“The Waste Land” Response Questions You must respond to two questions (1a or 1b AND 2) 1 A. In Part I the speaker promises to “show [the reader] fear in a handful of dust”. Has the speaker ‘made good’ on his promise in Part V; how so? Consider the setting and tone. 1 B. In 1932 Frank Raymond (F.R.) Leavis published New Bearings in English Poetry, one of the first critical examinations and defenses of modernist poetry. Below are some of the things he had to say about “The Waste Land”. Leavis begins his discussion of “The Waste Land” by asking, “What is the significance of the modern Waste Land?” Shortly thereafter he claims “the answer may be read in what appears as the rich disorganization of the poem.” He boldly asserts that the “disjointedness […] erudition[…and] wealth of literary borrowings and allusions” that make the poem so difficult to first comprehend “reflect the […] state of civilization” at the time Eliot was writing. Leavis continues, “the traditions and cultures mingled […] and the result is a break-down of forms and the irrevocable loss of that sense of absoluteness which seems necessary” as much in society as it does poetry. Leavis concludes that every reader must “take account of the incessant rapid change that characterizes the Machine Age” to fully appreciate how the “breach of continuity and the uprooting of life” that Eliot so beautifully describes. Paraphrase Leavis’ defense of Eliot’s most well-known work. What does Eliot’s poem “do” and why, according to Leavis? 2. Offer up a one paragraph reading/ analysis of “The Waste Land”. Does this poem describe an individual’s attempt to find his/her place in a rapidly changing world, society’s effort to reconcile the war, the poet’s own quest for spirituality, or something else entirely—you decide. Regardless of what you see this poem “doing”, be sure to structure your response like a good paragraph; begin with a topic sentence, include support, evidence, and explanations of the evidence.