TITLE PAGE Title: Ultrasound findings of Early Cholangiocarcinoma in Risk group in Endemic area of Opisthorchis viverrini. Authors: Jidapa Stapornchaisit1 Affiliations: 1 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand Corresponding authors: Name: Jidapa Stapornchaisit Address: Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand Telephone: +66Fax: e-Mail: ryoma.tas@gmail.com Type of contribution: Original research results Running title: Ultrasound findings of Early Cholangiocarcinoma in Risk group in Endemic area of Opisthorchis viverrini Number of words in the abstract: 268 Number of words in the text: x,xxx Number of tables: x Number of figures: x 1 ABSTRACT Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the highest prevalent cancer in northeastern Thailand without yet specific tools or clinical for screening in early stage. Ultrasound is considered our most useful screening tool. However, not much study had been done to determine the common early ultrasound findings of the section proven CCA cases in large risk group population. Objective: To identify the common ultrasound findings of early cholangiocarcinoma cases in risk population living in endemic area of Opisthorchis viverrini. Methods: We also collected ultrasonographic findings data from the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program(CASCAP) which is the largest-ever study performed in cholngiocarcinoma risk population, in terms of type of abnormal findings and associated parenchymal background in cases with confirmed diagnosis by further investigation imaging and pathological report. Results: In total of 536 cases found in 46,983 screening individuals, ?.??%(n=???) are confirmed to be cholangiocarcinoma by pathological report, ?.??%(n=???) are confirmed to be cholangiocarcinoma by further investigation including CT and MRI?.??%(n=???) are other malignancies, ?.??%(n=???) are benign and ?.??%(n=???) do not receive further investigation due to various reasons. ??% of the confirmed cases are in early stage cholangiocarcinoma and ??% are in late stage. Among ??? confirmed cholangiocarcinoma cases, ?.??%(n=???) are found in periductal fibrosis parenchyma, ?.??%(n=???) in normal parenchyma, ?.??%(n=???)in fatty liver parenchyma and ?.??%(n=???) in cirrhotic parenchyma. The mass-forming characteristic is accounted for ??%(n=???) of confirmed cholangiocarcinioma cases and biliary dilatation is ??%(n=???). ??% (n=???) have both mass-forming and biliary dilatation findings. Conclusions: The most common ultrasound finding found in cholangiocarcinoma patients with histological proven is.............. and the most common parenchyma background in cholangiocarcinoma cases is................................. Further studies in term of predictive value for each finding are needed. Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma, Ultrasound 2 INTRODUCTION The number of patients with cholangiocarcinoma tends to rise every year worldwide (1-5). Thailand is the country with highest incident rate of cholangiocarcinoma especially in the northeastern region(6). The major risk factor is liver fluke infection such as Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis (7). Patients are usually asymptomatic and are usually diagnosed at late-stage of the disease where rate for curative treatment is only 21.6%. Early diagnosis and treatment are necessary to improve the outcome of the treatment(8). Ultrasound is a valuable screening modality to choose patients for further imaging with accuracy of 88% in benign diseases and 88% in malignant diseases(9). It has proven to have early CCA detection and surveillance role in endemic area of Opisthorchis viverrini(10). Some study had mentioned about ultrasound screening in group of people in endemic area (11) but never before had ultrasound screening been implement in large scale screening of population at risk. This study is aim to identify ultrasound characteristics of early cholangiocarcinoma cases in risk group with pathological proof. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethical consideration This study was conduct according to the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline and the Declaration of Helsinki. The final study protocol and the final version of the Written Informed Consent had been approved by Khon Kaen University Ethic Committee. This study was registered at Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTRXXXXXX). Population This study is a retrospective descriptive study of asymptomatic patients enrolled in Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP, see details at www.cascap.in.th) for ultrasound surveillance. In cases that abnormal findings were reported, the patients were then sent for further investigation and surgery if indicated. We collected data of those cases with available pathological proven CCA and looked back to the ultrasound findings found in early ultrasound screening. Ultrasound findings The ultrasound images available of the confirmed diagnosis cases were review by 2 gastrointestinal radiologists with … and …. years of experience in gastrointestinal imaging. The reviewers will be blinded from clinical, previous ultrasound report, further investigation report and pathological report. Three aspects of liver and biliary system will be reviews. First parenchymal echo, the reviewers will grade into normal parenchyma and abnormal parenchyma, the abnormal result will be classified into fatty liver, periductal fibrosis(PDF) and cirrhosis. Second liver mass, the reviewers will categorized our cases into no mass, hypoechoic mass, hypoechoic mass, mixed echoic mass and anechoic mass. And finally dilatation of biliary system will be noted if presented. Pathological reports The pathological reports are sent from various centers depended on the hospital that operated on the CCA cases. The reports are classified as CCA, non CCA malignancy and benign diseases. 3 Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate the conduct of the study. Overall study algorithm was presented as a CONSORT diagram (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial). Baseline characteristics of the patients were examined using descriptive statistics. Mean and standard deviation were used for continuous variables and frequency counts and percentage were for categorical variables. All statistical analyses were implemented using Stata 13 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). RESULTS Table 1. Patient characteristics presented as number and percentage unless specified otherwise Characteristics Number Percentage Total Gender Male Female Mean age ± SD(years) Receive further CT/MRI CT MRI Do not receive further CT/MRI With pathological proof Without pathological proof Table 2. Ultrasound findings in cholangiocarcinoma cases present in number and percentage unless specified otherwise Ultrasound characteristics Number Percentage Parenchymal echo Normal Abnormal Fatty liver PDF Cirrhosis Liver mass Absent Present High echo Low echo Mixed echo An echo Dilated bile duct Absent Present Right lobe Left lobe Common bile duct 4 Figure 1. Algorithm of the study All patients enroll in CASCAP database (n =82,922) All patients underwent ultrasound screening (n =46,983) Cases with positive ultrasound findings (n = 562) Cases with pathological proven CCA (n=xxx) Excluded (n=xx) - No further investigation(n=x) - No pathological proof(n=x) - Benign patho(n=x) - Non CCA malignant patho(n=x) 5 DISCUSSIONS Explaining the findings <copy narrative parts of the Results followed by explaining each important findings in turn , 5-10 references needed here in this section where about half of them are the same as the one cited in the Introduction section of the manuscript> Strength of the study The data of study is from the largest ultrasonographic screening in risk population ever performed. All the cases included in this study have pathological proof of cholangiocarcinoma. Limitation of the study Ultrasound is an operator dependent tool, so variation of experience of the performers is the limitation of this study. Not all ultrasound images are available for retrospective review by experience radiologist. Many patients denied further investigation or surgery, making the number of pathological proven became lower. Conclusions In this study we found that in confirmed cases of CCA, ……….is the most common ultrasound finding and ………..is the most common parenchymal background. Recommendations Further studies in terms of positive predictive value of each finding are needed to confirm the benefit of ultrasound in screening for early CCA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank to all patients for their valuable participations, to members of the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) for their efforts in operating the project, and to members of the Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center (DAMASAC) for their supports in data management and analysis. Both CASCP and DAMASAC were supported to handle this project by the Faculty of Medicine and the Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University. CASCAP was implemented under a memorandum of understanding between Ministry of Public Health, Ministry of Education, and Ministry of Interior. CASCAP was also supported by the Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation of Thailand. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST This study was financially supported by the Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation of Thailand. All authors reported no conflicts of interest. REFERENCE 1. Konfortion J, Coupland VH, Kocher HM, Allum W, Grocock MJ, Jack RH. Time and deprivation trends in incidence of primary liver cancer subtypes in England. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2014 Aug;20(4):498-504. PubMed PMID: 24902884. 6 2. Pinter M, Hucke F, Zielonke N, Waldhor T, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. Incidence and mortality trends for biliary tract cancers in Austria. Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. 2014 Aug;34(7):1102-8. PubMed PMID: 24119058. 3. Witjes CD, Karim-Kos HE, Visser O, de Vries E, JN IJ, de Man RA, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a low endemic area: rising incidence and improved survival. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2012 Nov;14(11):777-81. PubMed PMID: 23043667. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3482674. 4. Kamsa-ard S, Wiangnon S, Suwanrungruang K, Promthet S, Khuntikeo N, Kamsa-ard S, et al. Trends in liver cancer incidence between 1985 and 2009, Khon Kaen, Thailand: cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2011;12(9):220913. PubMed PMID: 22296358. 5. West J, Wood H, Logan RF, Quinn M, Aithal GP. Trends in the incidence of primary liver and biliary tract cancers in England and Wales 1971-2001. British journal of cancer. 2006 Jun 5;94(11):1751-8. PubMed PMID: 16736026. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2361300. 6. Sripa B, Pairojkul C. Cholangiocarcinoma: lessons from Thailand. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2008 May;24(3):349-56. PubMed PMID: 18408464. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4130346. 7. Blendis L, Halpern Z. An increasing incidence of cholangiocarcinoma: why? Gastroenterology. 2004 Sep;127(3):1008-9. PubMed PMID: 15362064. 8. Liu XF, Zhou XT, Zou SQ. An analysis of 680 cases of cholangiocarcinoma from 8 hospitals. Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT. 2005 Nov;4(4):585-8. PubMed PMID: 16286268. 9. Singh A, Mann HS, Thukral CL, Singh NR. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2014 Mar;8(3):103-7. PubMed PMID: 24783094. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4003596. 10. Chamadol N, Pairojkul C, Khuntikeo N, Laopaiboon V, Loilome W, Sithithaworn P, et al. Histological confirmation of periductal fibrosis from ultrasound diagnosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. 2014 May;21(5):316-22. PubMed PMID: 24420706. 11. Mairiang E, Chaiyakum J, Chamadol N, Laopaiboon V, Srinakarin J, Kunpitaya J, et al. Ultrasound screening for Opisthorchis viverrini-associated cholangiocarcinomas: experience in an endemic area. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2006 JulSep;7(3):431-3. PubMed PMID: 17059338. 7