Entangled Photon Pairs from Semiconductor Quantum Dots Nikolay Akopian, Eilon Poem and David Gershoni The Solid State Institute and the Physics Department, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel Netanel Lindner, Yoav Berlatzky and Joseph Avron The Physics Department, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel Brian Gerardot and Pierre Petroff Materials Department, UCSB, CA 93106, USA Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Outline Motivation: deterministic sources for entangled photons. Entanglement. Radiative cascades in semiconductor quantum dots. Entanglement by spectral projection. Why does it work in spite of inhomogeneous broadening. Conclusion: semiconductor quantum dots are practical sources for entangled photons on demand. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Motivation Entanglement is an essential resource of quantum information processing. Entangled photons are particularly attractive due to their non interacting nature, and the ease with which they can be manipulated. Quantum computing, quantum communication require “Event ready” entangled photon pairs. Therefore, deterministic sources of entangled photons are needed. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Entanglement H H AHB Systems A and B, Hilbert space The combined state is not entangled (seperable) if AB i i i i A B i 1 i Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute (not) Entanglement Alice Bob i A i B i AB i i i i A B i 1 i Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Entanglement How can we tell if a general state AB is entangled? For two qubits, we have the Peres criterion: AB is entangled iff TA its partial transposition satisfies AB 0 A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413, 1996. TA AB 00,00 * 00,01 * 00,10 * 00,11 00,01 00,10 01,01 01,10 * 01,1 10,10 0 * * 01,11 10,11 00,11 01,11 10,11 11,11 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Example The state 00 11 1/ 2 0 0 1/ 2 gives the density matrix 0 0 0 0 0 1/ 2 0 0 0 0 0 1/ 2 The partial transpose gives a non –positive matrix 0 0 1/ 2 0 0 0 1/ 2 0 0 0 1/ 2 0 0 0 0 1/ 2 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Strain induced Self assembled Quantum Dots 3D confinement of charge carriers with discrete spectrum of spin degenerate energy levels. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Single semiconductor quantum dot Off resonance excitation P S emission due to radiative recombination h S P Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Entangled photon pairs from radiative cascades Right circular polarization S shell 2 e- Left circular polarization S shell 2 h+ Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Bi-exiton radiative casacade Isotropic QD R Anisotropic QD L | pHH | pVV L R | RX LXX | LX RXX Suggestion: Benson Yamamoto et al PRL 2000 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute The anisotropic e-h exchange interaction H The photon’s energy indicates the decay path V - + H V No entanglement Classical correlations only Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute | H XX H X | pHH | GH | VXXVX | pVV | GV Polarization Momentum wave function HH HV VH 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environment VV 0 0 2 HH HV VH Reduced Density Matrix For Polarization * pHH | pVV GH | GV VV Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute HH HV VH 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VV 0 0 2 Peres criterion for entanglement: HH HV 1 0 2 VH VV Maximal Bell inequality violation: M. Horodecki et. al., Phys. Lett. A 223,1 (1996) Tr ( B ) 2 1 4 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute 2 2 Two photon polarization density matrix: HH HH HV HVVH VH VV VV In our case: pHH | pVV 0 0 2 2 00 00 0 * ' 00 0 ' 00 00 00 00 22 00 00 00 00 00 However, we can still make a measurement on the wave packet: P , P P projection ' * pHH P pVV P 2 GH GV Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute The experimental setup Nika Akopian Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Polarization sensitive photoluminescence 27 eV Spectral diffusion!! Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Polarization density matrix without spectral projection Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Spectral projection – Elimination of the ‘which path’ Information. Photons from both decay paths Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Spectral filtering | AV (, ) |2 | AH (, ) |2 Δ = 27μeV Γ = 1.6μeV N,γ * AH AV Relative Number of photon pairs N Off diagonal matrix element (| AH | | AV | )d 2 2 spectral window 1 * AH AV d N spectral window Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Density matrix – spectral window of 200 25 μeV μeV (closed (open slits) slits) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Density matrix – spectral window of 25 μeV (closed slits) γ = 0.18 ± 0.05 2 1 + 4 γ = 2.13 ± 0.07 > 2 2 Bell inequality violation Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Is there any ‘which path’ information left in the degrees of freedom of the QD’s environment ? 1.6 eV 27 eV γ No remnant ‘which path’ witness in the enviroenment of the QD!! < G H | G V > 1 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Spectral Filtering in the presence of inhomogeneous broadening Energy of X photon (2) Energy conservation Energy of XX photon (1) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Spectral Filtering in the presence of inhomogeneous broadening Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Conclusions: First demonstration of entangled photon pairs from the radiative cascade in SCQDs. No other “which path” information in the environment. Deterministic entangled photon pair devices based on SCQD are thus possible provided is increased such that no spectral filtering is needed. Akopian et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130501 (2006) Lindner et al, quant-ph/0601200 . Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Intensity Cross--Correlation Function : j D1 MC i PL Energy Second order Intensity Correlation Function. gij 2 Ii t I j t Ii t t I j t t Ij (t1) MC D2 Ii (t2) t correlator I(t) - Intensity conditional probability of detecting photon from line j at time (t+) after photon from line i had been detected at time (t) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Polarization Sensitive Intensity CrossCorrelation Measurements X 0 XX 0 X 0 XX 0 number of correlated radiative cascades Decay time of 0.8 nsec Γ=1.6μeV Time (nsec) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Polarization Tomography D 1 2 ( H V ); R 1 2 Spectral window 200 μeV ( H iV ); L 1 2 ( H iV ) Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute no subtraction of events from distinct cascades! 1.5 ns window Largest negative eigenvalue of the partially transposed matrix: Peres = -0.03 ± 0.06 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute no subtraction of events from distinct cascades! 0.6 ns window Largest negative eigenvalue of the partially transposed matrix: Peres = -0.15 ± 0.07 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute no subtraction of events from distinct cascades! 1.5 ns temporal window Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute no subtraction of events from distinct cascades! 0.6 ns temporal window Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Polarization Tomography Spectral window 25 μeV Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute