Differential Diagnosis of Lower Quarter Conditions Marcie Swift, PT, PhD, FAAOMPT Assistant Professor in Physical Therapy Rockhurst University What will I take away? • New students: Introduce concepts related to differential diagnosis through deliberate practice. • Seasoned students: Supplement and reinforce importance of differential diagnosis through deliberate practice. Ultimately, I hope to… Provide you with some tools to practice confidently in a direct-access setting! Agenda • Direct Access • Body Chart – Introduction to Julie • Directed Inquiry – Finish SE • Objective Exam Tests and Measures – Selected Tests and Measures • Triage Direct Access • Unrestricted: 18 states AK, AZ, CO, HI, ID, IA, KY, MD, MA, MT, NE, NV, ND, OR, SD, UT, VT, WV • Restricted: 1 state MI (evaluation only) • Provisions: 31 states +District of Columbia AL, AR, CA, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, LA, ME, MN, MS, MO, OK, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WI, WY – APTA--Advocacy http://www.apta.org/StateIssues/DirectAccess/ – Direct access by state https://www.apta.org/uploadedFiles/APTAorg/Advocacy/State/Issues/D irect_Access/DirectAccessbyState.pdf Missouri: Provisions • Missouri Revised Statutes, Chapter 334 (Physicians and Surgeons--Therapists--Athletic Trainers--Health Care), Section 334.506 – PTs must have RX to begin new course of treatment BUT – PTs can provide education, fitness/wellness programs, and screening/consultation services without a RX and – PTs can evaluate and treat a patient previously diagnosed by “an approved health care provider.” Kansas: Provisions • May evaluate and initiate treatment on a patient without a referral. • If providing treatment without a referral and patient is not progressing toward documented treatment goals within 10 visits or 15 business days from the initial treatment visit following the initial evaluation visit, the PT shall obtain a referral from an appropriate licensed health care practitioner. Bottom Line • A PT must “refer to an approved health care provider any patient whose medical condition at the time of examination or treatment is determined to be beyond the scope of practice of physical therapy” and • “No person licensed to practice, or applicant for licensure, as a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant shall make a medical diagnosis.” Disorder Recognition Body Chart Complete SE OE Treatment Plan • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 • Modify Hypotheses • Further Hypotheses Modification • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) “Science” “Practice” PowerPoint Presentation has flow of information Link to Google Doc for Case Study Application https://docs.google.com/document/d/162T5E0Yv5_NG QfJUJpOHz2e0nBVJf_9L5FokKlzoC1M/edit?usp=sharing Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Julie ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ P2:sharp, constant, variable ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ P1: ache, constant, variable; at its worst: 8/10 ✓ P1 = / ≠ P2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Go to the case! https://docs.google.com/docum ent/d/1yAotNgx4OLszKQkfAeCFb AYqw5aJgAlrmaox71BchUE/edit? usp=sharing Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Remember to ask questions that will not only rule in your hypothesis (provisional diagnosis) but rule out other diagnoses. This process is known as differential diagnosis. Possible Non-Musculoskeletal Sites Capable of Referring Pain to the Low Back/ Pelvis-SI region • liver, gallbladder, stomach (lower thoracic referral as well as shoulder area) • kidney/ureter/bladder/urethra • pancreas • abdominal aorta (abdominal aortic aneurysm) • prostate gland • uterus/ovaries • testes • small intestine/colon Moore, p. 243, 305; Goodman, p. 148-151, 156, 175-6, D’Ambrosia, p. 300-1, Boissonnault, p 68 Visceral Pain Referral Patterns (Boissonnault, 2011, pp. 182–192) Visceral Pain Referral Patterns (Boissonnault, 2011) Systemic Signs and Symptoms (Red Flags) Requiring Referral to a Physician • bloody diarrhea, light stools, melena • fecal incontinence or urinary incontinence • dark or foul-smelling urine • pain that is boring/stabbing, cutting/knifelike, or gnawing/burning • constant pain or pain unchanged by movement/position • dysphagia, odynophagia • early satiety • fever, chills • jaundice • positive McBurney’s point • • • • • • • • • • • • migratory arthralgias night pain or night sweats skin lesions sudden weight loss or gain vomiting, nausea Kehr’s sign (if unsupported by other glenohumeral signs &/or symptoms) decreased pulses intermittent claudication fatigue malaise progressive sensory or motor loss (especially “saddle” anesthesia) change in mentation (Goodman, p. 142, 153, 179) Note to the Wise: Any “red flag” can become a “yellow flag” on further questioning; conversely, a “yellow flag” can convert to a “red flag” over time. Directed Inquiry: Review of Systems 9 Great Questions • • • • • Fatigue Malaise Weakness Fever/chills/sweats Weight change • Nausea / vomiting • Dizziness / lightheadedness • Paresthesia / numbness • Change in cognition -General Health Component of Review of Systems Boissonnault, 2011, Ch 9, p 122 Directed Inquiry: All parts of SE! • Environmental Factors MS • Participation Factors ------ Rule – Aggravating and Easing Factors Out Non MS – 24 hour • History – Current Condition (current and past) – Medical History Non MS -----• Review of Systems MS Rule In Back to the Case!! https://docs.google.com/document/d /162T5E0Yv5_NGQfJUJpOHz2e0nBVJf _9L5FokKlzoC1M/edit?usp=sharing Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Remember to perform tests and/or measures that will not only your hypothesis (provisional diagnosis) but other diagnoses. This process is known as differential diagnosis. Directed selection of Tests and Measures **Assumption: the clinician is performing a Lower Quarter OE sequence so we will highlight non-musculoskeletal and musculoskeletal tests and measures the clinician should consider to perform depending on their clinical reasoning. Examination: Sitting Non-musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Posture • Observation/Inspection Musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Observation/Inspection • Functional Test (squat, gait, balance) • LS ROM • Balance • Neurological – S1 myotome – Heel/Toe Walking – Balance (Boissonnault, 2011, Ch 13) Examination: Sitting Non-musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Percussion of kidneys (Boissonnault, 2011, Ch 13) Musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Posture/Observation • Neurological Testing – Segmental Neuro Exam – Neurodynamic Testing (Slump) Examination: Supine Non-musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Abdominal Tests – – – – – – Observation Auscultation Percussion Palpation Sensory Testing Superficial Abdominal Reflex • Lymph Node Palpation (NAVeL) • Arterial Pulses of Lower Extremities Musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Muscle strength and length tests • Implicate/ Clear joints above and below – Pelvis-SIJ, Thoracic Spine – Hip, Knee, Ankle, Feet/Toes • Neurological Testing – Segmental (myotomes, dermatomes, reflexes) – Central (Babinski, Clonus) – Neurodynamic Testing (SLR, PNF) (Boissonnault, 2011, Ch 13; Magee, p.405) Examination: Prone Non-musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • None Musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Muscle strength and length tests • Implicate/ Clear joints above and below – Pelvis-SIJ, Thoracic Spine – Hip, Knee, Ankle, Feet/Toes • Neurological Testing – Segmental – PKB • Palpation • Prone Stability Test • Repeated Extension in lying Examination: Sidelying Non-musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • None Musculoskeletal Tests and Measures • Muscle strength and length tests • Implicate/ Clear joints above and below – Pelvis-SIJ • Palpation (PPIVMs) • Anterior Stability Test Back to the Case!! https://docs.google.com/document/d /162T5E0Yv5_NGQfJUJpOHz2e0nBVJf _9L5FokKlzoC1M/edit?usp=sharing In addition to Non-MS tests… Consider the following MS tests and measures MS diagnosis for differential -----• Neurological Testing Non MS – Central Neurological Exam – Segmental Neurological Exam – SLR Rule Out • Implicate/ Clear Tests for joints above and Non MS below Rule In SI, Hip – Lumbar Spine, Pelvis/ • Stability Testing -----MS Back to the Case!! https://docs.google.com/document/d /162T5E0Yv5_NGQfJUJpOHz2e0nBVJf _9L5FokKlzoC1M/edit?usp=sharing Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • Modify Hypotheses OE • Further Hypotheses Modification Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Disorder Recognition Body Chart • Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesis 4 Complete SE • What additional questions will you ask to Rule IN/ OUT?? OE • What tests and measures will you perform to rule IN/ OUT?? Treatment Plan • Assess Response to Treatment and/ or TRIAGE (Maitland, Hengeveld, Banks, & English, 2011) Triage Categories • Serious: medical referral trumps PT Intervention – Urgent: life- or limb-threatening condition; escort client to emergency room – Immediate: serious condition requiring medical referral within 1-2 days; “urgent care clinic” referral – Delayed: condition should be evaluated within a week or two by primary care physician • Minimal: treat presenting complaint but also refer • Expectant: unable to benefit from PT Intevention Back to the Case!! https://docs.google.com/document/d /162T5E0Yv5_NGQfJUJpOHz2e0nBVJf _9L5FokKlzoC1M/edit?usp=sharing Errors in Clinical Reasoning • Over-emphasis on findings which support an existing hypothesis • Ignoring findings that do not support an existing hypothesis • Obtaining redundant information • Misinterpretation • Translation errors – The clinician accepts the terminology used by the patient as the diagnosis Reminder: If what you think is a musculoskeletal condition does not respond to treatment in a reasonable amount of time, consider a non-musculoskeletal etiology and refer or return to the primary care manager. References • • • • • • • • • • Bates B (1991). A Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking, 5th ed. JB Lippincott Company. Chapter 11. Boissonnault WG (2011). Primary Care for the Physical Therapist: Examination and Triage (2nd ed). Saunders Elsevier. Chapter 13 (pp 182-192). D’Ambrosia RD (1977). Musculoskeletal Disorders: Regional Examination and Differential Diagnosis, Chapter 7. Goodman CC, Snyder TEK (1990). Differential Diagnoses in Physical Therapy: Musculoskeletal and Systemic Conditions, Chapters 6, 7. Magee DJ (1997). Orthopedic Physical Assessment, 3rd ed. Chap 9. Maitland, GD, Hengeveld, E, Banks, K, & English, K (2011). Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation Text and Evolve eBooks Package, 7e (7th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Moore KL, Dalley AF (1999). Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 4th ed. Chapter 2. Oluwole O, Akinyemi R, Owolabi LF (2005). Superficial Abdominal Reflex Is Not Sensitive to Direction of the Moving Stimulus. African Journal of Neurological Sciences, 24(1), letters. http://medicine.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/abdomen.htm Critical findings on abdominal plain films: http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/nonintestinal-xray?src=mp&spon=17&uac=126254DT