Criteria Guidelines & Format Introduction Body Paragraphs (Identification; Application; Analysis) (x2) Conclusion Word Choice & Sentence Fluency Writing Mechanics Exceeding the Standard (10) Meeting the Standard (8.5) Working Towards the Standard (5) Below the Standard (3) All of the following guidelines were followed in an exceptional fashion: Significant & compelling topic was approved ahead of time by teacher Paper follows standard MLA format Proper Title Times New Roman, 12 pt font, 1” margins, double spaced 3-5 pages The introduction: Summarized in a thorough & expert & compelling fashion. Uniquely hooks reader’s attention as discussed in class. Introduces topic, premise, and main points well All body paragraphs contain evidence of: Ample & expert outside research of topic. Authentic understanding & skillful insight of terminology. Addresses the topic in relation to social issue 5 W and 1 H question answered fully Student Voice is evident throughout Detail: Supportive details and evidence throughout (stats, examples, etc) Conclusion provides: a skillful and engaging recap of the topics contents an insightful explanation of the topics future implications Word Choice: language is consistently precise & vivid; appropriate for the audience & purpose, and promotes reader understanding in exceptional manner. Sentence Fluency: meaningful sentences are grammatically sound, correct in structure, and can be read quickly and easily. The writer demonstrates a strong understanding of the conventions of standard written English (e.g. spelling, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and paragraphing); any errors, although noticeable, do not impair the paper’s readability. All of the following guidelines were followed: Appropriate topic was approved ahead of time by teacher Paper follows standard MLA format Appropriate Title No formatting issues 3-5 pages long ONE of the following guidelines was NOT followed: Appropriate topic was approved ahead of time by teacher Paper follows standard MLA format Few Formatting issues 2-2 ½ pages long TWO or more of the following guidelines were NOT followed: Appropriate topic was approved ahead of time by teacher Paper follows standard MLA format Many formatting issues Less than 2 pages long The introduction: Summarized topic in a thorough & coherent fashion. Sufficiently hooks reader’s attention as discussed in class. Introduces topic, premise, and main points well All body paragraphs contain evidence of: Thorough outside research of economic terms Authentic understanding of terminology. Addresses the topic in relation to social issue 5 W and 1 H question answered Student Voice is evident throughout Detail: Supportive details and evidence throughout (stats, examples, etc) Conclusion provides: a sufficient recap of the topic’s contents thorough explanation of the topic’s future implications Word Choice: language is correct, appropriate for the audience & purpose, and promotes reader understanding. Sentence Fluency: Sentences are grammatically sound, correct in structure, and can be read with minimal difficulty. The introduction: Summarized topic in a minimal and/or slightly incoherent fashion. Adequately introduces topic Common introduction The introduction: Did not provide a sufficient or understandable summary of topic. Introduction was missing many of key aspects Thesis statement? ONE body paragraphs lack evidence of: evidence of outside research of term; or thorough research Authentic understanding of terminology (i.e., overuse of direct citation). 5 W and 1 H question answered Student Voice is missing at times Detail: Some details and evidence throughout (stats, examples, etc) TWO or more body paragraphs lack evidence of: evidence of outside research of term; or thorough research authentic understanding of terminology (excessive direct citation). 5 W and 1 H question answered Student Voice is missing Detail: Details and evidence are not found throughout (stats, examples, etc) Conclusion provides: a minimal recap of the topic’s contents weak explanation of the topic’s future implications The writer demonstrates a good understanding of the conventions of standard written English (e.g. spelling, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and paragraphing); any errors, although noticeable, do not impair the paper’s readability. The writer demonstrates a basic understanding of the conventions of standard written English (e.g. spelling, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and paragraphing); errors sometimes impair the paper’s readability. Conclusion provides: a poor and confusing recap of the topic’s contents little or no explanation of the topic’s future implications Word Choice: language is used incorrectly; vocabulary is limited; and language frequently confuses the reader. Sentence Fluency: Most sentences lack clarity & reader must work at connecting ideas; grammatically errors are distracting & text is difficult to read. The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the conventions of standard written English (e.g., spelling, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and paragraphing); many errors impair the paper’s readability. Word Choice: language is mostly correct, but at times can be too trite, informal, colloquial, general or technical for audience. Sentence Fluency: Most sentences are grammatically sound, correct in structure, but the reader occasionally has difficulty following the text. Work Cited Demonstrates thorough research with 7 or more sources. Includes 4 or more newspaper or periodical sources and at least one of each Current Events Report Rubric Total Score: _______/80 pts = Comments Demonstrates adequate research with 5-6 sources Includes 3 newspaper or periodical sources and at least one of each Demonstrates minimal research with 2-4 sources Includes 1-2 newspaper or periodical sources and at least one of each Name __________________________________________ Demonstrates lack of research with 0-2 sources Includes 0 newspaper or periodical sources Period ______