Chapter 15 Exercise Solutions 15-1. LSL = 0.70 g/cm3, p1 = 0.02; 1 – = 1 – 0.10 = 0.90; p2 = 0.10; = 0.05 (a) From the variables nomograph, the sampling plan is n = 35; k = 1.7. Calculate x and S. Accept the lot if Z LSL x LSL S 1.7 . (b) x 0.73; S 1.05 102 Z LSL 0.73 0.70 1.05 102 2.8571 1.7 Accept the lot. (c) Excel workbook Chap15.xls : worksheet Ex15-1 From the variables nomograph at n = 35 and k = 1.7: p2 OC Curve for n=25, k=1.7 1.000 0.800 0.600 Pr{accept} p1 p Pr{accept} 0.010 0.988 0.016 0.945 0.020 0.900 1-alpha 0.025 0.820 0.030 0.730 0.040 0.560 0.050 0.400 0.070 0.190 0.100 0.050 beta 0.150 0.005 0.190 0.001 0.400 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0.200 p Pa{p = 0.05} 0.38 (from nomograph) 15-1 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-2. LSL 150; 5 p1 0.005;1 1 0.05 0.95; p2 0.02; 0.10 From variables nomograph, n = 120 and k = 2.3. Calculate x and S. Accept the lot if Z LSL x 150 S 2.3 15-3. The equations do not change: AOQ = Pa p (N – n) / N and ATI = n + (1 – Pa) (N – n). The design of a variables plan in rectifying inspection is somewhat different from the attribute plan design, and generally involves some trial-and-error search. For example, for a given AOQL = Pa pm (N – n) / N (where pm is the value of p that maximizes AOQ), we know n and k are related, because both Pa and pm are functions of n and k. Suppose n is arbitrarily specified. Then a k can be found to satisfy the AOQL equation. No convenient mathematical method exists to do this, and special Romig tables are usually employed. Now, for a specified process average, n and k will define Pa. Finally, ATI is found from the above equation. Repeat until the n and k that minimize ATI are found. 15-4. AQL = 1.5%, N = 7000, standard deviation unknown Assume single specification limit - Form 1, Inspection level IV From Table 15-1 (A-2): Sample size code letter = M From Table 15-2 (B-1): n = 50, knormal = 1.80, ktightened = 1.93 A reduced sampling (nreduced = 20, kreduced = 1.51) can be obtained from the full set of tables in MIL-STD-414 using Table B-3. The table required to do this is available on the Montgomery SQC website: www.wiley.com/college/montgomery 15-5. Under MIL STD 105E, Inspection level II, Sample size code letter = L: n Ac Re Normal 200 7 8 Tightened 200 5 6 Reduced 80 3 6 The MIL STD 414 sample sizes are considerably smaller than those for MIL STD 105E. Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-6. N = 500, inspection level II, AQL = 4% Sample size code letter = E Assume single specification limit Normal sampling: n = 7, k = 1.15 Tightened sampling: n = 7, k = 1.33 15-7. LSL = 225psi, AQL = 1%, N = 100,000 Assume inspection level IV, sample size code letter = O Normal sampling: n = 100, k = 2.00 Tightened sampling: n = 100, k = 2.14 Assume normal sampling is in effect. x 255; S 10 Z LSL x LSL S 255 225 10 3.000 2.00, so accept the lot. 15-8. = 0.005 g/cm3 x1 0.15;1 1 0.95 0.05 x A x1 (1 ) n x A 0.15 1.645 0.005 n x2 0.145; 0.10 x A x2 ( ) n x A 0.145 1.282 0.005 n n 9 and the target x A = 0.1527 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-9. target = 3ppm; = 0.10ppm; p1 = 1% = 0.01; p2 = 8% = 0.08 (a) 1 – = 0.95; = 1 – 0.90 = 0.10 From the nomograph, the sampling plan is n = 30 and k = 1.8. (b) Note: The tables from MIL-STD-414 required to complete this part of the exercise are available on the Montgomery SQC website: www.wiley.com/college/montgomery AQL = 1%; N = 5000; unknown Double specification limit, assume inspection level IV From Table A-2: sample size code letter = M From Table A-3: Normal: n = 50, M = 1.00 (k = 1.93) Tightened: n = 50, M = 1.71 (k = 2.08) Reduced: n = 20, M = 4.09 (k = 1.69) known allows smaller sample sizes than unknown. (c) 1 – = 0.95; = 0.10; p1 = 0.01; p2 = 0.08 From nomograph (for attributes): n = 60, c = 2 The sample size is slightly larger than required for the variables plan (a). Variables sampling would be more efficient if were known. (d) AQL = 1%; N = 5,000 Assume inspection level II: sample size code letter = L Normal: n = 200, Ac = 5, Re = 6 Tightened: n = 200, Ac = 3, Re = 4 Reduced: n = 80, Ac = 2, Re = 5 The sample sizes required are much larger than for the other plans. Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-10. Excel workbook Chap15.xls : worksheet Ex15-10 OC Curves for Various Plans with n=25, c=0 1.20 1.00 Pa 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 p single I=1 I=2 I=5 I=7 Compared to single sampling with c = 0, chain sampling plans with c = 0 have slightly less steep OC curves. Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-11. N = 30,000; average process fallout = 0.10% = 0.001, n = 32, c = 0 Excel workbook Chap15.xls : worksheet Ex15-11 (a) p 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040 0.0050 0.0060 0.0070 0.0080 0.0090 0.0100 0.0200 0.0300 0.0400 0.0500 0.0600 0.0700 0.0800 0.0900 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 Pa Pr{reject} 0.9685 0.0315 0.9379 0.0621 0.9083 0.0917 0.8796 0.1204 0.8518 0.1482 0.8248 0.1752 0.7987 0.2013 0.7733 0.2267 0.7488 0.2512 0.7250 0.2750 0.5239 0.4761 0.3773 0.6227 0.2708 0.7292 0.1937 0.8063 0.1381 0.8619 0.0981 0.9019 0.0694 0.9306 0.0489 0.9511 0.0343 0.9657 0.0008 0.9992 0.0000 1.0000 OC Chart for n=32, c=0 1.0 Probability of Acceptance, Pa 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 Fraction Defective, p 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-11 continued (b) ATI n (1 Pa )( N n) 32 (1 0.9685)(30000 32) 976 (c) Chain-sampling: n = 32, c = 0, i = 3, p = 0.001 Pa P(0, n) P(1, n)[ P(0, n)]i P(0, n) P(0,32) 0.9685 P(1, n) P(1,32) 0.0310 Pa 0.9685 (0.0310)(0.9685)3 0.9967 ATI 32 (1 0.9967)(30000 32) 131 Compared to conventional sampling, the Pa for chain sampling is slightly larger, but the average number inspected is much smaller. (d) Pa = 0.9958, there is little change in performance by increasing i. ATI 32 (1 0.9958)(30000 32) 158 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-12. n = 4, c = 0, i = 3 Excel workbook Chap15.xls : worksheet Ex15-1 p 0.0010 0.0100 0.0200 0.0300 0.0500 0.0600 0.0700 0.0800 0.0900 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9500 P(0,4) 0.9960 0.9606 0.9224 0.8853 0.8145 0.7807 0.7481 0.7164 0.6857 0.6561 0.4096 0.2401 0.1296 0.0625 0.0256 0.0081 0.0016 0.0001 0.0000 P(1,4) 0.0040 0.0388 0.0753 0.1095 0.1715 0.1993 0.2252 0.2492 0.2713 0.2916 0.4096 0.4116 0.3456 0.2500 0.1536 0.0756 0.0256 0.0036 0.0005 Pa 0.9999 0.9950 0.9815 0.9613 0.9072 0.8756 0.8423 0.8080 0.7732 0.7385 0.4377 0.2458 0.1304 0.0626 0.0256 0.0081 0.0016 0.0001 0.0000 OC Curve for ChSP-1 n=4,c=0 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 Pa 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 p 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-13. N = 500, n = 6 If c = 0, accept. If c = 1, accept if i = 4. Need to find Pa{p = 0.02} Pa P(0, 6) P(1, 6)[ P(0, 6)]4 0.88584 0.10847(0.88584) 4 0.95264 15-14. Three different CSP-1 plans with AOQL = 0.198% would be: 1. f = ½ and i = 140 2. f = 1/10 and i = 550 3. f = 1/100 and i = 1302 15-15. Average process fallout, p = 0.15% = 0.0015 and q = 1 – p = 0.9985 1. f = ½ and i = 140: u = 155.915, v = 1333.3, AFI = 0.5523, Pa = 0.8953 2. f = 1/10 and i = 550: u = 855.530, v = 6666.7, AFI = 0.2024, Pa = 0.8863 3. f = 1/100 and i = 1302: u = 4040.000, v = 66,666.7, AFI = 0.0666, Pa = 0.9429 p 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 0.0040 0.0045 0.0050 0.0060 0.0070 0.0080 0.0090 0.0100 0.0150 0.0200 0.0250 0.0300 0.0350 0.0400 0.0450 0.0500 0.0600 0.0700 0.0800 0.0900 0.1000 f = 1/2 and i = 140 u v Pa 1.5035E+02 2000.0000 0.9301 1.5592E+02 1333.3333 0.8953 1.6175E+02 1000.0000 0.8608 1.6788E+02 800.0000 0.8266 1.7431E+02 666.6667 0.7927 1.8106E+02 571.4286 0.7594 1.8816E+02 500.0000 0.7266 1.9562E+02 444.4444 0.6944 2.0346E+02 400.0000 0.6628 2.2037E+02 333.3333 0.6020 2.3909E+02 285.7143 0.5444 2.5984E+02 250.0000 0.4904 2.8284E+02 222.2222 0.4400 3.0839E+02 200.0000 0.3934 4.8648E+02 133.3333 0.2151 7.9590E+02 100.0000 0.1116 1.3449E+03 80.0000 0.0561 2.3371E+03 66.6667 0.0277 4.1604E+03 57.1429 0.0135 7.5602E+03 50.0000 0.0066 1.3984E+04 44.4444 0.0032 2.6266E+04 40.0000 0.0015 9.6355E+04 33.3333 0.0003 3.6921E+05 28.5714 0.0001 1.4676E+06 25.0000 0.0000 6.0251E+06 22.2222 0.0000 2.5471E+07 20.0000 0.0000 f = 1/10 and i = 550 u v Pa 7.3373E+02 10000.0000 0.9316 8.5553E+02 6666.6667 0.8863 1.0037E+03 5000.0000 0.8328 1.1848E+03 4000.0000 0.7715 1.4066E+03 3333.3333 0.7032 1.6795E+03 2857.1429 0.6298 2.0162E+03 2500.0000 0.5536 2.4329E+03 2222.2222 0.4774 2.9502E+03 2000.0000 0.4040 4.3972E+03 1666.6667 0.2749 6.6619E+03 1428.5714 0.1766 1.0238E+04 1250.0000 0.1088 1.5930E+04 1111.1111 0.0652 2.5056E+04 1000.0000 0.0384 2.7157E+05 666.6667 0.0024 3.3467E+06 500.0000 0.0001 4.4619E+07 400.0000 0.0000 6.2867E+08 333.3333 0.0000 9.2451E+09 285.7143 0.0000 1.4085E+11 250.0000 0.0000 2.2128E+12 222.2222 0.0000 3.5731E+13 200.0000 0.0000 1.0035E+16 166.6667 0.0000 3.0852E+18 142.8571 0.0000 1.0318E+21 125.0000 0.0000 3.7410E+23 111.1111 0.0000 1.4676E+26 100.0000 0.0000 f = 1/100 and i = 1302 u v Pa 2.6790E+03 100000.0000 0.9739 4.0401E+03 66666.6667 0.9429 6.2765E+03 50000.0000 0.8885 1.0010E+04 40000.0000 0.7998 1.6331E+04 33333.3333 0.6712 2.7161E+04 28571.4286 0.5127 4.5912E+04 25000.0000 0.3526 7.8675E+04 22222.2222 0.2202 1.3638E+05 20000.0000 0.1279 4.2131E+05 16666.6667 0.0381 1.3395E+06 14285.7143 0.0106 4.3521E+06 12500.0000 0.0029 1.4383E+07 11111.1111 0.0008 4.8192E+07 10000.0000 0.0002 2.3439E+10 6666.6667 0.0000 1.3262E+13 5000.0000 0.0000 8.2804E+15 4000.0000 0.0000 5.5729E+18 3333.3333 0.0000 3.9936E+21 2857.1429 0.0000 3.0255E+24 2500.0000 0.0000 2.4121E+27 2222.2222 0.0000 2.0179E+30 2000.0000 0.0000 1.6195E+36 1666.6667 0.0000 1.5492E+42 1428.5714 0.0000 1.7586E+48 1250.0000 0.0000 2.3652E+54 1111.1111 0.0000 3.7692E+60 1000.0000 0.0000 Chapter 15 Exercise Solution 15-16. CSP-1 with AOQL = 1.90% Plan A: f = 1/5 and i = 38 Plan B: f = 1/25 and i = 86 15-17. Plan A: AFI = 0.5165 and Pa{p = 0.0375} = 0.6043 Plan B: AFI = 0.5272 and Pa{p = 0.0375} = 0.4925 Prefer Plan B over Plan A since it has a lower Pa at the unacceptable level of p.