Direct Strength Prediction of Cold-Formed Steel Beam-Columns Y. Shifferaw, B.W. Schafer Research Progress Report to MBMA February 2012 Origins of a different approach • Steel beam-column design (hot-rolled and cold-formed) traditionally follows an interaction equation approach. • The origins of which can be traced back to the much beloved engineering solution to stress in a beam: Pr + M r y = f A I Pr Mr + £1 Afy (I / c) fy Pr M r + £1 Py M y Origins of a different approach (cont.) • First yield (for section symmetric about axis of bending) follows this linear interaction: Pr + M r £1 Py M y but, basically nothing else! • In CFS design it is presumed that first yield may be replaced by nominal capacity: Pr M r CFS recall that these capacities are determined from + £ 1 For relatively complex calculations, that we may summarize as.. Pn M n Pr Mr + £1 Pn = f (Py , Pcr , Pcrd , Pcre ) M n = g(M y , M cr , M crd , M cre ) Py and My might behave, but what about all these “cr”’s, local, distortional and global buckling?? Traditional CFS interaction approach (locally slender example) Py Pn Pcrl Mn My Mcrl Let’s fire up my favorite tool and explore what stability does under the more complex demands of a beam column CUFSM Approx. 8 ZS 225 x 065 (55ksi) Axial only Stability under axial only Restrained bending only Stability under bending only Reference stress 0.25Py,0.75My 0.25Py Applied as reference 0.75My loads 1/3 P/M ratio… Comparing stability solutions P ref Py 0.25Py 0.25P y 0 M XXref 0 0.75My 0.75M y My M ZZref 0 0 0 0 l 0.19 0.81 0.60 1.02 ld 0.84 0.43 0.69 0.30 l e (100 in.) 0.27 0.50 0.51 0.58 if linear actual Stability does not follow the linear interaction, can be better, worse or same… P,Mxx,Mzz all at the same time! +0.25MZZy P ref Py 0.25P y 0.25P y 0.25P y 0 M XXref 0 0.75M y 0.75M y 0.75M y My M ZZref 0 0 +0.25My(ZZ) -0.25My(ZZ) 0 l 0.19 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.02 -0.25MZZy ld 0.84 0.69 0.61 0.79 0.30 l e (100 in.) 0.27 0.51 0.47 0.56 0.58 Origins of a different approach (cont.) • Conclusion from this little FSM study is that elastic buckling is dependent on cross-section and on applied demands (P, Mx, Mz) in a nonlinear fashion. • Cross-section stability analysis which picks up this dependency is available. • Standard interaction approach is limited and can not take advantage of situations when stability is favorable, instead always assumes a worst case linear reduction… Traditional CFS interaction approach (locally slender example) Revisited Py Pn Pcrl Mn My Mcrl CFS interaction (locally slender example) unsymmetric bending axis.. Py Pn Pcrl Mn My Mcrl CFS interaction (locally slender example) unsymmetric bending axis.. Py Pn Pcrl Mn My Mcrl How to generalize formulation to take advantage of this, is the research! Research • Proposal goes back to 2008, solicited from AISI • 2011 MBMA partnered with AISI to help fund the first year of the work • Research is now underway • Long term potential is greater than CFS, but with DSM in AISI-S100 it is the logical starting place Year 1 Su Fa 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 6. Nonlinear FEA and Parametric studies for Strength and Sensitivities a. Examine members in each of the limit states, local, distortional, global, b.-e. Examine members with large neutral axis shift, modal interactions, other issues f. Provide strength predictions for a wider class of members 7. Phase 2 Experimental Testing to Expand Validation Base a. Develop phase 2 testing matrix (expand database, explore specific issues) b.,c. Perform testing, condensation of data, and test report 8. Development of design provisions and outreach a.-d. Finalize DSM expressions and provide reliability f. Write provisions in specification language with commentary, g.,h. Design examples and industry specific benefit to strength guidance Sp Year 2 Su Fa Sp Year 3 Su Fa Sp Current Progress Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Year 2-3 work (if funded) 6. Nonlinear FEA and Parametric studies for Strength and Sensitivities a. Examine members in each of the limit states, local, distortional, global, b.-e. Examine members with large neutral axis shift, modal interactions, other issues f. Provide strength predictions for a wider class of members 7. Phase 2 Experimental Testing to Expand Validation Base a. Develop phase 2 testing matrix (expand database, explore specific issues) b.,c. Perform testing, condensation of data, and test report 8. Development of design provisions and outreach a.-d. Finalize DSM expressions and provide reliability f. Write provisions in specification language with commentary, g.,h. Design examples and industry specific benefit to strength guidance Current Progress Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Industry assistance • ADTEK (Jeffrey Klaiman), • NUCON1 (Rick Haws, Anwar Merchant & Bao Pham), • MESCO (Harley Davidson), • BUTLER (Al Harrold and Frederico Bueno) • ALPINE (Tamil Samiappan and Bill Babich). and • MBMA (Lee Shoemaker) • AISI (Jay Larson) 1. R.I.P. Selecting industry relevant beam-columns Truss Selecting industry relevant beam-columns CFS Framing Model buildings from • Devco (CFS-NEES) • Adtek • Nucon CFS-NEES building Selecting industry relevant beam-columns Metal building Focus on Secondary (CFS) members Like eave strut.. and of course purlins and girts Enjoying learning integrated building design Identifying key beam-columns… 0.25 M only P+M 0.68 0.25 0.68 0.36 0.14 0.94 0.36 0.14 Combined axial and bending stress index d=1.079” t=0.068” Continuous Eave strut design example LC30=1.0D+0.750L+0.750WPA2 P=( f(0.750WPA2)) Current Progress Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Preliminary formulation Demands set the Pr/Mr ratio of interest, which is the slope of this line! Py Pn Pcrl by bn bcrl Mn My Mcrl Preliminary formulation (2) For local buckling of a stub section, P or M simply replaced by b! y Automating CUFSM (P+Mx) Automating CUFSM (P+Mz) Current Progress Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Selecting industry relevant beam-columns CFS Framing Model buildings from • Devco (CFS-NEES) • Adtek • Nucon CFS-NEES building Focusing on most efficient sections Pn/A All CFS framing members Most efficient Mn/A Focus is here in the limited year one work, expansion to more complicated cases in years 2 and 3 if funded Color indicates an efficient section Axial dist Bending yield Axial local Bending yield Axial dist Bending local Axial local Bending dist. Distortional only! Local only! Selection based on predicted limit states Modeling • Nonlinear shell FE models of imperfect CFS member • End displacements over desired P, Mx, My • Boundary conditions and lengths to isolate local and distortional buckling • Preliminary models completed with success P-Mmajor, distortional, C section P-Mminor, distortional, C section Potential! Local DSM vs minor axis strength bounds for C DSM vs Strength Bounds-362Cloc,minor 1 FE-Loc DSM anchor pts 0.9 Y ield Loc cr 0.8 DSM proposed Interaction 0.7 P/P y 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 Mz /Mz,y 0.5 1 1.5 Current Progress Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Related Recent Testing (Setup) Related Recent Testing (Demands) P, Δ H 2 He 2 He H, δ HL 4 L He 2 H 2 Loading Idealization Axial Load Moment (drawn on tension side) Shear Force Torsion Related Recent Testing (Results) 30 OO GO OG GG OB or BO BB P axial load (kip) 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 H horizontal load (kip) 2 2.5 Testing • Plan is for paired specimens to remove global modes and focus on local and distortional modes • End fixtures to be pinned about axis of bending to provide controlled boundary conditions • Will spread out horizontal load to create constant moment region (as opposed to single point load) • Will create end and load fixtures that can be oriented at an angle so that biaxial bending + compression explored on the members • Bracing/sheathing will be used to remove distortional buckling for local buckling tests • Focused on lipped channels at this stage as providing sufficient initial exploration of the P+M space, a topic for discussion though.. • Drawings complete, end fixtures under fabrication in the coming weeks – larger testing rig already in place Wrapup Year 1 Su Fa Sp %comp 1. Industry survey on beam-columns in applications a. Survey industry (metal buildings, racks, metal studs, truss, etc.) b. Write a brief “summary of the practice” document 100% 90% 2. Development of enabling tools for preliminary studies a. Develop extensions to elastic stability analysis via finite strip analysis (CUFSM) b. Develop a preliminary, explicit, DSM beam-column formulation c. Automate AISI-S100-07 traditional beam-column strength prediction 55% 75% 0% 3. Preliminary studies for identifying targeted CFS beam-columns a. Identify ~ 5 industry standard and 5 common/archteypical CFS beam-columns b.,c. Use task 2 tools to find regions of predicted beneficial strength gain 50% 0% 4. Development and shakedown of testing program a. Develop nonlinear FEA collapse models of members to be studied b.,c. Detail and acquire testing fixtures, perform shakedown testing 25% 30% 5. Phase 1 Experimental Examination of targeted CFS Beam-Columns a. Develop testing matrix (approximately 30 total tests) b.-d. Perform tests to collapse, post-process, write test report e. Examine comparison to predictions 15% 0% 0% Modestly behind, but good progress being made. Test results by the summer; hopeful that funding for years 2 and 3 can be secured.