Treatment of wastewaters containing toxic metals (nickel)

advertisement
1
Nickel(II) removal by mixtures of Acorga M5640 and DP8R in
2
pseudo-emulsion based hollow fiber with strip dispersion
3
technology
4
R.Gonzaleza,b, A.Cerpab, F.J.Alguacila,*
5
6
7
a
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalurgicas (CSIC Agency), Avda. Gregorio del
Amo 8, 28040 Madrid, Spain. *E-mail corresponding author: fjalgua@cenim.csic.es
8
9
b
Universidad Europea de Madrid, Dpto. de Electromecanica y Materiales, Edificio C,
10
Campus Universitario-c/Tajo s/n, Urbanización El Bosque. Villaviciosa de Odon,
11
28670-Madrid, Spain
12
13
Abstract
14
15
This work presents the investigation of
Ni(II) extraction from aqueous solution
16
through pseudo-emulsion based hollow fiber strip dispersion (PSEHFSD) containing the
17
mixture Acorga M5640+DP8R/Exxsol D100 as extractant in the form of a pseudo-
18
emulsion with H2SO4. The permeation of Ni(II) is investigated as a function of various
19
experimental variables: hydrodynamic conditions, feed pH, extractants mixture
20
concentration in the pseudo-emulsion, initial Ni(II) concentration in feed phase, H2SO4
21
concentration in the pseudo-emulsion as strippant. In PEHFSD, pseudo-emulsion is an
22
emulsion that is formed temporarily between organic and stripping solutions. The
23
organic and aqueous strip phases are separated when the stirring device is stopped. In
2
24
this investigation, feed was circulated through the lumen side in counter-current mode.
25
The selectivity of Acorga M5640+DP8R/Exxsol D100 based PEHFSD toward different
26
metals was also examined.
27
28
Keywords: Nickel (II); Pseudo-emulsion hollow fiber strip dispersion; Acorga M5640;
29
DP8R; Metal transport; Wastewater treatment
30
31
32
1. Introduction
33
34
Over the past decades, membrane technology has led to important innovations either
35
in the processing and in products specially when it was refereeing to sustainable
36
industrial growth.
37
Membrane technology and its inherent accompanying science has been demonstrate in
38
a wide range of applications including: metal ion extraction, wastewater treatment,
39
fermentation, pharmaceuticals, etc. (Pabby et al., 2008).
40
Including in this science and technology, liquid membranes (LMs) have offered their
41
potentials and among them, supported liquid membranes (SLMs), in whatever its
42
configuration, are constantly under theoretical and practical consideration. Thus, the
43
removal of metals from dilute or even concentrate solutions, using this technology, has
44
received a considerable attention for the recovery of valuable metals or decontamination
45
of liquid effluents.
46
Though LMs and SLMs variations offered their attraction, some of the problems
47
encountered in their use, specially their apparent lack of stability, had led to a less
3
48
frequent scaling-up of such membrane processing. Thus, modifications and
49
improvements are needed continuously, specially when refereed to find a more stable
50
technology. In this context, non-dispersive solvent extraction (NDSX) (Kumar et al,
51
2002), supported liquid membrane with strip dispersion (SLMSD) (Ho, 2003), and
52
hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane (HFRLM) (Ren et al., 2008) had been developed
53
in order to find a suitable technology for practical use. All the three above can be
54
operated using a hollow fiber contactor which gives a high surface area to volume ratio,
55
and whereas stripping is performed in NDSX in a second module, both SLMSD and
56
HFRLM perform the stripping in a single hollow fiber contactor.
57
Being nickel a metal widely used in the industry and currently reaching elevated
58
prices, it is also one of the metals which appeared in liquid streams. In surface waters,
59
this element arises from runoff from soil and tailing pipes, from atmospheric deposition
60
and from landfill leachates. Industrial and municipal wastewater is another important
61
source of nickel in surface waters. Leaching of nickel from soil into groundwater
62
accounts for much of the element found in these waters being this process probably
63
accelerated in regions in which acid precipitation occurs. Nickel absorption for humans
64
is higher when the element is present in drinking water as opposed to food, and though
65
there is not an apparent EPA-mandated legal limit of amount of nickel in drinking
66
water, the recommendation of the agency for the maximum contaminated level (MCL)
67
is 0.1 mg Ni per liter of drinking water. The toxicological character of nickel to humans
68
is that its ingestion is consistently associated, among others, with lung and
69
nasopharyngeal cancer (Sutherland and Costa, 2002).
70
Various technologies were used to remove nickel from aqueous solutions, i.e. solvent
71
extraction, LMs, and ion exchange resins (Algarra et al., 2005; Alguacil et al., 2006;
4
72
Amini et al., 2009; Argun, 2008; Bukhari, et al., 2006; Cerpa and Alguacil, 2004;
73
Cheng, 2006; Dabrowski et al., 2004; Dimitrov et al., 2008; Egorov et al., 2010; Jung et
74
al., 2008; Kandah and Meunier, 2007; Molinari et al., 2008; Ortiz et al, 2001; Reddy
75
and Priya, 2006; Tanaka et al, 2008; Van der Voorde et al., 2004; Wilson et al., 2006;
76
Yang and Cussler, 2000).
77
The prime objective of this investigation is to study Ni(II)/Acorga M5640+DP8R in
78
relation to several experimental variables: hydrodynamic conditions, pH of feed,
79
extractants Acorga M5640 and DP8R concentrations in Exxsol D100, Ni(II)
80
concentration in feed solution, etc., by pseudo-emulsion based hollow fiber strip
81
dispersion technology using a single module for extraction as well as stripping. In
82
addition mass transfer parameters were estimated and the selectivity of Ni(II) against
83
metals such as Co(II), Fe(III) and Cr(III) was also evaluated.
84
85
2. Experimental
86
2.1. Materials
87
The active substance of DP8R is di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid, whereas the active
88
substance of Acorga M5640 is 2-hydroxy-5-nonylbenzaldehyde oxime to which a fatty
89
ester is added as a modifier.
90
DP8R and Acorga M5640 extractants were supplied by Daihachi and Avecia,
91
respectively. Both reagents were used as supplied by the manufacturers as also did with
92
Exssol D100 diluent (ExxonMobil) containing >99% aliphatics.
93
All other chemicals used in the present study were of AR grade.
94
95
2.2. Hollow fiber apparatus used for PEHFSD, preparation and methods
5
96
The hollow fiber device (Liqui-cel 8x28 cm 5PCG-259 LLE contactor and 5PCS-
97
1002 Liqui-Cel LLE unit) used for experimentation was a commercially available unit
98
from Celgard (now Membrana). The module details and hollow fiber membrane
99
characteristics were given elsewhere (Kumar et al., 2005).
100
The hollow fiber strip dispersion process comprises one membrane module for
101
extraction and stripping, one stirred tank for preparing a pseudo-emulsion of Acorga
102
M5640+DP-8R/Exxsol D100 and H2SO4, and a supplementary second tank which
103
contained the feed solution homogenized by gentle stir. The experimental set-up for the
104
separation of the metal consists of two gear pumps of varying flows for both phases.
105
The organic phase wet the porous wall of the fiber because of its hydrophobic nature.
106
The interface was maintained at the pore by applying a higher pressure to the feed phase
107
than to the pseudo-emulsion solution, thus, in the feed phase the pressure was
108
maintained 0.2 bar higher than in the pseudo-emulsion phase. The differential pressure
109
was always kept below the breakthrough pressure.
110
The view of PEHFSD using a single hollow fiber contactor in the recirculation mode
111
is shown in Figure 1. The PEHFSD operation was carried out by passing the feed
112
solution containing nickel (II) through the tube side and the pseudo-emulsion through
113
the shell side in counter-current mode. The pseudo-emulsion was prepared by mixing in
114
the corresponding tank, the organic and strip solutions, being the latter dispersed into
115
the organic phase. The stirring rate in this tank was kept below 500 rpm, this stirring
116
speed was fixed as best suited for this experimentation. The character of the pseudo-
117
emulsion may be such that it should have clear and fast phase separation (organic and
118
strippant phases) when the mixing is stopped. The recovery of nickel from pseudo-
6
119
emulsion can be accomplished (pseudo-emulsion breaks down in about 30 seconds after
120
the mixing of phases stopped) and strip and organic phases separated automatically.
121
The volume of pseudo-emulsion phase is 800 cm3 (400 cm3 of Acorga
122
M5640+DP8R/Exxsol D100 and 400 cm3 of H2SO4 solution); 3000 cm3 of feed solution
123
of the desired Ni(II) concentration was prepared by taking a suitable aliquot of the
124
nickel sulphate stock solution. Further, the desired feed pH was adjusted and controlled
125
by adding small aliquots of H2SO4 or NaOH solution.
126
127
At predetermined time, aliquots of the aqueous phases were taken and analyzed for
metal concentration by AAS.
128
129
3. Results and discussion
130
For extraction of Ni(II) by PEHFSD containing DP8R (HL) and Acorga M5640 (HR)
131
as mobile carrier, the concentration profile across the hollow fiber membrane pores in
132
the contactor is schematically shown in Figure 2. The nickel (II) ions in the aqueous
133
solution complex with the extractants dissolved in the suitable diluent.
134
135
The extraction equilibrium is expressed as (Alguacil, 2002):
2

Ni aq
 pH 2 L 2 org  qHR ) org  NiL 2 p R q H 2 p  q  2 org  2H aq
(1)
136
which is related to a cation exchange reaction, and where p can be 2 or 4 depending of
137
the extractant concentration and q is 2. The extracted complex then diffuses through the
138
pore of the hollow fiber toward the membrane pseudo-emulsion interface, where nickel
139
is stripped in the pseudo-emulsion phase after coming into contact with H2SO4. This
140
reaction, in which the above equilibrium is shifted to the left, is fast and instantaneous.
141
At the same time, the carrier is regenerated and diffuses back through the hollow fiber,
142
after which the process is repeated. Such a process is called counter-transport, where the
7
143
difference in H+ concentration between the feed and the strip solutions is used as the
144
driving force for nickel transport.
145
In the case of PEHFSD, calculation of the overall permeability coefficient of the
146
experimental system is based on a first-order mass transfer equation with instantaneous
147
chemical reaction in the stripping side when a recycling mode is operated.
148
The transport of nickel across the liquid membrane can be described by considering
149
only diffusional parameters. The interfacial transport of Ni(II) due to the chemical
150
reaction has been neglected as the chemical reactions seem to take place at the feed
151
solution-membrane and membrane-pseudo-emulsion phase interfaces, and it had been
152
previously suggested that chemical reactions occur simultaneously relative to the
153
diffusion process (Zuo et al, 1996; Alguacil and Alonso, 2003; Juang and Huang, 2003).
154
The transport of Ni(II) in a hollow fiber membrane system operating in the recycling
155
mode can be explain by consideration of equations which described i) the change of
156
metal concentration in the feed and stripping streams when are circulating through the
157
hollow fiber module and ii) the change of metal concentration in the feed and stripping
158
tanks when the aqueous solutions are continuously recirculated. Also, linear
159
concentration gradient and absence of back-mixing are assumed.
160
161
162
Accordingly (Kumar et al, 2000), experimental results can thus be fitted to a firstorder kinetic law:
 VFEED ln
Nit
Ni0
 S t
(2)
163
where S is a factor dependent on the geometry of the fibers and the module, the linear
164
velocity of the fluids, and the overall permeability of the system. This last value, PNi,
165
can be obtained by the following relation:
8
PNi 
166
S  ri  v FEED
2  r  L  N  v FEED  S  L  
(3)
2
i
167
where N, L, ri, ε (membrane porosity) and vFEED are known values dependent of the
168
module characteristics (N, L, ri, ε), and vFEED is the experimental feed linear flow
169
velocity.
170
The separation-concentration of nickel using the hollow fiber module and overall
171
permeation coefficient center on three mass transfer resistances. One occurs in the
172
liquid flowing through the hollow fiber lumen. The second correspond to the nickel-
173
complex diffusion across the liquid membrane immobilized in the porous wall of the
174
fiber. The third resistance is due to the aqueous interface created on the outside of the
175
fiber.
176
The reciprocal of the overall permeability coefficient is given by:
r 1 ri 1
1
1
  i 
 
PNi k i rlm Pm ro k o
177
178
179
180
181
182
(4)
The membrane permeability is related to the partition coefficient of nickel (DNi) with
the mixture Acorga M5640+DP8R via eq. (1):
   H L   HR 
Pm  D Ni  k m  K ext  H 
2
aq
2
p
2 org
q
org
 km
(5)
where DNi is defined as:
D Ni 
NiL
2p

R q H 2 p  q 2  org
Ni 
2
(6)
aq
183
Inserting eq.(5) in eq.(4), and if the reaction is instantaneous on the stripping side, the
184
contribution of the outer phase is removed from eq. (4) and:
 
2
185
H  aq
ri
1
1



p
q
PNi k i rlm k m  K ext  H 2 L 2 org
 HR org
(7)
9
186
187
3.1. Influence of flow rate on nickel transport
188
Table 1 showed the effect of different feed flows for testing 0.01 g L-1 concentrations
189
of Ni(II) using 10% v/v DP8R+10% v/v Acorga M5640/Exxsol D100. PNi values
190
increased with increasing the flow of the feed phase up to 280 cm3 min-1 and further
191
decreased at a flow rate of 360 cm3 min-1. As expected, PNi first increased with flow and
192
then decreased. The increase of PNi with the flow is caused by a decrease of the
193
thickness of the aqueous boundary layer when the flow in the fiber lumen increased,
194
whereas the decrease in PNi value could be lower residence time at higher flow rate,
195
which provides insufficient time to complex Ni(II) with the carriers. This resulted in
196
incomplete loading of the extractants with nickel, which finally contributed to the lower
197
value of PNi. In this experimental study, it was necessary to maintain the interface in the
198
pore of the fiber mouth. To avoid the problem of the contamination of feed phase by the
199
pseudo-emulsion at the highest flow rate, the 280 cm3 min-1 flow rate is selected for
200
further investigations. The importance of pressure control across the tube sides of the
201
contactor is described elsewhere (Sonawane et al., 2008).
202
203
3.2. Influence of H2SO4 concentration in the strip phase on metal transport
204
To study the influence of the sulphuric acid concentration in the stripping solution on
205
the transport of nickel, a series of experiments were conducted using feed phase of 0.01
206
g L-1 Ni(II) at pH 4.0±0.1, an organic solution of 10% v/v DP-8R+10% v/v Acorga
207
M5640/Exxsol D100 and strip phases containing 0.5-2 M H2SO4. Results obtained
208
indicated that the variation in the H2SO4 concentration in the strip phase has no
209
influence on metal permeation, with PNi values very close to 4.4x10-4 cm s-1. On the
10
210
other hand, the variation of the H2SO4 concentration in the strip phase has also a minor
211
effect on the percentage of nickel recovered in this phase.
212
213
3.3. Influence of initial metal concentration on Ni(II) transport
214
Studying the effect of the initial concentration of nickel (II) (0.01-3.6 g L-1) in the feed
215
phase, when the stripping solution contains no nickel, it was revealed that the metal
216
permeation continuously decreased as the initial metal concentration increased in the
217
feed phase. The results of nickel permeation through the fibers as a function of the
218
initial metal concentration are shown in Figure 3, indicating that the concentration limit
219
for the proper function of the technology is below 0.4 g L-1 Ni(II) in the feed phase..
220
This behaviour can be related to that within the present range of nickel concentrations
221
used, the transport process is controlled by diffusion of nickel species. The interfacial
222
transport of Ni(II) seem to take place at the feed solution/fiber and fiber/pseudo-
223
emulsion interfaces. As it was mentioned above, chemical reactions occur at the same
224
time to the diffusion process. Thus, the nickel(II) transport rate is determined by the
225
diffusion rate of nickel that contains species across the aqueous feed diffusion layer and
226
by the diffusion rate of Ni(II)/Acorga M5640+DP8R complexes through the fibers. The
227
decrease in transport at higher nickel concentrations in the feed solution could be further
228
enhanced either by increasing the surface area of the contactor or running the operation
229
for longer time.
230
231
3.4. Effect of feed phase pH on the transport of nickel (II)
232
In the present PEHFSD system, the pH gradient between the feed and the stripping
233
solutions is the driving force for the transport of metal ion. To asses the role of this
11
234
variable, pH variation studies in the range 2.0-5-0±0.1 were carried out. The stripping
235
solution consisted of 1 M H2SO4, whereas the concentration of the organic solution was
236
10% v/v DP8R+10% v/v Acorga M5640/Exxsol D100. It is evident from Table 2 that
237
the metal permeability increases with an increase in pH from 2.0 to 4.0, though at
238
higher pH it remained unaffected. Thus, it is considered that the pH value of 4.0 may be
239
optimum for nickel permeation. Moreover, at low pH values the diffusion of the carrier
240
mixture through the fibers become dominant. Two limiting cases can be considered:
241
i) at low pH:
2
PNi 
242
243
if p=q=2 in eq. (1),
244
ii) at high pH:
 
rlm  k m  K ext  H 2 L 2 org  HR org  H 
2
2
aq
(8)
ri
245
PNi  k i
246
and the permeability is independent of pH. In this case, PNi = ki = 4.4x10-4 cm s-1.
(9)
247
248
3.5. Influence of the extractant mixture concentrations on nickel (II) transport
249
The influence of the organic phase composition on nickel transport was studied using
250
different extractants concentrations in the organic solution of Exxsol D100. Table 3
251
shows metal permeabilities values for the transport of nickel through the hollow fiber
252
module with solutions 1+1 to 20+20 % v/v DP8R+Acorga M5640 in the diluent. In the
253
absence of extractants in the organic phase, no transport of nickel occurred. As can be
254
seen, the permeability increased with the initial extractants mixture concentrations, thus,
255
it can be considered that in the transport process, permeability is controlled by
256
membrane diffusion. At extractants concentrations in the 5+5 % v/v range a maximum
12
257
in permeability is obtained. This maximum or limiting permeability is explained by
258
assuming that diffusion in the fibers is negligible and the permeation process is then
259
controlled by diffusion in the stagnant film of the feed phase. In this condition, it can be
260
assumed:
Plim 
261
D aq
d aq
(10)
262
where Daq is the aqueous diffusion coefficient of the nickel-containing species (in the
263
10-5 cm2 s-1 order) and Plim = 5.7x10-4 cm s-1, then the overall thickness of the aqueous
264
film (daq) estimated from the above equation is 1.8x10-2 cm. This value can be
265
considered as the minimum thickness of the feed diffusion layer under the present
266
experimental conditions. At higher extractant concentrations the decrease of
267
permeability can be explained in terms of the increase in the organic solution viscosity
268
that increases membrane (fibers) resistance.
269
270
3.6. Selectivity
271
A series of experiments were conducted to investigate the selectivity of nickel in order
272
to examine the effect of several metal ions generally accompanying Ni(II), and their
273
interferences with the overall permeation of this element. Two types of synthetic
274
solutions were used in this study; in one case (Solution I) the metal accompanying to
275
nickel was cobalt (II), being this case representative of the cobalt-nickel mining
276
operation. In the second case (Solution II), the metals accompanying to nickel were iron
277
(III) and chromium (III), and this case being representative of rinse waters from
278
stainless steel piclinkg.
13
279
Table 4 summarizes the results obtained in the first case and in sulphate medium (Cerpa
280
and Alguacil, 2004), it can be seen that the two metals were extracted, and even cobalt
281
transport is a little better than that of nickel.
282
In the second case, nitrate-fluoride media (Lobo-Recio et al., 2004), the same Table 4
283
showed the results obtained from this investigation; here, the transport order
284
Fe(III)>Cr(III)>Ni(II) was encountered.
285
From the results above and the calculations of the separation factors as:
SF 
286
PNi
PMetal
(11)
287
and given in the same Table 4, it is concluded that the present system presented a poor
288
selectivity against the presence of other accompanying metals in the feed solution,
289
though still is useful to remove nickel from the above solutions.
290
291
3.7. Continuous cycles in PEHFSD
292
This experimentation was carried out using 18 L of 0.01 g L-1 Ni(II) at pH 4.0±0.1 as
293
a feed (linear flow velocity of 1.03 cm s-1) and a pseudo-emulsion formed by 1 M
294
H2SO4 and 10+10 % v/v DP8R+Acorga M5640/Exxsol D100 to evaluate concentration
295
factor, defined as the ratio of the final concentration of Ni(II) in the stripping phase to
296
the initial concentration in the feed solution under similar experimental conditions. In
297
this investigation, feed was continuously replaced with fresh feed without changing
298
pseudo-emulsion. Thus, metal was allowed to concentrate in pseudo-emulsion in
299
recirculation mode (linear flow velocity 0.05 cm s-1). After passing 18 l, mixing unit
300
was stopped and pseudo-emulsion was allowed to settle for few minutes. Finally, strip
301
solution was checked for nickel concentration. This was around 25 times the initial
302
metal concentration in the feed. The total time taken for this experiment was 6 hours.
14
303
The feasibility of recovering Ni(II) with PEHFSD using DP8R+Acorga M5640 mixture
304
in Exxsol D100 as a liquid membrane was thus proven.
305
306
3.8. Estimation of the mass transfer coefficients
307
From eq. (7) it can be seen that the overall permeation coefficient is a function of the
308
individual transfer coefficients ki and km. The tube mass transfer coefficient (ki) is
309
known to depend on the flow conditions in the fiber tube. For this coefficient the
310
following correlation was given (Kumar and Sastre, 2008):
1
311
D aq  d i2  v FEED  3


k i  1.64
d i  L  D aq 
(12)
312
Thus, being Daq= 10-5 cm2 s-1, di= 24x10-3 cm, vFEED= 1.03 cm s-1, and L= 15 cm, the
313
value of ki for the present system is estimated as 1.1x10-3 cm s-1. The variation in the
314
value of ki estimated from eqs. (11) and (9) and (10), in this two last cases the value of
315
ki is very close, may be due to that eq. (11) overestimates experimentally determined
316
mass transfer coefficients at low flows; this can be attributed to non-uniform flow
317
caused by polydispersity in hollow fiber diameter (Wickramasinghe et al., 1992). Also,
318
tube side flow distribution not always is uniform (Park and Chang, 1986).
319
320
321
The membrane mass transfer coefficient can be determined from the following
expression (Kumar et al., 2004):
km 
Dm  
  d o  d i / 2
(13)
322
For the system considered here, the membrane tortuosity (τ)= 3, ε= 0.3, do and di=
323
30x10-3 and 24x10-3 cm, respectively, and the diffusion coefficient of the nickel
15
324
complex (es) in the membrane (Dm) in the 10-6 cm2 s-1 order. Thus, km was about 3.3x10-
325
5
326
327
cm s-1.
On the other hand, the effective diffusion coefficient (Deff) of nickel complex(es)
through the organic membrane phase is defined as follows:
D eff  k m  d org  
328
329
(14)
where dorg is the membrane thickness of 3x10-3 cm. Then, Deff is about 3x10-7 cm2 s-1.
330
331
4. Conclusions
332
Pseudo-emulsion based hollow fiber strip dispersion inverstigations were carried out
333
with a unique module for simultaneous extraction and stripping in counter-current
334
operation. From the experimental study it is concluded that using the initial conditions
335
of i.e. pseudo-emulsion formed by mixing 5 % v/v + 5 % v/v DP8R+Acorga M5640 in
336
Exsol D100 and 1 M H2SO4 and maintaining a linear flow velocity in the feed phase of
337
1.03 cm s-1, are suitable for the efficient extraction and concentration of nickel (II)
338
under optimum conditions, i.e. initial Ni(II) concentration in the feed solution below 0.4
339
g L-1. For concentration of the extractants of 5% v/v + 5 % v/v DP8R+Acorga M5640 a
340
limiting value of 5.7x10-4 cm s-1 for permeability is obtained, and the transport process
341
is controlled by the diffusion of the feed film, as occurred at high pH values in the feed
342
phase. However, it is also apparent that the role of membrane diffusion becomes
343
dominant under the conditions of low feed pH and low carriers mixture concentrations
344
in the organic phase. The stability of PEHFSD was found to be good enough, thus, this
345
technology is a challenge to conventional procedures for the recovery of Ni(II) from
346
liquid effluents, however, Co(II), Fe(III) and Cr(III) are co-transported with Ni(II), if
347
present in the feed solution.
16
348
Acknowledgements
349
To CSIC Agency (Spain) for support.
350
351
Nomenclature (not described in text)
352
DNi
partition coefficient of nickel
353
ki (cm s-1)
interfacial coefficient corresponding to the inner aqueous boundary layer
354
ko (cm s-1)
interfacial coefficient corresponding to the outer aqueous boundary layer
355
km (cm s-1)
membrane mass transfer coefficient
356
Kext
extraction equilibrium constant
357
L (cm)
fiber length
358
N
number of fibers in the contactor
359
[Ni]t/[Ni]0
nickel concentrations in the feed solution at an elapsed time/time zero
360
Pm (cm s-1)
membrane permeability
361
ri (cm)
inner radius of fiber
362
rlm (cm)
hollow fiber log mean radius
363
ro (cm)
outer radius of fiber
364
t (s)
time
365
VFEED (cm3)
volume of feed solution
366
367
References
368
Algarra, M., Jimenez, M.V., Rodriguez-Castellon, E., Jiménez-Lopez, A., Jiménez-
369
Jimenez, J., 2005. Heavy metals renoval from electroplating wastewater by aminoproyl-
370
Si MCM-41. Chemosphere 59, 779-786.
17
371
Alguacil, F.J., 2002. Solvent extraction with DP-8R/LIX 860 mixtures for the selective
372
separation of cobalt and nickel. Rev. Metal. Madrid 38, 205-209.
373
Alguacil, F.J., Alonso,M., 2003. Chromium (VI) removal through facilitated transport
374
using Cyanex 923 as carrier and reducing stripping with hydrazine sulphate. Environ.
375
Sci. Technol. 37, 1043-1047.
376
Alguacil, F.J., Alonso,M., Lopez-Delgado, A., 2006. Membrane-based extraction of
377
nickel (II) using the mixture Acorga M5640 and DP-8R as carrier. J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
378
17, 839-843.
379
Amini, M., Younesi, H., Bahramifar, N., 2009. Biosorption of nickel(II) from aqueous
380
solution by Aspergillus niger: Response surface methodology and isotherm study.
381
Chemosphere 75, 1483-1491.
382
Argun, M.E., 2008. Use of clinoptilolite for the removal of nickel ions from water:
383
Kinetics and thermodynamics. J. of Hazard. Mat. 150, 587-595.
384
Bukhari, N., Chaudry, M.A., Mazhar, M., 2006. Triethanolamine-cyclohexanone
385
supported liquid membrane study for extraction and removal of nickel ions from nickel
386
plating wastes. J. Membr. Sci. 283, 182-189.
387
Cerpa, A., Alguacil, F.J., 2004. Separation of cobalt and nickel from acidic sulfate
388
solutions
389
hydroxyoxime (Acorga M5640). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79, 455-460.
390
Cheng, C.Y., 2006. Solvent extraction of nickel and cobalt with synergistic systems
391
consisting of carboxylic acid and aliphatic hydroxyoxime. Hydrometallurgy 84, 107-
392
117.
using
mixtures
of
di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric
acid
(DP-8R)
and
18
393
Dabrowski, A., Hubicki, Z., Podkoscielny, P., Robens, E., 2004. Selective removal of
394
the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method.
395
Chemosphere 56, 91-106.
396
Dimitrov, K., Rollet, V., Saboni, A., Alexandrova, S., 2008. Recovery of nickel from
397
sulphate media by batch pertraction in a rotating film contactor using Cyanex 302 as a
398
carrier. Chem. Eng. and Processing 47, 1562-1566.
399
Egorov, V.M., Djigailo, D.I., Momotenko, D.S., Chernyshov, D.V., Torocheshnikova,
400
I.I.,
401
trioctylmethylammonium salicylate as extraction solvent for transition metals. Talanta
402
3, 1177-1182.
403
Juang, R.S., Huang, H.L., 2003. Mechanistic analysis of solvent extraction of heavy
404
metals in membrane contactors. J. Membr. Sci. 213, 125-135.
405
Jung, M.J., Venkateswaran, P., Lee, Y.S., 2008. Solvent extraction of nickel (II) ions
406
from aqueous solutions using triethylamine as extractant. J. of Ind. and Eng. Chem. 14,
407
110-115.
408
Kandah, M.I., Meunier, J.L., 2007. Removal of nickel ions from water by multi-walled
409
carbon nanotubes. J. of Hazard. Mat. 146, 283-288.
410
Kumar, A., Haddad, R., Benzal, G., Ninou, R., Sastre, A.M., 2000. Use of modified
411
membrane carrier system for recovery of gold cyanide from alkaline cyanide media
412
using hollow fiber supported liquid membranes: feasibility studies and mass transfer
413
modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 174, 17-30.
414
Kumar, A., Haddad, R., Benzal, G., Sastre, A.M., 2002. Dispersion-free solvent
415
extraction and stripping of gold cyanide with LIX 79 using hollow fiber contactors:
416
optimization and modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 613-623.
Smirnova,
S.V.,
Pletnev,
I.V.,
2010.
Task-specific
ionic
liquid
19
417
Kumar, A., Haddad, R., Alguacil, F.J., Sastre, A.M., 2004. Improved kinetics-based
418
gold cyanide extraction with mixture of LIX 79-TOPO utilizing hollow fiber membrane
419
contactors. Chem. Eng. J. 100,11-22.
420
Kumar, A., Haddad, R., Alguacil, F.J., Sastre, A.M., 2005. Comparative performance of
421
non-dispersive solvent extraction using a single module and the integrated membrane
422
process with two hollow fiber contactors. J. Membr. Sci. 248, 1-14.
423
Kumar, A., Sastre, A.M., 2008. Hollow fiber membrane-based separation technology:
424
performance and design perspectives. In: M. Aguilar, J.L. Cortina (Eds.), Solvent
425
Extraction and Liquid Membranes. Fundamentals and Applications in New Materials.
426
CRC Press. Boca Raton.
427
Lobo-Recio, M.A., Lopez-Delgado, A., Alguacil, F.J., 2004. The application of ion
428
exchange to the treatment of stainless steel rinse waters. In: I.Gaballah, B.Mishra,
429
R.Solozabal, M.Tanaka (Eds.), Global Symposium on Recycling, Waste Treatment and
430
Clean Technology, Vol.II. TMS and INASMET. San Sebastián.
431
Molinari, R., Poerio, T., Argurio, P., 2008. Selective separation of copper(II) and
432
nickel(II) from aqueous media using the complexation-ultrafiltration process.
433
Chemosphere 70, 341-348.
434
Ortiz, I., Galan, B., San Roman, F., Ibáñez, R., 2001. Kinetics of separating
435
multicomponent mixtures by nondispersive solvent extraction: Ni and Cd. AIChE J. 47,
436
895-905.
437
Pabby, A.K., Rizvi, S.S.H., Sastre, A.M., 2008. Handbook of Membrane Separations.
438
CRC Press, Boca Raton.
439
Park, J.K., Chang, H.N., 1986. Flow distribution in the lumen side of a hollow fiber
440
module. AIChE J. 32, 1937-1947.
20
441
Reddy, B.R., Priya, D.N., 2006. Chloride leaching and solvent extraction of cadmium,
442
cobalt and nickel from spent nickel-cadmium batteries using Cyanex 923 and 272. J. of
443
Power Sources 161, 1428-1434.
444
Ren, Z., Zhang, W., Dai, Y., Yang, Y., Hao, Z., 2008. Modeling of effect of pH on mass
445
transfer of copper(II) extraction by hollw fiber renewal liquid membrane. Ind. Eng.
446
Chem. Res. 47, 4256-4262.
447
Sonawane, J.V., Pabby, A.K., Sastre, A.M., 2008. Pseudo-emulsionbased hollow fiber
448
strip dispersion: a novel methodology for gold recovery. AIChE Journal 54, 453-463.
449
Sutherland, J.E., Costa, M., 2002. Nickel. In: B. Sarkar (Ed.), Heavy Metals in the
450
Environment. Marcel Dekker, NY.
451
Tanaka, M., Huang, Y., Yahagi, T., Hossain, M.K., Sato, Y., Narita, H., 2008. Solvent
452
extraction recovery of nickel from spent electroless nickel plating baths by a mixer-
453
settler extractor. Sep. and Pur. Technol. 62, 97-102.
454
Van der Voorde, J., Pinoy, L., De Ketelaere, R.F., 2004. Recovery of nickel ions by
455
supported liquid membrane (SLM) extraction. J. Membr. Sci. 234, 11-21.
456
Wickramasinghe, S.R., Semmens, M.J., Cussler, E.L., 1992. Mass transfer in various
457
hollow fiber geometries. J. Membr. Sci. 69, 235-250.
458
Wilson, K., Yang, H., Sea, C.W., Marshal, W.E., 2006. Select metal adsorption by
459
activated carbon made form peanut shell. Biosur. Technol. 97, 2266-2270.
460
Winston Ho, W.S., 2003. Removal and recovery of metals and other materials by
461
supported liquid membranes with strip dispersion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 984, 97-122.
462
Yang, C., Cussler, E.L., 2000. Reaction dependent extraction of copper and nickel using
463
hollow fibers. J. Membr. Sci. 166, 229-238.
21
464
Zuo, G., Orecchio, S., Muhammed, M., 1996. Facilitated transport of gold through
465
membrane via complexation to thiourea based reagents. Sep. Sci. Technol. 31, 1597-
466
1613.
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
Download