Flow chart 1: Action taken when a child with Child Sexual Exploitation concerns is referred to local authority Children’s Social Care Services. CHILD’S CASE IS REFERRED TO LOCAL AUTHORITY ASSESSMENT TEAM USING CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL or INFORMATION REPORT. CSE HUB INFORMED Children’s Social Care and the CSE Hub make a decision within 1 working day of next steps Assessment required Section 17 or section 47 of the Children Act 1989 No further LA Children’s Social Care involvement at this stage. Concerns about child’s immediate safety See flow chart 2 on immediate protection See flow chart 3 on assessment and flow chart 4 on strategy discussion Feedback to referrer on next course of action Feedback to referrer on next course of action Case to be referred by the CSE hub for universal and targeted services Flow Chart 1: Response to a referral. Once the referral of CSE has been received by the local authority via contact point, the information is passed onto the CSE hub. Within one working day of a referral being received the CSE hub Manager will: Screen the referral and discuss at the daily multi agency CSE hub meeting and make a decision about the type of response that is required from Children’s Social Care. The response could be one of the following: 1. The child requires immediate protection and urgent action is required: 2. The child is in need, and should be assessed under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 (to be carried out by area team or Hub Social Worker) 3. There is reasonable cause to suspect that the child is suffering , or likely to suffer significant harm, and whether enquires must be made and the child assessed under section 47 of the Children Act 1989. (to be carried out by the area team) At the CSE hub meeting decisions will be made in relation to whether the child is medium or high risk which means the case is an open case by the hub and the child is “hub managed”. This means the case will be open to CSC, Police and Voluntary sector. Referrals that are categorised as low will be referred to universal services for preventative work. Where there are no concerns of CSE, but other concerns, a referral will be made to the area teams for an assessment. Feedback will be given to the referrer. Flow Chart 2: Immediate protection Child at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation Decision made by an agency with statutory child protection powers (the police, the local authority (LA) or the CSE hub Manager that emergency action may be necessary to safeguard a child. Immediate strategy discussion between LA Children’s Social Care, the CSE Hub police health and other agencies as appropriate, where involved. Consideration for paediatric medical Immediate strategy discussion makes decision about: 1. 2. 3. Immediate safeguard action: and Information giving, especially to parents Relevant agency seeks legal advice and outcome recorded Relevant agency (taking emergency action) sees children and outcome recorded. Shared with the CSE hub. No emergency action required Appropriate emergency action taken With family and other professionals, agree plan for ensuring child’s future safety and welfare and record decisions, and act on it. Plan shared with the CSE hub. Review risk assessment Child in need See flow chart 3 Strategy discussion and section 47 enquires initiated See flow chart 4 Flow Chart 2: Exploitation Immediate protection Child at Risk of Child Sexual Where there is a risk to the life of a child of likelihood of serious immediate harm, local authority social workers, the police or NSPCC must use their statutory child protection powers to act immediately to secure the safety of the child. If the child is “hub managed”, or the reasons for immediate protection are related to child sexual exploitation, the CSE hub needs to be aware of the situation immediately. (Please refer to page 28 of the Working Together 2013) Multi- agency working Planned emergency action will normally take place following an immediate strategy discussion. Social workers, the police, CSE hub or NSPCC should: Initiate a strategy discussion to discuss planned emergency action. Where a single agency has to act immediately, the CSE hub needs to be information and a strategy discussion should take place as soon as possible after action has been taken. Where medicals and video interviews are carried out, Social workers to be present at both of these. See the child. Fill in a CSE risk assessment. Flow Chart 3: Action taken for an assessment of a child under the Children Act 1989 where the child is at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation. Assessment completed in line with local protocol; and completion of CSE risk assessment tool. A timely assessment based on the needs of the child within 45 working days of the point of referral in LA Children’s Social Care will be undertaken. No LA Children’s Social Care support required. Risk assessment tool forwarded to CSE hub for next steps Feedback to referrer Child in need Assessment led by social worker, other professionals contribute No actual or likely significant harm Social worker discusses next steps including review/decision points with child, family and colleagues and CSE hub Actual or likely significant harm See flow chart 4 Increased CSE concerns of significant harm Assessment continues; services provided if appropriate Social worker with family/other professional agrees next steps within 45 working days Children in Need (CIN) plan or Child Protection (CP) plan or step down plan i.e TAC. Coordinates provision of appropriate services. N.B CSE risk assessment and level of risk to be reviewed at every meeting the timescales for accessing the frequency of visiting and reviewing child in need is the same as for children who are subject to CP plans. i.e CSE meetings to be held every 6 weeks. Review plan and outcome for child and when appropriate refer to nonstatutory services e.g ‘step down’ or refer for section 47 enquiries or close the case. All recommendations for case closure to be discussed and agreed with CSE hub prior to closure and put in writing. Flow Chart 3 : Action taken for an assessment of a child under the Children Act 1989 where the child is at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation (Please refer to page 30-32 of the Working Together 2013) Assessment is completed within 45 days along with a CSE risk assessment. Should the findings of the assessment be child in need, child protection, the child needs to:1. be seen every 4 weeks 2. CSE meetings need to take place every 6 weeks (these will be the same as core groups or CIN meetings. If the level of risk increases for the child, the CSE hub needs an updated risk assessment of the concerns. If the level of risk decreases for the a “hub managed child”, and the local authority are wishing to close the case, the Social Worker must inform the CSE hub for agreement 6 weeks prior to closure. The CSE hub will hold a 6 weekly multi agency meeting and agree or disagree with closure of cases whilst considering the risk. Should case closure be agreed the child will no longer be “hub managed”. Flow Chart 4: Action following a strategy discussion regarding child at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation No further LA Children’s Social Care involvement at this stage, but refer to CSE hub and other services may be required. i.e voluntary CSE services Strategy discussion is convened by LA children’s social care to decide whether to initiate section 47 enquires. Decisions are recorded Police investigate possible crime Decision to initiate section 47 Decision to complete assessment under section 17 of the Children Act 1989. See flow chart 3 Social worker leads assessment under section 47 of the Children Act 1989 and other professionals contribute. Assessments follow local protocol based on the needs of the child within 45 working days of the point of referral. Concerns about child not substantiated but child is a child in need. Information shared with CSE hub Concern substantiated but child not likely to suffer significant harm. Information shared with CSE hub. With family and other professionals, agree plan for ensuring child’s future safety and welfare and recorded and act on decisions Agree whether child protection conference is necessary and record decisions and CSE hub informed Concerns substantiated, child likely to suffer significant harm Yes No Social worker completes assessment Social work manager convenes child protection conference within 15 working days of the strategy discussion, CSE hub informed and invited Decisions made and recorded at child protection conference Child likely to suffer significant harm Child is subject of child protection plan; outline child protection plan prepared; core group established . Child becomes a “hub managed child” CSE risk assessment tool and level of risk to be reviewed at every CP meeting With family and other professionals, agree plan for ensuring child’s future safety and welfare and record and act on decisions plan shared with CSE hub Child not likely to suffer significant harm Further decisions made about ongoing assessment and service provision according to agreed plan See flow chart 3 Flow Chart 4 : Action following a strategy discussion regarding child at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation The process is followed in line with working together pages 33-41. Social worker must: Inform the CSE hub of the strategy discussion, or the CSE hub inform the area team of the strategy discussion. Information is passed both ways, to the CSE hub and to the area teams. Members of the CSE hub are invited to meetings and able to input into the plan for the child.