Using isotopic analysis to determine the source and fate of groundwater contamination identification of stable isotopes and chemical elements within chemical compounds. Ability to demonstrate source and degradation of contaminants Environment, bioremediation Drug testing Quality control Stable isotopes: naturally occurring forms of the same element with different numbers of neutrons C13/C12 H1/H2 Cl35/Cl37 Stable isotope analysis based on determination of the ratios of two stable isotopes in a sample Fractionation: partitioning of isotopes due to chemical, biological, geological and hydrological processes Differing molecular weights cause isotopes react at different rates source material left "heavier” (heavier isotope more abundant) Kinetic Isotope Effect Degradative vs non degradative processes Gas Chromatography – Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Separates individual chemicals from a complex mixture based on molecular mass Different isotopes have different masses! High sensitivity, high precison, rapid Provides an isotopic fingerprint that can be compared among samples Isotopic composition conserved during environmental processes Contaminant fractionated by environmental processes Sources with distinct isotopic compositions What processes have affected the contaminant and to what extent Bioremediation & degradation Determination independent of non degradative processes BTEX: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes Petroleum derivatives Ex. Gasoline CNS Toxin, carcinogen TCE: Trichloroethene Chlorinated ethene degreaser, industrial solvent, dry cleaning chemical CNS depressant, carcinogen, ALS, PD MTBE: methyl tert-butyl ether Gasoline additive Potential carcinogen http://www.lenntech.com/images/gw-contamination.gif http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/61771/61771,1146769634,1/stock-photo-the-wrong-tool-for-the-job-1275505.jpg http://cdn.sheknows.com/articles/crave/whisk-eggs.jpg “Isotopic analysis is a powerful tool for investigating and monitoring of the sources and fates of environmental contaminants, provided it is applied in situations where the basis of knowledge is sufficient for isotopic forensics to work.” pg. 22 Clear difference in isotope pools to be compared Isotopic distinction greater than present variations/imprecisions Source differentiation: various source pools Degradation: degraded and undegraded contaminant Environmental processes Instrumental precision Predictable isotopic behaviour Anaerobic, unconfined aquifer Within 6.5m deep glacial deposits Underlying shale bedrock Watertable 0.3-1m below ground Two sources of TCE contamination Repeated samples must be taken both upstream and downstream (groundwater flow) of the contamination site Multiple transects Sufficient data for identification of trends Decreased effect of variation Characterized by very high depletion, saturation of contaminant Depletion (low relative levels heavy isotope) indicates a lack of degradation Enrichment (high relative levels heavy isotope) indicates degradation Source can only be identified in a sample well with no degradation/fractionation Repeated contamination events over time from a single or multiple sources Extent of the effect on source determination determined by quantity added Worst Case: enrichment must proceed beyond potential range source variation Given a linear trend, the assumption can be made that temporal variability does not have an effect Isotope ratio converted to an internationally accepted standard value (δ) Trends and samples analyzed by application of statistical models Linear relationship between concentration and δ Sampling and variability taken into account Requires only prior knowledge of the enrichment factor (ε) Available in literature Based on known rates of degradation of isotopes of interest Can be used to determine fractionation, degradation or source Site specific determination of presence of contaminants, bioremediation and sources of contamination Highly sensitive Highly precise Growing field with potential to expand to include many other isotopes & unique applications