Slashing surgical site infections (SSI) Bundle Supporting Documents In response to Hospital Compare data indicating that Minnesota hospitals report higher SSI than the national average, the Collaborative Healthcare-Associated Infection Network (CHAIN) convened a Surgical Site Infection subgroup to learn more about the infections being reported, and design an action plan to decrease the number of surgical site infections in Minnesota. The CHAIN SSI subgroup is multi-disciplinary, with surgical and infection prevention professionals from Mayo Clinic, Allina Health, Regions Hospital, Essentia Health-Duluth, University of Minnesota Medical Center, District One Hospital, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, North Memorial Medical Center, Glencoe Regional Health Services, Hennepin County Medical Center, Cuyuna Regional Medical Center, Grand Itasca Hospital and Sanford Bemidji Medical Center. Due to a lack of sound scientific evidence suggesting the absolute benefit of every surgical site infection prevention strategy individually, national SSI experts are encouraging groups of hospitals, systems, or surgical practices to select and implement a group of interventions, or “bundle” that is derived from scientific evidence where it exists, as well as theoretically sound practices that make good common sense. Findings from an analysis of over 60 abdominal hysterectomy surgical site infection cases reported to NHSN, a review of the literature and current best practices, implementation costs, and current surgical site infection practices at the participating hospitals were all considered as the Slashing SSI Bundle was developed. Surgeon leadership was provided throughout the course of the project, and rural hospitals were included to ensure rural relevance. The Slashing SSI Bundle is being piloted at Glencoe Regional Health Services, Hennepin County Medical Center, North Memorial Medical Center, Cuyuna Regional Medical Center, Grand Itasca Hospital, and Sanford Bemidji Medical Center. Feedback from the pilot sites has been invaluable and influenced the final bundle element selection. The Slashing SSI Bundle elements are listed below followed by pertinent references for each practice. Defined population: patients of all ages having surgery in the OR that involves a skin incision Showering/bathing recommendation (CDC): Patients are to be advised to shower or bathe (full body) with either soap (antimicrobial or nonantimicrobial) or an antiseptic agent, once the evening before and once the morning of the surgical procedure. Upon admission to the preoperative area, an FDA approved antiseptic solution is to be applied in full strength to the operative site. Adherence to instructions for preoperative antiseptic showering or bathing at home is to be assessed upon admission to the preoperative area as a part of a preoperative bundle/checklist. If a patient reports that he or she was unable, an antiseptic shower, bath or full body wipe is to be completed pre-operatively. Hospital inpatients requiring surgery are to receive an antiseptic shower, bath, or full body wipe prior to surgery whenever possible. Association of Operating Room Nurses. (2014). Perioperative standards and recommended practices: Recommended practices for preoperative patient Skin Antisepsis, Recommendation I. AORN. Centers for Disease Control Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (CDC HICPAC) http://www.jscva.org/files/CDC-SSI_Guideline_Draft2014.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/ssiguidelines.pdf Engemann JJ, Yehuda C, Cosgrove SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36:592-598. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/676022.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true Veiga, D. F., Joel Veiga‐Filho, M. D., Ricardo Góes Figueiras, M. D., Roberto Bezerra Vieira, M. D., Edgard Silva Garcia, M. D., Silva, V. V., & Ferreira, L. M. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of chlorhexidine showers before elective plastic surgical procedures. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 30(1), 77-79. Veiga, D. F., Damasceno, C. A., Veiga Filho, J., Silva Jr, R. V., Cordeiro, D. L., Vieira, A. M., ... & Ferreira, L. M. (2008). Influence of povidone-iodine preoperative showers on skin colonization in elective plastic surgery procedures. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 121(1), 115-118. Webster, J., & Osborne, S. (2007). Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2. Postoperative wound care recommendation (AORN, CDC, JC): Surgical sterile dressings are to be left intact 24 – 48 hours unless there is bleeding or a reason to suspect early infection. Where postoperative dressing changes are necessary, sterile gloves and dressings should be used. Patient education on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing SSI is to be provided preoperatively, and hand hygiene products will be provided at the patient bedside. Hand hygiene products should be provided at the patient bedside. Centers for Disease Control Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (CDC HICPAC ) http://www.jscva.org/files/CDC-SSI_Guideline_Draft2014.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/ssiguidelines.pdf Cima, R., Dankbar, E., Lovely, J., Pendlimari, R., Aronhalt, K., Nehring, S., & Quast, L. (2013). Colorectal surgery surgical site infection reduction program: a national surgical quality improvement program–driven multidisciplinary single-institution experience. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 216(1), 23-33. Climo MW, Sepkowitz KA, Zuccotti G, Fraser VJ, Warren DK, Perl TM, Speck K, Jernigan JA, Robles JR, Wong ES. The effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: results of a quasi-experimental multicenter trial. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):1858-65. Joint Commission Center for Transforming Health Care http://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/assets/4/6/SSI_storyboard.pdf Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/676022.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true The Joint Commission (TJC) http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_28.pdf Closing trays for class II and higher open surgeries (AORN) For all class II and higher clean/contaminated open laparotomies, including extracorporeal bowel anastomoses, clean instruments, water, and gloves/gowns are to be utilized for wound closure. The need for closing trays is to be added to the preoperative briefing or timeout script. Association of Operating Room Nurses. (2014). Perioperative standards and recommended practices: Recommended Practices for Sterile Techniques, Recommendation V. AORN. (bowel surgery only) Cima, R., Dankbar, E., Lovely, J., Pendlimari, R., Aronhalt, K., Nehring, S., & Quast, L. (2013). Colorectal surgery surgical site infection reduction program: a national surgical quality improvement program–driven multidisciplinary single-institution experience. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 216(1), 23-33. Antibiotic dosing recommendations (IDSA): Intra-operative re-dosing of surgical prophylactic antibiotics is to be performed for procedures that last longer than two half-lives of the drug. Intra-operative re-dosing of surgical prophylactic antibiotics is to be performed for procedures involving blood loss >1500cc. A weight based dosing protocol is to be implemented per AHSP/SHEA guidelines Infectious Disease Society of America http://www.idsociety.org/uploadedFiles/IDSA/GuidelinesPatient_Care/PDF_Library/2013%20Surgical%20Prophylaxis%20ASHP,%20IDSA,%20SHEA,%20SIS(1).pdf American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2011). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 120: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology, 117(6), 1472. Bratzler, D. W., Dellinger, E. P., Olsen, K. M., Perl, T. M., Auwaerter, P. G., Bolon, M. K., & Weinstein, R. A. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 70(3), 195-283. Dale, W. B., & Peter, M. H. (2004). Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(12), 1706-1715. Engelman, R., Shahian, D., Shemin, R., Guy, T. S., Bratzler, D., Edwards, F., & Bridges, C. (2007). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: antibiotic choice. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 83(4), 1569-1576. Joint Commission Center for Transforming Health Care http://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/assets/4/6/SSI_storyboard.pdf Mangram, A. J., Horan, T. C., Pearson, M. L., Silver, L. C., & Jarvis, W. R. (1999). Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. American journal of infection control, 27(2), 97-134. Van Schalkwyk, J., & Van Eyk, N. (2010). Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric procedures. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC= Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC, 32(9), 878-892. Glycemic control (HICPAC, CDC): Implement perioperative glycemic control and use blood glucose target levels <200mg/dL for diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Centers for Disease Control Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (CDC HICPAC ) http://www.jscva.org/files/CDC-SSI_Guideline_Draft2014.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/ssiguidelines.pdf Kiran, R. P., Turina, M., Hammel, J., & Fazio, V. (2013). The clinical significance of an elevated postoperative glucose value in nondiabetic patients after colorectal surgery: evidence for the need for tight glucose control. Annals of surgery, 258(4), 599-605. Kwon, S., Thompson, R., Dellinger, P., Yanez, D., Farrohki, E., & Flum, D. (2013). Importance of perioperative glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Annals of surgery, 257(1), 8-14. Wang, R., Panizales, M. T., Hudson, M. S., Rogers, S. O., & Schnipper, J. L. (2014). Preoperative glucose as a screening tool in patients without diabetes. Journal of Surgical Research, 186(1), 371-378. Normothermia (HIC PAC): Maintain normothermia (body temperature ≥ 36ºC or 96.8º F) preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Centers for Disease Control Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (CDC HICPAC ) http://www.jscva.org/files/CDC-SSI_Guideline_Draft2014.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/ssiguidelines.pdf Gandhi, G. Y., Nuttall, G. A., Abel, M. D., Mullany, C. J., Schaff, H. V., O'Brien, P. C., & McMahon, M. M. (2007). Intensive Intraoperative Insulin Therapy versus Conventional Glucose Management during Cardiac SurgeryA Randomized Trial. Annals of internal medicine, 146(4), 233-243. Melling, A. C., & Leaper, D. J. (2002). Effect of preoperative warming on wound infection. The Lancet, 359(9304), 445-446.Kurz, et al. NEJM. 1996. Wong, P. F., Kumar, S., Bohra, A., Whetter, D., & Leaper, D. J. (2007). Randomized clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective abdominal surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 94(4), 421-426. OR traffic An assessment of OR traffic, with the intent to reduce unnecessary traffic, is performed upon implementation of SSI bundle and periodically thereafter. Association of Operating Room Nurses. (2014). Perioperative standards and recommended practices: Recommended practices for sterile technique, recommendation VIII. AORN. Brohus H, Balling KD, Jeppesen D. Influence of movements on contaminant transport in an operating room. Indoor Air. 2006 Oct;16(5):356-372. Knobben BA, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Evaluation of measures to decrease intra-operative bacterial contamination in orthopaedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2006 Feb;62(2):174-180. Epub 2005 Dec 15. Lynch, R. J., Englesbe, M. J., Sturm, L., Bitar, A., Budhiraj, K., Kolla, S., ... & Campbell, D. A. (2009). Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(1), 45-52. Pokrywka, M., & Byers, K. (2013). Traffic in the operating room: a review of factors influencing air flow and surgical wound contamination. Infectious Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Infectious Disorders), 13(3), 156-161. Scaltriti, S., Cencetti, S., Rovesti, S., Marchesi, I., Bargellini, A., & Borella, P. (2007). Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres. Journal of Hospital Infection, 66(4), 320-326. Tammelin A, Domicel P, Hambraeus A, Ståhle E. Dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis by staff in an operating suite for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: relation to skin carriage and clothing. J Hosp Infect. 2000 Feb;44(2):119-126.