AGENDA NOTE FOR ZONAL CONFERENCE FOR RABI 2011-12 ON
INPUTS (PLANT PROTECTION & PESTICIDES)
1.
1.1
PESTICIDES DEMAND AND DISTRIBUTION
Consumption and Demand of Pesticides
Consumption of pesticides during 2010-11 may be indicated by States/UTs (for
chemical and bio-pesticides separately) as per Annexure-I. Demand of pesticides
for 2011-12 (Kharif 2011 and Rabi 2011-12) may also be indicated by States/UTs
(for chemical and bio-pesticides separately) as per Annexure-I.
1.2
Availability and Distribution of Pesticides
States/UTs are required to monitor the availability of pesticides at various levels
periodically for review of the production and availability of pesticides with
manufacturers/formulators located in their respective States/UTs. No State/UT has
reported short supply of pesticides during Kharif 2011 season. Any problem
regarding availability of pesticides for Kharif 2011 may be reported in the Zonal
Conference. States/UTs may also provide information on their sale/distribution
points as on 01.01.2011 as per Annexure-II.
1.3
Commodity-wise consumption of Pesticides
All the States are using pesticides
and bio-pesticides for different
agricultural/horticultural crops. Therefore, the States are required to provide
consumption of chemical pesticides and
bio-pesticides
commodity-wise,
such as cereals, pulses, fibre crops vegetables, fruit crops, cash crops, plantation
crops, oilseed crops, etc. The information may be furnished in Annexure-III.
1.4
Area under application of Chemical & Bio-pesticides
The States are required to provide information on area under cultivation where
chemical pesticides and bio-pesticides are applied as per Annexure-IV.
2.
2.1
IMPLEMENTATION OF INSECTICIDES ACT, 1968 AND RULES FRAMED
THEREUNDER
Quality Control of Pesticides
The Insecticides Act has provisions for notification of four important functionaries for
implementation of its provisions relating to quality control, in particular. These
functionaries are (i) Licensing Officers (ii) Appellate Authorities (iii) Insecticides
Inspectors and (iv) Insecticides Analysts. States and UTs are required to notify
1
these functionaries. Every State is required to give details of Insecticide Inspectors
district-wise in the State in prescribed proforma as per Annexure-V.
2.1.1 State Pesticide Testing Laboratories (SPTLs)
23 States and 1 UT have set up 68 State Pesticides Testing Laboratories (SPTLs)
with an annual capacity of analyzing over 68,110 samples for monitoring the quality
status of pesticides. The details regarding location of these SPTLs and details of
samples analyzed are given at Annexures-VI & VII respectively. Information upto
March’11 must be updated.
The Central Government has also set up Central Insecticides Laboratory (CIL) as a
National Referral Laboratory u/s 16 of the Act. The details of samples analyzed at
CIL during previous 5 years are given at Annexure- VIII.
Besides two Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratories (RPTLs) have also been set
up at Chandigarh and Kanpur to supplement the resources of the States/UTs in the
analysis of pesticides, where SPTLs do not exist or facilities to analyze certain
pesticides do not exist. The details of samples analyzed at RPTLs during previous
five years are given at Annexure-IX.
2.1.2. Issues for review with States/UTs
2.1.2. 1.
Strengthening of functioning of SPTLs:
States/UTs may ensure that each SPTL is equipped with sophisticated analytical
equipment i.e. UV-visible spectrophotometer, GLC, HPLC and FT-IR spectrometer
and also that these machines are functional and calibrated periodically, so as to
obtain accurate and repeatable results using referee methods.
2.1.2. 2.
Providing graphs with analysis reports:
Chromatograms or spectra, as the case may be, should invariably accompany
analysis reports of samples which are found to be misbranded on analysis.
2.1.2. 3.
NABL accreditation for State Pesticides Testing Laboratories (SPTLs):
The Central Insecticides Laboratory, Faridabad and the Regional Pesticides Testing
Laboratories at Chandigarh and Kanpur have received the Certificate of
Accreditation by National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration
Laboratories (NABL). During earlier Zonal Conferences, States/UTs were requested
to obtain NABL accreditation for their SPTLs also. The status of accreditation may
be furnished as per Annexure-X.
2.1.2. 4. Drawal of pesticide samples and utilization of analysis capacities of SPTLs:
The statistics provided by some of the States show that the analysis capacity of
SPTLs is not fully utilized.
Samples are required to be drawn from all
establishments selling pesticides as per Rule 27 and the manufacturing units as per
2
Rule 28 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971. States may review, plan and give specific
directions to their Insecticide Inspectors for drawal of samples from such
establishments or manufacturing units from where the samples were not drawn in
the past or found misbranded frequently so that not only the analysis capacity of
SPTLs is fully utilized but quality check is also enhanced through analysis of more
samples besides covering products of all manufacturers.
2.1.2. 5. Survey work for enhanced quality control:
An extensive survey may be undertaken by extension functionaries of State
Agriculture Departments to find out from farmers about the products, or
manufacturers whose products were found less effective or ineffective by them in the
past and the information so collected may be consolidated and utilized for planning
in drawal of samples in the current season.
2.1.2. 6. Proper examination of records of manufacturers:
States/UTs may direct their Insecticide Inspectors to proper examine the records of
pesticides manufacturers to collect information on date-wise receipt and disposal of
stocks of main raw materials, including insecticides. The information may then be
examined to find out if the production of pesticides is in consonance with inputs and
also whether the inputs, mainly the active ingredient, were received from approved
sources.
2.1.2. 7. Review the work of existing/setting up of new Flying Squads for special
Quality Control campaigns:
Unscrupulous elements/fly-by-night operators find it convenient to push
misbranded/spurious pesticide products during peak cropping season to meet
market demand. States/UTs are requested to review work of existing flying squads
or constitute fresh flying squads under direct supervision of senior officers of the
Agriculture Department to draw samples for quality monitoring during peak cropping
season, giving emphasis on sampling of products of those manufacturers from
whom sample were not drawn periodically or reported to be less effective or
ineffective or caused undesirable affects like phyto-toxicity in the field.
2.1.2. 8. Action against defaulters:
All exercise related to monitoring of quality becomes superfluous if appropriate
administrative and legal action is not taken against offenders. Statistics on the
number of samples drawn, found misbranded and the number of convictions
(Annexure-XI) shows that follow up action needs to be pursued vigorously by
States/UTs. The functionaries may be properly guided not only to handle the cases
of misbranded insecticides but also other offences, which may be found from
records. Administrative action, like suspension/cancellation of licenses may be
taken immediately, followed by legal action in cases of violation in order to deter
offenders and discourage others from following suite. It may be ensured that reports
on action taken are periodically submitted by the States to Directorate of Plant
Protection, Quarantine & Storage (DPPQ&S), Faridabad.
3
2.1.2. 9.
Establishment of Bio-pesticides Testing Laboratory:
Integrated Pest Management is country’s main plank of plant protection strategy.
Consequently, registration and use of bio-pesticides is being encouraged. With
increasing consumption of bio-pesticides, their quality control has also become
important. Assistance for setting up bio-pesticide testing facilities is available from
2010-11 under central sector scheme ‘Strengthening and Modernization of Pest
Management Approach (SMPMA)’ and proposals have been invited from
States/UTs. States/UTs are requested to create the infrastructure for bio-pesticides
testing in the existing SPTLs or State Bio-Control Laboratories (SBCLs) keeping in
view the quantity of bio-pesticides being used in the State and also notify Insecticide
Analyst(s) for the purpose, accordingly.
2.1.2. 10.
Implementation of recommendations of Expert Group:
The report of the Expert Group, constituted by the Department of Agriculture & Cooperation (DAC) under the Chairmanship of Plant Protection Adviser to the
Government of India, to assess existing pesticide testing and quality control
infrastructure in the public and private sector, estimation of required infrastructure
adequacy or otherwise of technical manpower and capacity building, estimation of
resource requirement, etc. has been circulated to all States/UTs for implementation
of recommendations. It would be appreciated if action is taken thereon in a timebound manner and a Quarterly Progress Report is sent to DPPQ&S.
2.1.2. 11.
Setting up of Task Force for Special Campaign for Quality Control:
States/UTs are requested to constitute special flying squads comprising senior
officers of the Agriculture Department to draw samples for quality monitoring during
peak period of cropping season. Emphasis may be given on sampling of the product
which is reported to be less effective or ineffective by the farmers or any other
sources. Close watch should be kept on fly by night operators trying to push
spurious pesticides into the market.
2.1.2. 12.
Issues relating to packaging:
Pesticide samples for testing of Packaging, Labeling and Leaflet parameters under
Rule 5 (C) are required to be drawn by State Department of Agriculture
Functionaries on regular basis as per the target earmarked to them. A copy of each
label, leaflet and the certificate of registration is required to be sent with the samples
of pesticides drawn under Rule 5(C) of Insecticides Rules, 1971 while forwarding the
sample to CIL.
2.1.3 Grants-in-Aid for Strengthening/Setting up of SPTLs
4
States have been provided grant-in-aid to strengthen facilities in existing SPTLs and
also for setting up of new SPTLs. Grants-in-Aid to the tune of Rs. 315.00 lakh, Rs.
240.00 lakh and Rs. 135.0 lakh were released to States/UTs for construction of new
laboratory buildings during 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2007-08 respectively. Some
SPTLs have been provided sophisticated equipments for strengthening existing
facilities during 2004-05, 2006-07., 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10. As decided by
DAC, States/UTs which do not have any SPTL have been advised of the minimum
requirement of infrastructure, manpower and equipments etc. so that they can
submit their proposals accordingly. Such States are again requested to send
proposals for strengthening and setting up of new SPTLs for quality control of
pesticides. A statement showing Grants-in-Aid to the State/UT may be seen at
Annexure-XII. States, which have received grant-in-aid for construction of new
laboratories are required to furnish utilization certificate and thereafter status of
minimum infrastructure facility developed and trained manpower provided in the
new laboratory, so that sophisticated equipments are provided. Utilization certificates
for grant-in-aid released during 8th and 9th Plans and 2003-04 may be furnished
expeditiously.
2.1.4 Safe Use of Pesticides and Pesticide Poisoning
As per Section 26 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, the States/UTs are required to notify
the functionaries to send information on all the cases of pesticide poisoning coming
within their cognizance to the Central Government. A number of pesticide poisoning
cases are reported from different parts of the country. The causes can be
attributed due to lack of information on safe and judicious use of pesticides. The
current status of poisoning cases and deaths are collected from the States/ UTs
during the zonal conferences. The States/UTs should periodiocally report the
poisoning cases in the prescribed format (Annexure-XIII) as well as deaths due to
poisoning (Annexure-XIV).
Improper, excessive and careless use and handling of pesticides may prove
injurious to man, domesticated animals and environment as well. It has been found
that the farmers/hired labourers are not aware of the hazards involved in use and
spraying of pesticides and do not use any protective clothing. Therefore, the State
Governments/Union Territories should organize safety campaigns at short intervals
to educate the farmers on “Safe and judicious use of pesticides”. In addition, during
spraying operation the extension functionaries of the State Deptt. of Agriculture and
multipurpose workers in the State Department of Health should ensure that safety
precautions should be actually observed by the spraymen while spraying pesticide.
Number of pesticide poisoning cases are reported for treatment at various hospitals
in different parts of the country. Doctors handling such cases for treatment are
handicapped due to non-availability of required antidotes and literature. Also,
sometimes the doctors are unaware of the newer trends in the management of these
cases. The Medical Toxicology Division of the Central Insecticides Laboratory,
Faridabad, is regularly conducting training and programmes on “Diagnosis and
Management of Pesticide Poisoning” for the benefit of doctors in various parts of the
country. Also, the literature, pamphlets, booklets related to above issues are
5
distributed and know-how of antidotes, etc. is provided during the training sessions.
During the period from 2003-2011, 1,192 doctors have been trained on the
”Diagnosis, management and treatment of pesticide poisoning”. Further, the State
Government/UT authorities should also organize refresher training courses for
doctors on diagnosis, management and treatment of pesticide poisoning with the
help of medical institutions. They should also ensure the availability of antidotes in
the hospitals as well as in medical stores.
3.
3.1.
REGISTRATION OF PESTICIDES
Registration of Bio-pesticides: Pesticides are toxic in nature and are required to
be used judiciously with specified precautions to safeguard the users, animals, wild
life and the environment. The Registration Committee (RC) constituted under
Section 5 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 is seized of the emerging pest problems in
the country and has been approving the uses of new pesticides and new
formulations of already registered pesticides to combat the pest problems of various
crops in the country. To promote the concept of Integrated Pest Management and
to reduce the use of chemical pesticides, RC has registered 19 bio-pesticides for
use in the country, 12 of them have been registered u/s 9(3) (Annexure-XV). As
many as 46 bio-pesticides have been included in the Schedule to the Insecticides
Act 1968 and the complete list is available at the website www.cibrc.nic.in. Quality
standards and specifications of these bio-pesticides have been formulated in
consultation with scientists of ICAR, SAUs, DBT, ICMR and bio-pesticides industry
and these are available on the website www.cibrc.nic.in. Department of Agriculture
of all States/UTs are required to follow them up with the help of facilities available in
their state in the bio-pesticides testing laboratories and SAUs or any other Research
Institutes having the required infrastructure. For quality control of bio-pesticides,
Government of India has notified, vide Gazette notification G.S.R. 756 (E) dated
15th December 2006, the 7 Laboratories in different States to function as Central
Insecticides Laboratory in respect of bio-pesticides (Annexure-XVI). As many as
46 bio-pesticides have been included in the Schedule to the Insecticides Act, 1968
by the Government of India by issuing the Gazette Notifications from time to time
and a list of pesticides in the Schedule to the Act is available on the website
www.cibrc.nic.in.
3.2. Registered, Banned and Restricted Pesticides:
230 pesticides have been granted regular registration for use in the country under
Section 9(3) of the Act (Annexure-XVII).
28 pesticides have been banned for
import, manufacture and use in the country, 4 pesticides formulations have been
banned for import, manufacture and use in the country. One pesticide and one
pesticide formulation have been banned for use but their manufacture is allowed for
export. Uses of 7 pesticides have been withdrawn (Annexure-XVIII). Restrictions
have been imposed on 13 other pesticides (Annexure-XIX) and 18 pesticides have
6
been refused registration in the country (Annexure-XX). States/UTs may take note
of this information.
3.3. Maintenance of Database of Manufacturing Licenses:
During previous Zonal Conferences, it has been emphasized to send an annual
statement for pesticide manufacturing facilities in the State based on valid
manufacturing licenses issued by the State Government. To maintain database on
this aspect, all the States/UTs need to send information in the month of January
every year.
3.4. Proper Use of Pesticides:
States/UTs are required to ensure proper use of registered pesticides as per the
conditions stipulated in their Certificate of Registration by the Registration
Committee constituted under the Act. A workshop on ‘Approved Use of Pesticides
in Agriculture’ was organized on August 30, 2010 by DAC at NASC Complex, Pusa,
New Delhi. State Departments of Agriculture and Horticulture and SAUs were asked
to review their recommendations on uses of pesticides on various crops to bring
them in alignment with the uses as approved by RC under the Insecticides Act,
1968. They are to ensure that every new use of pesticide in agriculture should
have approval of the Registration committee. They were also requested to create
awareness through extensive use of print, audio and visual media, preferably in
regional languages, about benefits of using pesticides as approved by RC, adverse
effects of non-approved uses of pesticides, repercussions of not observing the
waiting periods, and harmful effects of treating the food commodities with pesticides
just before harvest or at the time of marketing. States/UTs are requested to furnish
details of action taken on these recommendations.
7
4.
PROMOTION OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM)
4.1 Pest & disease situation
During Rabi 2010-11, the pest & disease situation in general remained normal
throughout the country as no major outbreak of any pest was reported. However, Sever
incidence of wilt disease of gram crop in Maharatra State was reported. Yellow rust of
wheat was appeared in northern states like, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and
Uttaranchal. No economic loss was reported due to this disease as record output of high
yield of wheat was reported during 2010-11 in these States. Repeated and indiscriminate
use of chemical pesticides ignoring IPM package of practices is counter-productive as it
affects adversely n the population of naturally occurring bio-control agents/bio-pesticides.
4.2
Pest and Disease Survey
Surveillance of kharif crops to monitor insect pest and disease situation is essential
and States are advised to constitute survey teams and finalize the survey routes of major
crops well in advance. The hot spots of pest/disease should be identified and survey
efforts in such areas should be intensified to know the pest/disease situation at the initial
stage itself. The present trained manpower as Master Trainers and Agricultural Extension
Officers (AEOs) may be deployed for conducting such surveys in the States. Central IPM
Centres conduct rapid roving survey on weekly interval basis especially in pests/ diseases
prone areas so as to advise state on any likely increase of pest’s build-up. All the States
are advised to maintain close liaison with CIPMCs for taking precautionary measures.
States may consider taking up intensive pest surveillance as implemented by Maharashtra
under their Crop Surveillance and Advisory Project (CROPSAP) for soybean, cotton,
pigeon-pea and chickpea, and by Orissa for rice (During 2011-12, Gujarat has also taken
up similar project for cotton and groundnut).
4.3
Pest Surveillance and Advisory System
DAC has constituted National Pest Surveillance and Advisory Unit (NPSAU) at
national level and suggested State Governments to set up State Pest Surveillance and
Advisory Unit (SPSAU) and District Pest Surveillance and Advisory Unit (DPSAU) at state
and district levels respectively. So far AP, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, UP,
Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Mizoram, West Bengal and Karnataka have
constituted SPSAU/ DPSAU. All the States were requested through letter no. 3-6/200809/IPM (surveillance) dated 22-07-09 to furnish action taken report on the minutes of the
first meeting of NPSAU held on 19.12.2008. So far only Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, West
Bengal and Rajasthan States have furnished action taken report. Further, a letter was sent
to all States on 24-09-2009 advising them to conduct SPSAU meeting regularly on 4 th day
of each month so as to review the pest/disease situation and furnishing the progress on
pest incidence, area affected, area treated efforts made/being made, etc. In-charges,
CIPMCs were also instructed to submit report of SPSAU to DPPQ&S by 7th day of each
month. States/UTs may furnish information on SPSAU/DPSAU.
8
4.4
Pest/Disease Monitoring Information System (PDMIS)
Presently, only Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and
Maharashtra states are updating pests/ diseases situation through the PDMIS. Other states
are requested to take necessary steps so as to update the information on pests/ diseases
through this system for taking further steps timely.
4.5
Seed treatment Campaign
Keeping in view the importance of seed treatment to achieve better crop output,
Government of India has launched a country wide campaign for ensuring 100% seed
treatment in all important crops. States/UTs are requested to communicate their
achievements through the enclosed proforma (Annexure-XXI).
4.6
Human Resource Development
During the past 20 years emphasis has been laid to develop skill human resources
in the States by imparting training to Master Trainers and AEOs through the conduct of 48
Season Long Training Courses. In these courses, a total number of 1,720 Master Trainers
have been trained on IPM in various agriculture/horticulture crops. Under the Farmers’
Field Schools (FFSs) programmes, since 1994-95 to 2010-2011, 13,738 FFSs have been
conducted and 58,354 AEOs and 4,12,997 farmers have been trained in IPM skills. During
2010-11, 804 FFSs were conducted wherein 3,970 AEOs and 24,044 farmers were trained
in Kharif and Rabi through CIPMCs. 132 and 8 two days and five days training programmes
respectively were conducted through CIPMCs during 2010-11. One SLTP on vegetables in
Lucknow was organized wherein 23 state level extension functionaries were trained. States
may utilize services of trained Master Trainers and AEOs for conduct of FFSs in the States.
During the FFSs programme women farmers have also been trained. Emphasis should be
to associate women farmers and farmers of the weaker sections of the society in the future
IPM training programmes.
4.7
Promotion of bio-control and Grant-in-aid
To supplement the field population of parasitoids, predators and pathogens by
releases of field collected or laboratory reared bio-control agents and use of bio-pesticides
(Bacillus thuringiensis, Trichoderma, NPV), grant-in-aid has been given to States/UTs for
establishment of 29 State Bio-control Laboratories (SBCLs) @ Rs. 50.00 lakh per
laboratory. So far, an amount of Rs. 1772.00 lakh has already been released to the States
for construction of Laboratory building and procurement of equipment and vehicles.
Statement showing funds allocated, amount spent and unspent balances against the States
during VIII & X Plans for the establishment of State Biological Control Laboratories (SBCLs)
under the scheme “Strengthening and Modernization of Pest Management Approach in
India” is enclosed at Annexure-XXII. All States except Jammu & Kashmir and Uttaranchal
have made considerable progress in construction and commissioning of the laboratories.
States may consider expeditious commissioning of the SBCLs so that additional
infrastructure is created in the States for mass production of bio-control agents. During 10th
Five Year Plan Govt. of India, had approved grant in aid for establishment of more State
9
Bio-control Laboratories (SBCLs) in States. So far, Govt. of India has released Rs. 405 lakh
@ Rs. 45 lakh per lab. to States of Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Assam, Jharkhand, Haryana, Maharashtra and Uttaranchal. The States should put their full
efforts for early establishment of these SBCLs. States are requested to furnish utilization
certificates of funds released so far.
4.8
Coordination of State IPM activities
Financial assistance is being made available to the States from various agencies like
Department of Agriculture & Cooperation’s TMOP, Crops Division, Plant Protection Division
of Government of India, State Departments of Agriculture, Department of Bio-Technology
etc. To derive full benefit of these resources, States may consider constituting a
Coordination Cell headed by a single Nodal Officer to coordinate and make better use of
these financial inputs for the benefit of the farmers. In this direction, State IPM Steering
Committee may be constituted which can advise the States to ensure proper
implementation of all the IPM programmes.
5. Locust Monitoring and Control
5.1 Desert Locust Situation:
India continued to remain free from gregarious desert locust activity this year so far.
However, solitary immature adults of desert locust ranging from 1-2 adult/ sq km were
reported from one locality and 5 adults of Tree Locust were collected at border areas of
Jaisalmer district. At present soil moisture is suitable for locust breeding in scheduled
Desert Area (SDA). LWO staff is keeping constant watch over desert locust activities
throughout
the scheduled Desert Area in the states of Rajasthan and Gujarat.
State governments of Rajasthan and Gujarat are requested to keep constant vigil on the
desert locust activities through their field staff and report the same to in-charge of LCOs of
their respected areas for necessary action by Central Government if any.
5.2 National Action Plan for locust control campaign – 2011 SDA:
A contingency plan, in anticipation, would be prepared for locust survey and control.
As a part of early warning system, locust situation bulletins to national, international and
other agencies would continue to be issued at fortnightly intervals. Locust surveys would
be intensified in whole of the Scheduled Desert Area (SDA) especially in the border areas
encompassing key locust prone areas. Special border surveys would also be conducted
during June –November, 2011. Creation of awareness about locust menace among the
public and government officials by way of providing wide publicity through print media,
electronic media, distribution of pamphlets, fixing up of hoardings and boards would be
done. The requirement/ availability of control potential like vehicle, survey and control
equipment, pesticides, manpower and communication equipments would be reviewed.
States are advised to take the stock of preparedness to combat locust threat.
10
6. PLANT QUARANTINE:
In view of globalization and liberalization of international trade in agriculture,
States/UTs are also required to play an important role in the international trade of plants
and plant materials under Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement under WTO.
Following issues are of significance requiring attention of States/UTs:
6.1 Export certification of plants and plant materials:
DAC has notified various officers of State Governments for issue of Phytosanitary
Certificates (PSCs) for agricultural commodities meant for export. PSC issuing officers are
required to maintain proper inspection procedures to ensure certification of only pest free
agricultural commodities for export. To streamline and harmonize certification process,
Standard Operating Procedure for “Export Inspection & Phytosanitary Certification of Plant/
Plant Products & Other Regulated Articles” has been developed and adopted. In the recent
past, India has been receiving increasing number of non-compliances on exported
consignments from importing countries especially from EU. While a major part of such
non-compliances relate to wood packaging (ISPM-15), there are significant number of
cases reported regarding interception of live insect pests and other deficiencies in exported
consignments. Hence, it is important that PSC issuing authorities ensure proper export
inspection and certification of the commodities to be exported.
6.2 Compliance of ISPM-15 on Export of Wood Packaging Materials:
As per IPPC provisions, all importing countries require that the Wood Packaging
Materials (WPM)/dunnage used in all kinds of goods and agricultural commodities should
be either fumigated with methyl bromide or heat treated by the registered treatment
providers to ensure that it is free from pests. These service providers have been accredited
by DPPQ&S (details available on www.plantquarantineindia.org).
These treatment
providers are authorized to put ISPM-15 stamp on treated WPM/dunnage.
All PSC
issuing authorities/export promotion personnel are advised to ensure ISPM-15 stamps on
WPM to avoid any non-compliance from the importing countries and consequent adverse
effects on our exports.
6.3 On line Application for PSC and introduction of uniform pre-printed stationary:
India has operationalized a uniform PSC form on pre-printed stationary having
security features with effect from 1st January, 2011. Plant Quarantine Information System
(PQIS) in the country has been launched on 24.01.2011. Exporters who intend to obtain
PSC would have to register their application online at http://plantquarantineindia.nic.in.
PSC issuing authorities will receive the said applications through a unique login ID which is
allotted to them. Authorized officer will issue PSCs on pre-printed forms which have
already been dispatched to all PSC issuing authorities. Those who have not yet received
pre-printed stationary may contact their nearest Regional Plant Quarantine Station.
11
6.4 Grants-in-aid released to State PSC issuing authorities:
During 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, grant-in-aid was provided to
various State PSC issuing authorities to strengthen/equip their laboratory with latest
equipments for carrying out export inspection. Rajasthan, Bihar, Nagaland and Mizoram
have sent utilization certificate for some of the funds released to them, but the others are
yet to send UCs (Annexure-XXIII). States are requested to send UCs. If funds remain
unspent, proposal for revalidation of sanction may be sent to DAC immediately.
*****
12
Annexure-I
STATEMENT SHOWING THE DEMAND VIS-À-VIS CONSUMPTION OF CHEMICAL
PESTICIDES DURING 2010-11 & PROJECTED DEMAND FOR 2011-12
M.T. (Technical Grade)
S.
no
States /UTs
2010-11
Kharif
Demand
Total
Rabi
Cosumption
Demand
Demand
Consumption
Projected Demand for
2011-2012
Kharif Rabi Total
Demand
Consumption
STATEMENT SHOWING THE DEMAND VIS-À-VIS CONSUMPTION OF BIO-PESTICIDES
DURING 2010-11 & PROJECTED DEMAND FOR 2011-12
M.T.
S.
no
States /UTs
2010-11
Kharif
Demand
Cosumption
Total
Rabi
Demand
Demand
Consumption
13
Consumption
Projected Demand for
2011-2012
Kharif
Ra Total
bi
Deman
d
Annexure-II
STATEMENT SHOWING THE NUMBER OF SALE POINTS OF PESTICIDES AS
ON 01.01.2011
S.No.
States/UT
State
Agri.
Deptt.
of Cooperatives
Agriculture
Distribution Points
Other Institutions
Private Trade
(Source: States/UTs(Zonal Conference Rabi, 2011)
14
Total
Annexure-III
CONSUMPTION OF CHEMICAL PESTICIDES & BIO-PESTICIDES COMMODITY-WISE
S. No.
NAME OF THE
COMMODITY
1.
Cereal Crops
2.
Vegetable Crops
3.
Pulse Crops
4.
Oilseed Crops
5.
Fruit Crops
6.
Plantation Crops
7.
Cash Crops
8.
Fibre Crops
CHEMICAL
PESTICIDES
(Qty. in MT)
9.
10.
Source: States/UTs (Zonal Conference Rabi, 2011)
15
(quantity in metric tonnes of technical grade)
BIO-PESTICIDIES
TOTAL
(Qty. in MT)
Annexure-IV
AREA UNDER APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIO-PESTICIDES
State/UT
Total cultivated area
Area (in ‘000 hectares)
Area under appln. of Area under appln. of Area under appln. of biochemical pesticides only bio-pesticides only
pesticides and chemical
pesticides both
(Source: States/UTs(Zonal Conference Rabi, 2011)
16
Annexure-V
Details of Insecticide Inspectors in the State/UT
S. No.
Name of the District
No. of Insecticide Inspectors
TOTAL
(Source: States/UTs(Zonal Conference Rabi, 2011)
17
Annexure- VI
STATE PESTICIDE TESTING LABORATORIES
Sl.
No.
State/UT
Number of
Laboratories
Location
Rajendra Nagar, Guntur, Anantapur,
Tadepalligudem , Warangal, Visakhapatnam and
Kurnool
Nehalagun
Guwahati
Patna
Raipur
Junagarh and Gandhinagar
Karnal , Sirsa, Rohtak and Punchkula
Shimla
Srinagar and Jammu
Bangalore, Bellary, Dharwad, Shimoga , Kotnoor
and Mandya
Trivendrum
Jabalpur
Pune, Amaravathi, Thane and Aurangabad
Mantripukhri
Neihbawih
Bhubaneshwar
Pondicherry
Amritsar, Ludhiana and Bhatinda
Jaipur, Bikaner, Udaipur, Kota, Jodhpur and
Sriganganagar
Coimbatore, Kovilpatti, Erode, Madurai, Trichy,
Aduthrai, Salem, Cuddalore , Kanchipuram,
Nagapattinam, Dharmpuri, Vellore, Sivaganga,
Theni and Thirunelveli
Agartala
Rudrapur , Srinagar(Pauri Garhwal)
Meerut, Lucknow (2) & Varanasi
Midnapore
1.
Andhra Pradesh
7
2.
3.
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
2
6
11
12.
13.
14.
15
16.
17
18.
19.
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Mizoram
Orissa
Pondicherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
3
6
20.
Tamil Nadu
15
21.
22
23.
24.
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
1
2
4
1
TOTAL
68
Target/Cap
acity per
annum
7,500
200
600
500
2,200
3,300
500
850
6,800
2,000
1,500
5,000
30
1,100
500
3,900
3,500
21,850
160
600
5,000
650
68,110
B. Regional Pesticide Testing Laboratories
1.
All States/UTs
2
Kanpur
Chandigarh
1,100
1,100
C. Central Insecticides Laboratory
1.
All States/UTs
1
Faridabad
18
1,600
Annexure-VII
ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDE SAMPLES IN STATE PESTICIDES TESTING LABORATORIES (2006-07 to 2010-11)
Sl.
No.
Name of the
States/UTs
2006-07
Sample
Analysed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Odisha
Pondicherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
18
19
20
21
22

Misbranded
(%)
2007-08
Sample
Analysed
2008-09
Misbranded
(%)
2009-10
Misbranded
(%)
Sample
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
Sample
analysed
81 (1.20)
0(0.0)
30 (5.15)
15 (2.79)
54 (3.88)
89 (2.93)
3 (1.25 )
34 (8.17)
109(2.45)
12 (0.83)
55 (5.57)
36(4.82)
0 (0.0)
135 ( 3.38)
312
(10.88)
68 (0.38)
-300 (7.13 )
21 (13.12 )
3 (0.72)
750
31
326
893
1,023
101
295
2,426
1,286
389
113
1,201
6 ( 0.8 )
0 (0.0 )
15(4.6)
49 (5.49)
35 (3.42)
3 (2.97)
28 (9.49)
51 (2.1)
5 (0.38)
1(0.25)
0 (0.0)
32 (2.66)
-
-
12,930
-186
10
54 (4.17)
-18 (9.67)
0
-
-
21,960
297 (1.35)
92 ( 1.45)
0 (0.00)
NR
-61(3.3)
159 (11.75)
3 (2.8)
66(7.05 )
103 (2.37)
27(1.75)
96(7.5)
71 (1.85)
0(0.00)
1(0.13)
2 (1.02)
119( 3.06)
6,685
34
NR
-1,344
1,315
157
501
3,578
1,032
1,217
3,889
NR
920
435
2,955
55(0.82)
0(0.00)
NR
-78 (5.07)
114 ( 8.66)
3 (1.91)
37 (7.38)
96(2.68)
14 (1.35)
89(7.3)
122(3.13 )
NR
13(1.41)
0(0.00)
112 (3.79)
6,669
12
328
-1,751
2,897
154
456
4,145
1,403
906
2701
NR
662
372
3,874
54 (0.80)
0 (0.00)
21 (6.4)
-89 (5.08)
119 (4.1)
3 (1.94)
18(3.94)
130(3.13)
12 (0.85)
50(5.51)
52(1.92)
NR
10 (1.51)
0 (0.00)
90 (2.32)
6,735
26
582
536
1,389
3,032
239
416
4,431
1,432
987
--746
328
3,993
2,021
167 (8.26)
1,636
156 (9.53)
2,650
139(5.24)
2,867
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
14,622
40
3,625
181
147(1.0)
6 (15.0)
426(11.75)
3 (1.65)
100(0.70)
2 (4.76)
308 (10.94)
14 (9.6)
9,220 35(0.37)
80
9(11.25)
4529 456 (10.06)
241
6(2.48)
17,687
-4,203
160
556
25( 4.49)
12,778
42
2,817
145
478
17 (3.55)
438
11(2.5)
Grand Total
47,450
1,574 (3.33)
41,958
1,330 (3.16)
43,488
1,304(2.99)
19
Misbranded
Sample
Analysed
6,304
34
NR
-1,840
1,353
107
936
4,338
1,539
1,279
3,822
50
727
195
3,881
To be updated by States/UTs
2010-11*
416
50,205 1,357 (2.70)
(%)
Annexure-VIII
SAMPLES ANALYSED AT CENTRAL INSECTICIDES LABORATORY (CIL), FARIDABAD (2006-07 to 2010-11)
States/UTs
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Andaman Nicobar Islands
Chandigarh
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Delhi
Daman & Diu
Lakshadweep
Pondicherry
Total
2006-07
Misbranded
Sample
(%)
analysed
93
41(44.08)
-(-)
-(-)
2
16
179
1(50.00)
-(-)
11(68.75)
71(39.66)
71
4
43
1
113
159
26
27
180
3
-
-(-)
17(23.94)
-(-)
0(0.00)
21(48.83)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
0 (0.00)
-(-)
56(49.55)
74(46.54)
-(-)
8(30.76)
-(-)
8(29.62)
55(30.56)
1(33.33)
-(-)
1
918
-(-)
0 (0.00)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
364(39.65)
Sample
analysed
45
1
2
8
132
2
50
1
2
45
2
154
231
34
25
161
11
6
1,057
2007-08
Misbranded
(%)
34(75.55)
-(-)
-(-)
0(0.00)
0 (0.00)
-(-)
1 (12.5)
52 ( 39.39)
-(-)
2(100.00)
-(-)
15 (30.00)
1 (100.00)
2(100.00)
22 (48.48)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
2 (100.00)
82 (53.24)
112 (48.48)
-(-)
8 (23.52)
-(-)
11 (44.0)
44 (27.32)
5 (45.45)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
2(33.33)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
455(43.04)
20
Sample
analysed
40
8
14
162
7
6
96
1
5
79
14
106
127
34
14
215
1
929
2008-09
Misbranded
(%)
22(55.00)
-(-)
-(-)
4 (50.00)
-(-)
-(-)
7 (50.00)
37(22.83)
-(-)
1 (14.28)
1 (16.66)
30 (31.25)
0(0.0)
2(40.0)
12(15.18)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
4(28.57)
32(30.18)
59(46.45)
-(-)
8 (23.52)
-(-)
5 (35.71)
63(29.30)
0(0)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
-(-)
279(30.03)
Sample
analysed
58
26
13
93
2
4
70
1
70
2
3
95
76
28
13
170
1
8
733
2009-10
Misbranded
(%)
31 (53.44)
17 (65.38)
6(46.15)
29 (31.18)
0 (0.00)
3 (75.0)
23 (32.85)
0(0.00)
19 (27.14)
2(100.0)
2(66.66)
37 (38.94)
47 (61.84)
7 (25.0)
5 (38.46)
42 (24.70)
1 (100.0)
0 (0.00)
271(36.97)
Sample
analysed
85
30
4
2
8
125
3
4
91
1
6
79
17
120
169
46
29
123
5
951
2010-11
Misbranded
(%)
34 (40.00)
16 (53.33)
3 (75.00)
1 (50.00)
6 (75.00)
41 (32.80)
1 (33.33)
0 (0.00)
25 (27.47)
0 (0.00)
3 (50.00)
34 (43.04)
8 (47.06)
44 (36.67)
93 (55.03)
20 (43.48)
3 (10.34)
36 (29.27)
1 (20.00)
370 (38.91)
Annexure-IX
ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDES SAMPLES FOR QUALITY CONTROL IN REGIONAL PESTICIDES TESTING LABORATORIES (RPTLs) DURING THE LAST FIVE YEARS
Sl.
No.
State/UT
2005-06
2006-07
2007--08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 (upto Dec’10)
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
Analysed
Misbranded
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
Analysed
Misbranded
(%)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
A&N Islands
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Gujarat
Goa
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
Manipur
385
17
38
4
108
931
76
46
2
340
48
183
9
1
12
2
1089
-
37 (9.6)
2(11.6)
13(34.2)
1(25.0)
21(19.4)
157(16.86)
6(7.88)
8(17.39)
28(8.2)
6(12.5)
19(10.38)
1(8.3)
218(20.01)
-
29
-1
3
22
-924
71
23
7
322
14
175
8
8
6
-343
--
4
-1
-5
-143
6
6
5
44
1
24
1
---46
--
53
6
83
828
62
18
3
328
11
211
3
7
4
305
-
2
2
11
112
4
1
25
17
1
1
34
-
51
38
885
57
10
8
573
1
195
15
4
6
338
-
2
2
108
9
32
13
2
30
-
91
12
21
800
9416
2
436
280
27
4
2
376
-
5
2
3
86
8
2
14
19
1
43
-
10
6
7
5
66
30
2
9
11
174
3
3
48
-
1
4
1
1
11
5
1
2
15
6
-
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Pondicherry
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Dadra & N. Haveli
Daman & Diu
Lakshadweep
CII*
Misc.
Total
11
34
120
6
81
7
8
250
34
109
286
4,238
1(9.09)
6 (17.6)
15 (12.5)
1(16.6)
15(18.5)
1(14.3)
25(10.0)
9(26.4)
11(10.1)
23(8.1)
624 (14.7)
10
--12
78
20
32
--9
203
18
54
---119
-2,511
---5
19
6
8
--1
27
6
8
---13
-379 (15.08)
2
11
47
1
53
2
150
41
29
201
2,459
1
5
5
19
8
1
15
264 (10.07)
3
3
26
41
35
5
30
157
20
29
464
11
3,005
2
2
3
5
10
3
3
22
6
256 (8.52)
2
39
20
7
31
1
46
201
14
28
76
15
2,641
2
1
1
12
21
6
4
230 (8.71)
2
24
3
14
1
43
22
11
34
3
531
1
7
12
1
3
73 (13.75)
21
Annexure - X
STATUS OF NABL ACCREDITATION OF SPTLs
Sl.
No.
State/UT
Name and location of
SPTL
Status of NABL Accreditation (Submission of
proposal with document to NABL/Prelim.
Inspection/Final Inspection/Award of Certificate)
22
Annexure-XI
QUALITY CONTROL OF PESTICIDES - ACTION TAKEN BY STATES/UTs (2006-07 to 2010-11 upto Dec.’10)
Sl.
No.
Licence
Name of the
State
0607
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Andhra Pr.
Arunachal Pr.
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pr.
J&K
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
11
NR
NR
NR
25
3
1
NR
57
2
Madhya Pr.
52
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttaranchal
West Bengal
A & Nicobar
Dadra & NH
Chandigarh
Delhi
Daman, Diu
Lakshadweep
Pondicherry
TOTAL
6
NR
NR
NR
NR
16
NR
NR
27
7
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
207
Suspended
07080908
09
10
Prosecution
1011
0607
Cancelled
07080908
09
10
1011
0607
Launched
07080908
09
10
1011
0607
Convicted
Judgment obtained
07080908
09
10
1
NR
NR
NR
20
1
1
NR
NR
45
17
15
1
92
-
12
17
6
2
12
-
4
2
1
45
-
7
NR
NR
NR
NR
39
4
NR
6
1
28
NR
NR
NR
1
NR
NR
1
-
2
1
1
-
3
6
21
4
-
18
-
NR
NR
NR
NR
29
159
25
NR
0
1
2
NR
NR
NR
74
14
NR
14
-
39
1
5
2
-
10
22
49
2
4
-
5
23
6
19
-
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
13
1
NR
4
-
NR
NR
NR
NR
3
52
NR
NR
NR
-
84
-
1
4
17
1
-
10
11
1
-
16
-
-
13
3
2
-
-
31
2
-
-
-
-
NR
-
-
-
NR
28
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
44
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
157
11
12
1
148
1
-
2
-
100
3
153
73
127
749
NR
NR
NR
NR
96
NR
NR
NR
257
NR
7
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
1179
14
NR
NR
NR
NR
32
NR
809
3
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
891
2
16
613
637
1
20
56
633
3
747
15
36
99
87
NR
NR
NR
NR
36
50
NR
31
NR
326
30
11
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
816
53
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
27
334
2
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
522
43
28
20
337
6
481
1
25
18
227
15
3
376
14
5
8
163
2
245
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21
NR
288
1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
328
2
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
8
474
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
539
4
413
501
4
354
381
268
269
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
11
NR
257
1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
278
23
0607
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
3
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
6
NR
NR
NR
-
2
NR
NR
NR
2
39
NR
NR
NR
-
-
-
1
-
74
-
13
-
-
NR
-
-
-
2
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
8
474
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
527
4
417
495
4
354
371
268
269
Annexure-XII
STRENGTHENING/SETTING UP OF SPTLs - STATUS OF GRANTS-IN-AID
(Rs. in lakh)
Sl.
No.
State/UT
VIII
IX
03-04
1.
2.
3.
4.
Arunachal Pr.
Andhra Pr.
Assam
Bihar
35.0
20.0
20.0
10.0
10.0
-
40.0
10.0
-
Released
0405-06
05
45.0
90.00
45.00
07-08
Total
-
45.0
175.00
40.0
65.00
Utilization Certificate received
VIII
IX
03-04 0405
-45.0
35.0
10.0
20.0
10.0
-
5.
6.
Chattisgarh
Gujarat
20.0
4.65
10.0
45.0
-
-
-
45.0
34.65
14.68
-
9.57
45.0
-
-
-
45.0
24.25
7.
8.
Haryana
Himachal Pr.
20.0
45.0
10.0
5.0
10.0
45.0
-
45.00
-
-
120.00
60.0
20.0
45.0
10.0
5.0
45.0
-
45.0
-
-
120.0
60.0
-
-
-
-
20.0
-
-
10.0
-
9.
20.0
-
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Jammu
&
Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Meghalaya
Manipur
Maharashtra
-
-
-
-
20.0
20.0
20.0
40.0
9.84
6.03
40.0
5.0
10.0
22.0
18.97
5.0
-
45.0
-
-
-
45.0
51.84
45.0
40.0
30.0
50.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
29.80
9.84
6.03
40.0
5.0
-
22.0
-
-
-
-
51.84
26.03
40.0
25.0
29.80
16.
17.
Mizoram
Madhya Pr.
20.0
20.0
-
45.0
30.0
-
90.00
30.0
175.00
20.0
20.0
-
30.0
-
-
Orissa
20.0
5.0
7.0
-
-
45.00-
77.0
20.0
5.0-
7.0
45.0
-
18.
-
19.
Punjab
35.0
-
-
-
-
-
35.0
-
-
-
20.
21.
Pondicherry
Rajasthan
10.0
15.0
-
45.0
30.00
-
30.0
112.50
Tamil Nadu
-
-
-
-
39.48
24.48
23.
24.
25.
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
25.0
-
14.4
8
30.0
6.56
-
40.0
-
45.0
-
-
30.0
71.56
45.0
25.0
-
10.0
14.3
9
14.4
8
30.0
6.56
-
-
22.
20.0
22.5
0
25.0
22.05
336
20.0
22.50
26.
West Bengal
20.0
-
6.03
-
-
-
26.03
-
-
467.
50
211.
56
169.00
315.
00
240.00
135.00
1538.06.
Total
378.5
1
196.
30
IX
03-04
0708
-
Total
-
40.0
10.0
-
4.65
-
-
-
-
10.40
-
-
--
-
-
--
20.
0
10.
20
-
-
-
-
-
20.0
10.0
18.97
5.0
-
45.0
-
-
-
45.0
-18.97
5.0
20.20
30.0
85.0
-
-
-
-
-
90.0
90.00
-
32.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12.
94
-
-
-
-
-
-
22.053
36
30.0
111.89
45.o
30.0
0.61
-
-
-
-
-
-
38.96
0.5
2
-
-
40.0
-
-
-
30.0
71.56
45.0-
-
-
-
45.0
-
-
-
-
88.5
7
270.
0
240.
00
-
1173.
38
20.
0
88.
99
24
0506
90.0
45.0
0708
-
Total
45.0
135.0
30.0
45.0
VII
I
20.
0
Unutilized
04-05
0506
--
5.3
2
-
-40.0
10.0
20.0
45.0
-
45.0-
-
-
0.61
-
-
-
0.52
--
-
-
-
--
-
6.03
-
-
-
26.03
15.26
80.0
45.0
-
135.
00
364. 68
12.95
-
Annexure-XIII
STATEMENT SHOWING THE NUMBER OF PESTICIDES POISONING CASES*
(STATEWISE DURING LAST FIVE YEARS)
S.NO.
01.
02.
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Name of the State/UT
Andaman & Nicobar
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra & N. Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshadweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Pondicherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
TOTAL
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
NIL
NIL
NR
NIL
NIL
NR
02
NR
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
439
11
NIL
333
NIL
1181
NR
NIL
7893
NR
NR
NR
NR
28
1341
284
333
NR
NIL
NIL
13
1259
20
13137
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
NR
02
NR
NR
NIL
NIL
03
373
11
NIL
399
NIL
504
NR
NIL
6604
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
1232
262
317
NR
NIL
NR
346
1414
39
11506
NR
219
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
02
280
13
35
96
NIL
943
NR
NIL
2210
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
1373
320
235
NR
NIL
NR
71
108
57
5962
NR
138
NR
NIL
NIL
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
NIL
123
20
255
164
NIL
666
NR
NIL
5659
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
1470
316
124
NR
NR
NR
120
544
207
9806
NR
29
NR
NR
110
NR
NIL
NR
NR
09
NIL
NIL
179
14
05
1014
NIL
1066
NR
NIL
2029
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
2065
244
119
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
229
03
7115
*The poisoning may be suicidal/ homicidal /accidental/occupational
NR – Not Reported
25
Annexure-XIV
STATEMENT SHOWING THE NUMBER OF DEATHS* DUE TO PESTICIDES
POISONING CASES (STATEWISE DURING LAST FIVE YEARS)
S.No.
01.
02.
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Name
of
the
State/UT
Andaman & Nicobar
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra & N. Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshadweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Pondicherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
TOTAL
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-2010
NIL
NIL
NR
NIL
NIL
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
67
05
NIL
66
NIL
310
NR
NIL
1236
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
16
119
331
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
190
01
2341
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
NIL
03
48
03
NIL
46
NIL
96
NR
NIL
1413
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
40
88
317
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
934
01
2989
NR
25
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NR
NIL
02
40
2
35
34
NIL
203
NR
NIL
174
NR
NR
NR
NR
NIL
25
70
59
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
24
NIL
693
NR
119
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
29
04
55
40
NIL
146
NR
NIL
773
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
25
62
124
NR
NR
NR
51
39
03
1470
NR
11
NR
NR
12
NIL
NIL
NR
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
19
04
01
130
NIL
88
NR
NR
333
NR
NR
NIL
NR
NIL
25
35
119
NR
NIL
NIL
NIL
16
03
796
*The poisoning may be suicidal/ homicidal /accidental/occupational
NR – Not Reported
26
Annexure-XV
LIST OF BIO-PESTICIDES REGISTERED FOR USE IN THE COUNTRY
Microbial Biopesticides Registered U/s 9(3)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Bacillus thuringiensis var.israelensis
Bacillus thuringiensis var.kurstaki
Bacillus thuringiensis var. galleriae
Bacillus sphaericus
Beauveria bassiana
Trichoderma viride
Verticillium lecanii
NPV of Helicoverpa armigera
NPV of Spodoptera litura
Trichoderma harzianum
Microbial Biopesticides Registered U/s 9(3B)
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Metarrhizium anisopliae
Pseudomonas fluorescence
Verticillium chlamydosporium
Paecilomyces lilacinus
Ampelomyces quisqalis
Bacillus subtilis
Photorhabdus luminescences akhurustii strain K-1
Botanical Biopesticides Registered U/s 9 (3)
18. Azadirachtin
19. Pyrethrum/Pyrethrin
27
Annexure- XVI
List of Notified Central Insecticides Laboratory in the Country
For quality control of bio-pesticides, Government of India has notified the following
seven laboratories in different States to function as Central Insecticides Laboratory
in respect of bio-pesticides wide Gazette notification G.S.R. 756 (E) dated 15 th
December 2006:
1. Indian Agricultural Research Institute (Division of Entomology), Pusa, New Delhi.
2. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (Centre of Advanced Studies
in Plant Pathology), Pant Nagar, Uttaranchal.
3. Regional Research Laboratory (department of Biotechnology), Jammu.
4. Assam Agricultural University (Department of Entomology), Jorhat, Assam.
5. Mahatama Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (College of Agriculture), Pune Maharashtra.
6. University of Agriculture Sciences (Department of Agricultural Entomology),
Dharwad, Karnataka.
7. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
28
Annexure-XVII
Pesticides Registered under Section 9 (3) of the Insecticide Act, 1968
for use in the country
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Name of the Pesticide
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid
Acephate
Acetamiprid
Alachlor
Allethrin
Alphacypermethrin
Alphanaphthyl Acetic Acid
Aluminium Phosphide
Anilophos
Atrazine
Aureofungin
Azadirachtin (Neem Products)
Azoxystrobin
Bacillus thuringiensis var. galleriae
Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis
Bacillus thuringiensis var. krustaki
Bacillus sphaericus
Barium Carbonate
Beauveria bassiana
Bendiocarb
Benfuracarb
Benomyl
Bensulfuron
Beta Cyfluthrin
Bifenazate
Bifenthrin
Bispyribac sodium
Bitertanol
Bromadiolone
Buprofezin
Butachlor
Captan
Carbaryl
Carbendazim
Carbofuran
Carbosulfan
Carboxin
Carfentazone Ethyl
Carpropamid
Cartap Hydrochloride
Chlorantraniliprole
Chlorfenapyr
29
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
Chlorimuron ethyl
Chlormequat Chloride (CCC)
Chlorothalonil
Chlorpropham
Chlorpyriphos
Chlorpyriphos Methyl
Cinmethylene
Clodinafop-propargyl
Clomazone
Chlothianidin
Copper Hydroxide
Copper Oxychloride
Copper Sulphate
Coumachlor
Coumatetralyl
Cuprous Oxide
Cyfluthrin
Cyhalofop-butyl
Cymoxanil
Cypermethrin
Cyphenothrin
Dazomet
Deltamethrin (Decamethrin)
Diazinon
Dichloro Diphenyl Trichloroethane (DDT)
Dichloropropene and Dichloropropane mixure (DD mixure)
Diclorvos (DDVP)
Diclofop-Methyl
Dicofol
Difenocenazole
Difenthiuron
Diflubenzuron
Dimethoate
Dimethomorph
Dinocap
Dithianon
Diuron
Dodine
D-trans Allethrin
Edifenphos
Emamectin Benzoate
Endosulfan*
Ethephon
Ethion
Ethiprole
Ethofenprox (Etofenprox)
Ethoxysulfuron
Ethylene Dichloride and Carbon Tetrachloride mixture (EDCT Mixture 3:1)
Famoxadone
30
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
Fenamidone
Fenarimol
Fenazaquin
Fenitrothion
Fenobucarb (BPMC)
Fenoxaprop-p-Ethyl
Fenpropathrin
Fenpyroximate
Fenthion
Fenvalerate
Fipronil
Fluazifop-p-butyl
Flubendiamide
Fluchloralin
Flufenacet
Flufenoxuron
Flufenzine
Flusilazole
Fluvalinate
Forchlorfenuron
Fosetyl-Al
Gibberellic Acid
Glufosinate Ammonium
Glyphosate
Hexaconazole
Hexazinone
Hexythiazox
Hydrogen Cyanamide
Imazamox
Imazethapyr
Imidacloprid
Imiprothrin
Indoxacarb
Iprobenfos (Kitazin)
Iprodione
Iprovalicarb
Isoprothiolane
Isoproturon
Kasugamycin
Kresoxim methyl
Lambdacyhalothrin
Lime Sulphur
Linuron
Lufenuron
Magnesium Phosphide Plates
Malathion
Mancozeb
Mepiquate Chloride
Mesosulfuron Methyl + Iodosulfuron Methyl Sodium
31
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
Metaflumizon
Metalaxyl
Metalaxyl-M
Metaldehyde
Methabenzthiazuron
Methomyl
Methoxy Ethyl Mercury Chloride (MEMC)
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (MCPA)
Methyl Parathion
Metiram
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Metsulfuron Methyl
Milbemectin
Monocrotophos
Myclobutanil
Novaluron
Nuclear polyhyderosis virus of Helicoverpa armigera
Nuclear polyhyderosis virus of Spodoptera Litura
Oxadiargyl
Oxadiazon
Oxycarboxin
Oxydemeton-Methyl
Oxyfluorfen
Paclobutrazole
Paraquat dichloride
Penconazole
Pencycuron
Pendimethalin
Permethrin
Phenthoate
Phorate
Phosalone
Phosphamidon
Prallethrin
Pretilachlor
Primiphos-methyl
Profenophos
Propaquizafop
Propanil
Propergite
Propetamphos
Propiconazole
Propineb
Propoxur
Pyrachlostrobin
Pyrazosulfuron ethyl
Pyrethrins (pyrethrum )
32
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
217.
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
Pyridalyl
Pyriproxyfen
Pyrithiobac sodium
Quinalphos
Quizalofop ethyl
Quizalofop-P-tefuryl
S-bioallethrin
Sirmate
Sodium Cyanide
Spiromesifen
Spinosad
Streptomycin + Tetracycline
sulfosulfuron
sulphur
Tebuconazole
Temephos
Thiacloprid
Thifluzamide
Thiobencarb (Benthiocarb)
Thiodicarb
Thiomethoxain
Thiometon
Thiophanate-Methyl
Thiram
Transfluthrin
Triacontanol
Triadimefon
Triallate
Triazophos
Trichlorofon
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma viride
Tricyclazole
Tridemorph
Trifloxystrobin
Trifluralin
Validamycin
Verticillium lecanii
Zinc Phosphide
Zineb
Ziram
Endosulfan* : Endosulfan has been banned by Supreme Court of India w.e.f. 13-05-2011 for
production, use & sale all over India vide ad-interim order in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 213 of
2011.
33
Annexure-XVIII
LIST OF PESTICIDES / PESTICIDES FORMULATIONS BANNED IN INDIA
A.
B.
PESTICIDES BANNED FOR MANUFACTURE, IMPORT AND USE
1.
Aldrin
2.
Benzene Hexachloride
3.
Calcium Cyanide
4.
Chlordane
5.
Copper Acetoarsenite
6.
CIbromochloropropane
7.
Endrin
8.
Ethyl Mercury Chloride
9.
Ethyl Parathion
10.
Heptachlor
11.
Menazone
12.
Nitrofen
13.
Paraquat Dimethyl Sulphate
14.
Pentachloro Nitrobenzene
15.
Pentachlorophenol
16.
Phenyl Mercury Acetate
17.
Sodium Methane Arsonate
18.
Tetradifon
19.
Toxafen
20.
Aldicarb
21.
Chlorobenzilate
22.
Dieldrine
23.
Maleic Hydrazide
24.
Ethylene Dibromide
25.
TCA (Trichloro acetic acid)
26
Metoxuron (Use withdrawn w.e.f 08-01-2008)
27.
Chlorofenvinphos (Use withdrawn w.e.f. 31-12-2008)
28.
Lindane (Vide Gazette Notification No S.O. 637(E) Dated 25/03/2011)Banned for Manufacture,Import or Formulate w.e.f. 25th March,
2011 and banned for use w.e.f. 25th March, 2013.
PESTICIDE / PESTICIDE FORMULATIONS BANNED FOR USE BUT THEIR
MANUFACTURE IS ALLOWED FOR EXPORT
1.
Nicotin Sulfate
34
2.
C.
D.
Captafol 80% Powder
PESTICIDE FORMULATIONS BANNED FOR IMPORT, MANUFACTURE AND
USE
1.
Methomyl 24% L
2.
Methomyl 12.5% L
3.
Phosphamidon 85% SL
4.
Carbofuron 50% SP
PESTICIDE WITHDRAWN
1.
Dalapon
2.
Ferbam
3.
Formothion
4.
Nickel Chloride
5.
Paradichlorobenzene (PDCB)
6.
Simazine
7.
Warfarin
35
ANNEXURE-XIX
PESTICIDES RESTRICTED FOR USE IN INDIA
S.No.
Name of Pesticides
1.
Aluminium Phosphide
2.
DDT
3.
Diazinon (banned for use in agriculture)
4.
Lindane
5.
Methyl Bromide
6.
Methyl Parathion
7.
Sodium Cyanide
8.
Methoxy Ethyl Mercuric Chloride (MEMC)
9.
Monocrotophos(ban for use on vegetables)
10. Endosulfan(Banned in the state of Kerala)
11. Fenitrothion (banned for use in agriculture)
12. Fenthion (banned for use in agriculture)
13. Dazomet (not permitted on tea)
36
ANNEXURE-XX
LIST OF PESTICIDES REFUSED REGISTRATION
S.No.
Name of Pesticides
1.
Calcium Arsonate
2.
EPM
3.
Azinphos Methyl
4.
Lead Arsonate
5.
Mevinphos (Phosdrin)
6.
2,4, 5-T
7.
Carbophenothion
8.
Vamidothion
9.
Mephosfolan
10.
Azinphos Ethyl
11.
Binapacryl
12.
Dicrotophos
13.
Thiodemeton / Disulfoton
14.
Fentin Acetate
15.
Fentin Hydroxide
16.
Chinomethionate (Morestan)
17.
Ammonium Sulphamate
18.
Leptophos (Phosvel)
37
Annexure-XXI
Statement showing progress of Seed Treatment
Name of the State:
Season:
Sl.No.
Name of
Crops
Total acreage
cultivated
under the
crop ( in ha)
Achievement
Target
Quantity of treated seeds (in
(Area covered under Seed
(Area in ha)
Quintal)supplied by
Treatment (in ha)
Kharif (2009) Rabi (2009-10) Kharif (2011) Government
Others
Agency
Total
38
Annexure-XXII
8th Plan Outlay:
Physical targets:
STATUS OF GRANTS-IN-AID RELEASED TO STATES/UTs FOR SETTING UP OF STATE BIO-CONTROL LABS.
Rs. 4500.00 lakh; Approved Grants-in-aid :
Rs. 1500.00 lakh
Setting up of bio-control laboratories in the States/UTs with 100% Central assistance (Rs.30.00 lakh for construction of laboratory building
and Rs.20.00 lakh for purchase of laboratory equipment and one vehicle to supplement the bio-control efforts of the States).
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No
State/UT
1.
2
Head 3601
1. Andhra Pradesh
Approved Amount released (VIII Plan)
during 92-93 94 -95 95-96
96-97
VIII
Plan
3
4
5
6
7
Released during IX Plan
97-98
98-99 99-00 00-01
8
01-02
9
10
11
12
X Plan
02-03 03-04
13
--
14
50
12.50
-
-
17.50
17.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
37.50
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
30.00
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
12.50
-
7.50
-
7.50
-
2.50
--
---
2.50
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
---
2.50
5.00
17.50
-
-
---
04-05
15
--
Total
amount
released
U.C.
furnished
by States
16
17
Amount
surrendered
18
Unutilized
balance
with state
19
47.50
47.50
-
95.00
48.15
1.85
50.00
50.00
-
-
92.50
92.50
92.30
47.50
--
45.20
45.0
--
95.00
95.00
--
---
25.00
50.00
47.50
-
25.00
2.50
95.00
92.50
50.00
47.23
-*0.27
45.00
45.00
2.
Assam
50
12.50
3.
Bihar
50
-
20.00
-
4.
5.
Gujarat
Haryana
50
50
-
20.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
-
6.
Himachal Pradesh
50
-
20.00
10.00
-
7.
8.
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
50
50
-
20.00
20.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
9.
10.
Kerala
Maharashtra
50
50
20.00
12.50
-
10.00
-
-
11.
12.
Madhya Pradesh
Manipur
50
50
-
20.00
10.00
10.00
20.00
20.00
-
17.50
-
-
-
-
---
---
47.50
50.00
47.50
50.00
---
-
13.
14.
Orissa
Punjab
50
50
-
20.00
20.00
10.00
5.00
25.00
20.00
-
-
-
-
-
---
---
50.00
50.00
50.00
37.30
--
12.70
15.
Rajasthan
50
-
20.00
5.00
25.00
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
50.00
41.61
-
8.39
16.
17.
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
50
50
12.50
30.00
17.50
-
-
--
-
-
-
10.00
-
---
---
40.00
30.00
40.00
29.30
0.07
18.
19.
20.
Uttaranchal
West Bengal
Nagaland
50
50
50
-
-20.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
-
-
-
-
5.00
-
----
12.50
17.50
--
92.50
47.50
50.00
44.50
30.00
50.00
0.50
--
21.
Tripura
50
-
10.00
-
40.00
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
50.00
50.00
--
-
22.
Meghalaya
50
-
10.00
20.00
20.00
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
50.00
50.00
--
-
23.
Mizoram
50
-
10.00
20.00
20.00
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
50.00
50.00
--
-
24.
25.
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
50
50
-
10.00
10.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
-
-
-
-
-
---
---
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
---
-
26.
Goa
50
-
5.00
-
-
20.00
-
7.50
7.50
--
47.50
47.50
--
-
27.
Pondicherry
50
-
-
25.00
25.00
-
-
- 7.50
Head 3602
-
-
--
--
50.00
50.00
--
-
28.
Delhi
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
29.
A&N Island
50
-
10.00
20.00
-
-
-
Head 2401
17.00
-
--
--
47.00
44.15
2.85
-
30.
Lakshadweep
50
-
5.00
25.00
20.00
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
50.00
49.86
0.14
-
31.
32.
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
TOTAL
17.50
32.00
45.00
45.00
1777.00
45.00
1432.53
-
-
1500
50.00 360.00 287.50
350.00
17.50
17.50
12.50
165.00 40.00
"U.C.": Utilisation Certificate
Total amount released Rs.1777.00 lakh
Utilisation Certificate furnished Rs 1432.53 lakh
Amount surrendered Rs. 5.68 lakh
Balance unutilised Rs. 338.79 lakh
39
30.00 10.00
10.00
--
40.00
45.00
-
45.00
45.00
30.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
390.00
5.68
45.00.
- 29,93
47.50
17.50
-
338.79
Annexure- XXIII
Status of Grants-in- Aid released to PSC issuing authorities and receipt of Utilization
Certificates (upto December, 2010)
Year
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Name of State
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattishgarh
Gujarat
Goa
Haryana
Himachal
Pradesh
J&K
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya
Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttaranchal
West Bengal
Total
2004-05
6.62
9.93
3.31
3.31
6.62
3.31
13.24
3.31
3.31
6.62
6.62
3.31
69.51
(Amount in lakh)
200506
6.62
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
9.93
3.31
9.93
6.62
6.62
6.62
3.31
6.62
6.62
3.31
200607
3.31
200708
3.31
200809
6.62
6.62
-
3.31
3.31
3.31
9.93
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.31
99.30
3.31
3.31
3.31
39.72
*****
40
3.31
26.48
Total
23.17
3.31
3.31
13.24
3.31
9.93
3.31
3.31
3.31
9.93
19.86
3.31
3.31
36.41
6.62
6.62
6.62
3.31
6.62
3.31
19.86
3.31
6.62
6.62
13.24
6.62
9.93
238.32
Receipt
of
UC
13.23594
2.72865
3.31
2.71
3.26552
3.10000
6.62
3.31
9.82000
3.10000
6.62
57.61011
Balance
23.17
3.31
3.31
0.00406
3.31
7.20135
-3.31
3.31
7.22
16.59448
3.31
3.31
36.41
3.52
6.62
----6.62
3.31
10.04
3.31
6.62
3.52
6.62
6.62
9.93
180.499