Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine Overview

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel

Handling Machine Overview

By: Steve Sherfey, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

1

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

Agenda

© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

Analytical Model

Hoist & Hook Model Configurations

Acceptance Criteria and Codes

Service Condition

Seismic Condition

Special Modeling Technique

Primary and Secondary Evaluations

2

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

Abstract

© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Nuclear Power Plants contain Fuel Handling Machines

(FHMs) for moving fuel

Rail Mounted, Motorized, and Computer controlled

Very top heavy

Very difficult to qualify

Engineers must use a special modeling technique for qualification

3

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model

Main Hoist

Upper Bridge

Lower Bridge

SFP Hoist

Upper Rail

Lower Rail & Wheel

Power Center

Lower Rail & Wheel

Motor

4

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

.

© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

5

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model - Inputs

Design Drawings

Boundary Conditions

Material and Sectional Properties of Structural Components

Proper member releases at bolted connections

Response Spectra for the SSE Event

Create analytical model using Structural Analysis Computer

Code such as GTStrudl

6

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model – Material Properties

7

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model – Sectional Properties

8

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model

Response Spectrum (X Direction)

9

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model

Response Spectrum (Y Direction)

10

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model

Response Spectrum (Z Direction)

11

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Analytical Model

12

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Hoist & Hook Model Configurations

Main Hoist at Mid Span,

SFP Hoist at North End.

Main Hoist at North End,

SFP Hoist at South End.

Main Hoist at North End,

SFP Hoist at Mid Span.

N

13

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Acceptance Criteria and Codes

Plant Design Specification & Response Spectra

AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress

Design

ASME NOG-1, Rules for Construction of Overhead and

Gantry Cranes

ASME B&PVC Code, Section III, Division 1, Sub-Section

NF

CMAA-70, Crane Manufacturers Association of America,

“Specifications for Top Running Bridge & Gantry Type

Multiple Girder Electric Overhead Traveling Cranes”

14

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Service Condition

Analyzed for all service loads without seismic excitation and qualified per CMAA-70

Loadings shall include Inertia of mass loads from movement of Crane, Trolley, Hoist, and Lifted Load

Loadings due to Wind, Skewing, Collision, Platform, and maximum critical hook loads shall be considered when applicable.

15

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Seismic Condition

Analyzed for all normal operation deadweight loads acting simultaneously with seismic excitation from Safe Shutdown

Earthquake (SSE)

Response spectrum method shall be used

– Proper Combination of modes of seismic vibration

– Proper Combination of directional seismic responses

– Proper Damping factors

16

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Special Modeling Technique

Sliding or rolling must be considered to prevent overturning

Force required to cause sliding or rolling must be calculated

Each crane drive wheel is restrained in the movement direction with a specified spring stiffness

The spring stiffness is derived by iteration

An initial stiffness is assumed; the value is changed & analysis rerun until the wheel seismic load equals the sliding/rolling force.

17

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Required Crane Evaluations

Primary Evaluations:

Wheel Reactions, Displacements, Accelerations, Structural

Steel Stresses, Plate Element Stresses

Secondary Evaluations:

Welds, Beam Connection Plates, Beam Flange/Web

Deformations, Stiffener Plates, Bolts, and Wire Ropes

18

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Some Typical Items Being Evaluated

TUBE ON TUBE

CONNECTION

M SHAPE TO W SHAPE

CONNECTION

THE END

19

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Bolt Evaluations

The maximum forces and moments for each connection type can be extracted from GTStrudl

30-40 types of major bolted connections in the FHM

Can be grouped in 10-15 typical connection types

Each connection type has a different bolted configuration pattern due to size, number, and spacing of bolts

Each configuration has different sectional properties required for calculating max shear and tension stresses

Bolts must be qualified to applicable code

20

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Slack Rope Evaluations

If the lifted load has an upward seismic acceleration greater than 1 g, the hoist wire rope may need to be evaluated for the slack rope condition

ASME NOG-1 provides design guidance for performing this evaluation

The maximum slack rope allowable is based on a percentage of the rope breaking strength

A non-linear time history analysis is normally required for performing the slack rope analysis

The analysis is only used for evaluating the rope for the most probable lifted load condition

21

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine

THE END

22