Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review Improved Fullerenes for OPV PV 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Text Michael D Diener TDA Research 303 940 2314 May 26, 2010 eere.energy.gov Overview Timeline • • • Project start date: 8/8/2007 Project end date: 8/7/2009 Percent complete: 100% Budget • Total project funding – DOE share: $850,000 – Contractor share: $185,227 • • Barriers • • • OPV are not sufficiently efficient; this project will increase the efficiency of organic photovoltaics. Partners TDA Research, lead NREL, sub DOE Funding received in FY09: $379,490 DOE Funding for FY10: $0 2 2 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Challenges, Barriers or Problems OPV Champion Device Efficiency by Year • Though rapidly improving, the efficiency of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells remains low • Due to their extremely versatile and low-cost fabrication, a few percent additional increase in OPV efficiency will lead to their wide-spread adoption in a tremendous variety of powergeneration applications. 3 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Relevance • Objective: To increase the efficiency of OPV by increasing the open circuit voltage (Voc) through the synthesis of new electron-rich fullerenes, used as acceptors in a variety of OPV architectures – Voc in OPV (ionization potential of the polymer) – (electron affinity of the fullerene). Reduce the fullerene’s electron affinity, increase Voc. – Current Voc is ~0.5 V – 2020 target efficiency is 12% (2008-2012 MYPP) • 2010 champion device efficiency is 7.4% • Need new materials that maintain low-cost manufacturing – 2009 objectives were the de novo synthesis and characterization of electron-rich fullerene derivatives, followed by testing of the new fullerenes in OPV devices – New materials for OPV are created by synthetic organic chemistry. • Good: incredibly large choice of materials; fine tailoring of properties • Bad: de novo synthesis can be slow & costly 4 4 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Approach • Summarized Project Tasks – Optimize OPV performance from the materials developed in Phase I – Perform quantum chemical modeling of new synthetic targets – Synthesize the new electron-rich fullerene derivatives using the methodology developed in Phase I – Characterize the new fullerenes • • • • Electrochemistry UV-vis absorbance Solubility Stability – Test their performance in OPV • Inverted bulk heterojunction (BHJ) cells with poly(3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) • ITO/MgxZn1-xO/P3HT:fullerene/(PEDOT:PSS or oxide/)Ag device geometry 5 5 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Approach • • • Electron-rich elements tend to react directly with electron-poor fullerenes, without altering the electron affinity from that of PCBM Must ensure that the extra electron density is present in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the resulting derivative Quantum chemistry calculations allow for downselection of targets – Example: C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2 • Electron Affinity = 2.399 eV (vs. PCBM = 2.522 eV) MO52X/6-311++G(d,p) calculation • The LUMO is on the fullerene: 6 6 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Collaborations • NREL – $100,000 subcontract using a CRADA – Preparation and testing of the promising new fullerene derivatives in BJ OPV using their state-of-the-art facilities 7 7 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Initial Synthetic Strategy Three step synthesis of PCPZEA. The resulting isomer mixture is converted to pure (6,6)PCPZEA by stirring the purified isomer mixture under a sodium lamp for four hours. 1: NEt3, CH2Cl2, 0 C, 1h; H2O, MgSO4, LC (silica); 32% yield. 2: CH3OH, 6h reflux; -CH3OH, +CH2Cl2; H2O, MgSO4, LC (silica); 20% yield. 3: NaOCH3, pyridine, oDCB, 70 C, 16h, dark; -pyridine, -oDCB, LC (silica) 2x; 50% yield (consumed C60 basis). 8 | Solar Energy Technologies Program New products compared to PCBM – similar solubility, similar morphology expected eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results The new fullerenes do not work in normal devices with low work function metals ITO/PEDOT:PSS/(fullerene):P3HT/Ba/Al ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PCPZEA:P3HT/LiF/Al 9 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results PCPZEA does work in inverted devices Tuning the work function of the TCO electrode greatly enhances efficiency ITO/Zn1-xMgxO/P3HT:PCPZEA/Ag devices cast from ODCB 10 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Synthesis of PCSME Thermally unstable 11 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Quantum Chemical Calculations for PCSME: Structure Determination • Molecular mechanics conformational analysis: vary the dihedral angles, minimize the energy • 10,000 optimizations: each of the 200 lowest energy structures was found about 50 times • The six lowest energy conformers (of 200) all had the N pointing away from C60 N in blue, O in red 12 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Quantum Chemical Calculations: Electron Affinity • Four lowest energy conformers + #7 (amine down) geometry optimized with M052X/6-31G • #7 is 5 kcal/mol higher in energy than #1 • Thermal energy at ambient temperature = 0.59 kcal/mol • Not much #7 likely to be present • Unless the crystal lattice energy imposes a higher energy conformation… • Single point energy calculated at M052X/6-311++G(d,p) • Rather little difference in electron affinity between PCBM and PCSME (either conformer) or TCSMe C60 • C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2 still looks good 13 | Solar Energy Technologies Program EA (eV) 2.607 PCBM 2.522 C60CH2 2.523 PCSME conformer 1 2.486 PCSME conformer 7 2.488 TCSME conformer 1 2.522 C60C(CH2N(CH3)2)2 2.399 eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Where Are the Electrons Going? Idea #1: The ester is stealing them • Replace the ester with an alkyl chain • Conformational analysis & structure optimization • Electron Affinity is now 2.521 eV • Same as PCBM • Not the ester Idea #2: The phenyl ring is stealing them • Replace the phenyl ring with a t-butyl group • Conformational analysis & structure optimization • Electron affinity is now 2.459 eV • Halfway between PCBM and C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2 • Yes, it’s the phenyl ring, combined with having an amine on both sides of the vertex carbon 14 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Other Synthetic Targets with Amines Imidazoline Adduct Electron Affinity = 2.436 eV 15 | Solar Energy Technologies Program 3,6-diamine substituted cyclohexyl (A Diels-Alder adduct?) Electron Affinity = 2.354 eV eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Silyl Adducts C60C(CH3)2 Electron Affinity = 2.497 (CH3)2SiC60 Electron Affinity = 2.393 eV ((CH3)2Si)2CC60 Electron Affinity = 2.501 eV (Not useful) Recent work from Japan shows SIMEF has ~0.1 eV lower electron affinity than PCBM (JACS 131, 16048), and OPV with phthalocyanine has PCE = 5.2% 16 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Accomplishments / Progress / Results Other syntheses, other calculations, other devices not yet IP-protected Stability of electron-rich fullerene derivatives is clearly an issue: rearrangements and oxidations are frequent (and frustrating) 17 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Budget Status and Potential for Expansion • DOE $750,000 Phase II + $100,000 Phase I • TDA $185,227: Equipment $60,283 + Labor – Project and budget are complete – Additional funding would allow us to pursue new derivatives • Enhance the stability of the new derivatives through the introduction of bulky substituents and/or other chemical motifs • Increased purity of the new derivatives – Only ~98% achieved routinely, impairing performance – Commercial electronic grade PCBM is 99.5% 18 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Future Plans (FY 2011 and beyond) • Pursue patent protection on the composition of matter of the new fullerenes, as well as the synthetic methodology • Market the materials to OPV manufacturers • Attempt to further enhance purity of the stable new fullerene derivatives 19 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov Summary • OPV is swiftly advancing – efficiency has doubled in ~6 years and there is no sign of advancements slowing down – Expect to meet the 12% goal by ~2015 at this pace, ahead of the MYPP target of 2020 • • • While cell construction can enhance efficiency, the big steps are taken with new materials Excellent progress has been made with low bandgap polymers to enhance currents, but little published work has appeared with new fullerenes to enhance Voc QC calculations prove that significant enhancements in performance are possible, but new derivatives must also have proper solubility and stability 20 20 | Solar Energy Technologies Program eere.energy.gov