Capacity of primary school management for professional development in selected primary schools in Tanzania1 By Emmanuel Nkumbi Letisia Warioba Willy Komba Outline 1 2 3 4 5 6 Background and policy context Reflection on review of literature Problem statement Methodology Significance of the study Work plan Background In Tanzania, as in all other countries, education is considered the corner stone of economic and social development. This is because investment in education has a direct and positive effect on productivity as well as development of social-cultural activities. Recognizing the central role of the education sector in achieving the overall development goal of improving the quality of life of Tanzanians, the Government of Tanzania (GoT) has identified education as one of the strategies of combating poverty. Several policy and structural reforms have been initiated for improving the quality of education and ensuring universal primary education with a view to strengthening the link between education provided at all levels and the socio-economic development of Tanzania. In 1996 the GoT developed the Education Sector Development Programme (ESDP). The aim was to address the existing problems and face the new challenges resulting from the socio economic reforms initiated in 1986 and increasing demand for human resource development in line with fast changing technological advancement. The ESDP derives its objectives from the national policies such as the Tanzania Development Vision 2025, the Education and Training Policy (1995), the technical education policy and the national science and technology policy, millennium development goals, etc. 1 Research Proposal presented at the Africa-Asia Dialogue Seminar held at the United Nations University, Tokyo, 10th March 2006 1 Objectives of the Education Sector Development Programme The ESDP covers all sub-sectors in the education sector, namely basic education including pre-primary, primary, adult, secondary, and teacher education; higher education and vocational education, both formal and non-formal. The major objectives of ESDP include: Decentralization and devolution of powers to regions, districts, communities and education and training institutions. Improvement of the quality of education both formal and non-formal Promotion of access and equity to basic education Broadening the base for education financing by encouraging cost-sharing measures and establishment of education funds Promotion of science and technology Expansion of provision of education and training In 2000 the GoT in collaboration with Development Partners (DP) commissioned a study on the status of the education sector in an effort to develop a strategic approach to education sector development. The Education Sector Status report (Galabawa et al, 2001) formed the basis upon which the Primary Education Development Programme (PEDP) was initiated. The four strategic priorities of PEDP are enrolment expansion, quality improvement, capacity building and optimizing human, materials and financial resource utilization. Each of the strategic priorities has components, sub-components, objectives and strategies around it. With regard to quality improvement, PEDP aims at improving teacher’s teaching styles and methods in the classroom, ensuring the availability of good quality learning and teaching materials, and ensuring the necessary support for maintaining educational standards. The document stipulates that the implementation of the components should be complemented by the adoption of proven best practices and innovations from projects of 2 CBOs, NGOs and religious organizations. The policy document recognizes that a teacher in the classroom is one of the main instruments for bringing about qualitative improvement in learning and that such quality is maximized where there is an enabling and supportive environment, where the learners participate actively in the process, and where pupils, teachers and schools have opportunities for personal and institutional growth. One of the objectives around this component is to enable pre-service and inservice teachers to acquire and develop appropriate pedagogical skills that are academically sound, child-friendly and gender-sensitive. The policy prescribes the following strategies that are relevant for achieving the objective: strengthening cost-effective in-service teacher training programmes reviewing the content of pre-service and in-service teacher training programmes with a view to sensitizing teachers and providing them with opportunities to acquire and develop appropriate pedagogical skills that are academically sound, child-friendly and gender-sensitive, together with individual life skills which take into account the current HIV/AIDS pandemic Strengthening the linkage and network of pre-service and in-service school based training through outreach programmes. Establishing and utilizing school based teacher resource centres Provision of professional development opportunities for tutors, inspectors, head teachers, ward education coordinators and other education administrators at council, regional and central levels. Having in place a formal programme for support and mentoring of student teachers Reinforce the participatory teaching and learning methods in teachers’ colleges Have a clearly defined and sustainable continuous professional development (CPD) programme for primary school teachers Develop mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating CPD courses Put emphasis on classroom competence in primary level classroom teaching and management 3 Strengthen and conduct classroom-based researches Quantity versus quality Reports on the implementation of the PEDP suggest that the thrust was on enrolment expansion, teacher recruitment and deployment, construction of classrooms and sanitary facilities, provision of teaching and learning materials, as well as provision of pre-service and in-service teacher training. In other words, the trend has been to create better conditions at school level (inputs) and not so much on content or pedagogic capacities of the teacher (processes). This is clear from reviews conducted by academics, the World Bank, and NGOs. For example, the WB ICR report (2003) remarked ‘We feel that more could have been done in the quality component of the programme’. A similar remark was made by HakiElimu (2004): ‘The teaching and learning process needs to be transformed to become participatory, interactive, gendersensitive, child focused in safe and supportive school environments’. In addition, there are several micro research studies conducted by Masters students at University of Dar es Salaam that indicate the prevalence of poor teaching methods in public schools (Shoo, 2004), and that interventions were welcomed by many teachers (Sila, 2003) and could, in principle, be effective in improving teaching methods but they either lacked materials or support (Minduva,2004). A School mapping and micro-planning study (MoEC/JICA, 2002) conducted by JICA in 33 districts aimed at strengthening institutional capacity of targeted local authorities in educational administration. Although the study did not examine capacity at school and community levels, it observed that some teachers do not teach well, that management capacity for primary education at all levels is low. Among the recommendations was the need to raise community awareness, to improve teachers and to improve school administration. 4 Statement of the problem Tanzania has, ever since gaining independence in 1961, been committed to the Universal Primary Education (UPE). However, by the late 1990s, the primary education system was in crisis, with fewer than half of Tanzania’s school age population attending primary school, whilst many of those who were attending were receiving poor quality of education. In response to this situation, in recent years, Tanzania like many other developing countries has committed itself to providing high quality UPE. Partly with reference to the insights gained from the in-depth research conducted within a selection of Tanzania primary schools and their communities, and partly from the wider literature available, there are serious doubts about whether, despite the rhetoric to be found within recent government documents, the quality of education being provided has been a genuine policy priority. There are debates as to whether the increases in key quantitative inputs in the education process, notably classroom construction and teacher recruitment, have been sufficient to compensate for the rapid expansion in access to primary education. Furthermore, in addressing the shortage of teachers in primary schools, MoEVT revised the two year Grade A teacher education program into a one-year program followed by one- year school based training. There has been much criticism about the new program. Concern has been raised by the Tanzania Teachers’ Union and academics about the quality of the teachers produced under the new program. The arguments seem to revolve around the adequacy of the professional support that the school management can provide to these teachers Although policy statements in PEDP and Teacher Education Master Plan (TEMP) recognize the centrality of the teacher in the realization of quality education, little attention has been given to the capacity of school management to support teacher professional development and improvement of classroom processes. Therefore, there is a gap in knowledge particularly with regard to the capacity of school management to support teachers, who are the single most important factor for the realization of quality education 5 Literature review The need for Teacher Professional Development Teachers are expected to play new roles as part of the systemic reform efforts. Teacher professional development provides opportunities for teachers to explore new roles, develop new instructional techniques, refine their practice and broaden themselves both as educators and as individuals. It is important that educators, parents, policy makers and the general public should understand the new expectations of teachers, the new roles and responsibilities, and current definitions of professional development. Recognition by the entire community of the complex nature of the changes needed is the first step in building the necessary support to ensure that teachers can fulfill their crucial role in systemic reform. However, schools are bureaucratic, hierarchical; teachers are isolated from one another and have learned to work alone; principals usually have not been asked to support teamwork; leadership has been linked only to formal roles. PD has relied upon a deficit model in which an expert imparts knowledge and information to teachers who are assumed to be deficient and in need of outside experts to teach them new modes of working with students (Little, 1987). PD requires systemic reforms, changing both structures of school and the norms and practices within them. According to Fullan (1991), the change process involves four levels, namely active initiation and participation, pressure and support, changes in behavior and beliefs, and ownership. Without understanding the complex nature of the changes required, and without creating professional development opportunities for teachers and others, school communities can end up adopting innovation after innovation without seeing any permanent improvement in the achievement of school goals. The design, implementation, and evaluation of professional development must ensure attention to all phases of the change process. Reform efforts that do not focus on teacher acceptance may fail. Therefore, PD must shift its emphasis from working 6 on teachers to working with teachers toward improvement of teaching and learning for all students. Teacher professional development in the context of Tanzania In the context of Tanzania refers to the processes, organizational mechanisms and practices that are aimed at providing support to the teacher for the improvement and smooth discharge of his/her duties. Organizational mechanisms are the mechanisms for monitoring continuous development of the teacher. These may take the form of planned and scheduled short term training programmes and seminars aimed at meeting various professional needs of the teaching force. Practices, on the other hand, include the formal mentoring programs developed in situ e.g. advice that the teacher gets from the head teacher, ward education officer. Other forms of practice are the meetings held at school level and at cluster level with the purpose of reviewing and reflecting on practice on a regular basis. Establishment and effective utilization of Teachers Resource Center is an important element in the professional development of teachers. Informal practices include team teaching and the sharing of experiences and educational resources among teachers, which greatly contributes to self improvement. The need for teacher professional development links with the quest for school effectiveness and school improvement. Much research has been done in this area which can be summarized as follows: School effectiveness research ESR, SIR, IEQ – Effective School Research (Coleman, 1966; Heineman, 1976) – capacity viewed as deficit at school level; absence of certain inputs; judged by test scores; ignores classroom processes. – School Improvement Research (whole school development): de-emphasis of classroom processes 7 – Improving Educational Quality: in-depth focus on generating knowledge about the school and classroom experiences of educators and students; focus on processes and context, limited scope and time-frame The researches in one way or another were skewed efforts at assessing the capacity of schools to provide quality education. This research focuses on school management capacity for teacher professional development. School Management Capacity In the context of this study, SMC refers to the potential and the actual use of that potential, including school-wide organizational and other resources available in the school’s environment that can be tapped and deployed to support, enhance and sustain quality of teaching and learning. It is a dynamic interaction of leadership style, teacher's intellectual and personal resources, professional and peer support, the curriculum and materials including the organizational (both systemic and institutional) culture. Leadership style With regards to the style of school management, Beare, Caldwell and Millikan (1993) distinguish between transactional and transformational leadership. Managers who are ‘transactional’ in their approach to school improvement try to ‘sell’ their ideas and demands to staff, using a combination of pressure and compensation. Negotiation takes the form of bargaining, in which management and teaching staff each aim to protect their interests as much as possible. Transformational managers, on the other hand, try to improve the organisation through improving its working conditions, most notably the capability of its staff. Negotiation takes the form of convincing staff of necessary change, sharing responsibilities and empowering staff through shared decision-making. Depending on the kind of change, managers in schools may exhibit either styles at one time or another. Beare et al (1993) argue that 8 the use of the transformational style is a feature of management in more effective schools, in particular with regard to changes for improvement. In the transaction model, head teacher might be the main ‘change agent’ in the school, promoting the increase of capability of the teaching staff through regular in-school inspections, promoting staff attendance in in-service training, by being accessible to staff, parents and pupils and willing to listen to and act on suggestions as well as critique. If school improvement is interpreted locally as using more effective ways of achieving the required level of performance of the school and improving the working conditions of staff, and both are viewed in a material and procedural way, then a transactional approach may be seen as sufficient in achieving the desired changes. Where school improvement is seen as mechanistic rather than a cultural change, a transformational style of leadership may be seen as less appropriate, as the ultimate aim of the improvements is the enhanced efficiency of the existing situation, not a change of that situation. This seems to be true for both externally imposed as well as internally generated initiatives to improve the schools. Personal charisma of the head teacher may be a determinant for achieving success in school performance, as well as in securing collaboration and commitment among staff. Organizational Culture The institution’s vision and the values of the school managers are important factors for achieving school improvement and so they form part of its capacity for providing teacher professional support. Having a vision of the direction and how to improve the school is seen by many as essential to the process of school improvement (Bush and Coleman, 2000; Fullan, 2001; GoT, 1997; Hopkins, Ainscow and West, 1997; Stoll and Fink, 1996; Bell and 9 Harrison, 1995;). Leaders in the school have to be able to communicate this vision convincingly in order to provide a rationale for change and to secure commitment and collaboration from all staff so as to achieve the intended change. Leading by example is considered to be among the most effective ways of instilling educational values in the functioning of the schools’ staff. Fullan (2001) stresses that mutual trust between school leaders and teaching staff is the single most important factor within a school’s culture that will allow for successful changes for improvement to be possible. Without trust there is no effective communication or collaboration, which hampers the development of commitment to school improvement Purpose of the study The study seeks to investigate the capacity of primary school management for teacher professional development in Tanzania. Research questions 1. What is the capacity of school management in providing professional development support of primary school teachers? 2. What factors affect school management capacity to provide professional support? 3. How is the capacity perceived by the school management and teachers in relation to professional development? Study objectives 1. To determine the capacity of school management in provision of teacher professional support. 2. To identify factors that influence the school management capacity to provide teacher professional support. 3. To investigate the school management’s perception of its capacity for teacher professional development 10 Methodology The objectives of the study suggest the use of largely qualitative but also quantitative research approach. The case study, sometimes described as the collective case study (Cresswell, 1998, Stake 1995), will be used. The approach involves studying a number of cases jointly in order to understand a phenomenon, population or general condition. The present research seeks to understand the school management capacity for providing professional support to teachers. This methodology is well suited because the intention is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the complex concept of school management capacity and teacher professional development. Using the case study approach the processes, organizational mechanisms and practices that are aimed at providing support to the teacher for the improvement and smooth discharge of his/her duties will be reviewed. The review will find out the existence and identify the forms of organizational mechanisms that have been set up by the school management for monitoring continuous development of the teacher. Through a combination of data gathering procedures, practices relating to the formal mentoring programs developed in situ will be examined e.g. advice that the teacher gets from the head teacher, and ward education officer. Other forms of practice to be investigated are the meetings held at school level and at cluster level that aim at reviewing and reflecting on teaching practice. The study will establish the frequency of such meetings as well as the beneficiaries. As noted earlier, the establishment and effective utilization of Teachers Resource Center is an important element in the professional development of teachers. This study will investigate the extent to which TRCs are actually being used to support teacher professional development. Focus group discussion and interviews will be conducted with teachers in order to understand the teachers’ own perception of professional development and attitude towards self improvement. The study will determine the prevalence of teacher initiated 11 practices such as team teaching and the sharing of experiences and educational resources among teachers. Classroom observation will also be used. The purpose of the observation is to investigate teachers’ knowledge, competencies and attitude towards innovation, and towards lifelong learning and self improvement. This will enable the researchers to have a better understanding of the real needs of teachers and the kind of support they may require. The observations will be complemented by interviews. Capacity and willingness of the teaching staff to teach the children with learning difficulties will be examined. Some of the children may have (severe) learning and behavioural difficulties for which the staff is not equipped to deal with appropriately. These difficulties may be aggravated rather than addressed, if staff teach in a suppressive rather than an understanding way. Factors affecting teacher professional development Through interviews the study will examine the vision and seek to understand the values of the school managers in relation to achieving school improvement and enhancement of capacity for providing teacher professional support. Leaders in the school have to be able to communicate this vision convincingly in order to provide a rationale for change and to secure commitment and collaboration from all staff so as to achieve the intended change. A study of school leadership will be conducted particularly as it relates to the provision of teacher professional support. Social networks analysis and institutional culture study will be conducted within and outside the school particularly as this relates to attitudes, values and practices of the schools’ managers towards teacher professional development. In addition to the analysis of policy documents that are relevant to school management capacity, the research team will make naturalistic observations of how the system works and what resources are available and the manner in which these resources are constructed and organized to provide the school management’s capacity for teacher professional 12 development. This will produce thick descriptions of the practices that exemplify the organization of resources and materials at each school so as to realize the school goals. Sampling procedure Tanzania (Mainland) has 21 regions divided into 8 educational Zones. Due to its proximity to the participating Universities in Dar es Salaam and Morogoro (including external universities and partners), and also because of logistical considerations, only one zone, namely the Eastern Zone, will be chosen. The following procedure will be followed: – All districts in the Eastern Zone will be classified into two categories; A = districts where school mapping and micro-planning study was conducted B = districts where school mapping and micro-planning study was not conducted – Both the groups will be ranked in respect to completion rate so as to obtain two districts – one with high completion rate and another with low completion rate as follows: A1 = district with high completion rate A2 = district with low completion rate B1 = district with high completion rate B2 = district with low completion rate – All schools in each chosen district will be ranked on the basis of school inspection reports in order to obtain two schools (good and poor) as follows: A1.1 = Good school A1.2 = Poor school A2.1 =Good school A2.2 = Poor school B1.1 = Good school B1.2 =Poor school 13 B2.1 = Good school B2.2. = Poor school – The eight schools will then form the study sample. These will be compared in respect to school management capacity for teacher professional development.. The study will focus on head teachers, primary school teachers, ward education coordinators, district education officers, school inspectors, and members of the school committee. These categories of respondents are a key to the study because they possess the information that is pertinent to the objectives of the research. Data analysis The qualitative data gathered from interviews and focus group discussions with teachers will be analyzed and categorized according to patterns and themes. These will be interpreted so as to provide insights into the school management capacity for teacher professional development. Quantitative data obtained through the observation and checklist will be analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Significance of the study This study is significant for the following reasons: first, findings will add to the current body of knowledge and debates about the concept of ‘education quality’, teacher effectiveness, and school effectiveness. Secondly, findings will make a contribution to policy that will lead to enhancement of school management capacity for teacher professional development 14 Research plan This research is expected to last for two years. The following sequence of activities will guide the implementation of the project. Research team The research team shall consist of 22 members drawn mainly from the following categories: – Research facilitators 3 – Ministry of Education and Vocational Training – University of Dar es Salaam 2 – Mzumbe University 1 – Tanzania Institute of Education 1 – Agency for the Development of Education Management 1 – District Education Officer – Primary school head teachers 8 2 4 Phase I: Planning phase (April-May 2006) to be conducted through literature review, school visits, meetings and workshops Briefing meeting: This will be organized immediately upon return to Tanzania. The following dignitaries and stakeholders shall be visited for briefing about the research proposal and soliciting of their goodwill and support. – Minister of Education and Vocational Training – Permanent Secretary MoEVT – Dean, Faculty of Education, UDSM – JICA representative, Country Office, DSM – UNESCO, Country Office, DSM Literature review and conceptual framework Identification of members to join the research team; literature review. Workshop to develop research instruments and procedures with identified team members 15 Kick-off meeting and Launching of the project among academics and other stakeholders ((from JICA, CICE, and other AA dialogue participants) Phase II: Baseline research (June-December 2006) to be conducted through interviews, documentation of school management capacity, (e.g. characteristics of teachers), classroom observation, focus group discussions, and interviews Piloting and revising instruments Fieldwork – Data collection – Development of profiles – Supervision and monitoring of fieldwork – Compilation of data and writing of field work findings – Data analysis workshop – Report writing Phase III: Data analysis and report writing (January-May 2007) Discussion of findings at primary school level and integrating comments into draft Reviewing and writing final report Reflective meeting (Uganda, Feb/March 2007) Phase IV: Dissemination of the study findings (June 2007)( (with JICA, CICE, and other AA dialogue participants) Final presentation at AA Dialogue conference (Nov/Dec. 2007) 16 References BEARE, H., CALDWELL, B. and MILLIKAN, R. (1993); ‘Leadership’; in: Preedy, M. (ed); Managing the Effective School; London: Chapman BELL, J. and HARRISON, B. (eds) (1995); Vision and Values in Managing Education; London: Fulton BUSH, T. and COLEMAN, M. (2000); Leadership and Strategic Management in Education; London: Chapman DAVIES, L. (1993); ‘Teachers as implementers or subversives’; in: International Journal for Educational Development; 13(2), p. 161-170 EVANS, L. (1999); Managing to Motivate: A Guide for School Leaders; London: Cassell FULLAN, M. (2001, 3rd edn.); The New Meaning of Educational Change; London: RoutledgeFalmer GOVERNMENT OF TANZANIA (1997); Whole School Development Planning: A Manual for Primary Schools in Tanzania; Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education and Culture HARGREAVES, A. (1998); ‘The Emotions of Teaching and Educational Change’; in: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M. and Hopkins, D. (eds.); International Handbook of Educational Change; London: Kluwer International HOPKINS, D. AINSCOW, M. and WEST, M. (1997); ‘School Improvement propositions for action’; in: Harris, A., Bennett, N. and Preedy, M. (eds.); Organisational Effectiveness and Improvement in Education; Buckingham: Open University MoEC (2001). Primary Education Development Programme, Dar es Salaam. MoEC (2001) Tanzania Education Status Report, Dar es Salaam STOLL, L. and FINK, D. (1996); Changing our Schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement; Buckingham: Open University URT/MoEC/JICA (2002). The Study on school mapping and micro-planning in education in the United Republic of Tanzania. Final Report Summary. PADECO Co. Ltd. URT/MoEC (1995). Education and Training Policy. Dar es Salaam 17