Complex locus of a circle , doc

advertisement

Complex locus of a circle

Yue Kwok Choy

(1) It is easy to show that |z – z

1

| = a , where z

1

, a

form a circle with centre P

1

(z

1

) and radius a , using an Argand Diagram.

(2) By putting z = x + yi and z

1

= x

1

+ y

1 i , we can transform the equation to well known Cartesian form : (x – x

1

)

2

+ (y – y

1

)

2

= a

2

. The equation, in fact, is a circle with centre (x

1

, y

1

) and radius a in the rectangular plane.

(3) Squaring the equation of circle in (1) , we get

|z – z

1

|

2

= a

2 

 z

 z

1

 z

 z

1

 a

2 

 z

 z

1

 a

2  z z

 z

1 z

 z

1 z

 z

1 z

1

 a

2

We get another form of circle: z z

 z

1 z

 z

1 z

 c

0 , a

, c

.

Here a

2  z

1

2  c

0 in order not to get an imaginary or degenerate circle .

(4) Putting z = x + yi, z

1

= x

1

+ y

1 i in (3) gives back the Cartesian form of the circle.

(5) Putting z = r(cos

+ i sin

) , z

1

=

(cos

+ i sin

) , (

,

are constants) in (3) : z z

 z

1 z

 z

1 z

 c

0

 r

2  r

 cos

  

 i sin

  

 

 r

 cos

  

 i sin

  

 

 c

0 we get the polar form of a circle : r

2  r

 cos

  

 c

0 , with centre = (

,

) and radius =

 2  c .

(6) arg z z

 z z

2

1

 

, 0 <

<

gives an arc and not a circle.

P(z)

Arg(z-z

1

)

As in the figure, the locus gives an arc of the circle standing

P

1

(z

1

) on the chord with end points z

1

and z

2

such that

P

1

PP

2

=

is subtended by the chord at points on the arc, using the

 s in the same segment theorem.

P

2

(z

2

)

Arg(z-z

2

)

(7) Putting z = x + yi , z

1

= x

1

+ y

1 i , z

2

= x

2

+ y

2 i in (6) , we have : arg 

 x x

 x

1 x

2

 

  y y

 y

1 y

2 i

 i

   arg

  x

 x

  y

  i

1 y

1

 arg

  x

 x

  y

 y

 i

2 2

 

1

 tan

1

 y x

 y x

1

1

 tan

1

 y x

 y x

2

2

  * *

 t a n

 t a n

1

 y x

 y

1 x

1

 t a n

1

 y x

 y

2 x

2

 t a n

 y

 y

1

1 x

 y x

1 x

 y

1 x

 y x y x

 y x y x

2

2

2

 tan

1 2

 x

 x

2

 y

 y

1

  x

 x

1

 y

 y

2

  tan

 x

 x

1

 x

 x

2

  y

 y

1

 y

 y

2

 

(8) The last equation in (7) is a homogenous equation of degree 2 , also

(a) coeff. of x

2

–term = coeff. of y

2

term and

(b) there is no xy-term,

It therefore gives a complete circle and not an arc.

* *

The "problematic" step in (7) marked by "  " changes the arc into a circle .

(9) The locus of P in (7) represents :

(a) when

= 0 , the whole line P

1

P

2

with the line segment P

1

P

2

removed.

(b) when

=

, the line segment P

1

P

2

.

(c) when 0 <

<

, an arc of a circle, terminating at P

1

and P

2

(and excluding these points)

(d) when

=

/2 , a semicircle and the supplementary semicircle is given by

= 3

/2 .

(10) arg z z

 z z

2

1

 

or

+

, 0 <

<

gives a complete circle with P

1

and P

2

removed.

You may investigate the following loci :

(a)

(b) arg arg z z

 z z

2

1 z z

 z z

2

1

 

or

, 0 <

<

.

, 0 <

<

.

(11) z

 z

1 z

 z

2

 k where z

1

, z

2

, k > 0 , k

1 gives a circle (excluding points P

1

(z

1

), P

2

(z

2

) )

Note : When k = 1, the locus is the perpendicular bisector of the line joining P

1

(z

1

) and P

2

(z

2

) .

Proof : z

 z

1

2  k

2 z

 z

2

2   z

 z

1

 z

 z

1

  k

2

 z

 z

2

 z

 z

2

  z

 z

1

 z

 

1

 k

2

 z

 z

2

 z

 z

2

 z z

 z

1 z

 z

1 z

 z

1

2  k

2 z

 z

 z

2 z

 z

2 z

 z

2

2

1

 k

2

 z z

 z

1

 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

2  k

2 z

2

2 

0

2

 z z

 z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

2  k

2

1

 k

2 z

2

2

0

 z z

 z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

 z

 z

1

2  k

2 z

2

1

 k

2

2

0

Comparing this with that given in (3), we get a circle with centre z

1

1

 k

2 z

2 k

2

and radius a, where a

2  z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

2

 z

1

2  k

2 z

2

1

 k

2

2

 a

 k z

1

1

 k z

2

2

on simplification (exercise)

(12) z z

 z

1

 z

2

 k

 z

 z

1

 k z

 z

2 and if we take P(z) a variable point and P

1

(z

1

) and P

2

(z

2

) , we have P

1

P = k P

2

P . This then reduces to a well-known geometry problem :

The Circle of Apollonius : Given two fixed points P

1

and P

2

, the locus of point P such that the ratio of P

1

P to P

2

P is constant , k, is a circle.

The Circle of Apollonius is not discussed here. Interested readers may consult web-sites such as: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt725/Apollonius/Cir.html

If we know that the locus is a circle, then finding the centre and radius is easier.

As in the diagram, C is the centre and AB is the diameter of the circle.

Then A and B divide P

1

P

2

internally and externally :

P

1

A : AP

2

= k : 1

P

1

B : BP

2

= –k : 1

By section formula:

A represents z

1

1

 kz

2 k

B represents z

1

1

 kz

2 k

P

1

(z

1

)

|z-z

2

|

A

P(z)

|z-z

1

|

P

2

(z

2

)

C

The centre of the circle represents

1

2 z

1

1

 kz

2 k

 z

1

1

 kz

2 k

 z

1

1

 k

2 k

2 z

2

B and the radius = CA

 z

1

1

 kz

2 k

 z

1

1

 k

2 z

2 k

2

 k z

1

1

 k z

2

2

.

3

Download