Proust copper carbonate Solution a) To obtain moles, divide the mass by the molar mass. Relevant molar masses are: (2x1.008 + 16.00) g/mol = 18.02 g/mol , (12.01+2x16.00) g/mol = 44.01 g/mol , 63.55 g/mol , 16.00 g/mol ; 1 mol so mol H2O = 10 g = 0.56 mol , 18.02 g 1 mol mol CO2 = 46 g = 1.05 mol , 44.01 g 1 mol mol Cu = 100 g = 1.57 mol , 63.55 g 1 mol mol additional O = 25 g = 1.56 mol . 16.00 g The mole ratio is: H2O : CO2 : Cu : O = 0.56 : 1.05 : 1.57 : 1.56 . Divide all numbers in the ratio by the smallest as a first step toward expressing the ratio in terms of integers: H2O : CO2 : Cu : O = 1 : 1.88 : 2.84 : 2.82 . This is fairly close to 1 : 2 : 3 : 3 . In fact, dividing all of the original numbers of moles by moles of water makes the ratios seem further from whole numbers than they really are. If we divide the numbers of moles by moles of Cu and multiply by 3, we get: H2O : CO2 : Cu : O = 1.06 : 1.99 : 3 : 3.02 . So the ratio is 1 : 2 : 3 : 3 . (See teaching notes for further discussion of why the ratio looks better, i.e., more like integers, when we divide through by copper rather than water.) H2O: CO2: Cu: O: b) Empirical formulas have to do with the elemental composition. For example, we need moles of hydrogen rather than moles of water for the empirical formula. mol H = 2 x mol H2O = 2(0.56 mol) = 1.11 mol ,* mol C = mol CO2 = 1.05 mol , total mol O = mol H2O + 2 x mol CO2 + mol additional O , total mol O = (0.56 + 2x1.05 +1.56) mol = 4.21 mol , and mol Cu = 1.57 mol . The mole ratio is: Cu : C : H : O = 1.57 : 1.05 : 1.11 : 4.21 Once again, dividing through by the smallest number can provide a start to expressing a ratio in terms of integers: Cu : C : H : O = 1.51 : 1 : 1.06 : 4.03 . * I am not rounding until the end of the calculation. For instance, this result is really 1 mol 210 g = 1.11 mol, not 1.12 . There are some other slight discrepancies due to 18.02 g rounding below. All of these numbers are close to integers except the first one. Multiplying all the numbers by two gives: Cu : C : H : O = 3.01 : 2 : 2.12 : 8.05 , very close to 3 : 2 : 2 : 8 . So the empirical formula is Cu3C2H2O8 . c) If the compound is Cux(CO3)y(OH)z, then the subscripts x, y, and z must be the same as the subscripts on Cu, C, and H in the empirical formula (or at least stand in the same proportion). To make sure that this formula makes sense, add up the oxygen atoms: 3y + z must equal the subscript on O in the empirical formula. In fact, Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2 is consistent with the empirical formula. It also is electrically neutral, with three 2+ charges from copper balancing two 2– charges from carbonate and two 1– charges from hydroxide. The compound is the basic copper carbonate of the mineral azurite, which tends to be more blue than green. Its formula may also be expressed as 2CuCO3·Cu(OH)2 .