PICAM Status June 2011

advertisement

PICAM Status

Klaus Torkar (IWF Graz) for the PICAM Team

SERENA-HEWG Meeting, Key Largo, FL, 17 May 2013

Contents

 PICAM basics

 QM status and test results

 Front-end ASIC (TIMPO32) status

 FM status and schedule

2

P

lanetary

I

on

CAM

era

•All-sky camera for charged particles to investigate the exoionosphere composition and distribution

•Hemispherical instantaneous field of view to measure the 3-D velocity distribution and mass composition of ions at high resolution

Main contributions:

IWF/OAW (Austria)

LATMOS, LPP (France)

MPS (Germany)

WIGNER (Hungary)

STIL (Ireland)

ESTEC

IWF

LPP/ LATMOS

ESTEC

WIGNER

MPS

STIL

Responsibilities

Controller unit (DPU)

Integration at PICAM level

Environmental tests

On-board software

Thermal and mechanical analysis

Partial manufacture of ion optics (OPT)

Harness

Detector with its electronics (DET)

ASIC development support

Design of ion optics (OPT), partial manufacture of OPT

Ground and in-flight calibration

ASIC contract management, MCPs

DC/DC converter board (DCC)

Experiment ground support equipment

Gate encoder and driver board (GED)

High voltage board (HVC)

Ground calibration

Electronics box housing

Mechanical design

Ions in the Hermean Environment

Scientific Topic Energy

Major

Components

Exo-ionosphere density and composition

Ion component of the

Surface release

Solar wind sputtering

>1 eV

1- hundreds eV

H

Mg

O

+

K

+

+

, He

+ , others …

, Si

, K +

+

+

, Na

, Na

+

+

, O

, Ca

+

, others…

+

,

,

Ion component of the

Surface release heavy ion sputtering

1- hundreds eV

Mg

O

+

+

, Si

, K +

+ , Na + , Ca

, others…

Solar wind circulation and precipitation

Unperturbed

Solar wind

1-10 keV

Heavy ions circulation and precipitation

500 eV-10 keV Mainly Na + , O +

1 keV

Mainly H

Mainly H

+

+

+ ,

Observable region

Whole planet

Mainly dayside middle- latitude

Mainly night side middlelatitude

Dayside

Mainly middlelatitude

Specific MPO positions

Science Performance Requirements

 PICAM-related requirements from the Science Performance Report

Scientific Topic

Energy

Energy resolution

>10 eV

3. Exo-ionosphere composition

4. Exo-ionosphere spatial and energy distribution

5b. Plasma precipitation rate and distribution

7c.

Loss of planetary ions and distribution

>10 eV

E/E < 30%

> 10 eV

E/E <30%

> 10 eV

E/E < 30%

Mass resolution

~ 40

~ 40

~10

~ 40

FOV

Angular resolution



NA

< 60 o

5 o x180 o FOV in the orbit plane



< 25 o

Hemispheric

FOV



< 25 o

Time resolution

NA

Synergies with other BC instruments #

MMO/MPPE

MPO/PHEBUS

MPO/MAG

T < 3 mn MMO/MPPE

T< 1 mn

T< 5 mn

MMO/MGF

MPO/MAG

MMO/MPPE

MMO/MGF

MPO/MAG

MMO/MPPE

MMO/MGF

6

Mirror M1

Mirror M2

Detector

Ion Optics Principle

Annular input slit

Start gate

Toroidal analyzer

Ion Optics Layout

 Ions enter through an annular slit (1)

 After reflection on an ellipsoidal mirror (2) the ions pass through a gate (3), and the 90° polar angle distribution is folded to a narrow range.

 Through a slit (4) the ions enter a toroidal analyzer (5) for energy selection.

 Through exit slit (6) the ions enter the mass analysis section consisting of a plane mirror (7) whose geometry and potentials are set to optimize the resolution of the

TOF measurements, and finally hit the MCP (8).

2

1 – entrance window, 2 – primary mirror, 3 – gate, 4 – secondary slit,

5 – toroidal analyzer, 6 – exit slit, 7 – secondary mirror,

8 – MCP detector

Ion beams with entrance polar angles 0° (green), 45° (red), and 90° (blue)

Ion Optics Design Update

 Deflecting electrodes (6) allow for the correction of any misalignment between first mirror and electrostatic analyser

 Converging lens (4) improves polar angle resolution

 Retarding grid (5) - if activated - may improve the mass resolution

9

QM Detector

10

QM Gate, Mirror 1, 2, Partial Assy

11

QM Electronics

12

Anode Group Arrangement

 Grouping of anodes is necessary to reduce data volume

 Modes will be selected to support the various scientific objectives

No image (TOF only) Full image 4 groups 7 groups

Time-of-Flight Measurement

 Standard method: gate opens briefly and remains closed until the slowest ions in the passing packet have hit the MCP  low efficiency

 Random sequence (Hadamard code) at gate & deconvolution

 high efficiency

(~50% of the ions pass)

TOF spectrum before deconvolution after deconvolution

Power versus Performance

 Hadamard mode may be used below several 100 eV depending on code frequency

 For higher ion energies, single pulses will be used

22 000

20 000

PICAM Power (BOL) in Hadamard Mode

18 000

16 000

12.5 ns Code

25 ns Code

50 ns Code

14 000

12 000

10 000

8 000

6 000

4 000

2 000

0

100 1000

Energy [eV]

15

Operating Modes

 PICAM can simultaneously produce two data products:

 Primary science data:

 TOF spectra averaged over few or many pixels, for each out of typically 32 energy steps, typical sampling intervals 8 s to 64 s per data set

 Secondary (survey) data:

 Omnidirectional TOF spectra + full resolution images

(31 pixels) without mass discrimination, both at 32 energies, variable sampling intervals up to several minutes

 Common to both data sets are the settings for the energy sweep and the gating (single pulses or Hadamard codes)

Imaging Modes

 Without mass discrimination

 Three different image resolutions

 Primary telemetry with 8 or 32 s time resolution

 Secondary TM with full image but 64 s time resolution

8 s 32 s

17

Mass Discrimination and Combined Modes

 4 modes with mass discrimination, without imaging

 4 modes with combination of limited mass resolution and imaging

 Primary telemetry with 32 s time resolution, 16 or 32 E-steps

 Secondary TM with full mass spectrum integrated over FoV, but only 64s time resolution

18

Modes Selected as Baseline

 1 imaging mode: mainly used at Apoherm

 1 mass mode: mainly used at

Periherm

Orbit phase

A B C D p a p a p a p a

 1 combined mode: mainly used at Periherm

19

Pre-Calibration Examples

Angular distribution

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

9000

8000

7000

6000 pixel A pixel B pixel C pixel D pixel E

Numerical model, 1 keV ions pixel F

0°-10°

10°-20°

20°-30°

30°-40°

40°-50°

50°-60°

60°-70°

70°-80°

Energy resolution

E = 1 keV

ΔE

1/2

/E ~ 11%

ΔE

1/2

~ 110 eV

Numerical model, 1 keV ions

ΔE

1/2

/E ~ 4%

ΔE

1/2

~ 40 eV

E ~ 1.015 keV

QM measurement, ions N

2

+ , 1 keV QM measurement, ions N

2

+ , 1 keV

20

Pre-Calibration Examples

Simulation of the time of flight for masses 23 (Na) and 24 (Mg)

T ~ 2.81 µs

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

ΔT

1/10

~ 0.1 µs

T/ ΔT

1/10

~ 28

T ~ 5.72 µs T/

ΔT

1/10

~ 21

ΔT

1/10

~ 0.28 µs

Measured TOF with QM, ions N

2

+ , 300 eV

Resolution in this case was driven by gate pulse duration, not by geometry

21

Pre-Calibration Examples

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

ΔT

1/10

~ 0.1 µs

T ~ 2.81 µs

T/ ΔT

1/10

~ 28

T ~ 3.15 µs

T/ ΔT

1/10

~ 39

ΔT

1/10

~ 0.08

µs

 Mass resolution may exceed values of the numerical model, provided that gate pulse duration is properly set

Measured TOF with QM, ions N + and N

2

+ , 1000 eV

22

QM Status

 QM has been successfully vibrated and shock tested

 Functional testing and calibration has started

 Angular, energy, and mass resolution have been characterised

 Further future improvement of angular and mass resolution by fine-tuning internal voltages is expected

 Calibration will be resumed as soon as possible after the ongoing thermal vacuum test, for as long as possible

 Open work includes implementation of compression for PICAM data in the SCU

 Thermal vacuum test is ongoing

 Challenging set-up to achieve wide temperature range

(-90°...+240°C) for outer parts in a single facility

 Test is split into cruise phase and Mercury orbit qualification

23

TVAC Sequence

24

QM in TV Chamber

25

QM in Shock Test

26

QM in Vibration Test

27

TIMPO Issues

 Latch-up and SEU susceptibility of TIMPO ASIC detected during heavy-ion tests in October 2012

 Mainly in analogue part due to wrong choice of decoupling capacitors

 Also some sensitivity in digital part

 New ASIC will be developed, availability not earlier than Dec 2013

 Use of existing ASIC studied as an alternative, but it will suffer from very frequent latch-ups

 Additional electronic protection circuit mandatory for both versions

 Circuit requires new detector electronics layout and new layout of

DPU

 Re-design of ASIC already completed

 Funding of delta qualification testing is under negotiation

28

Heavy Ion Test Summary

29

FM Status

 Some FM components already delivered

 Electronics not affected by TIMPO changes is under manufacture

 Protection electronics development for the TIMPO and the delta qualification testing of the TIMPO drive the FM schedule

 QM has to be temporarily delivered to system as FM substitute

30

Summary

 The QM is under environmental testing and calibration

 Key performance parameters have been verified, but calibration is not yet complete and further tuning of the instrument is advisable

 Major current issue is the schedule and funding of the front-end

ASIC modification and related work

 QM has to be delivered temporarily as FM substitute

 FM with modified ASIC and additional protection electronics will not be ready before late summer 2014

31

Download