n n n Solar neutrinos n Daniel Vignaud (APC Paris) Recent results n Neutrinos at the forefront of particle physics and astrophysics n 23 October 2012 Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? The Sun Central temperature: 15 106 degrees convective zone radiative zone Composition : 73% hydrogen (H) 25% helium (He) 2% other elements core p + p d + e+ + n e 8 4 2 température T (106 K) Energy production in the Sun: cycles of nuclear reactions Energy balance : 4 protons + 2 electrons helium-4 + 2 neutrinos + 4 10-12 W Nuclear reactions in the Sun npp p + p 2H + e+ + ne 100% 2H + p 85% 3He + 3He 4He + 2p 3He 7Li + e- 7Li + ne + p 4He + 4He + g 15% + 4He 15% 7Be 3He 7Be + g 0,02% nBe 7Be 8B + p 8Be 8Be 8B + g + e+ + ne 4He + 4He nnB B Nuclear reactions in the Sun npp p + p 2H npep + e+ + ne p + e- + p 100% + p 85% + 3He 4He + 2p 3He 7Li + e- 7Li + ne + p 4He + 4He 3He 15% + 4He 15% 7Be + ne 0,4% 2H 3He 2H + g 2 10-5 3He + p 4He + e+ + ne 7Be nhep + g 0,02% nBe 7Be 8B + p 8Be 8Be 8B + g + e+ + ne 4He + 4He nnB B Nuclear reactions in the Sun CNO cycle 12C + p 13N 13C + p 14N + g 14N + p 15O + g 15O 15N 12C + p 13N 13C 15N + e+ + n e + e+ + n e 12C : catalyst + g nN nO + 4He nB Energy production in stars cycle CNO cycle pp 1 10 100 1000 Temperature of the star (106 K) Competition between the pp chain and the CNO cycle as a function of the stellar temperature. For the Sun, the pp chain is still dominant. Energy spectrum of solar neutrinos SuperK, SNO Chlorine Gallium LENS TPC Borexino pp 1010 13N pep 15O 106 7Be 8B hep 102 0,1 1 Neutrino energy (MeV) 10 Predictions of the solar models others 9 B 8 Be pp 7 140 120 100 6 60 80 percent 80 SNU SNU 100 120 5 4 3 40 1 0 0 Gallium (High met.) (Low met.) pp (1010) 5.98 6.03 pep (108) 1.44 1.47 1.4 1.2% 7Be (109) 5.00 4.56 4.72 7% (106) 5.58 4.59 5.31 14% 13N (108) 2.96 2.17 4 14% 15O (108) 2.23 1.56 3.5 15% 8B 60 40 2 20 Flux (cm-2 s-1) GS98 AGS09 Seismic (AGS09) Error (~) 0.6% 20 Radioch. (SNU) 0 Chlorine 8.5 6.9 7.67 10% Gallium 128 121 123.4 6% Chlorine SuperK SNO 40 years of solar modeling Z/X 0.0229 0.0178 J.N.Bahcall, M.Pinsonneault, S.Basu, astro-ph/0010346, Ap. J. 555 (2001) 990 A.M. Serenelli, W.C. Haxton, C. Pena-Garay, arXiv:1104.1639 S.Turck-Chièze et al., Ap. J. Lett. 555 (2001) L69 S. Turck-Chièze and S. Couvidat, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74 (2011) 086901 SSM and Seismic model Best determination of the Sun metallicity, but disagreement with héliosismology Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? The « pionneering » chlorine experiment 1970 : the detector Radiochemical Sensitive to 7Be and 8B Homestake mine (South Dakota) 600 tons of C2Cl4 ne + 37Cl 37Ar + e37Cl (T1/2=35 d) Result : 2.56 ± 0.20 SNU 1/3 of solar models (6.9-7.5 SNU) B.T.Cleveland et al., Ap. J. 496 (1998) 505 GALLEX / GNO : radiochemical detection of primordial solar n Solar models : 121-128 SNU SAGE Baksan (Russie) 50 tons Ga metal Similar results 30.3 tons of gallium in aqueous solution (GaCl3 + HCl) ne + 71Ga 71Ge + e- threshold = 233 keV sensitive to all n GALLEX : 77.5 ± 7.8 SNU (73.4 ± 7.2 SNU) GNO : 62.9 ± 6.0 SNU GALLEX/GNO : 69.3 ± 5.5 SNU (67.6 ± 5.1 SNU) ~60% of solar models W.Hampel et al., Phys. Lett. B447 (1999) 127 M.Altmann et al., Phys. Lett. B616 (2005) 174 F.Kaether et al., Phys. Lett. B685 (2010) 47 SuperKamiokande q 50 000 tons of water 10000 PMTs electron cosq Flux measured for 8B n : (2.32 ± 0.03 (stat.) ± 0.08 (syst.)) 106 cm-2 s-1 ne + e- ne + eE > 5 MeV sensitive to 8B n 45% of solar models (5 ±1) 106 cm-2 s-1 S. Fukuda et al. : hep-ex/0103032 Solar neutrinos: results and predictions chlore chlorine SuperK Spring 2001 gallium Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) 1000 tons D2O (target) 7000 tons H20 (shield) 9600 8’’ PM for Cerenkov light Canada-USA-GB Collaboration June 2001 n e d p p e- (CC) nx d p n nx (NC) ndt g n detection n Cl Cl g n 3 He t p n e e- n e e- (elastic sc.) E > 4-5 MeV sensitive to 8B n cosq Summary of SNO results (2006) ne e CC : 1.76 ± 0.11 W d n [units : 106 cm-2 s-1] CC : 1.68 ± 0.10 pp arXiv:1109.0763 e,n ES : 2.35 ± 0.27 ES : 2.39 ± 0.27 W,Z e n,e n n Z d Sun : 5 ± 1 ES(SK) : 2.32 ± 0.08 Salt phase NC : 5.09 ± 0.63 n (p) NC : 4.94 ± 0.43 No oscillation : Total flux = ES = CC = NC Oscillation Total flux = CC + (ES-CC)*6 = NC Experimental results after SNO The problem is solved Nuclear reactions in the Sun produce only ne Until SNO, solar neutrino detectors were sensitive only (mainly) to ne SNO has shown that : a) solar ne have been (partially) transformed into nm or nt and the oscillation mechanism explains the observed deficit b) the SSM is (at first order) right ! Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? 1. Borexino : 7Be, pep, CNO, 8B 2. SuperK, new results on 8B 3. SNO, final results on 8B Borexino (2007-…) Elastic diffusion ne ne Target n° 1 : 7Be neutrinos Proposal : 60 events / day (no oscillation) 10-40 (oscillation) Gran Sasso (Italy) 5 10-9 Bq/kg verreofd’eau : 10 11glass water: 10Bq Bq Objectif Purpose:: Gagner 10 de grandeur Improve byordres 10 orders of mag. Scintillator 50 times more light than Cherenkov No directionality No discrimination e- Sun and e- radioactivity Borexino is underground the Gran Sasso mountain (3800 m.w.e.) Target: 300 tons of liquid scintillator in a nylon vessel (4,25 m radius) 1er shielding: 900 tons of liquid scintillator 2nd nylon vessel (against radon) 2200 photomultipliers looking at the center 2nd shielding: 2100 tons of water 208 PMTs to sign muons (veto) Expected signal in Borexino (SSM+ oscillation [LMA]) events / (day x 100 tons) Be window pep window 103 pp ne ne 102 Be B pep 10 CNO 1 14C total 10-1 10-2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 visible energy (MeV) 2 Many radioactive enemies ! The expected signal is here 14C T1/2=5730 yr 100% b Emax = 156 keV 40K 85Kr T=10,7 yr ~100% b Emax = 0,687 MeV T=1,25 106 yr 89% b 11% c.e. Emax = 1,311 MeV 11C 210Po Cosmogenic (m) T=20 min 100% b Emax = 0.96 MeV 1.02<Evis<1.98 MeV T1/2=138 d 100% a Ea = 5,3 MeV Quenching f. in PC: 13.4 Evis = 395 keV Fortunately, Borexino could achieve exceptional low radiopurity of the scintillator and of all the components of the detector 0 0.5 1 1.5 E (MeV) 2 2.5 Towards 7Be solar n All data: 740 live days Expected 7Be signal Towards 7Be solar n All data: 740 live days Remove m + m followers (2 ms) Expected 7Be signal Towards 7Be solar n 210Po a All data: 740 live days Remove m + m followers (2 ms) Fiducial Volume R < 3.02m |z| < 1.67m Expected 7Be signal Fiducial mass = 75.6 tonnes Towards 7Be solar n All data: 740 live days Remove m + m followers (2 ms) Fiducial Volume Statistically subtract a’s [a/b discrimination by pulse shape analysis using the Gatti parameter] Expected 7Be signal Towards 7Be solar n Events / day / 100 tons : 7Be: 46.0 ± 1.5 ± 1.5 85Kr: 31.2 ± 1.7 ± 4.7 210Bi: 11C 41 ± 1.5 ± 2.3 : 28.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.7 2 types of fit : 1) No subtraction of a from 210Po – Energy from number of photons 2) Subtraction of a (pulse shape method by Gatti) - Energy from total charge Towards 7Be solar n 46.0 ± 1.5 (stat) ± 1.5 (syst) ev./day /100 tons for 7Be (862 keV) n Systematic errors F(7Be-862 keV) = (2.78 ± 0.13) 109 cm-2 s-1 SSM-High Met = (4.48 ± 0.31) arXiv:1104.1816 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 141302 (2011) 109 cm-2 s-1 Ratio = 0.62 ± 0.05 Pee = 0.51 ± 0.07 [s(ne)=4.5 s(nm,nt)] Towards pep and CNO n 210Po 11C 7Be : dominant background • Cosmogenic, t1/2 = 29 min • Borexino muon rate = 4200/day Can’t veto after every muon! v 85Kr pep v 210Bi CNO v External Backgrounds Towards pep and CNO n Cosmic μ n capture (255 ms) 11C +n • • Most 11C (t1/2=29 min) produced via 11C + n m + 12C 11C 11Be + e+ + n e Delayed neutron capture (2.2 MeV g signal) identifies when and where 11C was produced geometrical cut The 125 muon-neutron coincidences/day can be vetoed without excessive loss of live time. Towards pep and CNO n I. Three-fold coincidence : space and time veto after coinc. between m and cosmogenic n Remove 91% of 11C with a livetime sacrifice of 51.5%. Towards pep and CNO n II. Pulse shape discrimination between e+ and e- (50% of e+ give orthopositronium (t1/2=3 ns)) Towards pep and CNO n III. Multidimensional fit with all the ingredients + pep flux 3.1 ± 0.6 ± 0.3 counts/(day.100 ton) F(pep) = 1.6 ± 0.3 108 cm-2s-1 F(SSM) = 1.45 ± 0.1 108 cm-2s-1 * CNO flux < 7.9 counts/(day.100 ton) F(CNO) < 7.7 108 cm-2s-1 F(SSM) = 5.2 (3.7) 108 cm-2s-1 arXiv:1110.3230 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 051302 Towards 8B n FSSM = 5.58 ± 0.60 106 cm-2 s-1 (High Metallicity 2011) Expected rate (0-14 MeV) : 0.49±0.05 c/d/100 tonnes > 5 MeV (like SK and SNO): 0.14±0.01 c/d/100 tons Contamination from 2.6 MeV g (208Tl) E>2.8 MeV: 0.26±0.03 c/d/100 tons Borexino 246 d Counting rate: 30 c/d/100 ton Ratio S/B < 1/100!!! Spectrum (2.8-16.3 MeV) Towards 8B n m All m are cut (residual rate: <10-3 c/d) Neutron cut: 2 ms veto after each m, to reject induced n (mean capture time ~250 ms) (residual n rate: ~10-4 c/d) Muon energy spectrum Fiducial volume (to eliminate surface contamination by 220Rn and 222Rn) Cosmogenic cuts (to eliminate short-live radioactive induced like 12B, 8Li, 9Li, 8He, 6He,…) Some more cuts… 10C, 214Bi, 208Tl. Towards 8B n 345.3 d 75±13 events above 3 MeV (46±8 events above 5 MeV) Systematic errors: • 3.8% (fiducial mass) • 3.5% (energy threshold) F(8B) = 0.22 ± 0.04 ± 0.01 cpd/100 t (F(8B) = 0.13 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 cpd/100 t) F(8B) = 2.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.1 106 cm-2s-1 (F(8B) = 2.7 ± 0.4 ± 0.2 106 cm-2s-1) > 7 MeV > 7 MeV > 5 MeV F(SSM)High Met = 5.58 ± 0.6 arXiv:0808.2868 Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 033006 106 cm-2s-1 > 2.8 MeV > 5.5 MeV > 5 MeV > 6 MeV *Threshold is defined at 100% trigger efficiency SuperKamiokande : what’s new ? I. K. Takeuchi : Physun 2012 SuperKamiokande : what’s new ? II. K. Takeuchi : Physun 2012 SuperKamiokande : what’s new ? III. 8B Energy spectrum (all) Y. Takeuchi, Physun 2012 SNO : what’s new ? I- Low Energy Threshold I- LETA (Low Energy Threshold Analysis) : Teff > 3.5 MeV Low energy spectrum still consistent with no distortion Phys. Rev. C81 (2010) 055504 SNO : what’s new ? II- 3 phase analysis Combine data taking phases into a single analysis (to avoid double counting of common systematics) Total uncertainty : 3.6% N. Fiuza de Barros, NOW 2012 SNO : what’s new ? III- hep neutrinos hep solar neutrinos 1000 times less than 8B ! F(hep)SSM = (8.0 ± 1.2) 103 cm-2s-1 1054 days of SNO data F(hep) < 21 103 cm-2s-1 [preliminary] [F(hep)SK < 1.5 105 cm-2s-1] N. Fiuza de Barros, NOW 2012 Towards spectroscopy of solar neutrinos Borexino limit BX, SK, SNO pp 1010 SNO limit Borexino lowering the threshold 13N pep 15O 106 7Be 8B hep 102 0,1 1 Neutrino energy (MeV) 10 Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? Solar neutrinos and oscillation parameters (spring 2001) Thanks to MSW effect SMA Dm2 (eV2) Dm212 LMA LOW VAC tan2q q12 Bahcall, Krastev, Smirnov, hep-ph/0103179 Solar neutrinos and oscillation parameters (June 2001) LMA Dm212 Dm2 (eV2) SMA LOW VAC tan2q q12 Bahcall, Krastev, Smirnov, hep-ph/0103179 Solar neutrinos and oscillation parameters (precision) KamLAND (2008) sin2(2q12) = 0.87 Dm2 = 7.6 10-5 eV2 Sun Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 221803 Solar neutrinos and oscillation parameters (precision) A. Palazzo, Physun 2012 MSW effect : the Sun and LMA 1. sin2(2q12) = 0.87 Dm2 = 7.6 10-5 eV2 0.9 0.8 Needs more precision in the transition region vacuum effect 1-0.5 sin22q12 0.57 0.7 P(ne n e) 0.6 MSW effect sin2q12=0.314 0.5 0.4 pp - all solar 7Be - Borexino pep – Borexino 8B – SNO (LETA) + Borexino 8B – SNO + SK 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 1.0 En (MeV) 10. Day-night asymmetry of 7Be ne P(ne ne) • Possible regeneration of solar ve if they cross the Earth before interacting (Cribier et al., 1986). 1 0 E/Dm2 sin2q Model Predicted And (862 keV) LMA <0.001 LOW 0.11 - 0.80 MaVaN ~0.20 Solar before Borexino Day-night asymmetry of 7Be ne Low solution Adn(862 keV): 0.001 ± 0.012stat ±0.007sys Solar WITH Borexino arXiv:1104.2150 Phys. Lett. B707 (2012) 22 LOW solution excluded at >99.73% C.L. D/N in SuperKamiokande Y. Takeuchi, Physun 2012 Solar neutrinos : Recent results 1. Solar neutrinos, witnesses of the core of the Sun 2. Archaeology (1968-2001) : the solar neutrino problem 3. Towards solar neutrino spectroscopy ? 4. Solar neutrinos and particle physics 5. Is there any future ? Future for solar n in Borexino measure CNO n (if suppression of measure pp n ? 210Bi) ? Many astrophysical implications : - First probe of energy produced in high mass stars - Help to solve the metallicity problem - Check homogeneous young Sun (e.g. accretion during formation of planetary system) ,… Future Solar n experiments (beyond Borexino) A. Mc Donald, Neutrino 2012 Liquid scintillator in the old SNO sphere G. Orebi Gann, Physun 2012 LENA (Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy) Very high statistics in 7Be (allows to search for small flux fluctuations) CNO and pep possible,if to 100 (Borexino) 210Bi background < 10 8B spectrum from 3 MeV (elastic scattering) 8B spectrum via 13C charged current reaction from 4 MeV (∼ 425 counts/year) > 2020 ? L. Oberauer, Physun 2012 M. Wurm et al. / Astrop. Phys. 35 (2012) 685 Conclusion Important progresses in solar neutrino spectroscopy, thanks to Borexino : 7Be, pep, limit on CNO, low threshold for 8B. SuperKamiokande and SNO provide updated results on 8B. The experiments fix fluxes for solar models The oscillation solution MSW-LMA has become more precise, thanks to flux, spectrum and daynight effect (and KamLAND). Future : CNO ? pp ? Solar neutrinos n are at the forefront of particle physics and astrophysics (Lugdunum, -52 BC) n n n n n Towards 7Be solar n • 1-D binned likelihood fits in energy • 7Be, 210Po, 85Kr, 11C, 210Bi weights floated • pp, pep, 8B, and CNO fixed to SSM fluxes + LMA • 222Rn, 218Po, and 214Pb weights constrained by 214Bi-214Po co-incidence a/b pulse shape discrimination • • Particles with higher ionization density produce more slow light Separate α / β using the “Gatti Parameter” Fit each energy bin with the sum of two Gaussians Towards 8B n Solar neutrinos and oscillation parameters (precision) Données solaires + KamLAND 2005 : précision sur Dm212 M. Maltoni, Physun 2012 Survival probabilities with MSW effect How the solar neutrino spectrum is modified by the MSW effect ?