Jim Holliman, M.D., F.A.C.E.P.
Professor of Military and Emergency Medicine
Uniformed Services University
Clinical Professor of Emergency Medicine
George Washington University
Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Refers to mechanisms or programs designed to review patient care in the emergency department (E.D.) for :
ƒ
Identification of errors or deficiencies in patient care
ƒ
Training E.D. staff to avoid errors and correct deficiencies
ƒ
Overall improvement of quality of care offered
Also termed "Continuous Quality Improvement"
(CQI) to emphasize the lack of "guarantee" in the process & need for ongoing avtivity
One or more of these may be useful and applicable for any E.D. :
ƒ
Daily review of some or all of the prior day's E.D. patient care records (charts)
ƒ
Review and reports on specific "directed" types of cases or subjects
ƒ
Review and reports on all types of "major" events
(such as deaths in the E.D.)
ƒ
Mechanisms for presentation of Q/A reports to
E.D. staff for education
ƒ
Mechanisms to contact patients and families regarding potential problems or complaints
Daily audit of a random sample of prior day's charts
Weekly or monthly audit of sampled charts
Audit of all charts for a specified type of case for a defined period of time
Audit of all charts for specified individual members of the E.D. staff
Weekly or monthly meetings of staff designated as Q/A leaders or committee
Regular verbal & written reports for education of E.D. staff
Must have input from all the E.D. staff
"Due process" must be assured (for protection of the staff's rights)
It must be emphasized that the major goal of the Q/A system is improving patient care and educating the staff (not penalizing or criticizing the staff)
Should be an "open" process even though confidentiality of patient's medical information must be assured
Information from chart audits must be sent to E.D. leaders and administrators
Information from chart audits regarding deficiencies must be communicated directly back to the E.D. staff
Followup audits of identified deficiencies must be done to demonstrate correction or improvement
Formal wriiten records of audits must be maintained in case future additional review is needed
Missing documentation
ƒ
Mode of arrival
ƒ
Vital signs
ƒ
Allergies
ƒ
History components
ƒ
Exam components
ƒ
Lab results
ƒ
X-ray findings
ƒ
Consultations
ƒ
Disposition
ƒ
Follow-up instructions
Missed tetanus immunizations
Followup not listed for newly diagnosed hypertension
Abnormal exam, lab,
EKG, or X-ray results not addressed
Verification of attending supervision of resident and student cases
Chart Audit Items Which May Require
Phone Notification of the Patient
Missed need for tetanus immunization
Missed fracture or dislocation on X-ray
Missed pneumonia or tumor on X-ray
Misinterpreted EKG
Abnormal lab value not addressed in original visit
Positive blood or urine culture result
Consultant or referral physician wants to have earlier than originally scheduled follow-up
Situations Requiring "Automatic"
Q/A Review and Report
Death of patient in the E.D.
Major injury to patient occuring in the E.D.
Assault or major injury to E.D. staff
Event requiring institutional "incident report"
Complaint of major error by patient or family
Complaint of major error by consultant or referral physician
Potential life-threatening discrepancy noted on chart audit
These should be compared for each E.D physician and group of E.D. personnel :
ƒ
Complaints registered by patients or families
ƒ
Patients leaving "against medical advice"
ƒ
Patients leaving prior to evaluation
ƒ
Unscheduled rechecks
ƒ
Wound complications (such as infections)
ƒ
Revisit for same problem within 7 days
ƒ
Mean time durations for evaluation, admission, or discharge
ƒ
Caseloads per unit time
Followup for positive cultures reported by the hospital microbiology lab :
ƒ
Need to notify referral physician promptly
ƒ
May also need to notify patient directly
If E.D. EKG "overreading" is done by cardiology, need to notify patient directly to come back to E.D. if ischemia was missed
If major X-ray finding missed, need to notify patient directly or assure that referral physician notified and will follow up
Best if daily chart Q/A audits are done by physician not assigned that day to clinical duty
Probably best if specific staff designated as Q/A reviewers for better consistency
Department leaders and administrators need to be directly involved
Each type of department personnel must have input and specific Q/A system duties
Data may be accumulated by non-clinical personnel, but only personnel with clinical experience should be responsible for review & interpretation