense Sector/DOA
366 Otis St
Rome NY 13441-
DSN: 587-6784
Comm: (315) 334-6784
Cell: (315) 338-3940
Email joseph.bassett@ang.af.mil
Mr. Russell Beatse
Ops Support Specialist FAA Memphis ARTCC
3229 Democrat Road
Memphis TN 38008-
DSN:
Comm: (901) 368-8537
Cell:
Email russell.c.beatse@faa.gov
Mr. Tony Branham
Operations Support FAA Memphis ARTCC
DSN:
Comm: (901) 368-8530
Cell:
Email tony.a.branham@faa.gov
Memphis TN
Colonel Zane E Brown
DSN: 273-7693
CGL Co-Chair ANG Ohio ANG / A3
Comm: (614) 336-6000 7693
2825 W. Dublin-Granville Rd.
Cell: (614) 496-9994
Columbus OH 43235Email zane.brown@ang.af.mil; zbrown1@earthlink.net
Colonel John Dougherty
Ops Gp Commander ANG 119 Wing
1400 32nd Ave N.
Fargo ND 58102-
DSN: 362-8500
Comm: (701) 451-2500
Cell:
Email john.dougherty@ang.af.mil
Mr. Scott Duke
Division Chief ANG NGB / A3A
3500 Fetchet Ave
JB Andrews DC
DSN: 612-9866
Comm: (240) 612-9866
Cell: (703) 801-8420
Email scott.duke@ang.af.mil
Brig Gen Gary Ebben
WI Asst. AG - Air ANG JFHQ-WI
DSN: 724-3020
Comm: (608) 242-3020
Cell: (608) 469-1363
Email gary.ebben@ang.af.mil
Madison WI 53704-
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 1
ATTENDEE LIST
Mr. Jamie A Flanders
Airspace Mgr. ANG NGB / A3AA
3500 Fetchet Ave
JB Andrews MD 20762-
DSN: 612-9253
Comm: (240) 612-9253
Cell:
Email jamie.flanders@ang.af.mil
Mr. Sean Fortier
Supvirsory Traffic Mgnt Coord. FAA ZMP ARTCC
512 Division St.
Farmington MN 55024-
DSN:
Comm: (651) 463-5590
Cell:
Email sean.fortier@faa.gov
MSgt Thomas "Tom" Frutos
Combat Airspace Mgr. ANG 217th AOS/AOC
Battle Creek ANGB MI
DSN:
Comm: (734) 995-5042
Cell: (734) 890-1543
Email thomas.frutos@ang.af.mil; thomas.frutos@faa.gov
Colonel Don Furland
MI / JFHQ/DO ANG
3411 N. Martin Luther King Jr.
Lansing MI 48906-2834
DSN:
Comm: (269) 375-8674
Cell: (269) 330-1449
Email donald.furland@ang.af.mil
MSG Alfredo Garza
DARR ARMY FAA CSA DARR
2601 Mecham Blvd
Fort Worth TX 76137-
DSN: 477-2920
Comm: (817) 222-5924
Cell:
5920 or 5921
Email alfredo.garza@faa.gov
Mr. Jay Gaumer
DSN:
A/S & Proceedure Specialits FAA Kansas City ARTCC
Comm: (913) 254-8447
250 S. Rogers Road
Cell:
Olathe KS 66062Email jay.gaumer@faa.gov
SMSgt Thomas "Tom" Gill
Combat Airspace Mgr. ANG 217th AOS/AOC
Battle Creek ANGB MI
DSN:
Comm: (734) 955-5042
Cell: (586) 322-5779
Email thomas.gill@ang.af.mil; thomas.f.gill@faa.gov
Major Erin Goebel
Assst Director Sector Ops Ctr AF WADS
852 Lincoln Blvd
JBLM WA 98438-
DSN: 331-4395
Comm: (253) 982-4395
Cell: (253) 720-2141
Email erin.goebel@us.af.mil
Mr. Timothy Gravelle
Command Airspace Mgr. AF AMC/A3AA
402 Scott Drive, Unit 3A1
Scott AFB IL 62225-5302
DSN: 779-3415
Comm: (618) 229-3415
Cell:
Email timothy.gravelle@us.af.mil
Lt Col Curtis Grayson
Ops Officer ANG 148 FW / !79 FS
4611 Viper St.
Duluth MN 55811-
DSN:
Comm: (218) 788-7259
Cell:
Email curtis.grayson@ang.af.mil
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 2
ATTENDEE LIST
Captain Jerry R Grotjohn
Airspace Mgr ANG 114 FW - 175 FS/DOF
1201 W. Algonquin St.
Sioux Falls SD 57104-
DSN: 798-7746
Comm: (360) 907-8810
Cell: (360) 907-8810
Email jerry.grotjohn@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Christopher Hansen
Dir of Operations ANG CRTC Volk Field
100 Independence, Volk Field
Camp Douglas WI 54618-
DSN: 871-1201
Comm: (608) 427-1210
Cell:
Email christopher.hansen.1@ang.af.mil
Mr. Jonathan Harger
Gov Advocacy Spec EAA
3000 Poberzny Rd
Oshkosh WI 54903-
DSN:
Comm: (920) 426-6103
Cell:
Email jharger@eaa.org
Brig Gen Dick "Yo" Harris
Nat ARC Exec ANG ATAG-JFHQ/VT
789 National Guard Road
Colchester VT 05446-
DSN: 656-3101
Comm: (802) 338-3101
Cell: (802) 989-9608
Email richard.n.harris.mil@mail.mil
Major Tony Hart
ANG CRTC Volk Field
100 Indepedence Dr
Camp Douglas WI
DSN: 871-1419
Comm: (608) 427-1419
Cell:
Email antony.hart@ang.af.mil
Mr. Thor Hebner
A/S Specialist/NGB A3A D3ASO D3ASO
12486 Hillside Dr.
Plymouth IN 46563-
DSN:
Comm: (574) 248-2866
Cell: (574) 274-8083
Email thorulf69@comcast.net
Mr. Justin Hetland
Airspace Mgr. ST DOT WI DOT Aeronautical
4802 Sheboygan Ave. Room 701
Madison WI 53707-
DSN:
Comm: (608) 267-5018
Cell: (772) 538-8143
Email justin.hetland@dot.wi.gov
Major Eric R Hoopes
Commander ANG 149 FW Det 1 (McMullen Range)
117 Hensley St., Suite 1
Lackland AFB TX 78236-
DSN: 945-7648
Comm: (210) 925-7648
Cell: (210) 332-8224 945-7797
Email eric.hoopes@ang.af.mil
Mr. Nick Hough
Aviation Safety Mgr. FS Eastern Region
626 E. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 700
Milwaukee WI 53202-
DSN:
Comm: (414) 297-3165
Cell: (414) 208-7570
Email georgenhough@fs.fed.us
Ms. Jacqueline R. Jackson
Mgr. Tactical Ops Section FAA HQ FAA
490 L'Enfanta Plaza, Suite 3280
Washington DC 20024-
DSN:
Comm: (202) 267-8177
Cell:
Email jacqueline.r.jackson@faa.gov
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 3
ATTENDEE LIST
Lt Col Ryan Jones
Commander ANG 138TH OSS
Tulsa OK
DSN: 894-7370
Comm:
Cell: (918) 740-1920
Email RKJF16@MSN.COM
Mr. Landon Jones, III
Airspace Mgr. ANG NGB / A3AA
3500 Fetchet Ave
Andrews AFB MD 20762-
DSN: 612-9250
Comm: (240) 612-9250
Cell: (703) 216-5523
Email landon.jones@ang.af.mil
MSgt Kasten
ANG 115 FW / 176 FE
3110 Mitchell St,
Madison WI 53704-
DSN: 724-8512
Comm: (608) 245-4512
Cell:
Email
Major Todd J Kavouras
ANG 184 IW Det 1 (Smoky Hill Range)
8424 W. Farrelly Rd
Salina KS 67401-
DSN: 743-8544
Comm: (316) 759-8544
Cell: (785) 214-1734
Email todd.kavouras@ang.af.mil
Major Jeremy Keyes
ANG 128 ARW
1919E. Grange Ave
Milwauke WI 55207-
DSN: 580-8470
Comm: (414) 944-8470
Cell: (614) 535-6296
Email jeremy.keyes@ang.af.mil
Major Matt Kiser
ANG 119 FW
1400 32nd Ave N
Fargo ND 58102-
DSN: 451-2300
Comm: (701) 306-7992
Cell:
451-2132
Email matthew.kiser@ang.af.mil
SSgt Klein
ANG 115 FW / 176 FE
3110 Mitchell St,
Madison WI 53704-
DSN: 724-8512
Comm: (608) 245-4512
Cell:
Email
Mr. Harry A Knudsen, Jr.
Environment Spec D3ASO D3ASO
6684 Wisteria Dr.
Myrtle Beach SC 29588-
DSN:
Comm: (843) 650-7410
Cell: (301) 751-6538
Email knud645@gmail.com
Colonel William "Freddie" Krueger
AF WADS/DS
Bldg 852 Lincoln Bldg
Joint Base Lewis-McChord WA 98335-
DSN: 382-4600
Comm: (253) 982-4600
Cell: (253) 310-1252
Email william.krueger.1@us.af.mil
Mr. Joe Kuka
FAA Indianapollis ARTCC
1850 S Siesbee St
Indianapolis IN 46241-
DSN:
Comm: (317) 247-2527
Cell:
Email joseph.j.kuka-jr@faa.gov
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 4
ATTENDEE LIST
Mr. Juan Lavarrecla Perez
Airspace Mgr. AF 49 OSS / OSOS
Deleware Ave. Bldg 317
Holloman AFB, NM 88330-
DSN: 5722638
Comm: (575) 572-2638
Cell: (575) 442-3247
Email Juan.Lavarreclaperez@holloman.af.mil
Lt Col William Leahy
ANG 122 FW/163 FS
3005 Ferguson Road
Fort Wayne IN 46809-
DSN: 778-3301
Comm: (260) 478-3301
Cell: (413) 657-5188
Email william.leahy@ang.af.mil
Major Brad Lorentz
XP ANG
DSN:
Comm:
Cell:
Email bradley.lorentz#ang.af.mil
Mr. Brad G Marcum
Chief Airspace & Ranges AF AETC/A3OF
1 F Street, Suite 1
Randolph AFB TX 78148-
DSN: 487-8253
Comm: (210) 652-8253
Cell: (210) 867-5174
Email brad.marcum@us.af.mil
Capt Victor McCoy
ANG 115 FW / 176 FS
3110 Mitchell St.
Madison WI 53704-
DSN: 724-8512
Comm: (608) 245-4512
Cell: (847) 770-5288
Email victor.mccoy@ang.af.mil
Mr. Shawn McHenry
Branch Chief ANG NGB / A3AR
3500 Fetchet Ave
JB Andrews MD 20762-
DSN: 612-9248
Comm: (240) 612-9248
Cell:
Email shawn.mchenry@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Richard Miller
AFREP AF FAA CSA - ASW 910
2601 Meacham Blvd
Fort Worth TX
DSN: 477-2911
Comm: (425) 227-2947
Cell: (817) 222-5911
Email Richard.C.Miller@faa.gov
Cilonel Chad Milne
State DO ANG WI ANG HQ
3110 Mitchell St.
Mafdison WI 53704-
DSN: 724-8506
Comm: (608) 213-0979
Cell: (608) 213-0979
Email chad.milne@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Bryan Moore
Dir of Ops ANG 123 ACS
10649 McKinley Rd.
Cincinnati OH 45242-
DSN: 340-2952
Comm: (513) 936-2952
Cell: (614) 254-3816
Email bryan.moore@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Timothy "Tim" Moses
Commander ANG 180 FW / OSS
2660 South Eber Road
Swanton OH 43558-
DSN: 580-4086
Comm: (419) 868-4036
Cell: (937) 367-1985 580-4201
Email timothy.moses@ang.af.mil
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 5
ATTENDEE LIST
Mr. David Mullinax
Support Mgr. Airspace FAA Kansas City ARTCC
250 S. Rogers Rd
Olathe KS 66062-
DSN:
Comm: (913) 254-8440
Cell: (913) 206-1284
Email dave.mullinax@faa.gov
Lt Col Michael Nelson
ANG 149 OG /DOV
117 Hensley St
JBSA-Lackland TX 78236-
DSN: 945-5934
Comm: (210) 925-5934
Cell: (623) 824-9389
Email michael.nelson.8@ang.af.mil
Major Elena K O'Bryan
Branch Chief ANG NGB / PA
111 South George Mason Dr. Arlington Hal 2TS-230
Arlington VA 22204-
DSN:
Comm: (703) 607-2279
Cell: (571) 212-8410
Email elena.k.obryan.mil@mail.mil
Ms. Melissa Pierce
Mil Ops Specialist FAA Kansas City ARTCC (ZKC)
250 S. Rogers Road
Olathe KS 66062-
DSN:
Comm: (913) 254-8442
Cell:
Email melissa.d.pierce@faa.gov
Mr. Tim Prendergast
STMC FAA Chicago ARTCC
619 W. New Indian Trail
Aurora IL 60506-
DSN:
Comm: (630) 906-8341
Cell: (630) 488-1552
Email timothy.prendergast@faa.gov
Mr. Michael Rizzo
Cent Service Ops Support FAA CSA ATREP
2601 Meacham Blvd.
Fort Worth TX 76193-
DSN:
Comm: (817) 321-7733
Cell:
Email michael.rizzo@faa.gov
Colonel Dave Romuald
WI / CRTC/CC ANG Volk Filed CRTC
100 Independence Dr.
Camp Douglas WI 54618-
DSN: 871-1200
Comm: (608) 427-1200
Cell: (608) 886-0038
Email david.romuald@ang.af.mil
Mr. Gary Rose
DSN:
A/S Specialist/NGB A3A D3ASO D3ASO
Comm: (520) 360-5225
7370 N. Catalina Ridge Dr
Cell: (520) 360-5225 520-398-3340
Tucson AZ 85718-1369
Email grose@d3aso.com; gary.rose@tbcradio.com
Mr. James 'Inspector' Rousseau
AF AFMC/Nevada
NV
DSN: 525-8400 55057
Comm: (661) 275-8400 55057
Cell: (702) 358-4753
Email james.rousseau@oln-afmc.af.mil; jimboltc1@cox.net
Mr. Devin Scherer
ANG NGB / A7AM Plans & Requirements
3501 Fetchet Ave.
JB Andrews MD 20762-
DSN: 612-8114
Comm: (240) 612-8114
Cell: (703) 638-5006
Email devin.scherer.ctr@ang.af.mil
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 6
ATTENDEE LIST
Captain Brandon Schrader
AFRC 934th Airlift Wing / 934 OSS
760 Military Hwy
Minneapolis MN 55450-
DSN: 783-1765
Comm: (612) 713-1765
Cell: (218) 779-2193
Email brandon.schrader@us.af.mil
Major Nicholas "Nick" Schultz
Hardword RTO ANG Volk CRTC
100 Independence Dr.
Camp Douglas WI 54618-
DSN:
Comm: (608) 427-1443
Cell:
Email nicholas.schultz.1@ang.af.mil
Brig Gen Pete Siana
Nat ARC Co-Chair ANG JF/ CTANG COS
100 Nicholson Rd
East Granby CT 06026-
DSN: 220-2772
Comm: (860) 292-2772
Cell: (860) 883-1853
Email peter.siana@ang.af.mil
Brig Gen Jeffrey Silver
NWM Co-Chair ANG OR JFHQ/ATAG-AIR
1776 Militia Way SE
Salem OR 97309-5047
DSN: 355-2216
Comm: (503) 584-2216
Cell: (971) 404-8748
Email jeffrey.silver@ang.af.mil
Mr. Brendan Smith
ATO/DPLO ANG CRTC Volk Field
100 Independence Dr.
Camp Douglas WI 54618-5001
DSN: 871-1177
Comm: (608) 427-1177
Cell: (608) 343-4938 871-1018
Email brendan.smith@ang.af.mil
Mr. Greg Smith, Airspace & Procedures Mgr
FAA MSP ARTCC (ZMP)
512 Division Street
Farmington MN 55024-
DSN:
Comm:
Cell:
Email greg.smith@faa.gov
Lt Col John "Blocker" Steinbicker
DSN: 612-9251
OH / ANG 178 OSS/OSX
Comm: (240) 612-9251
4671 Weatherstone Ct
Cell: (419) 494-4566 329-2822
Mason OH 45040Email john.steinbicker@ang.af.mil; jdtransport.one@gmail.com
Mr. George Stone
Airspace Mgr. AF 28th BW / OSS
1956 Scott Dr., Room 207
Ellsworth AFB SD 57706-
DSN: 675-1230
Comm: (605) 385-1230
Cell: (605) 431-6580
Email george.stone@us.af.mil
Mr. Johnny Taylor
Airspace Mgr. AF 2 OSS
6402 Lindbery E Suite 121
Barksdale AFB LA 71110-
DSN: 781-2130
Comm: (318) 456-2130
Cell: (318) 542-0901
Email johnny.taylor@us.af.mil
Lt Col Matt Trumble
OGR ANG CRTC - Alpena - Grayling Range
5884 A Street
Alpena MI 49707-
DSN: 741-6335
Comm: (989) 354-6335
Cell: (231) 838-9427
Email matthew.trumble@ang.af.mil
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 7
ATTENDEE LIST
Major Leah Voelker
ANG 127 ARG / DOV
Wilber Wright Ave. Bldg 32
Selfridge ANGB MI 48045-
DSN: 273-2892
Comm: (586) 239-2892
Cell: (517) 282-1834
Email leah.voelker@ang.af.mil
Ms. Vicki Ward, Overflights Prog Mgr
NPS Natural Sounds & Night Skies Div.
1201 Oakridge Dr., Suite 100
Fort Collins CO 80525-
DSN:
Comm: (970) 267-2117
Cell:
Email vicki_ward@nps.gov
Major Jon Wiesinger
KC-135 Pilot ANG 171 ARS
Wilber Wright Ave. Bldg 17
Selfridge ANGB MI 48045-
DSN: 273-2408
Comm: (586) 239-2408
Cell: (734) 635-1285
Email jon.wiesinger@ang.af.mil
Mr. Steve Willenbring
TMC / MOS FAA ZMP ARTCC
512 Division St.
Farmington MN 55024-
DSN:
Comm: (651) 463-5545
Cell:
Email steven.willengring@faa.gov
Mr. Mark Winsor
Air Traffic Mgr. ANG 127 OG / AT
25700 Joy Blvd
Selfridge, ANGB MI 48045-
DSN: 273-5190
Comm: (586) 239-5190
Cell: (810) 513-7251
Email mark.winsor@ang.af.mil
Mr. John A. Witucki
Air Traffic Rep FAA Central Service Area
4500 Mercantile Plaza
Ft Worth TX
DSN:
Comm: (817) 321-7734
Cell:
Email john.witucki@faa.gov
Mr. Dennis "Zak" Zaklan
Dep Dir UAS FTC ST Physical science Laboratory
PO BOX 30002
Las Cruces NM 88003-8002
DSN:
Comm: (575) 646-9417
Cell: (575) 635-1030
Email dzaklan@psl.nmsu.edu
Central Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 28-29 May 2014
Attachment 2 - 8