CHAPTER 8 DYNAMIC P OWERP OINT™ S LIDES BY S OLINA L INDAHL Growth, Capital Accumulation, and the Economics of Ideas: Catching Up vs. the Cutting Edge CHAPTER OUTLINE The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth The Solow Model- Details and Further Lessons (Optional Section) Growing on the Cutting Edge: the Economics of Ideas The Future of Economic Growth For applications, click here To Try it! questions To Video Food for Thought…. Some good blogs and other sites to get the juices flowing: Introduction In 2010 China: GDP per capita grew by 10% U.S: GDP per capita grew by 2.2 % United States has never grown as fast as the Chinese economy is growing today. Why is China growing more rapidly than the U.S.? Is there something wrong with the U.S. economy? BACK TO Introduction There are two types of growth Catch-up growth takes advantage of ideas, technologies, or methods of management already in existence focuses on capital accumulation Cutting-edge growth developing new ideas focuses on developing new technology for resources. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Robert Solow (Nobel Prize Laureate) Total Output, Y, of an economy depends on: Physical capital: K Human capital: education x Labor = eL Ideas: A This can be expressed as the following “production function”: Y F(A,K, eL) BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth For now, ignore changes in ideas, education, and labor so that A, e, and L are constant. The production function becomes: Y F(K) If L is constant, then increases in K mean more capital per worker MPK: marginal product of capital : The additional output resulting from using an additional unit of capital. MPK diminishes the more capital is added. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth BACK TO Growth in China and United States The “iron logic of diminishing returns” largely explains why… The Chinese economy is able to grow so rapidly. It turned toward markets which increased incentives. The capital stock was low. The MPK was high. China will not be able to achieve these high growth rates indefinitely. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Why Bombing a Country Can Raise Its Growth Rate: Much of the capital stock was destroyed during WWII- so MPK was high. After the war, Germany and Japan had much higher growth rates than the U.S. as they “caught-up.” BACK TO Try it! The adoption of computers in the workplace has lead to a(n) a) increase in the supply of labor because people are needed to operate the computers. b) increase in labor productivity because computers are a capital good. c) decrease in labor productivity because computers are a capital good. d) decrease in human capital because To next Try it! computers are physical capital. SEE THE INVISIBLE HAND The first $500 spent on a computer for each of these kids yields a lot. The second $500? Not as big an increase. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Capital Growth Equals Investment minus Depreciation Capital is “output that is saved and invested.” Let g be the fraction of output that is invested in new capital. The next figure shows how output is divided between consumption and investment when g = 0.3. (30% of additional output is saved and put into new capital) BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Output, Y Capital Growth Equals Investment Minus Depreciation 20 When K = 100, Output = 10 Y K 15 10 Consumption = (1- 0.3) x 10 = 7 5 Investment = 0.3∙Y 3 2 0 Investment = (0.3) x 10 = 3 Capital, K 0 100 200 300 400 BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Capital Growth Equals Investment minus Depreciation (cont.). Depreciation: amount of capital that wears out each period Let d be the fraction of capital that wears out each period. This is called the depreciation rate so that: depreciati on δ K BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Capital Depreciation Depends on the Amount of Capital Depreciation Depreciation = 0.02∙K 6 4 Slope 42 200 100 2 0 Capital, K 0 100 200 300 400 BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Capital Alone Cannot be the Key to Economic Growth. Why? As capital increases, depreciation increases at a constant rate of d output increases at a diminishing rate. Because investment is a constant fraction of output, at some point depreciation will equal investment. The capital stock will stop growing & output slows. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Capital Increases or Decreases Until Investment = Depreciation GDP, Y Depreciation = 0.02∙K 8 At K = 400, Inv. < Dep. → ↓ K 6 Investment = 0.3∙Y 4.5 4 Result: equilibrium at K = 225, Y = 4.5 investment = depreciation =4.5 At K = 100, Inv. > Dep. →↑K 3 2 0 0 100 200 225 300 400 Capital, K BACK TO Capital Adjusts Until Investment = Depreciation Check the Math • At K = 100, Y =√100 = 10 • Depreciation = 0.02∙100 = 2 • Investment = 0.3x10 = 3 • Investment > Depreciation Result: K and Y grow. Check the Math • At K = 225, Y =√225 =15 • Depreciation = 0.02x225 = 4.5 • Investment = 0.3x15 = 4.5 • Investment = Depreciation Check the Math Result: 1. Investment = Depreciation • At K = 400, Y =√400 = 20 • Depreciation = 0.02x400 = 8 2. K and Y are constant. • Investment = 0.3x20 = 6 • Investment < Depreciation This is steady state. Result: K and Y decrease. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth The logic of diminishing returns means that eventually capital and output will cease growing. Therefore, other factors must be responsible for long run economic growth. Consider: Human capital: knowledge, skills, experience Technological knowledge: better ideas BACK TO Human Capital Investment Pays Off BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Better Ideas Drive Long Run Economic Growth Human Capital Like capital, it is subject to diminishing returns and it depreciates. Logic of diminishing returns also applies to human capital. Conclusion: Human capital also cannot alone drive long-run economic growth. (What about technological knowledge?) BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Better Ideas Drive Long Run Economic Growth Technological knowledge: Is a way of getting more output from the same input (an increase in productivity). We represent this in our model by letting A stand for ideas that increase productivity. Now the production function is: YA K BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth Increasing technology (even while holding K constant) creates a higher growth rate. BACK TO The Solow Model and Catch-Up Growth An Increase in A Increases Output Holding K Constant Conclusion: Technological knowledge / better ideas are the key to long run economic growth. Solow estimated that better ideas are responsible for ¾ of our increased standard of living. BACK TO Click below for one of the authors’ TED talks….The "dismal science" truly shines in this optimistic talk, as economist Alex Tabarrok argues free trade and globalization are shaping our once-divided world into a community of ideasharing more healthy, happy and prosperous than anyone's predictions. (14:37 minutes) SEE THE INVISIBLE HAND Roman aquaducts: ushering in an era of economic growth… Aquaducts were sophisticated feats of engineering that enabled population and industry to thrive. -Roman Aquaduct in Segovia, Spain, built in 2nd century A.D./C.E. The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons What we know so far: If Investment > Depreciation → K and Y grow. If Investment < Depreciation → K and Y fall. If Investment = Depreciation → K and Y are constant. Two important conclusions: 1. Steady state equilibrium occurs when investment equals depreciation. 2. When K is in steady state equilibrium, Y is in steady state equilibrium. BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons When K is in steady state equilibrium, Y is in steady state equilibrium. Output, Y Depreciation = 0.02∙K 8 6 4.5 4 Investment = 0.3∙Y 3 The Steady State K is found where 2 Investment = Depreciation 0 Capital, K 0 100 200 225 300 400 BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons When K is in steady state equilibrium, Y is in steady state equilibrium. Output, Y 20 Y K Steady state output 15 Depreciation = 0.02∙K 10 Investment 0.3 K 5 Steady state capital stock 0 100 200 225 300 400 Capital, K BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons The Solow Model and an Increase in the Investment Rate What happens when g, (the fraction of output that is saved and invested) increases? ↑gK↑Y Conclusion: an increase in the investment rate increases a country’s steady state level of GDP. Countries with higher rates of investment will be wealthier. BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons GDP per Capita is Higher in Countries with Higher Investment Rates BACK TO An Increase in the Investment Rate Increases Steady State Output Output, Y Y K 20 15 Depreciation = 0.02∙K 10 Inv. .4 K 5 Inv. 0.3 K Capital, K 0 100 200 225 300 400 BACK TO Try it! In the Solow model, if the depreciation rate increases, what happens to the steady state capital level and output level? a) b) c) d) they both increase they both decrease The steady state capital stock will increase and the output will decrease. The steady state capital stock will decrease and the output will increase. To next Try it! The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons Note: An increase in the investment rate = ↑ steady state level of output. As the economy moves from the lower to the higher steady state output = ↑ growth rate of output. This higher growth rate is temporary. Conclusion: ↑ investment rate = ↑ steady state level of output but not its long-run growth rate. BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons The Case of South Korea In 1950, South Korea was poorer than Nigeria. 1950s: the investment rate was < 10%. 1970s: Investment rate more than doubled. 1990s: Investment rate increased to over 35%. South Korea’s GDP increased rapidly. As GDP reached Western levels, the growth rate has slowed… BACK TO SEE THE INVISIBLE HAND What economic growth looks like at night The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons The Solow Model and Conditional Convergence Conditional Convergence: Among countries with similar steady state levels of output, poorer countries tend to grow faster than richer countries, and so converge in income. The Solow model predicts that a country will grow faster the farther its capital stock is below its steady state value. Solow predicts conditional convergence. BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons The poorer the OECD country in 1960, the faster its growth. BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons Solow and the Economics of Ideas in one diagram New ideas results in long run economic growth. Let’s see how this works: We begin at steady state equilibrium. New ideas → ↑A → ↑Output at every level of K ↑ Output → ↑Investment → Investment > Depreciation →↑ K→ ↑ Output (movement along new production function). As ideas continue to grow, output continues to grow. BACK TO Solow and the Economics of Ideas in One Diagram Output, Y Effect of ↑A from 1 to 1.5 Y 1.5 K c 33.7 Output ↑ b Better Ideas 15 Y 1 K a Depreciation = 0.02∙K Investment 0.3(1.5) K Investment 0.3(1) K 225 Old steady state capital stock 506 New steady state capital stock Capital, K BACK TO The Solow Model – Details and Further Lessons The Big Question: What Determines High Investment Rates? Incentives which include: Low real interest rates Low marginal tax rates Institutions which include: Honest government Secure property rights Effective financial intermediaries (banks) BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas The Economics of Ideas 1. Ideas for increasing output are primarily researched, developed, and implemented by profit-seeking firms. 2. Spillovers mean that ideas are underprovided. 3. Government has a role in improving the production of ideas. 4. The larger the market, the greater the incentive to research and develop new ideas. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas 1. Research and development is investment for profit. Keys to increasing technological knowledge: Incentives Institutions that encourage investment in physical and human capital and R&D. 70% of scientists and engineers in the U.S. work for private firms. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas 1. Research and development is investment for profit (continued) All kinds of people come up with new ideas. Business culture and institutions are also important. Appreciation of entrepreneurs is a relatively recent phenomenon. Institutions that are especially important: Commercial settings that help innovators to connect with capitalists Intellectual property rights A high-quality education system BACK TO SEE THE INVISIBLE HAND John Kay, “destroyer of jobs.” John Kay (1704-1780) invented the “flying shuttle” used in cotton weaving, the single most important invention launching the industrial revolution. Kay was rewarded for his efforts by having his house destroyed by “machine breakers,” afraid of job loss. He died a poor man. Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas Institutions that increase R & D A commercial setting that helps innovators connect with capitalists. Ideas without financial backers are dead. The U.S. is good at connecting innovators with businessmen and venture capitalists. American culture supports entrepreneurs. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas Intellectual property rights New processes, products, and methods can be copied by competitors. World’s first MP3 player was the Eiger Labs “MPMan” introduced in 1998. Eiger Labs lost out to competition. Patents grant temporary monopoly. But they can slow down the spread of technology. BACK TO SEE THE INVISIBLE HAND Profits provide incentive to invest in R&D: Property rights, honest government, political stability, a dependable legal system, and competitive open markets create profit and so help drive the generation of technological knowledge. “The patent system…added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius” -Abraham Lincoln, 1859 (only U.S. President to have been granted a patent) Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas A high-quality education system Important at all levels of education. Creates necessary talent. Universities generate basic and applied research. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas 2. Spillovers, and why there aren’t enough good ideas Ideas are non-rivalrous. Ideas can be used simultaneously. • Use of an idea by one individual does mean less of the idea available to someone else. The spillover (or “diffusion”) of new ideas generates widespread economic growth. Implication: Spillovers mean that the generator of the idea doesn’t get all of the benefits. Result? Too few ideas are produced. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas Optimal social investment in R&D: MSB = MSC (Marginal Social Benefit = Marginal Social Cost) Optimal private investment: MPB = MPC (Marginal Private Benefit = Marginal Private Cost) With spillover benefits: MSB = MPB + spillovers and MSC = MPC Conclusion: Optimal Private Investment in R&D < Optimal Social Investment in R&D Implication: Spillovers result in too little investment in research and development. BACK TO Spillovers Mean Too Little Investment in Research and Development $ Spillover benefits IP = optimal private investment in R&D IS =optimal social investment in R&D MPB = MPC MSB = MSC MPC = MSC MSB Assumes there are no spillover costs MPB IP IS Quantity of R&D BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas 3. Government’s Role in the Production of New Ideas Ideas in science have many applications so spillovers can be large. Problem: Even if the social benefits are large, the private benefits can be small. Solution: Subsidize the production of new ideas or give tax breaks for R&D expenditures. Both shift the MC of R&D curve down → ↑ R&D investment. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas Large spillovers to basic science suggest a role for government subsidies to universities. Especially those parts of the universities that produce innovations and the basic science behind those innovations. Universities produce scientists. Most of the 1.3 million scientists were trained in government-subsidized universities. BACK TO Growing on the Cutting Edge: The Economics of Ideas 4. Market Size and Research and Development Innovations like pharmaceuticals, new computer chips, software, and chemicals require large R&D expenditures. Companies will avoid investing in innovations with small potential markets. Larger markets mean increased rewards (thus incentives) for R&D. As the world market grows some companies get bigger and will increase their R&D investments. BACK TO Try it! When will people work harder to invent new ideas? a) When they can sell the new ideas to a (relatively large) market of 1 billion people. b) When they can sell the new ideas to a (relatively small) market of 10,000 people. c) When the government imposes high taxes on R&D expenditures. d) When the government lowers subsidies on R&D expenditures. To next Try it! The Future of Economic Growth Dawn of civilization to about 1500 A.D./C.E.: growth = 0% AD 1500 – 1760: growth = 0.08% Growth doubled in next 100 years Increased even further during the 19th and 20th centuries Today: world wide growth of per capital GDP = 2.2% Economic growth can be even faster. How? BACK TO The Future of Economic Growth A (ideas) = Population x Incentives x Ideas/Hour Population ↑population → ↑ number of people with new ideas Much of the world is poor: thousands of potentially great scientists are laboring in menial jobs. As the world gets richer → ↑ production of ideas → everyone benefits BACK TO The Future of Economic Growth More Hopeful Signs: If A (ideas) = Population x Incentives x Ideas/Hour Incentives Appear to be increasing in many places: Consumers are richer Markets are expanding due to trade World wide improvement in institutions Property rights Honest government Political stability Dependable legal system BACK TO The Future of Economic Growth More Hopeful Signs: If A (ideas) = Population x Incentives x Ideas/Hour Ideas per Hour New ideas do not experience diminishing returns. Two reasons why: 1. Many ideas make creating new ideas easier. 2. The field of ideas that can be explored is so large that diminishing returns may not set in for a very long time. BACK TO The Future of Economic Growth Recap: Economic growth might be even faster in the future than it has been in the past… There are more scientists and engineers in the world than ever before, and their numbers are also increasing as percentage of the population. Incentives are increasing due to growing markets resulting from Increasing trade Increasing wealth in developing countries Better institutions and more secure property rights are spreading throughout the world. BACK TO Try it! Many people say that if people save too much, the economy will be hurt. They often refer to the fact that consumer spending is two-thirds of GDP to make this point. This is sometimes called the “paradox of thrift.” Do you agree with the “paradox of thrift” for long-run growth? a) Yes, since a high savings rate makes a country poorer in the long run. b) No, since a high savings rate makes a country richer in the long run. BACK TO